{"id":9213,"date":"2008-11-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-14T12:25:05","modified_gmt":"2016-09-14T06:55:05","slug":"sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Chattisgarh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n           HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR       \n\n\n\n\n                Misc.Cr. C. A No. 514 of 2008\n\n\n                1.        Sanjay   Singh\n\n                 2.        Upendra  Gupta\n                                        ...Petitioners\n\n                 VERSUS\n\n\n                 State  of Chhattisgarh\n                                                ...Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>!          Mr. Saurabh Dangi  counsel for the applicants<\/p>\n<p>^          Mr. Avinash K. Mishra PL for the respondent\/State<\/p>\n<p>Honble Mr.T.P.Sharma,J  <\/p>\n<p>       Dated: 21\/11\/2008<\/p>\n<p>:       Judgment<\/p>\n<p>    APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 438 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL<br \/>\n                         PROCEDURE.\n<\/p>\n<p>\n                         (O R D E R)<br \/>\n                         (21.11.2008)<\/p>\n<p>     This application has been filed for anticipatory bail as<\/p>\n<p>the  applicants are apprehending their arrest  in  connection<\/p>\n<p>with  Crime No. 87\/2008 registered at police station  Rajpur,<\/p>\n<p>District  Sarguja for the offences punishable under  sections<\/p>\n<p>323, 506, 353 and 186 the Indian Penal Code and section 3 (1)<\/p>\n<p>(10)  of  the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention<\/p>\n<p>of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short the Act).<\/p>\n<p>2.   Case of the prosecution in brief is that on 1.8.2008 the<\/p>\n<p>applicants went to the office of Janpad (Vikas Khand)  Raipur<\/p>\n<p>and  threatened  the complainant Prem Sai  Paikra  who  is  a<\/p>\n<p>member  of  Scheduled Tribe category and also  beat  him  up.<\/p>\n<p>Complaiant was examined by the doctor who did not notice  any <\/p>\n<p>physical injury on his body.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Counsel for the applicants submits that the complainant<\/p>\n<p>is  posted as a Programme Office on contract basis under  the<\/p>\n<p>Rojgar  Guarantee Scheme. One Bhrihunath Shrivastava  who  is <\/p>\n<p>also  posted  in  the  said  office  confronted  one  of  the<\/p>\n<p>applicants  as to why he was misusing the money  allotted  to<\/p>\n<p>him   for  the  Rojgar  Guarantee  Scheme.  Complainant  also<\/p>\n<p>intervened  and  began  abusing  the  applicants   and   also<\/p>\n<p>threatened and assaulted them and the report was also  lodged<\/p>\n<p>by the applicants.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    On  the  other  hand  counsel for the  respondent\/State<\/p>\n<p>opposes  the  application for anticipatory bail  and  submits<\/p>\n<p>that the complaint prima facie shows that the applicants have<\/p>\n<p>insulted the complainant who is a member of Scheduled  Tribe,<\/p>\n<p>and therefore, they are not entitled for anticipatory bail.<\/p>\n<p>5.    In  the  instant  case, the offences  punishable  under<\/p>\n<p>sections 323, 506, 353 and 186  of the Indian Penal Code  and<\/p>\n<p>section  3  (1) (10) of the Act have been registered  against<\/p>\n<p>the applicants. Application for grant of anticipatory bail in<\/p>\n<p>terms  of  Section  438 of the Code is  sustainable  for  the<\/p>\n<p>offences punishable under the Indian Penal Code. The only bar<\/p>\n<p>is  created  under  Section 18 of the  Act  for  the  offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Section 3 (1) (10) of the Act. While dealing<\/p>\n<p>with  the  applicability of section 438 of the Code  for  the<\/p>\n<p>offence  punishable under section 3 (1) (10) of the  Act,  in<\/p>\n<p>the  matter  of  State  of M.P. and another  v.  Ram  Krishna<\/p>\n<p>Balothia  and  another 1 it has been held by the  Apex  Court<\/p>\n<p>that  Section 438 of the Code does not form an integral  part<\/p>\n<p>of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Section 18 of the<\/p>\n<p>Act  denying  the application of provisions for  anticipatory<\/p>\n<p>bail  to  those  accused under the Act,  cannot  be  said  as<\/p>\n<p>violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n<p>6.    Provision of Section 438 of the Code is a general  rule<\/p>\n<p>for  granting anticipatory bail but bar of anticipatory  bail<\/p>\n<p>under  Section 18 of the Act is an exception to  the  general<\/p>\n<p>rule. In case of any exception the prosecution is required to<\/p>\n<p>show  prima  facie the facts which attract  the  bar  in  the<\/p>\n<p>general rule. Without there being any material to this effect<\/p>\n<p>it  cannot  be  said that the person concerned would  not  be<\/p>\n<p>entitled  for  anticipatory  bail  as  he  has  been   merely<\/p>\n<p>described as accused by the Police for committing an  offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable  under the provisions of the Act.  There  must  be<\/p>\n<p>material  available  on record to show  that  the  person  is<\/p>\n<p>involved in the offence punishable under the provision of the<\/p>\n<p>said  Act.  While dealing with the application under  section<\/p>\n<p>438  of  the  Code,  the  Court is required  to  examine  the<\/p>\n<p>material collected by the prosecution or the complainant  and<\/p>\n<p>if  the  Court finds prima facie sufficient material for  the<\/p>\n<p>commission of the offence under the Act, then the bar created<\/p>\n<p>under  Section 18 of the Act comes into play and  it  is  not<\/p>\n<p>competent to grant bail under Section 438 of the Code. But if<\/p>\n<p>it  does  not  find any such material against  the  applicant<\/p>\n<p>under  the  provisions of the Act, then it  is  competent  to<\/p>\n<p>consider the application filed under Section 438 of the Code.<\/p>\n<p>Merely by mentioning section of the Act does not create a bar<\/p>\n<p>for  considering  the application under Section  438  of  the<\/p>\n<p>Code.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.   As held in the case of Satya Prakash (supra) at the time<\/p>\n<p>of  examination of the material, the Court is required to see<\/p>\n<p>whether the FIR or the complaint discloses the commission  of<\/p>\n<p>offence punishable under the provisions of the Act. The Court<\/p>\n<p>is required to see the FIR or the complaint in its face value<\/p>\n<p>and  at  this  stage it is not necessary for  it  to  closely<\/p>\n<p>examine  or  scrutinize the material available on  record  in<\/p>\n<p>order  to ascertain the veracity of the allegations  made  in<\/p>\n<p>the  FIR  or the complaint. In the case of Somesh Das (supra)<\/p>\n<p>it  has  been held by this Court that if on the face  of  the<\/p>\n<p>record  it raises doubt about the genuineness of the  FIR  or<\/p>\n<p>the  complaint and that there was an earlier dispute  between<\/p>\n<p>the   parties,  it  may  be  inferred  for  the  purpose   of<\/p>\n<p>entertaining the application under Section 438  of  the  Code<\/p>\n<p>that the complainant or the prosecution could not be able  to<\/p>\n<p>collect  the  prima facie material against the applicant.  In<\/p>\n<p>the  case of Abdul Abbas (supra) it has been held that if the<\/p>\n<p>intention of humiliation to the member of the Scheduled Tribe<\/p>\n<p>is not discovered from the FIR, application under section 438<\/p>\n<p>of the Code is maintainable.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8.    While  dealing with insult in respect of  a  member  of<\/p>\n<p>Scheduled  Caste community, in the matter of Swarn Singh  and <\/p>\n<p>others v. State through Standing counsel and another 2 it has<\/p>\n<p>been  held  by  the Apex Court calling a member of  Scheduled<\/p>\n<p>Caste  &#8220;chamar&#8221; with intent to insult or humiliate him  in  a<\/p>\n<p>place   within  the  public  view  is  certainly  an  offence<\/p>\n<p>punishable  under  Section 3 (1) (10) of  the  Act.  Relevant<\/p>\n<p>portion reads thus:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>     &#8220;Para  25:  A  perusal of the FIR clearly  shows<br \/>\n     that,  prima  facie,  an  offence  is  made  out<br \/>\n     against  appellants 2 and 3. As  already  stated<br \/>\n     above,  at this stage we have not to see whether<br \/>\n     the  allegations in the FIR are correct or  not.<br \/>\n     We  only  have to see whether treating  the  FIR<br \/>\n     allegations as correct an offence is made out or<br \/>\n     not. In our opinion, treating the allegations in<br \/>\n     the  FIR  to be correct an offence under Section<br \/>\n     3(1)(x)  of  the  Act is prima  facie  made  out<br \/>\n     against  Appellants  2 and 3  because  it  prima<br \/>\n     facie  seems  that the intent of the  appellants<br \/>\n     was  to insult or humiliate the first informant,<br \/>\n     and this was done within the public view.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Thus  from  the above-cited decision it is clear that  prima<\/p>\n<p>facie  commission  of offence has to be seen  from  the  FIR<\/p>\n<p>treating the allegations contained in it to be correct.<\/p>\n<p>9.    Taking into consideration the rival contentions of the<\/p>\n<p>parties  and  the  fact that case and the counter  case  was<\/p>\n<p>registered  between the parties, I am of the  view  that  at<\/p>\n<p>this  stage, the prosecution has not collected any  material<\/p>\n<p>against  the applicant to prima face show that the applicant<\/p>\n<p>has  committed the offence punishable under section 3 (1)(x)<\/p>\n<p>of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>10.   Consideration  for  bail is  different  from  that  of<\/p>\n<p>framing  the  charge  or making out  the  case  against  the<\/p>\n<p>applicant  for  trial  even if strong  suspicion  is  there.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, in the light of the above discussion and the  law<\/p>\n<p>laid  down by the Apex Court in respect of entertaining  the<\/p>\n<p>application under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in  the  matter<\/p>\n<p>of  offences relating to the Act, 1989, I am of the  opinion<\/p>\n<p>that it is a fit case in which the benefit of Section 438 of<\/p>\n<p>the  Cr.P.C.  should  be extended to the accused\/applicants.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly,  the application is allowed. It is,  therefore,<\/p>\n<p>directed   that   in   the   event   of   arrest   of    the<\/p>\n<p>accused\/applicants namely Sanjay Singh and Upendra Gupta  if  <\/p>\n<p>they  furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 10,000\/- each with  a<\/p>\n<p>surety  in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting<\/p>\n<p>Officer, they be released on bail.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>11.   The  applicants  shall make themselves  available  for<\/p>\n<p>interrogation by a police officer as and when  required  and<\/p>\n<p>shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat<\/p>\n<p>or  promise to any person acquainted with the facts  of  the<\/p>\n<p>case  so  as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts  to<\/p>\n<p>the  Court or to any police officer. This order shall remain<\/p>\n<p>effective for a period of two months from today. During this<\/p>\n<p>period the accused\/applicants may apply for regular bail.<\/p>\n<p>12.   Trial  Court shall not be influenced  by  any  of  the<\/p>\n<p>observations  made  in  this  order  and  shall  proceed  in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                             JUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chattisgarh High Court Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 HIGH COURT OF CHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Misc.Cr. C. A No. 514 of 2008 1. Sanjay Singh 2. Upendra Gupta &#8230;Petitioners VERSUS State of Chhattisgarh &#8230;Respondents ! Mr. Saurabh Dangi counsel for the applicants ^ Mr. Avinash K. Mishra PL for the respondent\/State [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9213","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-chattisgarh-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1433,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Chattisgarh High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008"},"wordCount":1433,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Chattisgarh High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008","name":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-14T06:55:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sanjay-singh-vs-state-of-chhattisgarh-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sanjay Singh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 21 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9213","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9213"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9213\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9213"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9213"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9213"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}