{"id":90373,"date":"2009-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2"},"modified":"2015-07-15T20:35:50","modified_gmt":"2015-07-15T15:05:50","slug":"regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 248 of 2006()\n\n\n1. REGI, S\/O. THANKAPPAN RESIDING AT\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. M. ELANGOVAN, S\/O. MARIMUTHU, 68,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. JOSE @ SUNNY,\n\n3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA\n\n4. V.P. SURESH, VADAKKEPUTHENPURAYIL HOUSE\n\n5. THE BRANCH MANAGER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SMT.ANNIE PAUL\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.JAYASANKAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON\n\n Dated :23\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                          P.R. RAMAN &amp;\n             P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JJ.\n               -----------------------------------------------\n                      M.A.C.A. No. 248 of 2006\n                     -------------------------------------\n            Dated, this the 23rd day of November, 2009\n\n\n                            J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>P.R. Raman, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Appellant is the claimant in OP(MV) 1948\/2001 on the file of the<\/p>\n<p>MACT, Muvattupuzha.       He was riding a Kinetic Honda scooter and<\/p>\n<p>proceeding in the Aluva &#8211; Munnar road towards west. A motor cycle<\/p>\n<p>coming from the opposite direction, overtook a jeep and hit against the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle of the appellant, as a result he fell down and sustained injuries,<\/p>\n<p>claiming an amount of Rs.3,00,000\/- by way of compensation.<\/p>\n<p>      2.     The evidence consists of oral testimony of PWs 1 to 3,<\/p>\n<p>Exts.A1 to A8 and Case Diary is marked as Ext.X1. The Tribunal, on<\/p>\n<p>appreciation of the entire evidence adduced in the case found that no<\/p>\n<p>negligence can be attributed on the part of the driver of the motor cycle.<\/p>\n<p>The application was dismissed, against which this appeal is filed.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that at the point<\/p>\n<p>of accident, the road was of 6.80 mts. width and the accident spot was<\/p>\n<p>2.06 mts. from the southern tarred end. It is contended therefore that<\/p>\n<p>the motor cycle was on the wrong side. It is also contended that the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW1 to 3 ought to have been accepted by the Tribunal. Yet<\/p>\n<p>MACA No. 248 of 2006<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>another contention on the part of the appellant is that when the vehicle<\/p>\n<p>was overtaking another vehicle, the rider should have taken care that no<\/p>\n<p>other vehicle came from the opposite direction. These are the main points<\/p>\n<p>to contend that the accident occurred as a result of negligence on the part<\/p>\n<p>of the rider of the motor cycle.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.     PW2 was not having a valid driving licence and he was<\/p>\n<p>imposed with a fine for driving the vehicle without proper licence. When<\/p>\n<p>he gave statement before the Police [Ext.X1(a)], it is recorded therein that<\/p>\n<p>the Kinetic Honda (Scooter) was ridden by &#8216;Jayan&#8217; and the motor cycle<\/p>\n<p>was ridden by &#8216;Jose&#8217; and that Jayan did not sustain any injuries.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously since PW2\/appellant did not have a licence, for fear of being<\/p>\n<p>implicated in the criminal case, he wanted to say that the vehicle was not<\/p>\n<p>being ridden by him; since at that time he was more concerned to get<\/p>\n<p>himself absolved from any criminal case. It was later, a petty case was<\/p>\n<p>charged against him and paid the fine and later, when he gave evidence<\/p>\n<p>before the Court, he gave a totally different version. In this circumstance,<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal did not choose to accept the evidence of PW2 on its face<\/p>\n<p>value.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     PW3 is stated to be an occurrence witness. He was a sales<\/p>\n<p>man in a shop near the occurrence place. According to him, the scooter<\/p>\n<p>came from east towards west. A bullet motor cycle proceeding from the<\/p>\n<p>MACA No. 248 of 2006<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>west, over took a jeep and hit the scooter. Both the vehicles overturned to<\/p>\n<p>the southern side. The rider of the bike did not sustain any injury. He<\/p>\n<p>stated that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the rider of the<\/p>\n<p>motor cycle. PW3 was confronted with the statement given by him to the<\/p>\n<p>Police, wherein it is recorded that the jeep was on northern side of the<\/p>\n<p>road and was not moving, while the motor cycle coming from the west, on<\/p>\n<p>seeing the Kinetic Honda coming from the opposite direction, applied the<\/p>\n<p>brakes and hit at the other vehicle involved. If this is the first statement<\/p>\n<p>given by him to the police, the version given by him much later while<\/p>\n<p>examining as a witness before the MACT, which is inconsistent with his<\/p>\n<p>earlier statement, can&#8217;t be accepted as reliable.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     Even if the statement given by him before the police cannot<\/p>\n<p>be accepted as a piece of evidence and that the scooter was being ridden<\/p>\n<p>by a person who had no licence, still there was a distance of 2.06 mts. on<\/p>\n<p>the left side of the rider and if he had turned his scooter little further<\/p>\n<p>towards left side, this accident could have been averted. Though the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently contended that, while<\/p>\n<p>overtaking a vehicle, one should see that no vehicle came from the<\/p>\n<p>opposite direction, it must be remembered that the jeep was lying parked<\/p>\n<p>and not a moving one. Secondly, it is not the case of the appellant that<\/p>\n<p>the road was not having sufficient width or that the vehicle coming from<\/p>\n<p>MACA No. 248 of 2006<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the opposite direction could not be seen from at least 100 mts. away.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the fact that the motor cycle had gone to the other side is of<\/p>\n<p>not much consequence when the vehicle was overtaking another vehicle<\/p>\n<p>parked on the road and it cannot be said that the rider of the motor cycle<\/p>\n<p>was negligent. On weighing the entire evidence as a whole, the finding of<\/p>\n<p>the Tribunal cannot be said to be perverse. The Sub Inspector of Police<\/p>\n<p>who was examined as PW1 on the side of the appellant, has also given<\/p>\n<p>evidence that he was not in a position to fix negligence on the part of both<\/p>\n<p>the riders and it was accordingly, that the matter was referred. We do not<\/p>\n<p>find any reason to interfere with the finding and reasoning given by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal. There is no merit in the appeal. The Appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                      P.R. RAMAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                            P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE<br \/>\ndnc<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 248 of 2006() 1. REGI, S\/O. THANKAPPAN RESIDING AT &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. M. ELANGOVAN, S\/O. MARIMUTHU, 68, &#8230; Respondent 2. JOSE @ SUNNY, 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA 4. V.P. SURESH, VADAKKEPUTHENPURAYIL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":896,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2"},"wordCount":896,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2","name":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-15T15:05:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/regi-vs-m-elangovan-on-23-november-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Regi vs M. Elangovan on 23 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}