{"id":90687,"date":"2008-09-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-17T19:19:13","modified_gmt":"2016-01-17T13:49:13","slug":"narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007                                   -1-\n\n                                      ****\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n              AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                         Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007\n                         Date of decision : 3.9.2008\n\nNarender Kumar                                               .....Appellant\n\n                         Versus\nDalip Singh                                                  ...Respondent\n\n                               ****\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND\n\nPresent: Mr. G.S.Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioner.\n\n            Mr. S.K. Jain, Advocate for the respondent.\n\nS. D. ANAND, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>             The appellant-complainant has filed a plea on the authority of<\/p>\n<p>the provisions of Section 378 (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to<\/p>\n<p>obtain leave to appeal against order dated 23.8.2007, vide which the<\/p>\n<p>learned Trial Magistrate recorded a finding of exoneration in favour of<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/accused Dalip Singh.           His co-accused Gobind Ram is<\/p>\n<p>indicated   in   the   impugned   order      itself   as   dead.     The      other<\/p>\n<p>respondents\/accused were not ordered to be summoned by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Trial Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The allegations, levelled by the appellant\/complainant in the<\/p>\n<p>complaint, were as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p>             On the evening of 10.11.1996, the appellant\/complainant was<\/p>\n<p>celebrating Diwali festival with other members of his family when<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/accused no. 3 Dalip Singh came over there while he was under<\/p>\n<p>the influence of liquor      and started hurling abuses.             When the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007                                -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                      ****<\/p>\n<p>appellant\/complainant     desired    him     to   get   away    from   there,<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/accused left the spot but not without reiterating the abuses. At<\/p>\n<p>about 8.00 P.M., respondent\/accused Dalip Singh along with others forced<\/p>\n<p>their entry between the house of the complainant\/appellant. At that point<\/p>\n<p>of time, they were armed with lathis and gandasis. On reaching the house<\/p>\n<p>of the complainant, they         initially raised a lalkara,      Thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>respondents\/accused belaboured the appellant\/complainant with lathis and<\/p>\n<p>fist blows. When Ram Pal brother of appellant\/complainant, endeavoured<\/p>\n<p>intervention on hearing a raula raised by the latter, the respondent\/accused<\/p>\n<p>gave a Gandasi blow to him. Om Parkash and few women folk, belonging<\/p>\n<p>to the family of complainant, came over there on hearing the alarm raised<\/p>\n<p>by the complainant and they rescued them.         The respondent\/accused left<\/p>\n<p>the scene of occurrence but only after holding out a threat that the<\/p>\n<p>appellant\/complainant would not be allowed to stay alive if they got an<\/p>\n<p>other opportunity in future. The appellant-complainant was treated in the<\/p>\n<p>hospital.   Inspite of having been approached a number of time in the<\/p>\n<p>relevant behalf, the police did not take any action against the<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/accused.     Instead thereof, it foisted a false case against<\/p>\n<p>complainant and two members of the complainant party.<\/p>\n<p>             During the course of preliminary evidence, complainant<\/p>\n<p>stepped into the witness box as PW-1 and examined PW-2 Ram Pal, PW-<\/p>\n<p>3 Dr. Viresh Bhushan and PW-4 Om Parkash.\n<\/p>\n<p>             On perusal of the preliminary evidence, the Court ordered the<\/p>\n<p>summoning of only Gobind Ram and Dalip Singh to face a trial under<\/p>\n<p>Sections 323, 452 and 506 IPC. As already indicated in the impugned<\/p>\n<p>order itself Gobind Ram is dead. That explains the filing of the present<\/p>\n<p>petition against only Dalip Singh.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007                                -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                        ****<\/p>\n<p>            Learned Trial Court invalidated the prosecution presentation<\/p>\n<p>by observing that complaint in respect of occurrence dated 10.11.1996<\/p>\n<p>have been filed after unexplained and inordinate delay on 30.1.1997 i.e.<\/p>\n<p>after delay of almost 2-2-1\/2 months.          Apart from noticing that &#8220;no<\/p>\n<p>explanation whatsoever is forthcoming on record for this delay&#8221; learned<\/p>\n<p>Trial Court observed that the present complaint is appeared to be counter<\/p>\n<p>blast of a State case which petitioner and some other were facing in case<\/p>\n<p>FIR No. 262 of 1996, Police Station, Nathusari Chopra under Sections<\/p>\n<p>452, ,323, 324, 326 read with Section 34 IPC. The learned Trial Court, in<\/p>\n<p>order to draw sustenance from finding of exoneration also drew<\/p>\n<p>sustenance from the fact that no independent witness had entered the<\/p>\n<p>witness box to reiterate the presentation on behalf of the complainant and<\/p>\n<p>the alleged eye witness examined by the petitioner\/complainant were also<\/p>\n<p>related to him. The fact that the petitioner\/complainant was not proved to<\/p>\n<p>have notified the offence to the police was also noticed by the learned Trial<\/p>\n<p>Court while observing that &#8220;this casts serious doubt in the mind of the court<\/p>\n<p>that the occurrence took place in the manner depicted by the present<\/p>\n<p>complaint and that the accused was aggressor party.           It appears that<\/p>\n<p>present complaint is a counter blast of the State case.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>            Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the impugned<\/p>\n<p>finding is perverse in view of the own finding by the learned Trial<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate conceding the factum of the impugned occurrence in which both<\/p>\n<p>the parties were participated.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Learned counsel is not on a firmer footing when he so argues.<\/p>\n<p>Learned Trial Magistrate recorded adequate reasons to discard the<\/p>\n<p>presentation made by the appellant\/complainant. As already indicated,<\/p>\n<p>learned   Magistrate      invalidated    the   presentation   made    by   the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                    ****<\/p>\n<p>appellant\/complainant on account of fact that the (private) complaint had<\/p>\n<p>been filed after unexplained and inordinate delay of almost 2-21\/2 months.<\/p>\n<p>It is also noticed that offence is not proved to have been notified to the<\/p>\n<p>police. The fact that the presentation by the appellant\/complainant was<\/p>\n<p>supported only by relation witnesses and not by any independent witness<\/p>\n<p>was also noticed by the trial Magistrate to draw sustenance in support of<\/p>\n<p>the finding of exoneration.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Learned Trial Magistrate, noticed that the present prosecution<\/p>\n<p>was a counter blast of the case in which the complainant\/appellant and few<\/p>\n<p>others are being prosecuted. It cannot, thus, be said that the present case<\/p>\n<p>represents a cross-case.\n<\/p>\n<p>            In the other case, the petitioner and his co-accused are<\/p>\n<p>averred to have been convicted and an appeal filed by them is pending<\/p>\n<p>consideration with the Court of Sessions.     In the light thereof, learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the appellant\/complainant raised a plea that if the present<\/p>\n<p>appeal comes to be allowed, it would enable the Court of Sessions to<\/p>\n<p>dispose of both the matter simultaneously.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The plea advocated on behalf of the appellant\/complainant<\/p>\n<p>does not merit acceptance for the simple reason that an appeal cannot be<\/p>\n<p>allowed just because the allowance thereof would enable simultaneously<\/p>\n<p>disposal in the above indicated manner. The parameters for disposal of<\/p>\n<p>such like controversy was indicated by the Apex Court in Ramesh Babulal<\/p>\n<p>Vs. State of Gurarat, AIR 1996 SC 2035, Jaswant Singh Vs. State of<\/p>\n<p>Haryana AIR 2000 SC 1833 and Main Pal Vs. State of Haryana AIR<\/p>\n<p>2004 SC 2158.\n<\/p>\n<p>            The impugned judgment has been decided on the touch stone<\/p>\n<p>of parameters indicated therein. There is nothing perverse in the manner<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007                           -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                                     ****<\/p>\n<p>of appreciation of evidence at the hands of learned Trial Magistrate. The<\/p>\n<p>impugned finding has not called for any interference.<\/p>\n<p>            Dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>September 03,2008                                   (S. D. ANAND)\nPka                                                     JUDGE\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>Note: Whether to be referred to Reporter: Yes\/No<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007   -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                           ****\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.730-MA of 2007 Date of decision : 3.9.2008 Narender Kumar &#8230;..Appellant Versus Dalip Singh &#8230;Respondent **** CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1061,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008"},"wordCount":1061,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008","name":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-17T13:49:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narender-kumar-vs-dalip-singh-on-3-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narender Kumar vs Dalip Singh on 3 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}