{"id":90848,"date":"2009-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009"},"modified":"2017-06-04T16:55:37","modified_gmt":"2017-06-04T11:25:37","slug":"bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>                                   1\n\n1     S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.1844\/2009\n           Bheru Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics\n\n\n    DATE OF ORDER            :     10th December 2009\n\n          HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI\n\n    Mr.Farzand Ali,for the petitioner.\n    Mr.N.K.Rai, Special Public Prosecutor.\n                                    ....\n\n    BY THE COURT<\/pre>\n<p>          The petitioner is accused of offences under Sections<\/p>\n<p>    8\/18, 29 of the NDPS Act and seeks bail under Section 439<\/p>\n<p>    Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously<\/p>\n<p>    argued on the bail plea with the submissions that the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>    has been sought to be implicated in the present case merely<\/p>\n<p>    on the basis of the statement as purportedly made by him on<\/p>\n<p>    05.03.2009 under Section 67 of the NDPS Act but the value,<\/p>\n<p>    worth, and relevance of such a statement remains seriously<\/p>\n<p>    questionable because the contraband in question was<\/p>\n<p>    recovered on 25.12.2008; and from the pieces of evidence<\/p>\n<p>    collected during the investigation until 05.03.2009, the<\/p>\n<p>    investigating agency had already categorised the petitioner as<\/p>\n<p>    an accused in this matter. The learned counsel contended<\/p>\n<p>    that for the petitioner&#8217;s placement as an accused in this case,<\/p>\n<p>    the statement as purportedly given by him on 05.03.2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cannot be treated to be an information given under, and for<\/p>\n<p>the purpose of, Section 67 of the NDPS Act;        and such a<\/p>\n<p>statement would be directly hit by Section 24 of the Evidence<\/p>\n<p>Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The learned counsel yet further contended that the<\/p>\n<p>alleged statement cannot be said to have been made<\/p>\n<p>voluntarily and even by way of specific retraction application<\/p>\n<p>as made before the learned Special Judge, NDPS Cases,<\/p>\n<p>Chittorgarh on 19.03.2009, the petitioner has clarified that it<\/p>\n<p>were not a voluntary statement and that his signatures were<\/p>\n<p>obtained in the name of the alleged arrest memo.<\/p>\n<p>       The learned counsel further submitted that there is not<\/p>\n<p>even an iota of corroborative evidence on the record         to<\/p>\n<p>sustain the accusation against the petitioner of the offence<\/p>\n<p>under the NDPS Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The learned counsel yet further pointed out that the co-<\/p>\n<p>accused persons Basant Sualka and Shanker, who were in<\/p>\n<p>one way or the other found in the vehicle carrying the<\/p>\n<p>contraband, have been ordered to be enlarged on bail by this<\/p>\n<p>Court while allowing their respective Bail Applications<\/p>\n<p>Nos.3539\/2009 and 5541\/2009 on 05.10.2009 and on<\/p>\n<p>01.12.2009.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      The learned counsel further contended that the<\/p>\n<p>allegations against the petitioner cannot be taken to be leading<\/p>\n<p>to the offence under Section 29 of the NDPS Act; and when<\/p>\n<p>the suggestions are, are the most, of some irregular dealing<\/p>\n<p>or some embezzlement of the opium produced, in the totality<\/p>\n<p>of the facts and circumstances, the petitioner deserves to be<\/p>\n<p>enlarged on bail.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Having    given   a   thoughtful   consideration   to   the<\/p>\n<p>submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>and having examined the relevant papers, at this stage of the<\/p>\n<p>proceedings, this Court does not feel persuaded to grant<\/p>\n<p>indulgence to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Prima facie evidence has been suggested in this case<\/p>\n<p>that out of the total 9.700 kilograms of opium involved in the<\/p>\n<p>crime, 4.700 kilograms of opium was sold by the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>True it is that the contraband in question was recovered on<\/p>\n<p>25.12.2008 and the statement of the petitioner came to be<\/p>\n<p>recorded on 05.03.2009 but then, for this reason alone, the<\/p>\n<p>entire of the statement cannot be discarded at this stage. It is<\/p>\n<p>noticed, inter alia, from the questions and the answers as<\/p>\n<p>occurring in the said statement that previously, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>was served with the notice under Section 67 of the NDPS Act<\/p>\n<p>on 14.01.2009 and was called upon to appear on 23.01.2009<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>but he did not, allegedly on the ground of some unspecified<\/p>\n<p>ailment; then, he was given another notice on 28.01.2009 and<\/p>\n<p>was called upon to appear on 14.02.2009 but, again, he did<\/p>\n<p>not and in that regard, merely expressed want of knowledge.<\/p>\n<p>In the given background, the suggestions as made by the<\/p>\n<p>learned counsel that the petitioner had already been<\/p>\n<p>categorised or assumed to be an accused before recording of<\/p>\n<p>his statement, cannot be accepted at this stage.<\/p>\n<p>      The value and worth of the statement said to have been<\/p>\n<p>made by the petitioner on 05.03.2009, his alleged retraction<\/p>\n<p>dated 19.03.2009, and the other requirements              of legal<\/p>\n<p>evidence would definitely be the matters to be considered by<\/p>\n<p>the learned Trial Court at the relevant stage but then, looking<\/p>\n<p>to the nature of the crime concerned and the role assigned to<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, from whom the contraband emanated, this Court<\/p>\n<p>does not find it a fit case to enlarge him on bail at this stage.<\/p>\n<p>      So far the aspect of grant of bail to the co-accused<\/p>\n<p>Basant Suwalla      is concerned, it is noticed from the order<\/p>\n<p>dated 05.10.2009 that the submissions on behalf of the said<\/p>\n<p>petitioner were taken into consideration by the Court that he<\/p>\n<p>was merely driving the vehicle wherein opium was being<\/p>\n<p>carried by Radhey Shyam and Banwari Lal who had hired the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle; and that he did not permit the co-accused to hire the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                           5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>         vehicle with the knowledge that the same was to be used for<\/p>\n<p>         carrying opium.\n<\/p>\n<p>               So far the other accused Shanker is concerned, the<\/p>\n<p>         submissions were noticed in the order dated 01.12.2009 that<\/p>\n<p>         the opium was recovered from Radhey Shyam and Banwari<\/p>\n<p>         Lal, that the purchaser of the opium had been Khinya Ram,<\/p>\n<p>         and Commission Agent had been Kishan; and that the said<\/p>\n<p>         accused Shanker was allegedly present at the time the deal<\/p>\n<p>         was struck between Khinya Ram and Kishan without direct<\/p>\n<p>         involvement in the transaction. The Court also considered the<\/p>\n<p>         position that the said accused Shanker was neither the<\/p>\n<p>         purchaser nor the seller of the opium.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Obviously, for the different roles as assigned to the said<\/p>\n<p>         accused persons, the bail orders in their relation do not enure<\/p>\n<p>         to the benefit of the present petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>               Accordingly, the bail application moved on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>         petitioner Bheru Lal s\/o Chamna Lal         under Section 439<\/p>\n<p>         Cr.P.C. stands rejected.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                          (DINESH MAHESHWARI),J.\n<\/p>\n<p>s.soni\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rajasthan High Court &#8211; Jodhpur Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 1 1 S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO.1844\/2009 Bheru Lal Vs. Central Bureau of Narcotics DATE OF ORDER : 10th December 2009 HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI Mr.Farzand Ali,for the petitioner. Mr.N.K.Rai, Special Public Prosecutor. &#8230;. BY THE COURT The petitioner is accused of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90848","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":940,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009"},"wordCount":940,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009","name":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-04T11:25:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheru-lal-vs-c-b-n-on-10-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bheru Lal vs C.B.N on 10 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90848","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90848"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90848\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90848"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90848"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90848"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}