{"id":89447,"date":"2011-04-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2"},"modified":"2017-07-10T17:26:59","modified_gmt":"2017-07-10T11:56:59","slug":"sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","title":{"rendered":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI\n                               Criminal Revision No. 1030 of 2010\n\nSudhir Lakra --         --     --     --     --     --     --     --     --Petitioner\n                                             Versus\nThe State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation           --Opposite Party\n\n       CORAM            :      THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.K. SINHA\n\nFor the Petitioner             : M\/s. Nityanand Sinha, Vikram Sinha,\n                                    Raj Kishore Kullu &amp; Kislaya Prasad, Advocates\nFor the C.B.I.                 : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, Advocate\n                                      -----\n\nReserved on: 18-3-2011                                Pronounced on: 25 -4-2011\n\n\n\nD.K. Sinha, J.          This criminal revision is directed against the order impugned\n                 dated 17.9.2010, passed by Shri Pankaj Kumar, Special Judge,\n                 C.B.I., Ranchi by which a petition filed on behalf of the petitioner\n                 under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in R.C. Case\n                 No.14(S)\/08-AHD-R was rejected and now the case is pending\n                 before the successor court of Shri Radha Mohan Tiwary, Special\n                 Judge, C.B.I., Ranchi.\n                        2.     Prosecution story in short was that the case was\n                 instituted by the Chief Manager, Bank of Baroda, Main Branch,\n                 Ranchi by submitting a written report on 28.11.2008, addressed to\n                 the Superintendent of Police (C.B.I.), Ranchi, alleging inter alia that\n                 a Cash Credit Limit of Rs.75,00,000\/- and a term loan of\n                 Rs.25,00,000\/- was sanctioned by the Bank of Baroda to M\/s.\n                 Neelam Spices, Ranchi. It was alleged that sum of Rs.74,92,805\/-\n                 and Rs.16,59,716\/- respectively on the different heads stated\n                 above were still outstanding against M\/s. Neelam Spices, Ranchi\n                 along with interest admissible thereon. S\/Shri Santosh Sahu and\n                 Satish Kumar Sahu were the partners of M\/s. Neelam Spices,\n                 Ranchi and the loan amount was sanctioned as against the\n                 equitable mortgage of landed property belonging to the partners\n                 aforesaid, whereas guarantors were S\/Shri Budhram Sahu, Jairam\n                 Sahu and Girdhariram Sahu, to which sale deeds were presented\n                 to the Bank of Baroda as collateral security with the application of\n                 the loan. It was alleged that partner of the firm Shri Santosh Sahu\n                 had deposited deeds of two land in respect of          two chunks of\n                 homestead land i.e. being Plot No.1937 to 1940, situated at village\n                 Simalia, measuring 83 decimals, whereas the other deed disclosed\n                 land measuring .25 acres at village Jhiri. The deeds of land\n submitted by the guarantors disclosed 2.81 acres of land situated at\nvillage Adchori, Ratu, Ranchi. It was stated that when the loan\nbecame sticky, the authorities of the Bank verified the landed\nproperties and in the process of verification, it transpired that the\nlanded properties shown by the loanee or the guarantors did not\nbelong to them. It was detected that .81 acres of land were\nmanipulated to be read as     2.81 acres and in that manner, Bank\nwas cheated inasmuch as it was induced to sanction loan in favour\nof the borrowers\/loanees on the basis of forged securities, as such,\non the written complaint,     R.C. Case No.14(S)\/08-AHD-R was\nregistered on 17.12.2008 against the borrowers\/guarantors viz.\nSantosh Sahu , Satish Kumar Sahu, Budhram Sahu, Jairam Sahu\nand Girdhariram Sahu for the alleged offence under Sections 120B\/\n420\/467\/468\/471<\/pre>\n<p> of the Indian Penal Code and litigation was<br \/>\ninitiated.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3.   Learned counsel Mr. Sinha submitted that the<br \/>\npetitioner was not named in the FIR but at the relevant time he was<br \/>\nposted as Manager, Credit in the Bank of Baroda. He was not<br \/>\nassigned the duty to examine the genuineness of the documents<br \/>\nproduced by the borrowers. The normal procedure was that before<br \/>\nrecommending the loan by the Branch Manger, pre-sanction<br \/>\ninspection report for new SSI Unit used to be prepared, to which<br \/>\ninspection used to be done by the competent officers of the Bank.<br \/>\nPapers and relevant documents, as per Banking Rules, were<br \/>\nexamined by the Legal Section of the Bank and only thereafter, the<br \/>\nloan was sanctioned after receiving the legal opinion from the<br \/>\nempanelled lawyer and for such reason, the informant did not name<br \/>\nthe petitioner as an accused in his written report being presented<br \/>\nbefore the   Superintendent of Police (C.B.I.). Now the petitioner is<br \/>\nposted in Mumbai as Manager Credit in the Bank of Baroda. Upon<br \/>\nreceipt of the summons from the Special Court, C.B.I., he applied<br \/>\nfor being represented in this case by his Advocate under Section<br \/>\n205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure but the same was rejected<br \/>\nby the impugned order. It was not practically possible for the<br \/>\npetitioner against whom there was no allegation, to attend the<br \/>\nSpecial Court, C.B.I. generally on each and every date and<br \/>\ntherefore, he craved the indulgence of the Special Court by filing a<br \/>\npetition under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,<br \/>\nwhich was rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4.   Mr. Sinha, the learned counsel further submitted that<br \/>\nthere was no material at all against the petitioner, however, since<br \/>\nthe summons was issued against him, he requested for<br \/>\n        dispensation from his personal attendance in the Court and<br \/>\n       permission to be represented through his lawyer on each and every<br \/>\n       date but the same was refused only on the ground that allegation<br \/>\n       was serious in nature and his petition was not fit for consideration.\n<\/p>\n<p>              5.     Heard Mr. Khan, the learned counsel appearing for<br \/>\n       the C.B.I., who submitted that transaction was made by granting<br \/>\n       loan to the named accused during the period of posting of the<br \/>\n       petitioner in the concerned Branch of the Bank of Baroda.\n<\/p>\n<p>              6.     A Bench of this Court in Dr. (Mrs.) Karuna Jha Vs.<br \/>\n       State of Jharkhand and another, reported in 2005(1) East Cr.C 176<br \/>\n       (Jhr) held as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                      &#8220;In the case of Ram Harsh Das vs. State of Bihar,<br \/>\n              reported in 1998(1) All PLR 495, a Division Bench of the<br \/>\n              Patna High Court while appreciating the provision<br \/>\n              observed that the Magistrate can exercise powers<br \/>\n              conferred upon him under section 205 Cr.P.C. even in<br \/>\n              warrant cases, provided he had issued summons instead<br \/>\n              of issuing the warrant. The Court further observed that in<br \/>\n              a case where a warrant has been issued at the first<br \/>\n              instance, the power under Section 205 Cr.P.C. cannot be<br \/>\n              exercised. The court also held that there is no hard and<br \/>\n              fast rule which can be laid down for deciding the question<br \/>\n              of grant or refusal of prayer for dispensing the personal<br \/>\n              attendance.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>              7.     Under the facts and circumstances, the criminal<br \/>\n       revision filed by the petitioner is allowed and the petitioner is<br \/>\n       dispensed with his personal attendance with the direction that he<br \/>\n       would appear through his Lawyer\/Lawyers on giving undertaking to<br \/>\n       the satisfaction of the concerned Court that he would not dispute<br \/>\n       his identity as the particular accused in the said case and that his<br \/>\n       counsel\/counsels would remain present in the Court and that there<br \/>\n       would not be objection on his part in recording of prosecution<br \/>\n       evidence in his absence. It is observed that at any time in course of<br \/>\n       trial, if the Trial Court finds that the presence of the petitioner is<br \/>\n       required then for the reasons to be recorded, the Court may direct<br \/>\n       the accused-petitioner to remain physically in attendance and the<br \/>\n       petitioner in such case would not avoid to attend the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>              8.     This criminal revision is allowed with the aforesaid<br \/>\n       observation and direction.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                         (D.K. Sinha, J.)<br \/>\nS.B.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 1030 of 2010 Sudhir Lakra &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8212; &#8211;Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation &#8211;Opposite Party CORAM : THE HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\"},\"wordCount\":701,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\",\"name\":\"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2"},"wordCount":701,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2","name":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-10T11:56:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sudhir-lakra-vs-state-of-jharkhand-thr-central-on-25-april-2011-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sudhir Lakra vs State Of Jharkhand Thr.Central on 25 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}