{"id":91225,"date":"2010-05-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-21T08:31:34","modified_gmt":"2017-11-21T03:01:34","slug":"mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                    CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000258 dated 13.3.2009\n                  Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\n\nAppellant        -       Shri Rajendra Singh\nRespondent           -   Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)\n                           Decision announced: 13.5.2010\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n<p>:\n<\/p>\n<p>         In our decision of 27.11.08 in File No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00916, we had<br \/>\ndirected as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;Because the 1st appellate authority has not addressed the<br \/>\n         questions of appellant, which are of direct concern to his public<br \/>\n         authority and because appellant has pleaded no ground for making<br \/>\n         a direct complaint to us u\/s 18, or apprehension of malafide on the<br \/>\n         part of the Department, the Commission has decided to remand<br \/>\n         this appeal to Shri A.K. Singh, DIG, CBI\/RO, 1st appellate authority,<br \/>\n         at 2 Booty Road, Ranchi-834 008 who is directed to dispose of the<br \/>\n         appeal, together with action on non-compliance with his orders, if<br \/>\n         any found by him, within 15 working days from the date of receipt of<br \/>\n         this decision, under intimation to Shri PK Shreyaskar, Jt Registrar,<br \/>\n         Central Information Commission. If not satisfied with the information<br \/>\n         so provided, appellant Shri Rajendra Singh will be free to move a<br \/>\n         fresh 2nd appeal before us as per Sec 19 (3). This Appeal now<br \/>\n         stands disposed of accordingly.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>         Subsequently, we have received a fresh appeal from Shri Rajendra Singh<br \/>\nof Vasant Kunj, New Delhi with the following prayer:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>         &#8220;16.1 To direct Shri R. N. Azad the then CPIO \/ SP to furnish<br \/>\n               true information.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         16.2         To impose penalty for furnishing false<br \/>\n               information.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         16.3         To recommend for disciplinary action under the<br \/>\n               service rules applicable to him.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         16.4         To pass any other order\/s as the Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\n               Commission may deem fit and proper.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>         The grounds for this appeal are as below:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            1<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;10.    That Shri R. N. Azad vide his reply to the decision dated<br \/>\n              8.4.2007 of FAA has furnished copy of extracts of note sheet<br \/>\n              file of crime file in case of RC 6(A)\/2003(DHN). The copy of<br \/>\n              extracts of note sheet file of crime file in case of RC<br \/>\n              6(A)\/2003(DHN) are enclosed as Annexure 7\/Cooly.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>11.           That the extracts of note sheet file of crime file in case of<br \/>\nRC6A)\/2003(DHN) do not reflect reference of complaints dated 27.6.03<br \/>\nand 2.7.03.\n<\/p>\n<p>12.           That I submit that Shri R. N. Azad has furnished false<br \/>\ninformation to shield the officers, who fabricated false evidence against<br \/>\nthe accused \/ persons.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.           That I moved 2nd appeal on 16.7.2007 before the Hon&#8217;ble<br \/>\nCommission. The copy of 2nd appeal is enclosed as Annexure 8\/Colly.\n<\/p>\n<p>14.           That the hearing was held on 27.11.2008. The copy of<br \/>\nnotice of CIC&#8217;s decision is enclosed as Annexure 9.\n<\/p>\n<p>15.           That the copy of notice of CIC&#8217;s decision dated 29.10.2008<br \/>\nagainst Shri R. N. Azad is also enclosed as Annexure 10\/Colly.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>      The appeal was heard on 13.5.2010. The following are present:<\/p>\n<p>      Appellant<br \/>\n            Shri Rajendra Singh<br \/>\n      Respondents<br \/>\n            Shri V. P. Arya, SP, CBI \/ CPIO<\/p>\n<p>      We have received a FAX from Jt. Director, CBI, Patna seeking leave of<br \/>\nabsence, as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;SP, CBI, ACB Dhanbad (CPI)) has been nominated to represent<br \/>\n      the first Appellate Authority i.e. Joint Director, CBI, Patna Zone,<br \/>\n      Patna, during the hearing fixed on 13.5.2010 in the above<br \/>\n      mentioned matter.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      Appellant Shri Rajendra Singh presented a copy of the order in first appeal<br \/>\nof DIG, CBI, ACR, Ranchi. In this decision, while directing compliance, appellate<br \/>\nauthority DIG has observed as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>      &#8220;Further with regard to Query No. 18, Appellant states that<br \/>\n      information furnished by CPIO is false but basis of declaring such<br \/>\n      information as false has not been offered by him. CPIO states that<br \/>\n      whatever documents were available in the concerned file have<br \/>\n      been provided to the Appellant.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        In compliance with this order, CPIO Shri V. P. Arya, SP, CBI, ACB<br \/>\nDhanbad has written to appellant Shri Rajendra Singh on 23.12.08 inviting him<br \/>\nas follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;You are further requested to please visit this office to inspect the<br \/>\n       concerned file of which copies of 9 pages have already been<br \/>\n       supplied with regard to Query No. 18. All due and possible<br \/>\n       assistance will be extended to you for inspection of the same.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       The documents sought with regard to queries No. 9 &amp; 10 of the original<br \/>\napplication of Shri Rajendra Singh have along with this letter been supplied to<br \/>\nappellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Query No. 18 of Shri Rajendra Singh&#8217;s original application reads as<br \/>\nfollows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;18.   Copy of the extracts of relevant portion of file notings<br \/>\n              wherein my complaint dated 27.6.2003 and 2.7.2003<br \/>\n              regarding fabricating of the official records in case RC<br \/>\n              6(A)\/2003\/(D) were dealt with.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       Appellant Shri Rajendra Singh explained that why he has stated that<br \/>\ninformation thus supplied is fabricated is because in the file of case RC No.<br \/>\n6(1)\/2003(D), these complaints have not been addressed. The notings on these<br \/>\ncomplaints are in separate files and he wishes to have copies of those notings.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In response to this Shri Arya submitted that whereas he has offered file<br \/>\ninspection to Shri Rajendra Singh in Dhanbad, appellant Shri Rajendra Singh has<br \/>\nnot visited the Office thus far.   In a specific reply to Shri Rajendra Singh&#8217;s<br \/>\ncontention regarding the files that he wishes to see, Shri Arya invited him to<br \/>\nspecify which files exactly he wished to see and if these were in his possession,<br \/>\nthey would be offered for inspection.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3<\/span><br \/>\n        Appellant Shri Rajendra Singh is now advised to visit Dhanbad so as to<br \/>\nobtain the information he seeks after inspection. It is, however, clarified that if<br \/>\nthe public authority does not hold the information &#8211; and appellant Shri Rajendra<br \/>\nSingh has implied that documents he seeks have been destroyed &#8211; these cannot<br \/>\nbe now supplied by respondents. However, if established that these documents<br \/>\ndid exist and have been unauthorizedly destroyed, this can form ground for<br \/>\ncriminal petition on the part of appellant Shri Rajendra Singh. The RTI Act itself<br \/>\nindeed allows u\/s 20 (1) for penalty for information, which is the subject of a<br \/>\nrequest, having been destroyed. This, however, can only be established once<br \/>\nthe relevant files are asked for and inspected.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The appeal is, therefore, allowed with regard to question No. 18, as<br \/>\noffered by CPIO Shri V. P. Arya. However, to ensure compliance appellant Shri<br \/>\nRajendra Singh is advised to visit Dhanbad not later than one month from the<br \/>\ndate of receipt of this decision notice so as to conclude this matter. The appeal<br \/>\nis disposed of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Announced in the hearing. Notice of this decision be given free of cost to<br \/>\nthe parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n13.5.2010<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges, prescribed under the Act, to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n13.5.2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                         4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000258 dated 13.3.2009 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant &#8211; Shri Rajendra Singh Respondent &#8211; Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Decision announced: 13.5.2010 Facts : In our decision of 27.11.08 in File No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2007\/00916, we had [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-91225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1059,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010"},"wordCount":1059,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010","name":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-21T03:01:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-rajendra-singh-vs-cbi-on-13-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Rajendra Singh vs Cbi on 13 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91225"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91225\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}