{"id":90680,"date":"2010-04-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010"},"modified":"2016-02-19T13:44:41","modified_gmt":"2016-02-19T08:14:41","slug":"mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010<\/div>\n
                                                  Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                       \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CIC\u00a0\/\u00a0AD\u00a0\/A\/\u00a02010\/\u00a0000087\n                               \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Dated\u00a0April\u00a030,\u00a02010\n\n\n         Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Satpathy\n\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata\n\n\n         Background<\/pre>\n
1.                  The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.07.07.2009\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0seeking\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
         of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a005.05.2005\u00a0written\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Asit\u00a0Chaturvedi,\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0CVO\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0ED(VT)\u00a0Railway\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Board.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a004.08.2009\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Senior\u00a0DGM\/SE\u00a0Railway\u00a0vide\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a0<\/p>\n
         03.08.2009\u00a0denying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0confidential\u00a0in\u00a0nature\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0exempted\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)<\/p>\n
         (g).\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0Appeal\u00a0on\u00a024.08.2009\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0source\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
         already\u00a0known\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a08(1)(g)\u00a0cannot\u00a0\u00a0apply\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0report\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Asit\u00a0Chaturvedi\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Government\u00a0body\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0furtherance\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0objectives\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Organization\u00a0but\u00a0to\u00a0defame\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0argued\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0Appeal\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0would\u00a0serve\u00a0public\u00a0interest\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0expose\u00a0the\u00a0misuse\u00a0of\u00a0power\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0satisfy\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n
         personal\u00a0grudge\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0a\u00a0form\u00a0of\u00a0corruption.\u00a0\u00a0According\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0interest\u00a0in\u00a0disclosure\u00a0outweighs\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0harm\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0personal\u00a0protected\u00a0interest.\u00a0The\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.11.2009,\u00a0upholding\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
         the\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0document\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0SDGM\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0capacity\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0exempted\u00a0under\u00a0<\/p>\n
         Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0invoked\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(g)\u00a0and\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0process\u00a0of\u00a0D\u00a0&\u00a0A\u00a0inquiry\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0been \u00a0<\/p>\n
         completed,\u00a0 denied\u00a0 the\u00a0 document\u00a0 also\u00a0 under\u00a0 Section\u00a0 8(1)\u00a0(h)\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0 RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0as\u00a0 the\u00a0confidentiality\u00a0of\u00a0 the\u00a0sources\u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n
         document \u00a0 still \u00a0 remain \u00a0 alive. \u00a0 \u00a0 Being \u00a0 aggrieved\u00a0 with\u00a0 this\u00a0 reply,\u00a0 the\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appeal\u00a0 before\u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
         on23.11.2009\u00a0requesting\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0to\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0to\u00a0impose\u00a0<\/p>\n
         penalty\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2.                  The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0heard\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0through\u00a0video\u00a0conferencing\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
         9\u00a0April,\u00a02010.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3.                  Shri \u00a0 Debasis \u00a0 Chaudhary, \u00a0 CPIO, \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 B.P. \u00a0 Khare, \u00a0 ADG(M), \u00a0 and \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Snehasish \u00a0 Bhattacharya, \u00a0 Dy. \u00a0 CVO\u00a0<\/p>\n
         represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0authority\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Kolkata.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         hearing.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
              Decision<\/p>\n
4.                  The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0furnished\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0grounds\u00a0for\u00a0appeal\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission:\n<\/p>\n
           a)                     The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0relying\u00a0on\u00a0different\u00a0exemption\u00a0clauses\u00a0at\u00a0different\u00a0points\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          time\u00a0just\u00a0to\u00a0deny\u00a0him\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
     b)   Denial\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0longer\u00a0tenable\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
          to\u00a0higher\u00a0authorities\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0SDGM,\u00a0with\u00a0whom,\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0is\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n
          fiduciary\u00a0capacity.\u00a0\u00a0When\u00a0a\u00a0responsible\u00a0Government\u00a0officer\u00a0authors\u00a0a\u00a0document\u00a0about\u00a0another\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0course\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          their\u00a0duties\u00a0then\u00a0the\u00a0document\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0held\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0private\u00a0document\u00a0(as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0trust\u00a0reposed\u00a0upon\u00a0another\u00a0<\/p>\n
          person\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0private\u00a0person)\u00a0\u00a0and\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0exempted\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0confidential.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
          present\u00a0incumbent\u00a0therefore\u00a0cannot\u00a0hold\u00a0the\u00a0document\u00a0passed\u00a0on\u00a0by\u00a0her\u00a0predecessor\u00a0in\u00a0‘trust’.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
     c)   As\u00a0for\u00a0reliance\u00a0on\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(g)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a02005,\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0even\u00a0remotely\u00a0connected\u00a0with\u00a0law\u00a0<\/p>\n
          enforcement\u00a0activity\u00a0or\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0security\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0state\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0source\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0already\u00a0known\u00a0to\u00a0him.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
5.        The\u00a0Commission\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0recent\u00a0decision\u00a0dated\u00a030th\u00a0November,\u00a02009\u00a0while\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0of\u00a0Union\u00a0<\/p>\n
          of\u00a0India\u00a0vs.\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0&\u00a0Shri\u00a0P.D.\u00a0Khandelwal, Justice\u00a0Sanjiv\u00a0Khanna\u00a0while\u00a0discussing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          scope\u00a0and\u00a0ambit\u00a0of\u00a0“fiduciary\u00a0relationship”\u00a0in\u00a0great\u00a0details\u00a0has\u00a0discussed\u00a0that\u00a0“…….Normal,\u00a0routine\u00a0or\u00a0rather \u00a0<\/p>\n
          many \u00a0 acts, \u00a0 transactions \u00a0 and \u00a0 duties \u00a0 of \u00a0 a \u00a0 public \u00a0 servant \u00a0 cannot \u00a0 be \u00a0 categorized \u00a0 as \u00a0 fiduciary \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0<\/p>\n
          purpose\u00a0of\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0and\u00a0information\u00a0available\u00a0relating\u00a0to\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0relationship. \u00a0<\/p>\n
          (The \u00a0 said \u00a0 reasoning \u00a0 may \u00a0 not \u00a0 be \u00a0 applicable \u00a0 to \u00a0 service \u00a0 law \u00a0 jurisprudence, \u00a0 with \u00a0 which \u00a0 we \u00a0 are \u00a0 not \u00a0<\/p>\n
          concerned.)\u00a0……..”\u00a0Therefore,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0well\u00a0settled\u00a0position\u00a0of\u00a0law,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0evident\u00a0that\u00a0exemption\u00a0under\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005,\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0apply\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0<\/p>\n
          letter\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0written\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0part\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0normal\u00a0duty\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0Public\u00a0Servant\u00a0to\u00a0another\u00a0Public\u00a0Servant\u00a0and\u00a0in\u00a0any\u00a0event\u00a0<\/p>\n
          has\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0on\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0higher\u00a0authorities\u00a0for\u00a0action\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0Department\u00a0and\u00a0hence\u00a0exists\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0<\/p>\n
          domain\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0definitely\u00a0not\u00a0confidential\u00a0any\u00a0longer.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6.        The\u00a0contention\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0that\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0would\u00a0result\u00a0in\u00a0establishment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0identity\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          the\u00a0author\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0justifiable\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0already\u00a0aware\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0author\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter.\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0contents\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0written\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CVO\u00a0based\u00a0on\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0D&\u00a0AR\u00a0proceedings\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Appellant\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0initiated\u00a0may\u00a0still\u00a0endanger\u00a0the\u00a0life\/physical\u00a0safety\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officer.\u00a0Keeping\u00a0this\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
          mind\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0denies\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(g)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005.\u00a0Furthermore,\u00a0<\/p>\n
          in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0likely\u00a0to\u00a0impede\u00a0the\u00a0process\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          D&AR\u00a0 Inquiry\u00a0 proceedings\u00a0and\u00a0 hence\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0disclosed\u00a0at\u00a0this\u00a0stage\u00a0under\u00a0provisions\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
          Section\u00a08\u00a0(1)\u00a0(h)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act\u00a02005.\u00a0The\u00a0Appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Judgment\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0was\u00a0reserved\u00a0and\u00a0pronounced\u00a0in\u00a0he\u00a0open\u00a0Chamber\u00a0on\u00a030th\u00a0April\u00a02010.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                       (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                            Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n
Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy:\n<\/p>\n
(G.\u00a0Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar
\n      Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.         Mr.A.K.\u00a0Satpathy
\n           Sr.\u00a0DSO,\u00a0DRM’s\u00a0Office,\u00a0
\n           SE.C.\u00a0Railway
\n           Kingsway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00ad440001<\/p>\n
2.         The\u00a0PIO
\n           South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway
\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0&\u00a0CPRO
\n           11,\u00a0Garden\u00a0Reach
\n           Kolkata\u00ad700043<\/p>\n
3.         The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n           South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway
\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0General\u00a0Manager
\n           11,\u00a0Garden\u00a0Reach
\n           Kolkata\u00ad700043<\/p>\n
     4. Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge\u00a0\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n
     5.\u00a0\u00a0Press\u00a0E\u00a0Group,\u00a0CIC<\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0CIC\u00a0\/\u00a0AD\u00a0\/A\/\u00a02010\/\u00a0000087 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Dated\u00a0April\u00a030,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.\u00a0Satpathy \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.07.07.2009\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Kolkata\u00a0seeking\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a005.05.2005\u00a0written\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Asit\u00a0Chaturvedi,\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0CVO\u00a0South\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0ED(VT)\u00a0Railway\u00a0 Board.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a004.08.2009\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Senior\u00a0DGM\/SE\u00a0Railway\u00a0vide\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a0 03.08.2009\u00a0denying\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0confidential\u00a0in\u00a0nature\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0exempted\u00a0from\u00a0disclosure\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a08(1) (g).\u00a0\u00a0Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0Appeal\u00a0on\u00a024.08.2009\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0source\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0 already\u00a0known\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a08(1)(g)\u00a0cannot\u00a0\u00a0apply\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0as\u00a0a\u00a0report\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0by\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Asit\u00a0Chaturvedi\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0 Government\u00a0body\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0furtherance\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0objectives\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Organization\u00a0but\u00a0to\u00a0defame\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0argued\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0Appeal\u00a0that\u00a0 the\u00a0disclosure\u00a0would\u00a0serve\u00a0public\u00a0interest\u00a0as\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0expose\u00a0the\u00a0misuse\u00a0of\u00a0power\u00a0by\u00a0a\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0satisfy\u00a0that\u00a0 personal\u00a0grudge\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0a\u00a0form\u00a0of\u00a0corruption.\u00a0\u00a0According\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0the\u00a0public\u00a0interest\u00a0in\u00a0disclosure\u00a0outweighs\u00a0 the\u00a0harm\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0personal\u00a0protected\u00a0interest.\u00a0The\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.11.2009,\u00a0upholding\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0 the\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0document\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0held\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0SDGM\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0fiduciary\u00a0capacity\u00a0and\u00a0is\u00a0exempted\u00a0under\u00a0 Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(e)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0invoked\u00a0Section\u00a08(1)\u00a0(g)\u00a0and\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0process\u00a0of\u00a0D\u00a0&\u00a0A\u00a0inquiry\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0yet\u00a0been \u00a0 completed,\u00a0 denied\u00a0 the\u00a0 document\u00a0 also\u00a0 under\u00a0 Section\u00a0 8(1)\u00a0(h)\u00a0 of\u00a0the\u00a0 RTI\u00a0Act\u00a0as\u00a0 the\u00a0confidentiality\u00a0of\u00a0 the\u00a0sources\u00a0 of\u00a0 document \u00a0 still \u00a0 remain \u00a0 alive. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":961,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010"},"wordCount":961,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010","name":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-19T08:14:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-a-k-satpathy-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.A K Satpathy vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}