{"id":89193,"date":"2010-10-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-01-12T14:38:17","modified_gmt":"2015-01-12T09:08:17","slug":"ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 1885 of 2006()\n\n\n1. AYISHA, W\/O. VAPPU.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SHEEREENA, D\/O. AYISHA.\n3. SHAMUSUDHEEN (MINOR), S\/O.AYISHA.\n4. SHAMSEENA (MINOR), D\/O. AYISHA.\n5. BEEVATHU, W\/O. LATE KUNJIMOIDU.\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. A.J. RAICHEL, W\/O. V.C.ELEAS,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. C.K. VARKEY, S\/O. KURIYAKKOSE,\n\n3. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.CHITAMBARESH (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.KKM.SHERIF\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :28\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    M.A.C.A.Nos.1885 & 2009 OF 2006\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  Dated this the 28th day of October, 2010\n\n                                JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n
      Both these appeals are directed against the judgment and award<\/p>\n
of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thrissur dated November 28,<\/p>\n
2005    in    O.P.(MV)No.589\/2003.                       The        appellants      in<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A.No.1885\/2006 are the claimants who are the wife, children<\/p>\n
and mother of deceased Vappu, who died in a motor accident that<\/p>\n
occurred on January 13, 2003 at about 12 O’clock .                        Appellant in<\/p>\n
M.A.C.A.No.2009\/2006 is the third respondent Insurance Company.<\/p>\n
      2.   The accident happened while the deceased was pillion<\/p>\n
riding on the motor cycle bearing Reg.No.KBF\/8232 which was ridden<\/p>\n
by one Rajesh and when they reached at Puthiya Workshop at<\/p>\n
Chirankonam, they were knocked down by a tipper lorry bearing<\/p>\n
Reg.No. KL8\/J 2176 driven by the second respondent.                          Deceased<\/p>\n
sustained serious injuries and he succumbed to the injuries sustained<\/p>\n
while undergoing treatment from Aswini Hospital, Thrissur. The rider<\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006                   2<\/span><\/p>\n
of the motor cycle also sustained injuries. Alleging negligence against<\/p>\n
the second respondent, the driver of the tipper lorry, the claimants filed<\/p>\n
the O.P. before the Tribunal under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act<\/p>\n
claiming a compensation of Rs. 18 lakhs.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    First respondent, the owner of the offending lorry remained<\/p>\n
absent before the Tribunal. No relief was claimed against the second<\/p>\n
respondent, the driver of the offending lorry. The third respondent, the<\/p>\n
insurer of the offending lorry filed a written statement admitting the<\/p>\n
accident, but denied the liability.\n<\/p>\n
      4.    This O.P. was jointly tried along with O.P.(MV)<\/p>\n
No.592\/2003 filed by the rider of the motor cycle and a common award<\/p>\n
was passed by the Tribunal. PW1 was examined and Exts.A1 to A26<\/p>\n
were marked on the side of the claimants. No evidence was adduced<\/p>\n
by the contesting third respondent. On an appreciation of evidence, the<\/p>\n
Tribunal awarded a total compensation of Rs. 8,51,200\/- with interest<\/p>\n
@ 7% per annum from the date of petition till realisation and<\/p>\n
proportionate cost.   The claimants have filed M.A.C.A.No.1885\/2006<\/p>\n
claiming enhancement of the compensation.         The third respondent<\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
Insurance Company has filed M.A.C.A.No.2009\/2006 contending that<\/p>\n
the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive and that this<\/p>\n
being a head on collision between the two vehicles, the Tribunal should<\/p>\n
have found that there was also negligence on the part of the rider of the<\/p>\n
motor cycle.\n<\/p>\n
     5.    Heard the counsel for the appellants and the counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondents.\n<\/p>\n
     6.    The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n
              1.    Whether the compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n
        Tribunal is excessive ?\n<\/p>\n
              2.    Whether the claimants are entitled to any<\/p>\n
        enhancement of the compensation ?\n<\/p>\n
              3.    Whether the finding of the Tribunal that the<\/p>\n
        accident occurred due to the negligence of the second<\/p>\n
        respondent in the O.P., the rider of the offending lorry<\/p>\n
        can be sustained ?\n<\/p>\n
     7.    The Tribunal found that the accident occurred due to the<\/p>\n
negligence of the second respondent in the O.P., the driver of the lorry<\/p>\n
on the basis of Exts.A1, A2 and A7. Ext.A1 is the copy of F.I.<\/p>\n
Statement and Ext.A2 is the copy of FIR and Ext.A7 is the copy of<\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006                    4<\/span><\/p>\n
police charge. Police has charged the case against the second<\/p>\n
respondent. No contra evidence was adduced by the contesting third<\/p>\n
respondent in the O.P. to show that there was any negligence on the<\/p>\n
part of the rider of the motor cycle. Therefore, the Tribunal is perfectly<\/p>\n
justified in holding that the accident occurred due to the negligence of<\/p>\n
the second respondent in the O.P.. The finding of the Tribunal on this<\/p>\n
point is confirmed.\n<\/p>\n
       8.    The next question for consideration is whether the<\/p>\n
claimants are entitled to any enhanced compensation.       The Tribunal<\/p>\n
awarded a total compensation of Rs. 8,51,200\/-. The break up of the<\/p>\n
compensation awarded is as under :\n<\/p>\n
       Transportation                - Rs. 1,500\/-\n       Extra nourishment             - Rs. 1,000\/-\n       Damage to clothing            - Rs. 500\/-\n       Treatment exp.                - Rs. 62,600\/-\n       Bystander exp.                - Rs. 600\/-\n       Funeral exp.                  - Rs. 5,000\/-\n       Pain and suffering            - Rs. 20,000\/-\n       Loss of love and affection    - Rs. 20,000\/-\n       Loss of consortium            - Rs. 20,000\/-\n       Loss of dependency            - Rs. 7,20,000\/-\n\n       9.    Counsel    for  the   claimant   sought enhancement of\n\ncompensation for the loss of dependency.\n\nMACA.No.1885\/2006                    5<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n
      10.   The Tribunal took the monthly income of the deceased as<\/p>\n
Rs. 7,500\/-. After deducting Rs.3,500\/- towards his personal expenses,<\/p>\n
took the balance amount of Rs. 4,000\/- per month as his contribution to<\/p>\n
his family and adopted a multiplier of 15 and awarded Rs. 7,20,000\/-<\/p>\n
for loss of dependency.        Deceased was employed as a driver in<\/p>\n
Muscut, according to the claimants. Ext.A11 series are passport of the<\/p>\n
deceased. Ext.A12 is the licence issued by Sulthanate of Oman, Royal<\/p>\n
Oman Police . Taking into consideration the above aspect, the Tribunal<\/p>\n
is perfectly justified in taking his monthly income as Rs. 7,500\/-. The<\/p>\n
Tribunal deducted Rs. 3,500\/- for the personal expenses of the<\/p>\n
deceased which appears to be excessive. In the light of the principles<\/p>\n
laid down by the Supreme Court in Sarala Varma v. Delhi Transport<\/p>\n
Corporation and another ( 2009(6) SCC 121), 1\/3 need be deducted<\/p>\n
for the personal expenses of the deceased in assessing the loss of<\/p>\n
dependency in the case of death of a person in a motor accident. Thus,<\/p>\n
his monthly contribution to his family can be taken as Rs.5,000\/-. The<\/p>\n
multiplier adopted by the Tribunal as 15 is not seriously challenged.<\/p>\n
Thus calculated, for the loss of dependency, the claimants are entitled<\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006                 6<\/span><\/p>\n
to a compensation of Rs. 9,00,000\/- ( 5000 x 12 x 15). Thus on this<\/p>\n
count, the claimants are entitled to an additional compensation of<\/p>\n
Rs. 1,80,000\/-. As regards the compensation awarded under other<\/p>\n
heads, we find the same to be reasonable and therefore are not<\/p>\n
disturbing the same. That being so, the appeal filed by the Insurance<\/p>\n
Company has to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
      11.   Thus, the claimants are found entitled to an additional<\/p>\n
compensation of Rs. 1,80,000\/- with interest @ 7% per annum from the<\/p>\n
date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost. The third<\/p>\n
respondent being the insurer of the offending vehicle shall deposit the<\/p>\n
amount before the Tribunal within two months from the date of receipt<\/p>\n
of copy of this judgment. The award of the Tribunal is modified to the<\/p>\n
above extent.\n<\/p>\n
      In the result, M.A.C.A.No.1885\/2006 is disposed of as found<\/p>\n
above. M.A.C.A.No.2009\/2006 is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
                                        A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n
                                      P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE
\nsv.\n<\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006    7<\/span><\/p>\n
MACA.No.1885\/2006    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 1885 of 2006() 1. AYISHA, W\/O. VAPPU. … Petitioner 2. SHEEREENA, D\/O. AYISHA. 3. SHAMUSUDHEEN (MINOR), S\/O.AYISHA. 4. SHAMSEENA (MINOR), D\/O. AYISHA. 5. BEEVATHU, W\/O. LATE KUNJIMOIDU. Vs 1. A.J. RAICHEL, W\/O. V.C.ELEAS, … Respondent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89193","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAyisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1007,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010"},"wordCount":1007,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010","name":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-12T09:08:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ayisha-vs-a-j-raichel-on-28-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ayisha vs A.J. Raichel on 28 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89193","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89193"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89193\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89193"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89193"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89193"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}