{"id":89740,"date":"2010-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-01-14T16:35:29","modified_gmt":"2016-01-14T11:05:29","slug":"kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 18\"\"\" DAY ()1? NOVEMBER 2010 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON-'BI.I\u00a3' MRJUS TICE 5. ABDUL NA  I\n\nWRIT PETITION N0.10961\/Zf:.\"0.I0y I\u00a2s;~I:I5S) I  \"    'V\n\nBeiwccn:\n\nSri Kere Kenchamtna Meenugarara \nSahakara Sangha, .D0ddz1bat.i__(Regd.)..,...  \nBy its President Sri H. Gi1'iI'a__j,'=.,_   .. . \nS\/0 Hanumanthappa,  * -. '\n\nAged about 44 years, _ .\n\nOcc: President, Sri Kare KenChViI11;IT;a O'  \nMcenugararzz Sah{1k'a'1'\u00a7l_bSang:hg1, g   A V  u \nDoddabati (Regd.  ._' r\/E) _D0dd,ab&amp;atE.,,. V\n\nDavanage-re T5,'.   \u00bb      Pctiti0ncI'.\n\n(By Sri LG.AGagsmhm:zniaI\u00a7A1I,.--\nAnd:  V ' \" \n\n_ I V.  State c)!\" I5, \nf)'ir\u00a7:C~*mr 0fFisi1cry,\nIii Fioor, Vishweshwariah Towers,\n\n A, y Dr. 'AI\"nbedk2-11' Rozzd, B:Ingai(.&gt;1'c*l.\n\n\n\n3 The Managing Director,\nKarnataka Cowoperative Fisheries\nFederation, No.37\/12, I\" Stage,\nIndustrial Town, Vish veshwa.rnagz3,r,\nMysore w 570 004. \n\n4 The Assistant Director of Fisheries,\n(Grade-2) and District Nodal Offizcer\nof Fisheries, Shamanur Road, \nNear Ashraya Hospit2.i',~..V_ in\nDavanagere Tq. &amp; Dist-._  __ \n\n5 The Assistant Registrarief-Co--oper\u00e9z,tivie 1  \"\nSocieties, Dav:m3'gere  ~ \n\nDavanagere:--.Tq.\u00a7&amp;  _  \n\n6 Kutigiwad' MeenLigai*ara\"8ahaka1'a Sangha,\nBy i ts .Se&lt;:--retary,  Suiro.s_!i&#039;;&#039;\u00ab \nS\/0 Ha\ufb01eiimanvtappa, iiurzdjaiad,\nDavanagere &#039;1fq.&#039;&amp;v&quot;Dis&#039;t.  Respondents.<\/pre>\n<p>-&#8216;(&#8216;,Evy  Nzz.gashree;iii}iICi&#8217;GP for R1, R2, R4 and R5<\/p>\n<p>_ . Si&#8217;i.,Maha2:;te:.sh_ S. &#8216;Hosmath, Adv. for R6<br \/>\n  S&#8217;ifi_Sai1d_eep &#8216;PatiiV,VjAdv. for M\/s AH. Law Firm, Adv. for R3)<\/p>\n<p>V &#8221; T1:&#8217;i&#8217; i&#8217;.&#8217;0r&#8217;*<\/p>\n<p>short), Mysore and for quzIshiiig&#8221;&#8221;r\u00abs:jic c()iis\u00e9qu\u00e9riiiiil rjrder at<br \/>\nAnnexurc &#8216;J&#8217; dated !8.3.2(}&#8217;1(}..&amp;iss:i&#8217;e3ri b&#8217;y&#8217;&#8212;ifjr:eVV&#8217;it&#8217;ii.ii*d rcspcinrient and<br \/>\nalso for striking down coiiditionNo\ufb01iiaii :h.;e._VGdiz_cr1i&#8211;1ncn: Order at<\/p>\n<p>Annexu datcdi&#8217;28=&#8230;l&#8221; L2\u20ac)0&#8217;6._g1ii&#8217;ci t&#8221;oi&#8217;ce1&#8217;tz1in other ieliefs.<\/p>\n<p> The pctitioiicirv is a&#8217; Ccmipcimivc Society l&#8217;CgiS[Cl&#8217;\u20acd under<\/p>\n<p> Iiic.pif(3i.risi&#8217;i&gt;f1s; _Oi7._;_Eic Kai&#8217;iiaI&#8217;aka CO~0pCl&#8217;\u00a3l[iVC Societies Aci, 1959.<\/p>\n<p>Rft?Sf)&#8217;O&#8217;i_&#8217;:(i&#8217;fA:n{? :&#8217;i&#8221;V.I.,Q.(:5&#8242;.V:1.5&#8243;Vi:1 Fishcries Cowoperative Society. its area of<\/p>\n<p>()pCl.&#8221;\u00a2Ki'{?)n c.piripri&#8221;scd of Kuiidawaida. Hosakuiidziwada, D()dcEzib:ttlii,<\/p>\n<p>. 4&#8243;&#8212;Sii;1.ma1mr,&#8221;:Nag2&#8217;1iiur, Halcbzitlii and Shirzimag0nd;.iii.ahz1lli villages<\/p>\n<p>ii {if *.Dii&#8217;v&#8217;;&#8217;iii21ge1&#8243;c Tzifuk and District. I: is the case of the pctiiionei&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>society under the pi'(wi:si.ons of the Kz11&#8217;11a1.aka C.()~(ipera1ive<\/p>\n<p>Societies&#8217; Act. 1959. it WEIS ziwawded fisiiing 1&#8217;ighi.:d.\u00a7iE\u20ac;i\u00a7 &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>3.51.2009 at Doddabauhi tank of Dzavziiizigere VI1\u00a3.lVi_&#8217;Lliii&#8221;(&#8220;.~.VVrI&#8221;i]&#8217;C.i&#8217;*Xiifliii <\/p>\n<p>petition fiied by the 6&#8243;&#8216; 1&#8217;e.\u00ab_;pondent eliziiiezigiiig tvhieregi~s;.tiaiipijiii(5f__ <\/p>\n<p>the pe\u00a3iti0ner&#8211;.s*0eiety was dismissed by 111is&#8217;;.CCm&#8217;i on \u00bb2&#8242;;2.6L&#8217;2.\u20ac)()9ii&#8217;:ini&#8221;i<\/p>\n<p>W.P.N0.i2I98\/2006 reserviiig 1ibci?1&#8217;ye._io the peii.t_id11ei* iheieiii to<br \/>\nchalienge the impugned uf(:i&#8217;e..ij i)(\u00a7i&#8217;i(.)l'(*&#8217;3iAi&#8217;h:&#8217;C:&#8217;-,i1ifJ~{)i'()pl&#8221;iEi{Lg \u00e9iuthority<br \/>\nwithin 30 days from the date O-f_tl&#8217;ie&#8221;e1&#8217;Zie1f&#8211;;~.Iii&#8217;&#8211;iEhe,.i.inean1i:ne, the<\/p>\n<p>District Nodal Oiff&#8217;ie&#8217;:&lt;:{:VLhz1s zigziiia pi:iss&quot;ed.A &#039;i21ni&#039;0r&lt;1e:1&#039; at Annexure &#039;F&#039;<\/p>\n<p>dated 19.&#039;2,20.n3 ;.i$xi;.~.rgii;jg ._fi\u00a7&#039;hiiig fights in the af01&#039;esaid tank in<\/p>\n<p>favour of the,__ pe\u00a7i\u00a3ii(5i;ei&quot;..i&#039;C;z1:_ii..:i period of five yeaixsx In the<\/p>\n<p> Ci!&#039;CEJl3].\u00a7sIi.&#039;\u00a7&#039;\u00a3il1Ci(\u00a3i\\&#039;. the F&#039;8fiCH1&#039;Zli.i&#039;()l} has resoived to award the fishing<\/p>\n<p>&#039;=_1&#039;igh1&quot;s&#8211;.iI_3 the t:.1nI&lt;_ihvquestion in i&quot;zw0uroi&#039;1he 6&quot;&#039; rcsponciem without<\/p>\n<p>n01i&#039;;:e&quot;to&#039;the&#039;p\u00a5\u00e9:i1ii01ic.1&quot;. This is I&#039;0il0weL&#039;E by an order passed by me<\/p>\n<p>-third 1&#8217;esp(5ii1:;Eeii1. awarding, fishing rights in fav0m&#8217; of the 6&#8243;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>ije\u00bb:;p0i&#8217;it:Ee111 in the said tank. The 1&#8243;es0Eui&#8217;i0n at Amiexure &#8216;H&#8217; is<\/p>\n<p>questimt 213 it has not completed one ye.&#8217;_.t_1.1&#8230;f:,&#8217;_(_)m the d2iteV;of\u00b0thetV<\/p>\n<p>registmtiori when it mztcie an application f'&lt;)&amp;&lt;;4z1\\v:g1&#039;rd.. of &#039;{i&#039;is&#039;hi&#039;:ig&#039; rig,ft1..t&#039;st_  &#039;<\/p>\n<p>Thus, the ()rde;~;_1t Annexu;-c -9&#039; ci21t.eed-3:11.2i(}\u20ac_)9&#039;urzts<br \/>\nis why the District Nodal Officer   oi\ufb01ier at<br \/>\nAnnexure &#039;F dated 19.2..2.0ii)~~..in(1ci_i&#039;i&#039;\u00a7&#039;iVtig&#039;:&#039;ii&#039;teTi;r\u00a71er zttvvi\ufb01iiinexttre<br \/>\n In Annexttre &#039;F&#039; order, theVD&#039;iA$Vt1tiiC_t:iii$iodttiV has eletirly<br \/>\nS[\u00a311Cd that the thirgi.   activity with<\/p>\n<p>the ztssistanee sot&#039; ;1&quot;&#8212;.l&#039;(&#039;)&#039;&quot;e&#039;z-it-t__ beCa-go-pei&quot;:I.ti&#039;:\\teit-soeaiety. The order at<\/p>\n<p>Annexure  does. riot&#039;Stt1te.t!iat_tihe third respondent has to carry<\/p>\n<p>on fishing acti\u00e9ity with the :tss&#039;is;t;t.i&#039;iee of the petitioner. The order at<\/p>\n<p>_vAnnext1,re &#039;F&quot;&#039;~is not &#039;unde1&#039; challenge. in pu1&#039;st121nce of the order at<\/p>\n<p>.7AE1IT1C&#039;.&#039;\u00a7Ei1&quot;!(;  Eh{3\u00ab.._1hiI&#039;d respondent has passed :1 resolution at<\/p>\n<p>AI11]C.X&quot;tlI&quot;:3.&#039; ti \u00a2:&#039;&#8211;e,$(&#039;)I.x;1ng to grant iishing rights to the 6&quot; l&#039;CSp0ft(&#039;}C!&#039;1E.<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; The saiti\u00ab4._1&#039;es(_\u00a7vititio-n and the consequential ordea&#039; an Annexure &#039;F&#039; is<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  &#039;\u00abp_ei-feetly in ate-;&#039;&lt;:)1&quot;ci21a&#039;1ee with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>T2<\/p>\n<p>9. The petitioner society was registered as p_e:&#8217;Wthe.j_&#8217;or_det.;___<\/p>\n<p>dated 17.1 1.2008. which is clear from the re.gist.r&#8217;a_tii~t.&gt;nv&#8211;eertitieateA at <\/p>\n<p>Annexure &#8220;A&#8221;. The competent Z1U[i1()lfT_lty.-iltigljr ctitfetited [ii&#8217;tl&#8217;\u00a7:&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;..&#8217;_(.)Ll:ii&#8217;.v&#8217;.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>respondent to amend its l)ye\u00ablawsun_de1&#8242; Seiet_io1&#8217;1 E1&#8217;\/..((~.V)&#8221;ofAhe_Aetigbyii<\/p>\n<p>deleting Doddabathi and H\u00e9ll\ufb02b\u00e9ltill&#8217;~.iil&#8217;lil\u00a31vgt3Sin &#8216;its area of<br \/>\noperation, which is \u20acVid\u20acl&#8217;E\u00a3wIl&#8221;l&#8221;.()1Tl  at A1ii1e.i&lt;u1&#039;e &#039;G&#039;<br \/>\ndated 4.11.2008. It is also    oeeasion, a<br \/>\nsimilar order  hyigthei  registering the<\/p>\n<p>petiti()ne1&#039;~s0c_i::_ty pill2.8.9&#039;;12()4(l(}i{fTlji&#039;svACotirtiidismissed the said writ<\/p>\n<p>petition cm 22.6i.A2Of}9&#8230;_With li.he&#039;rt._y to the petitioner therein to avail<br \/>\nthe alternative i&#039;em.edy_ e&quot;?&#039;.~e.\u00a7~&#039;pondei;a was granted 30 days time to<\/p>\n<p>file an ;appeal ehttll.e_n\u00a7ging the impugned order therein. It appears<\/p>\n<p> tihatthe 62&#039;&quot;:r&#039;e.spoi1dent had filed an appeal before the appellate<\/p>\n<p>aiutlitz-i&#039;fityi and&#039;..tl1evi.iap&#039;pellz:te authority had returned the appeal with<\/p>\n<p>_lil)erty&quot;*&#8211;to .1t1i1;:-.6&quot; respondent to challenge the order before the<\/p>\n<p>i&quot;-{;QI1.1l}f3&#039;l(2I1iii\u00a3lLli&#039;h()l&#039;l[y. Thereafter, the 6&quot;&#039; responde.nt filed it revision<\/p>\n<p> -pie&#8217;tit&#8217;iio:&#8217;1&#8243;it1 l\\lo.C()\/ l5CAP\/20 10 under Section 108 of the Karnataka<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>iespondeiit deleting I)(_)ddt1l:)21tlti and Haiehathi villziges fI&#8221;orn~,it..~;&#8211;V<\/p>\n<p>area of (&#8216;)pC1&#8217;E!1l()11 ltas been stayed in the revision petitieii. If&#8217;iEi}it~&#8211;is&#8221;7&#8211;\u00ab&#8211;.e ~<\/p>\n<p>so, the at&#8217;oresaid villages continue to be _i_n&#8230;th_e 21i&#8217;e.:1 ()li:l(&#8220;)B.\u00a2Vif-&#8216;L&#8217;Elell()ll&#8221; of <\/p>\n<p>the 6&#8243;&#8216; respondent. Therefore. the petitioner cgttmot h\u00a3i~ve&#8221;an&#8217;y fi<\/p>\n<p>right in VlCW or [he interim t)i&#8217;de;~&#8221;\u00a7j%iit.tecl lit}!\/lit? cli:tt\\&#8221;&#8216;\/4)1~l(;V?\\\\&amp;:y1AIVV\u20ac1\\:,f;C&#8221;v{i5&#8217;il()I\/1<br \/>\npetition. The petitioner inay;__h2we l'(.7 E.l.kEi)l;ETl:):(321&#8217;l&#8217; inthe til&#8217;oi&#8217;&#8211;es;iicl,ievision<br \/>\nand seek. modifieziti(&gt;11\/vaeaitiorll of    V215 it may.\n<\/p>\n<p>IO. As per l;l\u00a3&#8217;i.&#8221;,3 {)1~{iC):r~-&#8220;&#8216;\u00a31&#8243;&#8216;K\u00bb, .A:&#8217;1&#8242;]11lC&#8217;?{&#8216;1&#8242;}.&#8217;:;jQ&#8217;  Nodal<br \/>\nOffieei&#8217; had gifanteti  tel\/ihfe.lf*lenleli9nti&lt;):i after availing<br \/>\nthe sei*vi.ees__oti\ufb02tlieV-petitioner&#039;v.h_erein. The said order has been<br \/>\nmodified &#039;lay:    E-IS per Annexure &#039;F&#039; (fated<\/p>\n<p>E9.2.20l(). Perii&quot;i&#039;e.;2tVlll ol&quot;_tl&#039;:e. &quot;&#039;oi&#039;cler would clearly indicate that the<\/p>\n<p>it &#039; \u00ab.Nod;t&#039;l._\u00a73ffi&#8211;eet has gr&#039;\u00a2inted&#039;iishing ifights in favour of the Federation<\/p>\n<p>&#039;Q tltifoiigh the &#039; ~21; ..\n<\/p>\n<p>i\u00e9tzinee of {my local fishiiig e&lt;H)pet&#039;;1tive society.<\/p>\n<p>Thatis\ufb01lmw titre if-&#039;;&#039;=etlei&quot;ati()1t has passed the resolution at Annexiire<\/p>\n<p>&#039;H7 :ii%&#039;airclvi.iig &#039;[:&#039;i&quot;.\u00a7l1ing rights in the tank&quot; in question in f&quot;;1vour of the<\/p>\n<p>toil&quot;. ifesp(.)ti&#039;de11I. The petitioner has not ehzilleitged the order at<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>5&#8242;<br \/>\nA<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Aimexure &#8216;F&#8217;. The \ufb01shing season starts from E&#8221; 0&#8217;1&#8243; Jttly4&#8243;c:.f&#8221;::t_&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>pmticulztr year and eonies to end on 3()&#8221;&#8216; of June of ri1e_.i'{extye21i&#8221;.&#8217;= H<\/p>\n<p>which is 21150 clear from clause 1?, of (lie\u00bbuGm\u00bb&#8217;eI&#8217;I1_nr1cI1it&#8221;&#8216;G:&#8217;t;ici&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>Annexurc &#8216;R1&#8242;. Tiiereibre, though the &#8220;p&amp;etiiti_i0ne1&#8242; iktrtis&#8217; _g[&#8216;\u00a31&#8217;l1{C_d&#8217;._.<\/p>\n<p>fishing rights :15 per Annexure &#8216;B&#8217;V,&gt;v.i_i:&#8221;\u00a7.(x)Ui(i 1&#8217;i\u20acJi_&#8217;<br \/>\noperation because in terms ozftthe Gt)xzciiii&#8217;1&#8217;i31et&#8217;i\u00bbt,prciei; *it.,.ez-wig only<br \/>\nstart its operation from 1&#8221; Jul)i.&#8221;\u00e9i(h)*l-[}i\u00a7*   the order at<br \/>\nAIIIICXEHC &#8216;B&#8217; ha\ufb02  Invlciiiif ght has been<br \/>\nawarded by thei.thii&#8217;1&#8243;i1_Vfie;p{inLEen_t:_in   6&#8243;&#8216; respondent.<br \/>\nThere1&#8217;0re,   Peti\ufb01evnier ithat-itv&#8217;riz:s invested huge sums<br \/>\nof money iitazf  without any merit. Since<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner iizas. faileti._td;eii;i1_i~enge the order at Annexure &#8216;F&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>4.-vz11(udif&#8217;yvi~&#8217;:&#8217;\u00a7g the&#8217;eujde:&#8217; a1t&#8221;Ai11.1_e_2&lt;.Ls1&quot;e &#039;B&#039;, it is not necessary to consider<\/p>\n<p>&#039;i&#039;11.Ve&#039;c),ii}&#039;:&#039;e1&#039;vee.ntiein1i.o\u00a31&#039;s:.._The petition is devoid of meriis and. it is<\/p>\n<p>V ;:ee()i&#039;ding}y Liisn-ii&#039;;~;s&#039;i:5&#039;(.i.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">16<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I}. Since the writ pctiiion is disxnissccl as 21i}dvc.\n<\/p>\n<p>1.A.N0..I.\/2010 filed for vacating stay does not ;S&#8217;l&#8217;1~I&#8217;~&#8217;.&#8211;&#8216;..i.:\\.&#8221;&#8216;G.: _fC{}&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>cc):a:_eiderati(.)n and it is zuzcorcfingiy dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>BMM\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 18&#8243;&#8221;&#8221; DAY ()1? NOVEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON-&#8216;BI.I\u00a3&#8217; MRJUS TICE 5. ABDUL NA I WRIT PETITION N0.10961\/Zf:.&#8221;0.I0y I\u00a2s;~I:I5S) I &#8221; &#8216;V Beiwccn: Sri Kere Kenchamtna [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1451,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010"},"wordCount":1451,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010","name":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-14T11:05:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kere-kenchamma-meenugarara-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kere Kenchamma Meenugarara &#8230; vs The State Of Karnataka on 18 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89740\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}