{"id":9102,"date":"2010-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010"},"modified":"2018-06-15T07:04:59","modified_gmt":"2018-06-15T01:34:59","slug":"mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                           Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                     CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000060\n                                                                                        Dated\u00a0July\u00a028,\u00a02010\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                              :   Shri\u00a0\u00a0S.\u00a0Karndikar\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                       :   NC\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Jhansi\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a017.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0NC\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0issuing\u00a0his\u00a0revised\u00a0PPO\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0releasing\u00a0his\u00a0settlement\u00a0dues.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0he\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        sought\u00a0(i)\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0CDRG\/leave\u00a0salary\u00a0and\u00a040%\u00a0arrears\u00a0which\u00a0 \u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        time\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0take\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0new\u00a0PPO.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Addl\u00a0Rly.\u00a0Manager\u00adcum\u00adPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.8.09\u00a0stating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a01\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0and\u00a0giving\u00a0the\u00a0various\u00a0payments\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0passed.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DFM\u00a0office,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0is\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        PPO.\u00a0\u00a0To\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0dated\u00a08.9.09,\u00a0the\u00a0Div.\u00a0Rly.\u00a0Manager\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a05.10.09\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0informing\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0retired\u00a0employees\u00a0containing\u00a01608\u00a0names\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Finance\u00a0Manager,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0for\u00a0processing\u00a0their\u00a0settlement\u00a0dues\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0revised\u00a0PPOs.\u00a0Not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0 \u00a0complaint\u00a0on\u00a017.11.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0seeking\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a02.     The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0July\u00a028,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        2010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.      Shri\u00a0Sandeep\u00a0Trivedi,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0K.P.\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0AA\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.      The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0payments\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0processed\u00a0as\u00a0explained\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        and\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0revised\u00a0PPO\u00a0too\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0on\u00a09.12.09.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Commission\u00a0while\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0grievances\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0redressed\u00a0closes\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        case\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0end.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0S.\u00a0Karandikar<br \/>\n         Shiv\u00a0Building<br \/>\n         55\/7,\u00a0Hingan\u00a0Katra<br \/>\n         Jhansi<br \/>\n                                 \u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n         North\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         DRM&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Jhansi\u00a0Division<br \/>\n         Jhansi<\/p>\n<p>3.       Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/C\/2010\/000060 Dated\u00a0July\u00a028,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0\u00a0S.\u00a0Karndikar Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : NC\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Jhansi Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a017.8.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0NC\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0\u00a0seeking\u00a0 reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0issuing\u00a0his\u00a0revised\u00a0PPO\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0releasing\u00a0his\u00a0settlement\u00a0dues.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0regard\u00a0he\u00a0 sought\u00a0(i)\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0CDRG\/leave\u00a0salary\u00a0and\u00a040%\u00a0arrears\u00a0which\u00a0 \u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0 time\u00a0it\u00a0would\u00a0take\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0new\u00a0PPO.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Addl\u00a0Rly.\u00a0Manager\u00adcum\u00adPIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a025.8.09\u00a0stating\u00a0 that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0against\u00a0point\u00a01\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0and\u00a0giving\u00a0the\u00a0various\u00a0payments\u00a0 that\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0passed.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.\u00a0DFM\u00a0office,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0is\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0the\u00a0 PPO.\u00a0\u00a0To\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0dated\u00a08.9.09,\u00a0the\u00a0Div.\u00a0Rly.\u00a0Manager\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a05.10.09\u00a0once\u00a0again\u00a0informing\u00a0 the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0list\u00a0of\u00a0retired\u00a0employees\u00a0containing\u00a01608\u00a0names\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Addl.\u00a0 Finance\u00a0Manager,\u00a0Jhansi\u00a0for\u00a0processing\u00a0their\u00a0settlement\u00a0dues\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0issuing\u00a0revised\u00a0PPOs.\u00a0Not\u00a0 satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0 \u00a0complaint\u00a0on\u00a017.11.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0seeking\u00a0 information\u00a0once\u00a0again.\u00a0 \u00a02. The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0July\u00a028,\u00a0 2010.\u00a0\u00a0 3. Shri\u00a0Sandeep\u00a0Trivedi,\u00a0PIO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0K.P.\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0AA\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority.\u00a0 4. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Decision 5. The\u00a0Respondent\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0payments\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0processed\u00a0as\u00a0explained\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0reply\u00a0 and\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0made\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0revised\u00a0PPO\u00a0too\u00a0was\u00a0issued\u00a0on\u00a09.12.09.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0 Commission\u00a0while\u00a0holding\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0grievances\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Complainant\u00a0have\u00a0been\u00a0redressed\u00a0closes\u00a0the\u00a0 case\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0end. \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit) Information\u00a0Commissioner Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0 (G.Subramanian) [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":306,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010"},"wordCount":306,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010","name":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-15T01:34:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-karandikar-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-28-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.S Karandikar vs Ministry Of Railways on 28 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9102"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9102\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}