{"id":90858,"date":"2010-11-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2"},"modified":"2015-10-03T01:10:50","modified_gmt":"2015-10-02T19:40:50","slug":"sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
VII 1 VVV\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED was THE 4*\" DAY OF NOVEMBER,\nBEFORE E  %  \n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE MOHAN sHAn:TA:a.zA\u00e9QQbAg'    \n\nwan PETITION Nos.33?71-33?72 \"   * E E 7\n\n3432o~34332\/E2910 (ewes)  \n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1. Hemachandra\n\nS\/0 late Ramu . \nAged abouts59 yevarsv\u00bb . if\nR\/a House'N_O_;--1G  __ :\nArmstror*;.g F?f6a_d . I  _V\nRicha\ufb01ds _T\"ow'h'--~.. ,   '\n\nB:;E1_ng.;2|0tfe'435}'5,\"\"E    '\n\n2. B.H.~R4ames\"n ' A' V *1\nS\/0 fate H'anVu'Vmai_ah\"'\n__iAgE.d abo\"u-t._V53 years\n- 'R\/,a,House N0;'44\"\n :'E'_c.rc5ss, 2'\" Stage\n_ \"\"R.a'mm-\"Layout, Vijayanagar\n ..1V%sa'::Ag'_a:_or\u00a2--'05. ..Petitioners\n\n(By Ski: Gykakesh Raj for V.Y. Kumar, Advs.,)\n\n ~ AND \n\n   The State of Karnataka\n\nRep by its Secretary\n\n\n\nDepartment of Revenue\nVidhana Soudha\nBangalore.\n\n2. The Inspector General of\nRegistration and Commissioner of\nStamps, Government of Karnataka \nBangalore. 1\n\n3. The Sub--Registrar  _\nOffice of the Sub~Registrar  \nKanakapura  \nKanakapura Taluk  _ _. _    \nRamanagara District,   _    ..Respondeni:s\n\n(By Sri 5.3. Shahapur, AoAr.,,)  \n\nThese writ'p1e;t1tioI:i,s fi.I\u20ac(\u00a7'l:iI1('1.C.I;'}\\1'tiC1\u20acS 226 and\n227 of the __CGnS\u20acit_1J\u00a7ti0n' __of._India,v praying to quash the\nnotification 1:1atec'i_.12.'2..2'O'Q'\u20ac3. is--s11ec\u00a3:, by the 2nd respondent<\/pre>\n
vide Anne2;nre=.-AL’ ‘\u00ab1.;__ _ .,<\/p>\n
Tiiese “c:o’In_i11g-‘ on for preliminary hearing,
\nthis day the Court made’ tk_1e’ \u00bbfoi~1oWing:–<\/p>\n
‘=\\OkDER<\/p>\n
 C,iiilbost-iiticmgrsitAvhavve sought for quashing the<\/p>\n
iii’noti\ufb01\u00a2ar,i’c\u00abiririigiaiitied 12.2.2008 issued by the 2″”<\/p>\n
  resAp*ond,ent,i’.E~VnAi so far as it fixes the guidance market<\/p>\n
“”‘4″w:\u00a71a.lLVr,e ir\ufb01respect of the schedule lands situated in<\/p>\n
, ‘sy;m7;1 (Sy.Nos.1\/30, 1\/31, 1\/32, 1\/33, 1\/34, 1\/35,<\/p>\n
in<\/p>\n
13,
\n1\/36, 1\/39, 1\/40, 1\/42, 1\/43, 1\/44, 1\/46, 1\/47 and<\/p>\n
1\/P2), Gullattikaval Village, Harohalli Hiobgli,<\/p>\n
Ka nakapura Talu k, Rama naga r Dist’r”i*ct’  <\/p>\n
?14,4,00,000\/~ per acre. They have a|so~V-so\u00a7igh’t,::for ”  <\/p>\n
direction to the third respondent to,reg’iste.r”‘th’eif-sairef<\/p>\n
deeds as per the guidance Vi\/aiue which warsiiinjvforce in <\/p>\n
the year 2005 at ?60,QOO\/~ p_ei:r:’a,cr’e_,g<\/p>\n
2. The records ire’\/e.a|’*.,ttij.a,t ‘4t’n!;_–‘.:’,’;i>etitioners have
\nentered into an .__agre’e’nie;r:t_:’thesyear 2005 to
\npurchaf3e%”‘ti’r’fvi,a “‘situa’ted A  No. 1 (Sy . Nos. 1\/30,
\n1\/31, 1\/32,.1%\/’3\u00a7;f1%\/34,,,%’i1.\/35, 1\/36, 1\/39, 1\/40, 1\/42,<\/p>\n
1\/43,1\/44,\/111.\/451,111\/47i”and 1\/P2), totally measuring<\/p>\n
  Gulvl\u00e9ttikaval Village, Harohalli Hobii,<\/p>\n
 Ramanagara District, for a<\/p>\n
 _ cons’%..de:jationA of ?60,000\/- per acre with the land<\/p>\n
.Vov~.:ncers.V””..Those lands are belonging to the Scheduled<\/p>\n
Caste’: persons inasmuch as they are grantees of the<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
lands. Thus, the petitioners are the purchasers o_f.__the<\/p>\n
lands in question, from the grantees. The <\/p>\n
fiied an application before the competentfijaujtholrityiff if<\/p>\n
seeking permission to alienate f5cihe’dii_le\u00ab, landisignvvlthe <\/p>\n
year 2006. The said permbission14’=.’t’ii_tii’i–atti-kaval Village, Harohalli<\/p>\n
Hobli, Kan’ai_<4apvura_ ?14,40,000\/- per acre.<\/p>\n
_..,.$ince\u00ab.\u00a7.,;hve'~ petitio'*nefS_,.are required to pay the stamp<\/p>\n
V'<duty"'and_reg.istration charges based on the present<\/p>\n
guicla'nCeV.n.iaj_rl'.;'et value, they have approached this<\/p>\n
 Court forlseeking aforementioned reliefs.<\/p>\n
(M<\/p>\n
3. This Court does not find any ground to quash<\/p>\n
the notification dated 12.2.2008 issued by the.\u00abjse:c<okn–d'<\/p>\n
respondent declaring guidance marketf:'*va.i.geg:*i.,iin'? '<\/p>\n
respect of various properties, incl"uding\ufb02thep'topVevr.t'iies-,<\/p>\n
in question situated in Gu||Vattika'v_a:i–.V_\\A.\/iIlagei"Haro\u00abha.l.li'~.<\/p>\n
Hobli, Kanakapura Taluk, Ra'm\ufb01anagar'*ijistri.=ct';'1._4'l3'y'the 2<\/p>\n
said notification, the:_sieco_jid';_re's_p.on.c|ent'VhAasv merely
\nfixed the guidance  value is
\nnot actuai   The actual
\nmarketv_yavlue.V":i'ifia\\(   guidance value or
\nless  The guidance value is<\/p>\n
notified onlyfotieth"e%oujtierice of the public and officers<\/p>\n
 conc-i3rn__ed, The_rn__ari<et value of the properties to be<\/p>\n
'r'eVg'is.tAer_ed have to be arrived at as per the<\/p>\n
proviisiooo ofisections 45-A and Section 68 of the<\/p>\n
"i..,Stamp_'Atct and the provisions of the Karnataka Stamp<\/p>\n
"'liV'_(Pr_ev:ention of Under valuation of Instruments) Rules,<\/p>\n
,gggWlg77'<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
4. As could be seen from the impugned<\/p>\n
notification itself, it is clear that the said notification is<\/p>\n
issued under the provisions of Section 45–HBTof:.f”yth”e_,<\/p>\n
Karnataka Stamp Act, r\/w.Ruie 7(3) of  ”<\/p>\n
Stamp (Constitution of Centrai,”\\7a’i’uation<\/p>\n
for Estimation Pubiication.andit’Re’t<i.sion.y'..".of"<\/p>\n
Value Guidelines of Properties\u00bb),_  ihe
\naforementioned provisioins  concerned, to
\nrevise the guidance Fnarket Viiytfhefproperties in
\nany area,     the first prayer<\/p>\n
fails and s.am\u00e9-'is*ii\u00e9jeyc'tied~;_ ' f<\/p>\n
5, -in:V'vres–.oect of the second prayer, the<\/p>\n
"V"r–ipetiti5on;grs~..are not""e'ntit|ed to any relief. The stamp<\/p>\n
to be paid as on the date of the<\/p>\n
regi–s_travtion':\\..~oVf the sale deed. Mereiy because the<\/p>\n
R""'–..V:'agreemvent of sale is entered into between them prior<\/p>\n
 i._"to'f~ivAe years from the date of the presentation of the<\/p>\n
P'<\/p>\n
document for registration, the guidance market value<\/p>\n
as prescribed on the date of the agreement"fof':.f"sa'ie<\/p>\n
cannot be the basis for arriving at a  <\/p>\n
The market value has to be dete'r'mine_d–.<\/p>\n
situation as on the date ofVr.e_gistra.tion. V<\/p>\n
According to the  'State
\nGovernment without any  toovkwfiive Years
\nfor granting permissionto._thV_e:  alienate the<\/p>\n
property _:t'he"'wp'e'ti'tioner should not
\nbe sadvd'leVd""with   olipvayment of more stamp
\nduty. flee  cannot be accepted. The<\/p>\n
concerned 'uauvtho.rity"-  have to verify and pass<\/p>\n
borders;"Eon'%"~\u00abi_merits and in accordance with law.<\/p>\n
Ai'The'r_efo're',.v,iV_thetime spent before the Government of<\/p>\n
 Karn"ata.l:<\/p>\n
the market value of the properties has to be<\/p>\n
determined as on the date of presentation <\/p>\n
document for registration, the second pra’y.er.jaVIso”% <\/p>\n
cannot be granted.\n<\/p>\n
Hence, writ petitions fai.l_v”‘a..nd a’cc:ord_iVngiifisamei<\/p>\n
a re dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar VII 1 VVV IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED was THE 4*” DAY OF NOVEMBER, BEFORE E % THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE MOHAN sHAn:TA:a.zA\u00e9QQbAg’ wan PETITION Nos.33?71-33?72 ” * E E 7 3432o~34332\/E2910 (ewes) BETWEEN : […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-90858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":829,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\",\"name\":\"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2"},"wordCount":829,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2","name":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-02T19:40:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-hemachandra-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-november-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Hemachandra vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90858\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}