{"id":8925,"date":"2011-07-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-12T14:36:57","modified_gmt":"2016-02-12T09:06:57","slug":"appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: V. M. G.B.Shah,<\/div>\n
  \n Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n    \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nLPA\/618\/2010\t 5\/ 5\tJUDGMENT \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nLETTERS\nPATENT APPEAL No. 618 of 2010\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 11600 of 2008\n \n\n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI\n           Sd\/-\n \n\n\nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH   \n            Sd\/-<\/a>\n \n\n\n=========================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?   \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n NO\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?  \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nNO\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?       \n\t\t\t                                                             \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nNO\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ? \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nNO\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nNO\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n=========================================\n \n\nCHETANSINH\nGHANUBHA JADEJA \n\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nCHAIRMAN\n\/ MANAGING DIRECTOR, DENA BANK HEAD OFFICE AND OTHERS \n\n \n\n=========================================Appearance\n: \nMR PH\nPATHAK for\nthe Appellant  \nMR.VARUN K.PATEL for the\nRespondents \n=========================================\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nand\n\t\t\n\t\n\t \n\t\t \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE G.B.SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate<\/a>\n: 05\/07\/2011 \n\n \n\nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
(Per
\n: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. M. SAHAI)<\/p>\n
1.\tWe
\nhave heard learned counsel Mr. P.H. Pathak for the appellant and Mr.
\nVarun Patel for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tPresent
\nLetters Patent Appeal has been filed challenging the order dated
\n29.1.2009 passed by learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application
\nNo.11600 of 2008, whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the
\npetition filed by the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tFather
\nof the appellant died in harness on 7.9.2002. The appellant made
\napplication for compassionate appointment on 1.10.2002, which was
\nreceived by the respondents on 11.3.2003. The application was
\nforwarded by the local office to the Regional office on 12.3.2003.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tThe
\nGovernment of India by its communication dated 14.2.2002 directed the
\nrespondent Bank not to recruit any person in subordinate and clerical
\ncadre under any circumstance for a period of 5 years. Therefore,
\nthere was a ban imposed by the Government of India on appointment in
\nthe respondent Bank.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tIn
\nDecember 2003, the Chairman\/Managing Director of the Bank has
\napproved 57 cases for appointing dependents of deceased employees on
\ncompassionate ground in clerical and subordinate cadre and sought
\napproval of the Government of India for making these appointments as
\na ‘special case’. Permission was granted by the Government of India
\nand accordingly, the said 57 persons, who were dependents of deceased
\nemployees who died in harness between March 1998 and November 2003,
\nwere appointed.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tThe
\ngrievance of the petitioner is that his father had died in the year
\n2002, therefore his case was required to be considered for
\nappointment on compassionate ground. According to the respondents,
\nthe application was not made by the petitioner along with required
\nfull papers.\n<\/p>\n
7.\tThe
\nlearned counsel for the respondents urged that there were various
\ndependents of deceased employees from March 1998  till 2005, in all
\n72 cases, who have not yet got appointment on compassionate ground
\nfor the reason that their applications were not made along with
\nrequired full papers.\n<\/p>\n
8.\tIn para
\n4(iii)(c) and (iv) of the Supplementary Affidavit filed on behalf of
\nthe respondents, it had been stated that the deceased employee was an
\nEx-Army personnel and family of the deceased employee is receiving
\nmonthly family pension of Rs.5375\/- from the Army since February 2011
\nand the Bank is also paying to the widow of the deceased  the family
\npension to the tune of Rs.3,000\/- per month with effect from
\n27.11.2009. Therefore, the financial condition of the family of the
\nappellant is sound.\n<\/p>\n
9.\tLearned
\ncounsel Mr.Pathak for the appellant has urged that comparative chart
\nof all 57 persons should be placed before this Court for the purpose
\nof showing that what family pension their families were receiving
\nwhen they were granted compassionate appointment and their financial
\ncondition should be compared with the financial condition of the
\nappellant. The other argument of the learned counsel for the
\nappellant is that the ground on which the compassionate appointment
\nwas refused to the appellant was only that his application was time
\nbarred. The next argument is that the case of the appellant is
\nsimilar to Smt. Gitaben J. Trivedi. Mr. Pathak further urged that the
\ndetails have not been provided by the respondents that when the
\napplication of the appellant was received by the respondents. He
\nfurther urged that the appellant had been arbitrarily discriminated
\nwhen in the similar set of facts, four persons have been appointed on
\ncompassionate ground. He lastly urged that the family pension and
\npost death benefits received by family cannot be considered while
\nconsidering the claim for compassionate appointment. He has placed
\nreliance on a decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of
\nBalbir Kaur and another Vs. Steel Authority of India Limited
\nand others, reported in
\n(2000)6 SCC 493.\n<\/p>\n
10.\tThe
\nfather of the petitioner died in the year 2002 and we are in 2011.
\nMore than 8 years have passed. The family has survived. The financial
\ncondition of the family of the appellant is now good as the family of
\nthe appellant is receiving more than Rs.8000\/- per month towards
\nfamily pension from Army and the Bank. Apart from family pension, the
\nfamily must have received post-death benefits also. Compassionate
\nappointments are provided to meet with immediate exigency of the
\nfamily of the deceased. It is not a source of recruitment. The
\nHon’ble Apex Court has laid down a law in number of cases,
\nparticularly in the case of State Bank of India and others Vs.
\nJaspal Kaur, (2007) 9 SCC 571,
\nthat-\n<\/p>\n
“23.\tHence
\na major criterion while appointing a person on compassionate grounds
\nshould be the financial condition of the family the deceased person
\nleft behind. Unless the financial condition is entirely penurious,
\nsuch appointments cannot be made.”\n<\/p>\n
The Hon’ble
\nApex Court in the case of State Bank of India and Another Vs.
\nRajkumar, (2010)11 SCC 661, vide para 8 and 9,
\nheld as under:-\n<\/p>\n
“8.\tIt
\nis now well settled that appointment on compassionate grounds is not
\na source of recruitment. On the other hand it is an exception to the
\ngeneral rule that recruitment to public services should be on the
\nbasis of merit, by an open invitation providing equal opportunity to
\nall eligible persons to participate in the selection process. The
\ndependents of employees, who die in harness, do not have any special
\nclaim or right to employment, except by way of the concession that
\nmay be extended by the employer under the rules of by a separate
\nscheme, to enable the family of the deceased to get over the sudden
\nfinancial crisis. The claim for compassionate appointment is
\ntherefore traceable only to the scheme framed by the employer for
\nsuch employment and there is no right whatsoever outside such scheme.
\nAn appointment under the scheme can be made only if the scheme is in
\nforce and not after it is abolished\/withdrawn. It follows therefore
\nthat when a scheme is abolished, any pending application seeking
\nappointment under the scheme will also cease to exist, unless saved.
\nThe mere fact that an application was made when the scheme was in
\nforce, will not by itself create a right in favour of the applicant.\n<\/p>\n
9.\tNormally,
\nthe three basic requirements to claim appointment under any scheme
\nfor compassionate appointment are (i) an application by a dependent
\nfamily member of the deceased employee; (ii) fulfillment of the
\neligibility criteria prescribed under the scheme, for compassionate
\nappointment; and (iii) availability of posts, for making such
\nappointment. If a scheme provides for automatic appointment to a
\nspecified family member, on the death of any employee, without any of
\nthe aforesaid requirements, it can be said that the scheme creates a
\nright in favour of the family member for appointment on the date of
\ndeath of the employee. In such an event the Scheme in force at the
\ntime of death would apply.”\n<\/p>\n
11.\tSince
\nthe financial condition of the family of the appellant is good and we
\nare of the considered opinion that the appellant is not entitled for
\nappointment on compassionate ground, we are not required to consider
\nthe other arguments raised by the learned counsel for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
12.\tFor the
\naforesaid reasons, we do not find any illegality in the order dated
\n29.1.2009 passed by learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application
\nNo.11600 of 2008. The Appeal fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSd\/-\n<\/p>\n
(V.M.\n<\/p>\n
SAHAI, J.)<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSd\/-\n<\/p>\n
(G.B.\n<\/p>\n
SHAH, J.)<\/p>\n
omkar<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court =========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 Author: V. M. G.B.Shah, Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print LPA\/618\/2010 5\/ 5 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD LETTERS PATENT APPEAL No. 618 of 2010 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 11600 of 2008 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\n=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1214,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\",\"name\":\"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011"},"wordCount":1214,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011","name":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-12T09:06:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/appearance-vs-unknown-on-5-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"=========================================Appearance vs Unknown on 5 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}