{"id":89922,"date":"2009-10-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009"},"modified":"2014-04-13T14:15:01","modified_gmt":"2014-04-13T08:45:01","slug":"sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>13*\u00bb: &#8216;shins; mun (3UUR&#8217;i&#8217; are i{AI\\&#8217;NA&#8217;i&#8217;AKA AT uAr{g3;%.tLi}&#8217;:j&#8217;c.;\u00a7 &#8216;2,<\/p>\n<p>DATED mas THE 16TH DAY 0? acro\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01;    A&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>memsmmf  &#8211;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;mg 11mm1.;:: MN. JUS&#8217;1&#8217;\u00a3{}ii\u00a7&#8221;\\{.{;f&lt;ff)P}XL}5ix&#8211;{:\u00a7{):\u00a7p\u00a7&#039;5\u00a7:&#039;; :&#039;\u00ab.: &#039;i<br \/>\n _ ._  .\n<\/p>\n<p>THE il(}N&#8217;i}i..i3l Mg:-;. Ju\u00a7:;:.;\u00a3\u00a7;\u00a7\u00ab; ::.,_;\\_z.r\u00a7\u00e9;GA\u00a7,{ \ufb02ifgfma<br \/>\nWm&#8217;? A:~*:#1\u00a72*.;i;  am<\/p>\n<p>nmwmmn: _ <\/p>\n<p>Sm &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>we Lam ;&lt;*;;g;-*Ru\u00bb<br \/>\n&#039;.AC2\u00bbE[}AfL%{)1}&#039;\u00a3&#039;.5E\u00ab._YE:3.I2_S_&#039;<br \/>\nregztr rm; 4.53.?   &quot; _<br \/>\n314:2) &#039;BLQGK; eJAYA&#8211;N3\u00a3GAR<br \/>\nBA.\u00a7&#039;\u20ac\u20ac\u00a7i&#039;;L{}RE&quot;; ~::~:5&quot;e. \u00a7_\u00a3??&#039;i 1<\/p>\n<p>. . .Ai~&#039;Pi:}i.hPsE&#039;~\u00a3&#039;i&#039;<\/p>\n<p>.A &#039;\u20ac335 3.2;: -15; 3:-\u00a33311: mean Slii3&#039;i&#039;i&quot;s&#039;, ADV}<\/p>\n<p> L <\/p>\n<p> AA 1_ DE;-*u&#039;i*\u00a5 {.,&#039;i0M\u00a3if\u00a3l3Si\u00a3}Ni\u00a3R&#039;<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7.3ANCrAi,(}i~f\u00a3$ i~i&#039;Ui~22\u00b0sL i_)iS&quot;Fi~\u00a31f;fi&#039;<br \/>\n V.V.&#039;i&#039;(}W\u00a3;\u00a7i\u20acS<br \/>\nmmurex BL{}CI{,<br \/>\nD*R.B.R. AMBEBKAR&#039; R0533<br \/>\n3ANG\u00a33LOf%?E<\/p>\n<p>2 &#039;Ti iii 2&quot;sSSiS&#039;i&#039;AN&#039;l&#039; \u20ac_3{)f\\\u00e93fU\u00a7iS1:Sl{.}f\u20aci3}ix&#039;<br \/>\nR3M\ufb01\u00a7&#039;\u20acA\u20ac}RR SUB SIVESIOE<br \/>\nRRMANAGAR<\/p>\n<p>\/:\n<\/p>\n<p>Addi. Gaverjxment Advoc-air: for {\u00a316 r\ufb01spandrsizt anti <\/p>\n<p>the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. From the materiai on xwseaard, it is \ufb01vid\ufb01jfit   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>grant was made on iO.8.19\u00a3-52 a11e\u00a3__1:\u00a31at \ufb011\u00a73\u00a7M1:#&#8221;i;\u20acf)i3;:*..*f&#8217; lagixd  tr} 3 &amp;:\u00a5ci1edule Caste and<\/p>\n<p> ~._&amp;3&lt;:12E\u00a731~1:ai__.-:&#8211;:,:&#039;i&#039;2V?_ii:):=:  in the: ismtant ca , iaarned si\ufb01glr:<\/p>\n<p> tjuriTgt=; _w&#039;3i1Qiie:V&quot;&#039;cq\u00a7iiside1*i;1g the respec:&lt;1:ive cxyxxtentions crf th\u00e9<\/p>\n<p> i\u00a31&#039;.V&#039;V*?\u00a7&#039;*i *,F4:3.9*3\u00e9iiif\u20ac}?, came, ta 3. {\ufb010i1Ci1iS.it)11 that the<\/p>\n<p> &amp;ss\u00a7$mt:{tCbmn\ufb013sion\u00e91* had taken into oanskieratia\ufb01 the<\/p>\n<p>,.&#039;.aA?\u00a3~;\u00a7s:-*:;:g:-.:.\u00ab=; of mcrctardg wit}: regaxti his the: permi\ufb01sion being<\/p>\n<p>&#039;   by the State: and tht\u00e9m was rm dmunmnt piacsd on<\/p>\n<p>&quot; Wf\u00a7&#039;tC(\u00a7I&#039;z:i and that the dmumenf: Wiizicix was xzxjn\ufb01id\ufb01ktvd by the<\/p>\n<p>assisiant C0i}.&#039;\u00a3\ufb01:i.i$$i0i3&#039;1\u20ac\u00a7i&#039; with mgard ta aha said ;:.~er;a:iission<\/p>\n<p>was 3 cap? 0f the ciwumezxi and that evmr: if an oppoxmnitg<\/p>\n<p>*2<\/p>\n<p>was granted \u00a333? the Assistant Commissioner <\/p>\n<p>pefitim1er\/ agpeilant, th\u00e9 (33.36 0f the app\ufb02\ufb02ant   _<\/p>\n<p>.5\u00a7\u00bb._:%s2-vs, \u20ac%&lt;1\u00bb&quot;75&quot;&quot;\u00e9\u00ab <\/p>\n<p>ii .\n<\/p>\n<p>\n=  Simona 1:215 aianciatmy \u00a37cq1iiFCH1\ufb01i&#8221;,*.?.~-11iiiZ{\ufb01I*Sti\u20ac2ti(Z3\ufb01  <\/p>\n<p>4(2) of the Act has not fatten co1;11v\u00a7i;1ieci&gt;_AAx4a%\u00a3\ufb01i&#8221;.f\u00a3.\u00a7:i\u00e9;;:t:&#8211;f:&lt;:\u00a51~.s:;<\/p>\n<p>was 110 valid transfer of {and zmd\u00e9r th\ufb01i pmvisirriis  the&#039;1&#039;jS..3v,&#039;~.\u00bbI&#039;  }.<\/p>\n<p>Act. Uiild\ufb01f the ci1&#039;\u20ac:u:nsta11x\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7&#039;-$;..V&quot;t\u00a71\u00a2 judge<br \/>\nc011\ufb01ru1\u00a2=:d the order tcr &#039;itixfa  ()1: tilt?<\/p>\n<pre>\nbasis Qf $116 masaning  200?, the writ\npetition out eff'    was aiso\ndisposed -mfg'   aim, the gz\ufb01un\u00e9s urged\nand     as the mas were aissrz\n\nsitllijzagrq\ufb02 * '\n\n<\/pre>\n<p> , 123. ~ 7,.\u00a31:;  x:xi1i&#8217;ix%x1;_j;i:,Wou1{i be of mlevance to rafar to the<\/p>\n<p> \u00bbs:\u00a3{e&lt;:~-_isgic;:;A cf  apex (301111 in this mm of .5&#039;.L.1\u20ac::1po9r* V\/5.<\/p>\n<p>:&#039;f&#8230;f.&#039;.&#039;:l&#039;._V\u00a7i&#039;.1&quot;&#039;3T&#039;Vi,J\u00a33&#039;iV5V1.:;Ci%.&#039;_.&#039;_i&amp;j9_  {A114 1981 SC 13o; whemin a simiiar<\/p>\n<p>V . comf\u00a3.:1\ufb016\u00a7i &quot;313: the {.\u00a7\ufb02V\u20aci&quot;IiI1l6I1i did nut a\ufb01ltsrd any<\/p>\n<p>.  VL,.:\u00a73;:~_1_3&#039;&lt;:ess Cif law, it is 110<\/p>\n<p>V answer {Q say that in his partieuiar case due: pmcess cf law<\/p>\n<p>wcruld hav\u00e9 led to the same msuit because \u00a316 had \u00a329<\/p>\n<p>ari\u00e9qnate dcf\ufb01nca uyon the \u00a3}fi\u20ac:fitS. in ting iiistani case, si.,s:1cc:s<\/p>\n<p>5%<\/p>\n<p>A,\/4<\/p>\n<p>it has been estaiziishezzi that them was jm pmtsr p(\u00e91&quot;1113:.\u00e9\u00a7:~&quot;\u00a7io;3<\/p>\n<p>tak\u00e9n either by the vem:i0r[gra11tz=:e or by the  <\/p>\n<p>agpe\ufb02a at in accz31&#039;da:1ce with Sm\ufb01on 4(i3}&quot;&quot;\u00ab.3f  ;&#039;\u00a7.c&quot;i:,..:_ V&#039; <\/p>\n<p>in any way advanced the: case: cnf \ufb02h\u00e9  -in \u00a7ii\u00a3:w,g:}f ti1\u00e9&quot;.<\/p>\n<p>fuming mcnrded in the report 1;\u00a3&#039;i:g%:1\ufb01  <\/p>\n<p>peniiission dated 29.8.1991?  u&#039;af:ssfsE;1* &lt;:sf &#039;bi=&#039;:i&#039;V11g a V<\/p>\n<p>faiiricated dOC&#039;\u00a71i}1f&#039;:i1t wimtgh as.pc5i;f:&#039;V_1_3.\u00a71&#039;\u00a7&#039;:&quot;1_:3t b\u00e9\u00e9\u00a3i&#039;~x&#039;\ufb01~b&#039; utted by<\/p>\n<p>any r&#039;}Vid\u20aci1Cf:.\n<\/p>\n<p>(1.   -1_ea;3&lt;&#039;*11%:&#039;d  judge has rightly<\/p>\n<p>coma id   ti3af  was violation of the<br \/>\nco\ufb01diii\ufb01xg  4(2) of the Act, there: is<\/p>\n<p>ms vaiid 1:\u00a3&#039;::.::i$f\u20ac:1&#039; 51::  ;&#039;jI1\u00a7:&quot;3i&quot;.\u00ab&#039;\u00a3..C,1i1;V&#039;i&#039;\u00a7&amp;[l\u20ac..&quot;,&#039;\/6 with &#039;U316 enactment and<\/p>\n<p> , hex:-ab. the sam\u00e9&quot;&#8211;v\u00a7.s_____$2fe.ici far th\ufb01 aforesaid reasons. Th\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>  $3 the pzxmhasei&quot; caunat tixerefssre: get the<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039;b\u00a2i&#039;:\u00a3.a\ufb01t &quot;bi; pumhase aad thvm*&amp;f0J:e, i\ufb01\ufb01 As\ufb01stant<\/p>\n<p>C0a3.&quot;&#039;missi0.1;\u00e9:* and ijieputy L1:3;11:*:31&#039;$si  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>   ;uneE   <\/p>\n<p>3%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 Author: V.Gopalagowda And B.V.Nagarathna 13*\u00bb: &#8216;shins; mun (3UUR&#8217;i&#8217; are i{AI\\&#8217;NA&#8217;i&#8217;AKA AT uAr{g3;%.tLi}&#8217;:j&#8217;c.;\u00a7 &#8216;2, DATED mas THE 16TH DAY 0? acro\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01; A&#8217; memsmmf &#8211; &#8216;mg 11mm1.;:: MN. JUS&#8217;1&#8217;\u00a3{}ii\u00a7&#8221;\\{.{;f&lt;ff)P}XL}5ix&#8211;{:\u00a7{):\u00a7p\u00a7&#039;5\u00a7:&#039;; :&#039;\u00ab.: &#039;i _ ._ . THE il(}N&#8217;i}i..i3l Mg:-;. Ju\u00a7:;:.;\u00a3\u00a7;\u00a7\u00ab; ::.,_;\\_z.r\u00a7\u00e9;GA\u00a7,{ \ufb02ifgfma Wm&#8217;? A:~*:#1\u00a72*.;i; am nmwmmn: _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-89922","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":750,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009"},"wordCount":750,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009","name":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-13T08:45:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-satyan-vs-deputy-commissioner-on-16-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Satyan vs Deputy Commissioner on 16 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89922","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89922"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89922\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89922"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89922"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89922"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}