{"id":8937,"date":"2009-02-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-17T13:08:41","modified_gmt":"2015-05-17T07:38:41","slug":"sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAJCA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nnxrmn mm THE 19:\u00bb on or mnxuanx,  u N\nnmronn \"    ~ \n\nmm Hozrnuc mm. wsncg A.8.  = _ ,4 \"  \n\nR.F.A.. no.2o6c\u00a7\/29\u00a2;   * A\n\nBEIWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nSR1 VEERABASAPPA  _ \nAGED ABOUT 40 YEARS  _   \nS\/O LATE vEERA--3ADRM=m_'HU'RKADLi  \nR\/OF' BEHIM) L;'mf~'cc1iM\u00a3>LE;\u00a3,'\u00bbV.%  %\nKARATAGI, GANGA'\\{ATI~l!_'?Q=.,   \nDIST. KOPPAL 583,231, V \"\n     APPELLANT\n\n(By sxjf:5.N;\u00a7fARA%f3gU9ri1;j'_ADv\u00e9'CATE)\n\nAND: \n\n1.\n\nKUMKRI NA.YiANA I3f\u00a3:> VEERABASAPPA HURKADLI\n\n\u00a2 .;f AGED ABQ-UT 3 YEARS (MINOR)\n \u00b0*R:EP\"i'\u00bbE). BY TH;-':\";iR NATURAL GUARIHAN MOTHER\n61; NE1K'}'--._FRINED SM'I'.NANDINI,\n\n  Twm VEEPABASAPPA HURKADLI\n\nAGED ABQUT 35 YRS, OCC: HGUSEHOLI)\n\nA  R\/QF%.KA;RATAGI, NOW R\/AT HIRE HADAGALIA\n T\u20ac2.H-GOVINA HADAGALI, DIST. BELLARY\n\nKUMAR1 HALAMMA @ BHAVANA\n\n' we VEERABASAPPA HURKADLI\n\n AGED 2 312 YEARS (MINOR)\n\n. REPTD. BY THEIR NATURAL GUARDIAN MOTHER\n\n85 NEXT FRINED SIWIXNANDINI,\n\nW] 0 VEERABASAPPA HURKADLI\n\nAGED ABOUT 35 YRS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD\n\nR I OF KARATAGI, NOW R\/AT HIRE HADAGALI\n\n'FQ.HO()VINA HADAGALI, DISTBELLARY\n RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By Sri.: HANUMANTHA REDEJY SAHUKAR, ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n
RFA FILED U] S 96 OF CPC AGAINS’1″‘””‘—THE
\nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE DA’I’ED:7.12.05 PASSEI}._m 0:S.
\nNO. 14\/O5 ON THE FILE OF’ CIVIL JUDGE <\/p>\n
GANGAVATHI DECREEING THE sun’ FOR PARrrITiG\u00a7 –%.a:s:–n <\/p>\n
SEPERATE POSSESSION.\n<\/p>\n
THIS APPEAL COMING o\u00a3\u00a7t1Ax:31sr1is$I\u20acgN ‘i’;~11’s*;
\nDAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FQLLOWJNQ; \u00e9  <\/p>\n
JUlJiV\u00a7_\ufb01$H’1′ *-  .\n<\/p>\n
Appellant hcreiz; is ~uqucs\ufb01fiGzi:_tJ1V\u00a2_f\u00a7judgmcnt
\nand decree dated 07.   No.14\/2005. By<\/p>\n
the said judgment    has decreed<\/p>\n
holding   entitled to 1\/3 sham<\/p>\n
each    <\/p>\n
‘ -V22:  V’1″hvt”:i ‘1’\u00a7:ia\ufb01bn\u00a71ip between the parties to the suit<\/p>\n
‘ ”   iii dmputc  as the: plainti\ufb01s 1 and 2 are the<\/p>\n
   tbs defendant and the suit was’; instituted<\/p>\n
  Qhams in the suit schedule property by the<\/p>\n
 n10t117’e:7V__A;as the next \ufb01icnd. In the suit, pursuant to the<\/p>\n
  of suit summons, the defendant namely, the father of<\/p>\n
  ffhc miner plaintiffs had appeared and \ufb01led Written statement<\/p>\n
contending that then: was sct\ufb02czraent between himself and
\nthe plainti\ufb01s and he had agted to pay a sum of<\/p>\n
Rs.2,25,()O9\/- in full and \ufb01nal settlement in respect of the<\/p>\n
$<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
shares. Between himself  his wife it was  that<\/p>\n
there was divorce petition in MC No.04] 2003.<\/p>\n
3.<\/p>\n
Court as many as six issues werc_\ufb01*a1:_1ed _f61F”coi:1.:3i\u20acic1fa\ufb01on.”” \u00bb <\/p>\n
On the rival contentiens urged 4′  <\/p>\n
The issucs read as hereunder:\n<\/p>\n
i)<\/p>\n
1’1)<\/p>\n
Whether plain\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01 ‘;3mvt;:t  ‘the’:    ‘<\/p>\n
pmperty is the joi\ufb01t   <\/p>\n
Whether  ‘tha’i} they are
\nentitled far-..__1fj3’d–_sh\u00a7~;.*e,”e,\u00a7s:<:h? _<\/p>\n
Whether defgpklani are not
\nthc _}31n_111btf:I's of <\/p>\n
_ .  \ufb01uthcr proves that there was
\n' _ a n\u00e9bgztwcen himself and pLaint3'\ufb02's
\nincluding p}ai;ri.i\ufb01's guaniian Smt. Nandini and<\/p>\n
_towa:nr}_s 'mzazititenance of plaintiffs a sum of<\/p>\n
AA 4.\n<\/p>\n
I~'<'s.2,25,0{}0[- was paid in full and \ufb01nal
\nscttIe;m_t:;3t of their shapes and the piainti\ufb01s have<\/p>\n
 '  sje\ufb01nquishcd their interest in the mmaining
\n  of defendant?\n<\/p>\n
 defendant further proves that the suit
\n not properly valued and the court {ac paid is
\n‘ not proper?\n<\/p>\n
What order?\n<\/p>\n
In order to discharge the burden cast on the<\/p>\n
  ‘ s by the issues \ufb02amed by tIr;c:’1’rxa’ 1 Court, th\ufb01 plaintiff<\/p>\n
examined herself as PW-1 and got marked documents in<\/p>\n
E’\u00abx.P1 to P6, The defendant c:-caminad himself as DW-I and<\/p>\n
got marked documents at Ex.IT)I and D2.<\/p>\n
3i<\/p>\n
5. In the light of the contcn\ufb01ons_–p’ut.:  , <\/p>\n
documentaxy as Well as oral  3216<\/p>\n
Trial Court, the Trial Court co\ufb01sidcmd th\u00e9  x\u00e9haxg .<\/p>\n
answering the issues \ufb01amed” b3;:it. _ As”‘a1\u00ab\u00a7gciy  the
\nnelationship between  ._ao:&–..\u00a7hc  of the
\nproperties and also  in the suit
\nproperty in the   piaintiffs in the
\nsuit was   contention put forth
\nby tho’    of the said shares, the
\ndcfentiani  sum of Rs.2,25,000\/- in full
\nand  regard, the payment as settled<\/p>\n
  by’:L’f}1cE’\u00a7f{cfcndaiit’has*not been received by the plainti\ufb01 nor<\/p>\n
‘  -produced any documentary evidence not<\/p>\n
a\u00e9ce\ufb01   manner that the said amount had been<\/p>\n
  .. T\u00a71cI:ofore, since the monetary compensation in lieu of<\/p>\n
u x V’ .. ft1Fc*- in the movable property, had not been paid by the<\/p>\n
 ‘”c*1e fcij,dant, the Trial Count was of the View that the<\/p>\n
 Kajcttlcmczat itscif has not taken cifcct and therefore once the<\/p>\n
tight to the property is established and the relationship is<\/p>\n
also admitted, the piain\ufb01\ufb01s are entitled to the decree for<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAJCA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD nxrmn mm THE 19:\u00bb on or mnxuanx, u N nmronn ” ~ mm Hozrnuc mm. wsncg A.8. = _ ,4 ” R.F.A.. no.2o6c\u00a7\/29\u00a2; * A BEIWEEN: 1. SR1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\\\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":609,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\\\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\\\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009"},"wordCount":609,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009","name":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa ... on 19 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-17T07:38:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-veerabasappa-vs-kumari-nayana-do-veerabasappa-on-19-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Veerabasappa vs Kumari Nayana D\/O Veerabasappa … on 19 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8937\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}