{"id":89737,"date":"2009-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-25T01:40:06","modified_gmt":"2017-01-24T20:10:06","slug":"the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath & B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
IN1THEHKH{COURT(H7KARNKDMQXATBANGALQRE\n\nDATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF' SEPTEMBER.\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICEJKL,   \n\nAND\nTHE HONBLE MRS.  B;V'.VNAGAR2\u00a7THNA\n\nM.F'.A.N'O.10382\/.20CiG. ax\/IV)'  \nc\/w. M.F.A.1'$Q.:10\u00a7)87;f20G~8(MV]\n\nBETWEEN;    A      \n\nM.F.A.No. 1'0;?\u00a7:E',2;\/:2V(')\u00a35_6':  ~  L\n\n1 THE  KSRTC\nSMANTH1    \n(REPRE-SEN_TD. SYTTS CHIEF' LAW OFFICER)\n\n2, .\u00bb  \u20ac3I9\u00a7.ANDV.'P;'\u00a5.;'\u00a7TvI\u00ab{A,:\n NmJL\u00bb.R\n\n\" ~  DRNER OF KSRTC\n\n \" {$70 1 E5292\n   KOLAKDEPOT\n\n3 KRISHNA KUMAR\nA' D S,-'O SAIBABA,\nA '- AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,\n SEETHARAAMPURA,\n0AM GOAL PRAKASHAM DISTRICT.\n\n55.\n\n\n\n{BySH\ufb01:SH\"H\ufb02}U\\ANAND,ADVJ\n\n.uAPPELLANTS\n\nAND:\n\n1\n\nB S MANJULA  \nW'\/0 LATE GANGADHARAIAH  :\nAGE 38 YEARS   ;. \"\nR\/AT 9TH CROSS ,ASHOK NAGAR,\nTUMKUR    \n\nSGKARUNESH  \nS\/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH \nMAJOR, ~    \nR\/AT 9TH CROSS, ASHGK N__AG-AER\" \nTUMKUR-     \"\n\nSGA.JFaY A   \nS\/O LATE  \"NGAiD{3DHA._E\u00a7AIA_}{- A\n\n     \"  \nR\/AT 9TH C1ROS;?a_ASHOK' NAGAR,\nTUMKI_IR'.\u00bbj-. * *    ~\n\nH.RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
(By;_b1’i:_V E :=3ID’DAR’A1\\&A1AH, ADV. FOR R1–3)<\/p>\n
A V  T:{1s%jA~.MFA FILED U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT
\n AT.AGA1NsT%’ =  JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:\n<\/p>\n
7.A.4_%;:200_\u00e93′ ?;;\u00e9,A\u00e9\u00a7sED IN MVC NO. 1092\/96 ON THE FILE<\/p>\n
_ M  OF4 THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN] AND MACT,
\nH ‘   A   T'{31y1KtjN, AWARDING A<\/p>\n
COMPENSNHON OF<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
.\/<\/p>\n
RS.7,30,048\/~ WITH INTEREST @ 6% PA FROM ‘THE
\nDATE OF PETITION TILL PAYMENT. T <\/p>\n
. BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
M.F.A.NO.10087\/2006:\n<\/p>\n
1 B s MANJULA
\nW\/O LATE GANGADHARATAH
\nAGED ABOUT 49.yRs_.~– –.\n<\/p>\n
2 SGKARUNESH._ V   .\n<\/p>\n
s\/0 LATEvGANGAIJHARA1;.A}’i”T..  ; 1- <\/p>\n
AGED AEQUT 2:5 {RS1 . ”  <\/p>\n
\n\n3 s G    \n\ns\/Q \nAGED A;EoU;f1= ZSYRS    '\n\n<\/pre>\n
ALL  R\/,AT N.Q’.1_1..o GURURAGHVENDRA
\nN1L’AyA  CROSS 3121:) MAIN {ST STAGE
\n_ .BE1\\\/11; L_AYOUT’*.BASAVESHWARANAGAR
\n..  BANGALGRE 79<\/p>\n
. .. APPELLANTS<\/p>\n
A ‘(Ey\u00bbs;%i:’ \u20ac2%:1E’A’v’3iAT)DARA1vLA1AH COUNSEL)<\/p>\n
A’  1  THE GENERAL MANAGER KSRTC<\/p>\n
SHANTHINAGAR K.H.ROAD \/E’\/.’~
\nBANGALORE 27<\/p>\n
2. M.F.A.No.l0382\/2006 is \ufb01led by the K$RTC<\/p>\n
challenging not only the liability fixed on it, but<\/p>\n
quantum of compensation awarded in favouri” .<\/p>\n
claimants in M.V.C.No.1092\/98.onthe”file::’ofll’MAC’F,jV A<\/p>\n
Tumkur. M.F..A.No.10087\/06 igg\ufb01i\u00e9fd “by <\/p>\n
being not satisfied with  ofggcorripensation <\/p>\n
fixed by the MACT and alsoi-the’g’:con.tribntory negligence
\napportioned between  involved in
\nthe accident,   ;”ll’\\2l\\lre have heard
\nthese two apge\u00e9g.   if’.g –\n<\/p>\n
3. or__ the ‘–“sal<;e\u00bbofaconv-eriience the parties shall be<\/p>\n
referred to\ufb02lasv per  before the tribunal.<\/p>\n
   gclailrnants are the legal heirs of one<\/p>\n
   who was travelling in the KSRTC bus<\/p>\n
bearing F5292 on 8.8.96 as a passenger from<\/p>\n
 Kolar  Bangalore. When the bus reached Narasapura<\/p>\n
Village, on account of rash and negligent driving of the<\/p>\n
   by the driver, it dashed against an on coming lorry<\/p>\n
5%\u00bb:-\n<\/p>\n
bearing No.AP26\/1276, which resulted in the death of<\/p>\n
Gangadharaiah on the spot.\n<\/p>\n
5. According to the claimants, he wasHwo._rkijngll’as*  <\/p>\n
lecturer in District Institute of  8:’ <\/p>\n
Kolar. He was getting a salary of .l”Fw,,2()0 <\/p>\n
also an agriculturist and getting sepa1’ater–inco,:me from<\/p>\n
agricultural sources. ‘ ._  \u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
6. The casejwas contested’   According
\nto the  occurred on account of rash<\/p>\n
and negligent? driv:ing”~o:il”–the loriqfdriver.<\/p>\n
7. Iri.__orr:ler to prove.__the’ir respective contentions, two<\/p>\n
witnesses were ‘eican\ufb01ined on behalf of he claimants as<\/p>\n
  and\ufb02mthey relied upon Exs.P~1 to P–~l2. On<\/p>\n
  the driver of the bus, Chand Pasha,<\/p>\n
was examined as RW1 and he relied upon Exs.R—-1 to<\/p>\n
it    The tribunal considering the evidence let in by the<\/p>\n
l”‘–parties equally apportioned the contributory negligence<\/p>\n
2 “on the drivers of both the vehicles and awarded<\/p>\n
\u00a7,,.\n<\/p>\n
  Ksiaar <\/p>\n
compensation of 730,048\/\u00ab-. This said judgment and<\/p>\n
award is called in question in these two appea_1s._m~. <\/p>\n
8. Learned counsel for the cilairnants <\/p>\n
the driver of the bus was convicted in the  ‘ca~se*,<\/p>\n
and the charge sheet was fiiedjagainsi:   it<\/p>\n
submits that in   Diifiision Bench
\nof this court in an    arising out
\nof another   has held that
\nthe    Vresoonsible to pay the
\n he contends that the liability
\nsaddled’   lorry has to be set aside<\/p>\n
andgthe entire_V_V”corrrpensation has to be paid by the<\/p>\n
9.  ..I4ie”‘i’i,1rther contends that the trial court has<\/p>\n
 committed a serious error in not awarding<\/p>\n
Aicoirnpensation adequately. According to him, the<\/p>\n
.\/’9<\/p>\n
deceased was working as a lecturer and on promotion,<\/p>\n
he was transferred to Chitradurga and he had\u00e9wlorked<\/p>\n
for only 20 days and he had drawn Rs.7 _<\/p>\n
days as could be seen from IBJ:{,VI?’-9. _hei ”<\/p>\n
contends that the salary of  <\/p>\n
than Rs.10,700\/~ and in arlflditionlhe: was <\/p>\n
agricultural income. colntendsethat the
\nfinding of the  ‘dependency at
\nRs.7,2o,o48\/f }_1as_ to    contends
\nthat the   According
\nto hiII1v;V  have been applied by
\nthe  further contends that the<\/p>\n
compensation lawarded ‘under the conventional heads is<\/p>\n
l l  –als”o— or1i.the’* lower side.<\/p>\n
10.?”  “contra, learned counsel for the KSRTC<\/p>\n
ll”\ufb02,:co;1tend’s that the trial court has committed an error in<\/p>\n
-l   that the KSRTC driver was responsible for the<\/p>\n
” “clause of the accident. According to him, the documents<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
produced by the claimants and the evidence of RW1<\/p>\n
would go to show that the accident has occu.rredi_i’on<\/p>\n
account of rash and negligent driving of the ~<\/p>\n
lorry. She further contends   it<\/p>\n
compensation awarded by the  <\/p>\n
side and requests the to allow’ .  of<\/p>\n
KSRTC and dismiss the appeai -of-the_ciairnantsv;E<\/p>\n
11. I-Iaving\u00a7.hear’_’c1 the  parties, we have
\nto consider’thesfoiiowing.–two  in these two appeals
\n ”  thteftribunal was justified in holding
\n that”the.VA’ac:c1″dent occurred on account of the<\/p>\n
\u00e9contributitwryi negiigence of both the vehicles?<\/p>\n
‘A   _vd:’Whether the compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n
 tiiibviinai is on the lower side or higher side’?<\/p>\n
 12.  far as point No.1 is concerned, in View of the<\/p>\n
 of this court in 1Vi.F.A.No.5145\/2003 dated<\/p>\n
  M __ijO.12.2007, we are of the opinion that the \ufb01nding of the<\/p>\n
bi<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
tribunal has to be set aside by holding that the accident<\/p>\n
has occurred on account of rash and negligent dyrivinlgaof<\/p>\n
the KSRTC bus since the driver has been   .<\/p>\n
the criminal case. When the driver._has_’lbeeircolrivicted id’<\/p>\n
in a criminal case, we are of the opinioii <\/p>\n
in regard to the contributory negligerice   has * V L’<\/p>\n
to be accepted by us…’ Ac.cordingly_, we’ answer point<\/p>\n
No.1 in the affirmative. it<\/p>\n
13. Insofar Vleoncemed, it is not in
\ndispute that7.the_f9deceasVed._ was 49 years old and the
\nlearned wcotiynselllflor :_th–e”‘K.SRTC contends that as per<\/p>\n
nposj-:n.ortem  the age of the deceased has to be<\/p>\n
   years. But the SSLC marks card and<\/p>\n
  ‘records produced by the claimants would<\/p>\n
reyealthatlllthe age of the deceased as 49 years. Be that<\/p>\n
  “as Inlay, whether the deceased is 49 years or 50 years,<\/p>\n
llthe\ufb02sproper multiplier to be applied is 13 and not 12. So<\/p>\n
it far as the income of the deceased is concerned.<\/p>\n
\/5:\n<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
‘ admittedly he was working’ as a lecturer in a<\/p>\n
Government Training Institute. On promotion_4.hVe..4_h~ad<\/p>\n
worked as a lecturer for 20 days. Ex.P~8  .<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate for 20 days which discloses that” l”<\/p>\n
salary of Rs.7,200\/-. If the satne’eonverted:uii5ito’l7a:<\/p>\n
monthly salary, it would oorn’e~\u00bb..to  “it is <\/p>\n
submitted that he has a drayvn-vVtl:.a–e”‘salary” aspeir Ex.P~9
\non promotion from   the post of
\nDeputy Direot,r_niQf   if the salary on
\nthe date eijf 1″(‘)H,7O0\/-, a sum of
\nRs. 1  ;~    professional tax,
\nincome the net salary would be<\/p>\n
Rs.1_O..00O\/’- p.rn…’-anvdR’s.1,120,000\/- p.a., out of which<\/p>\n
. if “We deduct 1\/’V3?d”‘towards personal expenses it would<\/p>\n
 –. Since he was a government<\/p>\n
sewan_t~,*\\ye* have to apply split multiplier. At the age of<\/p>\n
  hewtiould have attained the age of superannuation.<\/p>\n
it flherefore, we can take multiplier of 10 considering the<\/p>\n
 ” ~-loss of dependency at the rate of Rs.80,000\/– p.a. which<\/p>\n
\ufb01e:\n<\/p>\n
E3<\/p>\n
entitled for 3 total compensation of Rs.9,5(),00O\/– with<\/p>\n
interest at 6% 13.21.\n<\/p>\n
16. Out of the enhanced compensation  <\/p>\n
total compensation with accruecii inte1*evst_tliie-fe0Iif\u00a7dV”be”\u00ab<\/p>\n
deposited in any nationalised bankiiias ap\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9i;19ti0nec’i\u00e9.’by K<\/p>\n
the tribunal for an initial pefi’Q:ti’ of fiVe._xr:eai*s.\ufb02TEEaeh of
\nthe claimants are   :\u00ab the eeriodical
\ninterest. The rest of theeomijensatierifsliall be released<\/p>\n
tothe<jann?\ufb01i\u00e9\u00a7j].Ex I"; t~fe\u00b0'e5<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nJUDGE<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
EUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 Author: K.L.Manjunath & B.V.Nagarathna IN1THEHKH{COURT(H7KARNKDMQXATBANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF’ SEPTEMBER. PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEJKL, AND THE HONBLE MRS. B;V’.VNAGAR2\u00a7THNA M.F’.A.N’O.10382\/.20CiG. ax\/IV)’ c\/w. M.F.A.1’$Q.:10\u00a7)87;f20G~8(MV] BETWEEN; A M.F.A.No. 1’0;?\u00a7:E’,2;\/:2V(‘)\u00a35_6′: ~ L 1 THE KSRTC SMANTH1 (REPRE-SEN_TD. SYTTS CHIEF’ LAW […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1253,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\",\"name\":\"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009"},"wordCount":1253,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009","name":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-24T20:10:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-general-manager-ksrtc-vs-b-s-manjula-on-8-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The General Manager Ksrtc vs B S Manjula on 8 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89737\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}