{"id":92054,"date":"2009-02-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009"},"modified":"2018-10-07T01:38:39","modified_gmt":"2018-10-06T20:08:39","slug":"kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
---- oI\\-'o':|v\u00a2'I\u00a2Il'IlII'' :-\n\n--VII '-II-VIII,  -u-uuvrurunn rlnari hvunl Ur l\\\u00abRIIl'u\\\u00a7Hl\\.H I\"'lIl9l'I LUUKI Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF   \n\nIN 'THE HIGH CCKI\u00a5?I' OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE\n\nDATED ms TE-IE\u00bb mt DAY op' FEBRUARY 2009 \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE Mr. JUSTICE AJITJ    ii) A T   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nKaaturhai Kl:1acii  \" ~. \"\nGr%og Sahakari    \nHo.1186, 31* Cross, 43* T\ufb01lodi, _  2 V \nJayanagar, [Dpp.ESI Hospimi) *   A}   \nBangalore-560041. \"   i'  V\nRept By its Chief Pf01I10tei'\" ' V. 1: \" \nsnu.3.N.Lw1a.~   ' ' 4%  _....1=E'rrnoNER\n(Sri S.P.KL1l1~mriIi; Atiwfaej  \n\nAND:\n\n1. The Camm;3a%  t    \n  Authority,\n\n w  T.CIV_\u00a7iu*;xu;1_\u00e9\u00a7y'},fa, Raid? .... .. \u00ab\n\nKama West,\n\n  9\u00b09-\n\n_ By its  Secretaryl,\n','T.C1nt~.!da\u00e9yya Road,\n\n   West,\n\n    Fetrolasnun\n\n' \"C-oz'porm:ian LIu11' 'ted\n\nA %  No.17, 7m Flmr, D.U.\n\nPark Thrimti. M.G.Rt>ad,\n\n 560 \u20ac301. ...RE23POHDEI'i'TS\n\nWRIT PE'I'lTIO2*I xo.g935  gooJg\u00a7  'mi   Y . \n\n\n\n........:._  nu-u\\n1ruru'\\.l|'l nuars LUUKI Ur KAKNAIAISR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR'\n\n(Sri K.G.Ra.ghavan, Adv. for R3; SI11t.Bhagi1\"ath1' far\nK.N.Puttcgowda, Adva. far R1 and R2 J\n\nThis W.P7n \ufb02ied under Articles 226 and  V \" \nCom\ufb01m\ufb01on caf India praying to quash the order  1 \n6.11.2004 by RS' being arbitraqi, c1'rox;<3_*.<:;i1$,'   \ncontrary to law equity am justice virie\u00bb em_  \n\n'Th1's W.P csoznmg' on for p1'eI1'rI;:"'\u00abix:;g ;-3; h  \n\nGroup this day, the Ceurt made  ro11\u00a2wmg; \nonnnR\u00a7 % % \n\nThe petitioner Tm   year\n1959 undo::r tha   Act,\n1959. The   _13;.y  24.93.1963,\nallotted git\u00bb;   site in block\nHa.IV T',   \n\nsax 19-5*  South. Acc\u00abord1r1gIy' ,\n\n   'vifease deer! in favraur cf the\n\n   " d of 30 years. Pesswsian <:<:rtJ\ufb01' sate\n\n  favuur of the petitioner society on\n\n 1a.1e.%19\u00a7e;A%%Baz however, the claim of the pexzitimer is\n\n% A   m the demand made by the then cm,\n  Pronaoter, ciepoaited a sum of Rs.5,oooz- arad\n   an:::t11er sum of Rs.26,5%\/-- an\n 'y&' \u00a7\u00a71.o3.19m. After the acpiry cf \ufb02u: lease pcried, it\n\n\/'\n\n\/'\n\n\n\n---- ----,.-  -------mn r-vn --vu-u vr nnlmnlnnn rm.-n1 count OF KARNATAKA I-\u00a7iGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COU\ufb02\n\n .f;J.P.Ho.14034f 2005. The said writ petition was \ufb01kxd by\n\nappears the petitioner was in oorzrnwpondeme with the:\n\nState for the renewal of lease. It appears; a letter Wag\n\nalso add;-med to the then Chisasf  \n\nconaide-.ra15:u:nI1 of their request 531' rial of  'V 3  K  \n\nappears, the then Chief Mir\ufb01stcr    \n\nautlaorixiaea, namely the Com1n_'m\u00a7_ion;\u00e9r see  V'\n\ncould be rarxr.-mad. But   is\n\ufb02mt  trmtlspired  \nThe second respondant   dated\n05.11.2904, }\u00a7\u00a3kLas.wi\u00a7o.12 made in\nfauna: of thc    I968 oi: the\ngrmmd    already expired and\n\nfurtlmr th::"siL1\ufb01c-   not put ta the use: for\n\n'\ufb02ax .T1Breafter pumuant B: a\n  V   daat-sec'; 22.11.2004, the petitioner society\n\n to review the arcier dated\n\n  .  reccnaidcr its claim' for renawal of the\n\nBut however,  happened\n\n     . Harms, the petitioner quea\ufb01omad the am-dc:\n  the allotment by way :31' a writ petIt_1n' ' 11 in\n\n\n\nq 'r-1 \u00abrun:-1\n\n'""'" '-"'V'A' ',..  I\\l"|I\\I'.l"'|I.l'\\l\\l'l rllutrl MUUKI ur ISHKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF  HIGH \n\nthe Chief Pmmoter crf thc amiety. Tim Catmrt dcclinad\n\ntn ex1I3ertainthewritpeti1:krnu11thegro1n1d \npctition was not maintainable, irxaamuch as, " \n ' _. the aaciety was  VV 1 1 \nHqu\ufb02amr was appoizltad. This Coi\u00e9g iv\n\ngo into Inaariizs of the l1'.l\ufb0113tE.'\u00a3';\u00a7.-'i.'If_1.I:'1E3.1;.!V.1'.1_:'.'#f?i aJs,_.}9;e~.f}c:1:   .\n\nAnnexure-K was net liable    The\npetitioner' preferred a \nIt app-aa.r3, du\ufb01ng   arder\nappainting mg   '\u00e9.i""';1aught. The\nDivision    iimma \ufb01led by the\n  2 \ufb01grithdraw the writ apmal\n\nresae11m.'\u00a5' Lib-&~rl:y\u00ab  -  Ether remedy axra\ufb02 able to\n\nF 1;; \u00e9ppear\u00e9', the p:I:'es\u00a2.=:nt writ peti\ufb01cm is\n\n  relief. Indeed, in this writ petiticm,\n\n %       the cancellation of the Ewe\n\n     the poaamaion. Ancathm' relief\n\n  '  59:\u00bb by the petitioner is for quashing the\n   order dated 18.03.2005 made in favour of the\n ' D\u00bb  respondent and to re-allot the same to the<\/pre>\n
 p5\u00a5\ufb01ti0I)sE:1′.  ><\/p>\n
u-nu-1 In many-\n<\/p>\n
– -warn-ny__u  Is:-nnlirlll-‘Ru-| l1IlJl”I I-\\lUlII Elf’ BHKIVIIIHKR H59″ LUUKI OF       <\/p>\n
2. Mr.S.P.Ku1karni, kearned cnurusel appaa.ri11g fd1f<\/p>\n
the petitionexr submits that the impugned  ”
\ntha base deed and reallotmexlt of the  3
\nrwpondent was in violation of _ i_ <\/p>\n
 He further suhmijzs    V.\n<\/p>\n
itltxerrwum, i.e., between the  of
\nand the disposal of  to a
\nreaolu\ufb01an, thus Banwra.  has
\nallotted the sif\u00e9f:   respondent
\nNo.3. He  h\u00e9sf\ufb01re cancelling th\ufb01
\nbase    of the site, the<\/p>\n
petitiezmsezr  not  {he altcmate, he aubmita<\/p>\n
gm: t1;eree,peo\ufb01dm us be% dig-acmd to gum; the petitioner
\n   site far the Purpeae at’ running :3.
\n j  Sangha.\n<\/p>\n
  for the third rmpondent submits that indeacad,
\n V   \ufb01ociety was superseded and a liquidaixar<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
  was appointed and pursuant ta :9: commtmmtimn. a W<\/p>\n
Z’<\/p>\n
1-rad uurvtrf.  l’\\.f”l,l\\l’l”|lDI.I\\l’| l”u\\.\ufb02”l MUUK! U!’ KHKNREAKA HIGH CCU”? OF KARNATAKA HIGH     <\/p>\n
copy sf which is produced at Annexuzm-R1 along with<\/p>\n
the amemm of abjections hf Bangalore Dmmhpnrg\ufb01t
\nAuthority would indicate that the IiqL1id.atgr.”
\nrequested the Bangalore Developnment p.ut1aaz~i:3\u00ab\u00a7;.  f  ”
\nback the poaamaion, inasmuch 3:3;  <\/p>\n
tnmutlmriaed mnanuc\ufb01nns    1 <\/p>\n
property was not put to usage it  “Ha
\nfurther submits that   in
\nfavour of tluc third   has
\nalready came   cf the
\ngcncral   amt: cthexwiaa,
\nthe   % \ufb01gnum, raquested the<\/p>\n
Bangalore:   to take back the<\/p>\n
 be in the nature of de jizcio<\/p>\n
   that the: petitioncr has no<\/p>\n
  the base was initially fur a perinni<\/p>\n
 % of so  from 24.08.1968 and the: same<\/p>\n
% Q  1ong back, the question ofthe petitioner<\/p>\n
L   quaahing Amuse-K and aiso annu\ufb02ing the
\n  made in favour of the third respondent do not<\/p>\n
…… ………._. .3. …-……-…-m.-. nlvn -..uuuu ur -uumnmnn !’lII.\ufb021 uuulu or KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR<\/p>\n
4. Learned ccurmel appearing for the
\nreapondent aubmita that pursuant to  ”
\nproduced along with the mmmmt T   <\/p>\n
posasasian has alraacly beam   _ <\/p>\n
of quanhing Ann:-.xure-K   ..\n<\/p>\n
5. The facts   grmgmh<\/p>\n
.as, the then C.ITB_  site in<\/p>\n
question in  32-1-‘;:O8.1968 for a
\nmm’ of so %:t%;4a am, &  x\u00e9iiaputc that after
\nthe  of tha petitioner society ran<\/p>\n
into some   was amaointeti. The<\/p>\n
 aka: ‘V   .tm:1ure as a liquidatar had<\/p>\n
  to the Bangakm: Dewlapmmt<\/p>\n
 possession on the grouzuzl that<\/p>\n
 the ai\ufb01\u00e9’  been put to use and aha that them are<\/p>\n
.  construction. ‘  the
\n gtepondent, Bmalore Develepmcnt Authority
\n  the ammmt and has taken back<\/p>\n
 ‘g\ufb01ossessinn. It ‘3 no doubt true that \ufb01aumg’ thia<\/p>\n
‘ “”””” “‘ “””””'””W–‘- “W” ~\u00bbvvff’!.  mumu-unnn mun <-..uuIu ur KAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR<\/p>\n
intcrmgnum. thus pctitionzer was in oorrespondencm with<\/p>\n
t& Stain and Bangalore Bevelnpment Authority .ftnj
\nranewal of the lease. But however. what is "
\ntint the said Isaase was not renewe\u00e9  T' 1
\nrezzsommmdation made by many. <\/p>\n
evan as an taday, the base   ii3'~,,_ <\/p>\n
not renewed. Even as on  };;etiiic3\u00a7i\u00a7\u00e9gr: 'ti\u00a2\u00a73ss
\nlmve a aernblamze of a   Hcnan an
\napplicatimm madc by   second
\nma-pendent   sine No.12 in
\nits favour. %%%% M   dated 16.03.2005.
\n   lease agreement is<\/p>\n
also   third raapcndents on<\/p>\n
2e.1a.gm::s..  same day, the third respondent<\/p>\n
  Thua, after the expiry of the<\/p>\n
   much wanna' has \ufb02own<\/p>\n
  inasmuch as, third party rights are
\n  Indeed, it is also ts he noticed that a<\/p>\n
  ' statisn has also coma up in the civm' '<\/p>\n
\ufb02<\/p>\n
– ‘urban: urn Inruunnirnup-guy;-Q \u00a2<\/p>\n
cu-tall In-\\rIJl\\y_g  I\\l’Il\\l’lIIl’|l\\l’| FIIIJI1 EJJIJIKI Ell’ l\\l’\\Kl’I\\ll’\\l\\.H HIT” QUUKI U!’       <\/p>\n
6. Indeved, an e\ufb01brt W83 made: by I*sir.Kulkami,<\/p>\n
barrne\ufb01tl muxlsel appearing for the petitioner to the
\nthat wen before the czzancellatic-n cf the Lease in  ”
\nthe petitioner at  K, a rasohztioxgh   T.  K  <\/p>\n
about purporting ta grant the   <\/p>\n
favour aftlm third  It is ‘t:: ‘\u00a3ae  <\/p>\n
the lease was grantead in fawurcimg
\non 16.08.2005    the
\nConmlissiomr. Homing  into the
\nresolution  \u00a33  The fact
\nremains t:nat:   \ufb01umuant tn the
\n  vhad naqunmted the<\/p>\n
aeatxmcl   loprmxut Authority in<\/p>\n
‘take pt\u00e9!s6\u00a34s3i:.\u00a7n’.._   dnubt true that the<\/p>\n
   Bquidatar was set at naught by the<\/p>\n
  But however, what is s1gm\ufb01ca’ ‘ nt is<\/p>\n
 mt t1?ie.1i\u00a71vi1i:\ufb021;atnr. durirg his tenurc, had issued a<\/p>\n
.  in the second rmpondent to tales
\n  of the property. Indeed, the question wcsuld
\n  any acts or axztinns done by the liquidator<\/p>\n
  his tenure weuld stand. obliterated er m <\/p>\n
-run \u00abnu-gnu-‘:1-J-nu’.–I 1|<\/p>\n
“-“‘ “‘-“-“‘t\\A’V.A  HHMVMIMRH ruun LUUKI ur ISAKNAEAIUI HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR’<\/p>\n
 some amcxw in the said shed. Exszzept fur thia small<\/p>\n
continue to hold water. Indeed, the: Apex Ccn.1r*\u00a3 in the<\/p>\n
case of GOICAIAJTJ’ R.AKGAR.n’-I-3’8 VI. STATE
\nAlbum mwm repcrtead in am 1931
\nw11.1’1em:amm’3.ng’ the doctrme’ afde    L<\/p>\n
“The de\ufb01le-to domains is new T
\nthe stem afthe O\ufb01cers  <\/p>\n
within the scape of V\u00bb
\nautlmrity, in the  p1iBEiA:\u00a2 ‘ar
\npersons and not i f:f.nr    are
\ngarmally as valid    were the<\/p>\n
acts ofo\ufb01_m::a_ E13  _ <\/p>\n
The   Bench in the
\nease of f*vs;kJf\u00a7’rA*m or mmsrmu<\/p>\n
reported in   In was.-w’ of the decisiun<\/p>\n
  um  in this regard, I am of the<\/p>\n
 and actiem dam: by the liquidator<\/p>\n
    be gum. am in Ammm
\nwt\ufb01ch hvfgasa-sci in the year 2004, mm is an<\/p>\n
r  made by the mmpetent mztlrmrtity, who on<\/p>\n
    the site in question has faund that there is
\n building with three ac sh-eem and there are<\/p>\n
. wurunl III nu-mun-nun Iuvli -..vunu_.yr nnnnnunnn nuwn uvulu vr l\\l\\l(l’.l-II!-|l\\.l\\ rI|I.-In LUUKI Ur’ IKAKNAIAIEA HIGH L.’UIJRI’ OF KARNATAKA HiGH COUR1<\/p>\n
‘\u00a31<\/p>\n
eonstructisn, tmre are no other activities. It 53 aim<\/p>\n
observed therein that no documents are <\/p>\n
shpw that any transactien er busirmss is  ” <\/p>\n
since 1970. The petitioner scrciety is not  3 1 V<\/p>\n
serious activity after 1970. It ‘a <\/p>\n
civic  site there   .\n<\/p>\n
cormtructicsn. mama, the said  an
\na spot inspection done
\nThis h ano1:her reasan  is not
\nentitled for   it has no
\nLocus,      mm: ta an<\/p>\n
   iheae fhcts, I am of the View<\/p>\n
  or intcrfcring with the mexmaen sf<\/p>\n
 j    of the civic amenity site to the<\/p>\n
 Vv  dares mat arm. Indeed, an alternate<\/p>\n
  ‘  Qf Mr.Kulkarni is required to be considered.
\n   is tn be nc\ufb01ced that the least: has come to an
\n \u00bb   order Buperced11g’ the society and appointing a
\n  has bean set aside: which would neczscaaarily<\/p>\n
1′<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009 Author: Ajit J Gunjal —- oI\\-‘o’:|v\u00a2’I\u00a2Il’IlII” :- –VII ‘-II-VIII, -u-uuvrurunn rlnari hvunl Ur l\\\u00abRIIl’u\\\u00a7Hl\\.H I”‘lIl9l’I LUUKI Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT OF IN ‘THE HIGH CCKI\u00a5?I’ OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALGRE DATED ms TE-IE\u00bb mt DAY op’ FEBRUARY 2009 BEFORE THE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nKasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1100,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009"},"wordCount":1100,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009","name":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog ... vs The Commissioner Bangalore ... on 17 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-06T20:08:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kasturbai-khadi-gramodyog-vs-the-commissioner-bangalore-on-17-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kasturbai Khadi Gramodyog … vs The Commissioner Bangalore … on 17 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92054"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92054\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}