{"id":91339,"date":"2010-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2"},"modified":"2015-01-23T23:53:18","modified_gmt":"2015-01-23T18:23:18","slug":"the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","title":{"rendered":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
L\n\nEN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 307\"\" DAY OF' NOVEMBER 2010-=.__\n\nBELI5-'ORE\n\nTHE HONBLI33 MRJUSTICE LNARAYANA    *\n\nMFA No.86o2\/20084\" V; & \n\ngm\nM.F.A. No.958\u00e9\/2008\" ~\n\nIN MFA N0.8602\/2008\nBETWEEN:\n\nmy: NATIONAL INSURANCE CQ'.\"'1;*\u00a3*L3{;\n\nHARIRAM s1TE_,%_2A'1ARAKAsAA\u00ab1.,ROAD,\"  \nTNAGAR, cHVENN\"AI\u00ab,..f5.  \" \nNOW REPRES.EN'I'ED 5\u00a5::<I'S'AA  "\nREGIONAL MANAGE:R,_  '   \n\nNEW INDIA ASS'U;RAJ\\ICE'VCOM'PANY LI'D..\nREGIONAL OFFICE, . .  \n\n2MB, UNITY _ BUILDING, ANNEXE.\nP.KAI,INGA..?--RAO~ ROAD, "  A .\n\u00a7sAN'GA1J@RE\u00bb.5e0 O27.  """   APPELLANT\n\n{BYsR;AN;K1=:1SHNA:sWAMY, ADV.)\n\n "  AND:\n\n GIRISH,' A\n\u00ab \u00ab .. j j .- A . _s,'x-.0 ':mAN1Y_APPA.,\n_  NO *AGED'ABoU'r 27 YEARS.\n"  1::\/A. .KE}K_KUE)AKAT.I.'E.\n\nSAJIPA MOODA VILLX-\\(}E.\n\n'   BAN'f\u00a7'sVAL TALUK.\n\n'V ' -. '*\u20ac:.:;.'i\u00a7I~:EPA.\n\n,I'5"-~\n\n\n\nRC3\n\nIONDE.NI'S\n\n{BY SR1 G.RAVISHANKAR'SHASTi\"RY'FOR C\/R1 V\n\nNOT'ICE R2 & R3 IS DIS.r>.I:I\\ISED WITH. ''\n\nSMT I~I.R.RENUKA_. 4.ADV.;1jF_QR~.R4} \n\nTHIS APPEAL IS'.VI9ILI2.D\"I.I\u00a7;ID_I\u00ab;R\n\n-'SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT\n\nAGAINST 'mE1IUDOMEN'I,'AND. .AV'.fA}\u00a7.D DATED 24\/5\/2008 PASSED IN\nMVC No.I737\/2Qo5..OI\\I'-.THI3 Ij\u00ab'IL..13 OF THE II ADDL. DIST. JUDGE,\n\nMEMBER. MACT--lH--..D.K., .MA\u00a3:!GAL~ORE.\n\nAWARDING A COMPENSATION\n\nOF RS.5,28..G24\/-- W1'1'H 1I\\ITER'ES'I' @ 6% RA. ON RS.5,13.624\/V FROM\n'I':~IE DATE  V P;::TI'I'1ON \"'-I.'!L__I_f__R;\u00a5.3ALISA'I'ION.\n\nIN ~m\u00ab'.A' N.,()_.95OA83\/2\u00a7)08_\nBETWEEN: ' O' ' \" '\n\n V-.._}\\\/iR.(}iRiSH';O - ._ \n S \/O '[\"HAN'EYfXI?PA..V \n'\u00bb._NO'\u00bb;>V AGED AI3'OU'I' 27 YEARS.\n\" ~  I{UKKUDA1EA':vIOODA VILLAGE.\n -.I3AN'.I*'wAI_, ' IIIK.\n*,_ D . I\u00a7;~I31;3TI21C'I' PINS742 I 9.\n\nC{  (9 R3 \"('3 . R.\/AVIS}--1 AN K AR  HASTR Y. AE)\\f.}\n\nF\n\n'K\n\n. . .APPELLANT\n\n\n\nAND:\n\n1.\n\nOJ\n\nIILDEEPA.\n\nFATI-IERS NAME NOT KNOVVN.\nNOVV AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS.\nR\/A KRISHNA NILAYA.\n\n20}, 153\"' FLOOR. 68 CROSS,\n\n51%-'H BLOCK,  ..\n\nRAJAJ I NAGAR.\nBANGALO RE.\n\nHARIRAIVI SITE OFFICE,\n2A PRAKASAM ROAD.\nTNAGAR. CHENNAI.\n\n. DAVID DSOUZA.\n\nS\/O CHARLES DSOUZA. . *\nNOW AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS--.~~. .  '\nR\/A BOGODI HOUSE,  I \nPANEMANGALORF. , \" '\n\nBANTWAL TQ..;  \"\n\n. BAJAJ AL1,:ANCE.~gD1C'1i;;\u00a7D.*;~.t  I I\n\nNO. 107. I FLOOR\". '\u20acj_.HRI'f\u20ac{i'A\u00a7,' ARC. . \nBALIViA'I'1'A? . = -,   -. ' '\nMANGALORE. D.K.DI_S'fR1C\"1\";\u00bb \"  \n\n{BY SMT H.R.RENU';P1::,A1.AV IS. FILED UNDER SECTION 173m 0}? MV ACT\n AGAII1\\FS'I'~I'fI'HE?JUVDG.ME'NTAND AWARD DATED 24\/5\/2008 PASSED IN\n'  MVC N'0.]'?'37\/20{)'5_AUN THE FILE OF THE) 11 ADDL. DIST. JUDGE.\n NIF\u00a3MBER~.~..__MAC'i'-III; D.K.. IVEANGALORE, AWARDING A COMPENSATION\n 0I\u00ab'VRs.5,28.52'4\/- 'Wm-\u00bb1 INTERES1' @ 6% RA. ON Rs.5.13.\u20ac~24\/-- FROM\n~ fi'1*\u00ab{EV'DA'i'E or-i 1_7'1'233T1'i'IC)N TILL REALISATION.\n\n2'\n\nI\n1,\nI.\n\n. THE NATIONAI. INSURANCE CCMPANY..1.1D;';A. I\n\n...RESPONDENT S\n\n  \"   --.A'I'Ir\u00a7.I\u00a7A\u00e93I\u00a7 APPEALS ARE COMING ON FOR I\"-IEARING THIS DAY.\nI ' ._'i\"f'\u00abI.Eii CQUR'I' DEL VERED Tfiii FOI.I.()V\\fIE\\I(}i\n\n\n\n%\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
MFA No.8602\/2008 is filed by the appellant._:=i’r1snranee<\/p>\n
Company and MFA No.9586\/2008 is \ufb01led by’_t’he_:’:clai.rrian_f <\/p>\n
injured challenging the jtidgmeriti  <\/p>\n
24\/5\/2008 passed in MVC No.17:-3-“Z\/2OlC)AE3_lon t.11c:”lv’f3.i:e:4_ofi:l1eiIii’.<\/p>\n
Additional District Judge,   ljsakshina<\/p>\n
Kannada, Mangalore.\n<\/p>\n
2. By the  gjudgrdentiand._axr\u00a7%ard, the Tribunal
\nhas granted ~ with interest at
\n6% per  5  the date of petition till<\/p>\n
realisation.\n<\/p>\n
 he lea1’neld”e’ouVnse1 for the appellant M\u00bb Insurance<\/p>\n
Cori1_panjf  the Tribunal committed error in not<\/p>\n
V’Viaoticingathat  ‘accident occurred almost on the middle of<\/p>\n
“-\u00abl..fi,’tlae”‘roe1d anclthe rider of the motor cycle had plenty of space<\/p>\n
 tirw\u00e9zrtls his left side. He has failed to avoid the accident.<\/p>\n
in  these (‘iiI’CuI’1″lSl,a11CCS, finding on  No.1 with regard<\/p>\n
K’<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
to negligence on the part of the driver of the lorry is<\/p>\n
erroneous. The decisions of t.he Apex Court in the eas_e’s”of<\/p>\n
Miriu I-3.Mehta & Another V\/s Balakrishna <\/p>\n
Nayara & Another, reported in AIR 1:9″i”‘?*–SC  it<\/p>\n
Irisuranee Company Ltd, V\/ s vi\\\/ieeria  <\/p>\n
reported in 2007 (2) TAC 417 an’d_j’IV\u00a3L1nieip.a1  of<\/p>\n
Greater Bombay V \/ s Shri La2gInar1t’I’}’reiif’\u00a7<z\ufb01Piriother;"ere1dorted in
\n2004 (1) TAC 3(SC) are relevarzt   Considering<\/p>\n
issue No.1 with rega1"'dto ne_g1i;ge1ice..   V' V<\/p>\n
4. It the Tribunal was
\nrequired  contaents of Mahazar which
\nwould c1eariyindiCate–  is straight without curves
\nand either ..9i_des4″”the roadisthere exists Kaehha road t.o a
\nIiiivlkii[f{}u”{;I\u00a7:\u20ac}{:E.t31″1t,A.Of 5xfeet–*\u00aband that itself would clearly indicate<\/p>\n
tha-t. the ‘rx:i’o-i_or<:ye1e had 3 feet space towards left side<\/p>\n
  and no r'easoI1sf–are"assigned by the rider of the motor cycle to<\/p>\n
 explain  'eould not take the vehicie towards left hand<\/p>\n
._"side_before"oeCur1'eI1ee of the a(:eident:, and the damages<\/p>\n
if
\n'X<\/p>\n
caused to both the vehicles which would speak volume___with<\/p>\n
regard to contributory negligence on the part of the..ride.r'~~of<\/p>\n
the motor eycle. The right side bumper of   <\/p>\n
damaged and entire front portiongof \u00abthe   Ru<\/p>\n
damaged.\n<\/p>\n
5. It is further submitted  thellrfiatelrjiallivavailable
\non record was sufficient  to come to a
\nconclusion that ther_e-vihras   on the part.
\nof the rider of  that there exists
\nlimb dlSabi1l.\u00a7.y,Ql!’.f%:5;ii}3 ;,:_to’   The whole body
\ndisability ‘–   dividing particular limb<\/p>\n
disability by three.,It done, the whole body disability<\/p>\n
is-hould  l’fZ53’:=..__%1.\u00a51.d not 25 % as decided by the doctor<\/p>\n
and    Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n
6.3., It ‘1s,A\u00abi'”1irt.her submitted that, there is no material to<\/p>\n
 prtiye ,and’* substantiate reduction of income of the 181<\/p>\n
 resptiiident owing to injuries sustained in the accident.. What.<\/p>\n
is r’et;_11ired to be proved was that owing to injuries sustairied<\/p>\n
K\n<\/p>\n
3.
\nE
\n\\<\/p>\n
‘7
\nK
\nin the accident, the 15* respondent. being a businessman has<\/p>\n
lost his income out. of business. No such ai:t.enipt is madeaiid<\/p>\n
no such document is produced. Under these circ:um’Stari’cesA,<\/p>\n
assuming that. there is loss of earning capacity t,o–‘a_.11 extent  V’<\/p>\n
25% is erroneous. Hence, it. is sL1i)rriitt;ed’..tihat_:’tft_1e’totai3<\/p>\n
compensation “x”.2,75,000\/- towards <\/p>\n
required to reduced by 50%.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. The learned   submitted
\nthat as per the evidence  was not in a
\n“position to move    of 11\/2 year.\n<\/p>\n
However,  ‘that nature of injuries
\nsustained theu”i1j1jd1,:reVci_is.._not’}abie to do work atleast for a
\nperiod oi’5:,6r _rn_oi1ths’;–\u00bb .71fh_e:’efore, for six months period the<\/p>\n
injured”ioist:,1iis”iincome. The T 1’ib’t1r121I has rightly considered<\/p>\n
  at 25%. Hence, there is no iilegality<\/p>\n
__~–._c4oir1rnittecithe Tribunal. Hence, it is subrnitted to dismiss<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
\\,<\/p>\n
8. The claimant has also filed an a.ppea1__ for<\/p>\n
enhancement. of compensation and the wound eert.ific:ja’te_”3{I”id<\/p>\n
also by looking it photographs, the enlaaiicemerit’ ”
\ntowards pain and suffering is requiredto\u00abbe5_4en_hant;:ed.~.f};’hle.,
\neompensaiiion has not been awarded “towards food”<\/p>\n
nourishment and towards loss of”-income durlingxthe laid up V’<\/p>\n
period another ?.48,000\/ ~ ,is~.1jequired  ll:Vi’e..enhan’e*et’l’.l<\/p>\n
9. I have heard the’ the learned
\nCounsel for     Counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondents.\n<\/p>\n
10. CA)’1:1_the  of both the learned Counsels.
\nI have gone through”the;\u00a7\u00e91d\u00a7ment and award passed by the
\n  found  the appellant is not examined the<\/p>\n
driver  and further the charge sheet has not been<\/p>\n
 filed aga\u00e9.y1s\u20ac;_”t’l1el”‘driver of the lorry. Hence. the ground taken
\nH   appeil-ant — Insurance Company for contrary negligence<\/p>\n
   lri.e’reb\u00a7,,*A’rejected.\n<\/p>\n
 ” ~ .(:{;_~,,\u00a7\\s:x;_ “:\n<\/p>\n
‘1. 1. The \u20ac3V’iCl\u20acI’1(‘.\u20ac of the cloetor reveals that the
\ndisability to the right leg is 38% and to the whole body it is<\/p>\n
25%. lf that is divided by ‘3’ it Comes to 12.5%. That ineans<\/p>\n
the compensation is to be reduced by 50% is the <\/p>\n
of the insurance Company. But that eaiiriot–.b:eu_aeee.pted’  <\/p>\n
ttonsidernig the nature of the i11ju1\u00b0y:=__and.et}’1e:_irnp2ei;\u00bbthose.’<\/p>\n
injuries have on the (:laime111t…*T-he proved. i11.C’o:ne_V_of_V\u00a7thle <\/p>\n
petitioner as per l31x.P5’7\\ P58 and  is   and
\nthe multiplier applicable age is ’18. But<\/p>\n
multiplier 17 is adopted whi{7i’1’\u00bbisfe1n–error..”_The”a.nnuaI income<\/p>\n
of the petitioner”edinesilfefo  = $97. 248\/- out of
\nthe said income v1\/3Vl”\u00bb’._JlS\ufb01’C\u00a7\u00a7VCl”I.1.(if\u20acd towards his personal
\nexpenses the I’es_nlt..anti._figui’e::_l’.Wot11cl be 364,832\/~. Aetiially<\/p>\n
in.—fcpln  ease””\u00ab’oneM.vthird deduction is impressible.<\/p>\n
\u00a7 PG”‘i*’~ NM-Co-11siAd’e.ijir1;g t.l:1is.f\u00e9i\u00abnd the fact that only ?25,000\/- is awarded<\/p>\n
‘:3 “”5:Ej\u00bb’~’.?d’ the  “en’_m;m;ed by another $25,000\/M. In View of the
\n*3 ‘r”*~:\u00a2?i0~\u00a3,\u00bbz.i\u00bb…..\u00bb ‘ ‘ 1. <<\/p>\n
V'&"' C""""*3'E1b('s\\r(t. t.lie "–eo1'21"pensat.i()n towards disabilities would be
\n_.'\u00a73""!~_.-5_.;}’\u00ab.p_.4  *~ ”<\/p>\n
 _  ,  25\/100 X 18 W 12,91,744\/~. The same has been<\/p>\n
 “.4”..g1\\v.3’:’d\u20ac:’t”l it as 2Ii\u00a7f'(‘1lI’}Sl. ?’.2.:)E5.000\/– towards sustained<\/p>\n
H<\/p>\n
1,0
\npem1a1″1em’ disability. In respect of the compeusatioil awardeci
\nby the ‘I”‘ri’0m1a} on the 0t1’161′ heads remains affirmed.<\/p>\n
Acco1’di1’1g1y, the appeal of the ciaimant, stands partly 211}C$=i=*f\u00e9.d.<\/p>\n
Amount. in dtzposit: be TI”d11SI1’1iU’.\u20acd 1.0 MACT.__-‘Q. ‘<\/p>\n
 % %JUDGE7 fi<\/p>\n
Akb'”‘*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 Author: L.Narayana Swamy L EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 307″” DAY OF’ NOVEMBER 2010-=.__ BELI5-‘ORE THE HONBLI33 MRJUSTICE LNARAYANA * MFA No.86o2\/20084″ V; & gm M.F.A. No.958\u00e9\/2008″ ~ IN MFA N0.8602\/2008 BETWEEN: my: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-91339","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\\\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\"},\"wordCount\":1102,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\",\"name\":\"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\\\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\\\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2"},"wordCount":1102,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2","name":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-23T18:23:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-girish-so-thaniyappa-on-30-november-2010-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The National Insurance Co Ltd vs Girish S\/O Thaniyappa on 30 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91339","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91339"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91339\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91339"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91339"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91339"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}