{"id":92310,"date":"2010-02-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-06-10T07:01:46","modified_gmt":"2018-06-10T01:31:46","slug":"sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
 \n\n \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDated this the 26*\" day of February, 2010 \n\nBEFORE-\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTZCE\u00abN\u00a2\"   \nWrit Petition No. 3980 of\u00a7f280ij8    V\n\nQLEE.\n\nWrit Petition Nos, 4602, 5142,  5494- 8488;-= 84558457,\n\n8458,8460,8461,8482,8463,8464,8465,8488,8487,8881,\n8882,8863,9088,9104L8978;99?7;1o248,15089,15560,\n15804,16873,18974,18975;\u00a26887;17858,17859,17880,\n17861,17862,17863,17864,1?865,l79\u00a7\u00a7?l7949 18524\n18525,18743.187gg'of20o8{\u00a388838}\n\nW11': Petitigg \u00a7\\I4\")S;\";3,:\u20ac'-i9_~,2;2....7...;9.\u00ab=\"2273, V2:2j\u00a7:_,,..Q275 2276 2277\n2278 4478 448';7.sg$__;4gz8g;_4;38'-1.', 5804.' 5805, 5806, 8: 13819 of\n\n .. ~'Nr'ft~v}?5\u00e9'\u00a3i'ii1;on 18\u00a7;;8'454--9\u00a3_2'bo8 {LA-BDA}\n\n \n\n \n\n \n\n \n\nWrit Petifion'-- N 0.8898-.  \"ERA-'I3DA]\nBETWEEN}  ' \" \"  \n\nSn' Gangaiah N.VE1.i\"d_'1.,1V \" \n\n .Sor1 cyf\ufb01ferrappa Naxdu ____ H .\n\n80 years  '\n\n 166; Pip.<3lin\u20ac: \n\nS8ra.1f;k:i s'(3;8L\u20ac.\u00a2 , " J ':9 V Nagar\nBa13.gai0re --' 560078\nSince\u00bb._\u00a71ece8s8tf:..--E3y his L.Rs..\n\nT~ ~ u._ 1{,a} Laksfimamma\n\nH * :,Wife"of Late Gangalah Naldu\n  years\n\n\n\n__ Ally ar,e}.resI'ding at "  A\n A" ' #.166',\u00ab..P'ipie}.ine Road\n Karra.,kap_1,1ra Road West\nSra1'a1;k'ia.GVa:e,\u00bbv J E? Nagar Post\n\n _  'mo:\n\n   V  ;1"*he Bangalore Development Authox\ufb02y\n\nix)\n\nMb} G. Rajagopal Naidu\nson of late Gangaiah Naiclu\n46 years\n\nHe) G. Purushotham Naidu\nson of late Gangaiah Naiclu\n44 years\n\nMd) 0. Mohana Kumari \nWife of M Adikeshavalu Naiclu \n40 years\n\nHe) G Bharathi Babu  \nWife of D. Surendra Babu  \n38 years V   \n\n1U) K.Char1dramrna . = ~   \nwife of late (3., NarayeanaswamyryNairhr' "\n50years    -  \n\nMg) N.   y  \nson of la;e'i.GNaraya\ufb02e;_sxMaIhy Ifiaidu\n\n    \nIfh] N. Bal'ajiV \n\nson  late G..v_N'ayrayan:a's'J.}an1y Naidu\n28 years % . V  \n\nBar_1g'a\u00a3VQre'--~ "_:36()~:O'78 . ..PeUti0r1ers\n\n . {By Sri N S Sanjaya Gowcla, Advocate}\n\n  Chowdaiah Road\n\nM\n\n\n\n. .. .. ...,_.....-,v-.-w-........_..,.\n\nta\n\n .. VetThe'B..angalore Development Authority\n\nK P West. Bangalore\nRepresented by its Cornrnissioner\n\n2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer\nBangalore Development: Authority &  .. _.__ .\nBangalore ...Res_gg'ondents  '\n\n{By Sri B V Shankamarayana Rao,  i\nfor R} and R2] "  5' -- 4\n\nThis Writ. Petition is filed undei<__Ai"tieles 226' and :22'? \nthe Constitution of India. prayingto quash the orderrdated 23"? '\nFebruary. 2006 (Annexure--C] passed\u00bb by th'e.re'sp_ond'ent~2.\n\nWrit Petition No.4602 ofj2_QQ6 {:;A\u00a7Bi;$A_} \nBETWEEN:  i "  " "\n\nV. Muniyappa V o _  V   \nSon of late VenEiat\u00e9;jsHariun1ai"ah   " it\nAged about 57"fearsv~--':*_V V    V V\nResiding at l\\}itid;\ufb011_a;i'_1apalya Vivillaged\nVishwan_e.eda_rri'~JPost1::;, .. " _  ' "  V \nBangalore -- 56009}    _ -- ...Petitioner\n\n-- {i3yfjVsfi"i~i\u00a7ig;:a.iah, Advocate)\n\nAND:\n\n- .o..Sta\u00a7-e of Karriataka\nV  By its Secretary\n\n" T 'l')ie'1jart;nle.r1tI'*of Housing & Urban\n._ """._Deiielopme;rit\n\nA ' M S _}3ui}.d.iing\n\nBantgalcre -- 560 001\n\nV KP West, Extension\n'  Bangalore ~ 560020\nRepresented by its Commissioner\n\n'rm\/..\n\n\n\n3 The Special Land Acquisition Officer\nBangalore Development Authority\nK P West Extension H  \nBangalore ~\u00ab\u00ab 560 020 ...Respond_ents,_ a\n\n{By Sri N. Prasad, GP for Rig A'  \nSri K N Puttegowda, Advocate for R2  .\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed undhei' Articles \n\nthe Constitution of India, praying t0':.dii:eet'Athe~.respor1de'nts*to\n\nregularize the private layout existed: at N'o.32,}:'3"* OAIAI.'\nGidadakonenahalli Village, Yeshwanthapuia Hobii,"'Bangalo1'eV\n\nNorth Taluk, as per the resoisution date_d"'t28--3\u00a52002 vide\nAnnexured by respondent~2. "   7\n\nWrit Petition No.5142 of 20:}e.i;e_\u00ab;3._;':3;_i1;igij*    _\n1 D1'. Hafee;}it1r:?ahrii:a:n 1:  V. "" "\nAged abo ..1"t._(3?:1 ..y1ears._'--.,. __  _ _\nS\/o late_A--iAl;du1'Azee1"f_' ._ " '\n\n2  Shaieestiif\u00e9 \nAged about  yyeiarsi'=.___  *\nS \/ 0 'late A Pxbdu.1v.1'.3iZ\u20ac'\u20ac:'5  \n\n3 Sri Naj eebtir A\nV, Aged. about 50' years\n- .__Sa'\/C,tf1;El[B A AbduI"Azeez\n\n* T Peti'nt3',on..\u00e9Vi"s_ igto 3 are\n._ ".._Resi'dents'~of"No. 13, 1 Floor\nA V 1'7m dmairi,-'vm Block\n"i{o1'amangala\nBamgalore --- 560 034\n\n  4" do  K Ganesh Babu\n\n' "Aged about 42 years\nS\/o Late Krishnamurthy Shetty\nR\/0 No.23. Ground Floor\n\n\n\nAND:\n\nModel LIC Housing Colony\nBasaveshwaranagar\nBangalore \u00ab~ 560 079\n\nSri T S Somashekar\n\nAged about 52 years\n\nS\/o late Srikamaiah\n\nR\/0 Tavarekere Village   ._\nHobalapur Post :\nThyarnangondlu Taluk\n\nBangalore Rural District _\n\nSmt. Shivamma\n\nAged about 76 years \nW\/o late Gurusiddappa \nR\/oNo.135\/A--35  A' _ A  V\n9"' Main. Sadashivanagar  *\n\nBangalore \u00ab\u00ab 560 08!}  . if A ...Petitior1ers\n\n    sit }i\u00e9gcil;\u00a7.;Ad}.}\u00a2'\u00a2'ate)\n\nThe Bangalore Development\nA'ut.hority' ' f  A   " _\nT. C'nowcIaiah_Ro'ari   "\nKumaia Park West S  l\nBangalore .: 560 020\n\n.. Represented' "cyV_its 'Commissioner\n\n: = .. Tnagtlpeciial Land Acquisition Officer\n' , Ba ng;alore*vs.Developn1ent Authority\n\n_  fir Cfrowdaiah Road\n' .__Kuma.ra"1.-'ark West\n\nBangalore \u00ab~ 560 020 ...Respor1derits\n\n(By Sri V.Y. Kumar, Advocate for R1 and R2)\n\ng1\/.\n\n\n\n6\n\nThis Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of\n\nthe Constitution of India. praying to quash the in1pugne.--r:_i_ order\ndated 232-2006 vide Annexure~H by respondent~2.   *\n\nWrit Petition No.53l9 of 2006 (LA--BDA)\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri G P Rajendranath\n\nS\/0 Sri G R Prasad\n\nAged about 35 years\n\nR\/at N0.1922, Southend 'C' Croats-s__\nJayanagar 9 th Block      \nBangalore -- 560 069 A  ...'i='etitioner\n\n[By Sri K Pl_As.hol.il{u\u00a7nia1:_Advocate)\n\n1 Bangalore De3i*elVopVri~i:ent 22 it "" "\nAuthoijity 2'     _ _\nKumara.pa;\ufb01k;\u00bb'Wesi"   ._ 2' 2\nBa_ngal,or'e_  _  \n\nBy its Co'm"mi_ss3ioner"'~\u00ab.__ _ '\n\n2 Assistant  \n\n{Landl"Ae:;u.Visiti_ori}. " H\n\nBangalore _Dev.elopnaent Authority\n, .l}\u00a7L1r1iara Parkwest.\n,__Bangalm:e .. ..... ..\n\n    \u00bbvl;and'..Aequisitio:1\n\n' Kumara ---Park West\nBangaiore . ..Responder1ts\n\n{By Sri V Y Kumar, Advocate for R1 and R3)\n\n2   Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of\n\n22"\u00bb__"thel;Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned\n\nit\/..\n\n\n\nnotice dated }O\u00ab~2~2006 vide Am1exure--E in\nNo.BDA\/DC\/LA\/SLAO\/44\/PR\/649\/05-06. --\nWrit Petition No.5494 of 2006 (LA--BDA]\nBETWEEN:\n1 K. Gangahanumaiah \nAged about 48 years\n2 Mahadeva\nAged about 40 years\n3 Dasappa @ Dase Gowda\nAged about 38 years\nA11 are the sons of La\u00a3e_'1<fis1\u00a7tnapp;1~~  \nResiding at Farm I-{Ao.u--se'\u00bb A . A _ A   " A\nC0nstruct_ed_'in--. Sy.1j\u00a7Jo.  of  u ' '\nHeroha11i?_Vi1Lage _ r  = ' \nYeshWant\ufb01apura_ I~IoI;31._i_  _ _\nBangaIVo_re\u00abiNo:rth '3"a}.uk."_' to  ...Pet1'tioners\nA  _ Atdag\u00e9abhlgshana, Advocate)\nAND: A A A\n1 State o15"f{arna1.aka'-\n\nV,  its Secretary\n\n_ '-..D'epa.rt1'nent of I4Ioiising 81 Urban\n,  Deveiopment\n\n _  _1vt.s"-23ur1'e:ng5\n" ._  .13af1gaivore.;?560 O01\n\n""Bar;gia1or'e Development Authority\n\nKumara Park West\n\n .. , Bangalore M 550 029\n\nRepresented by its Commissioner\n\nA " -- Bangalore\n\n\n\n  AND: '- .\n\n l j BangallorenVbevelopmen-E Authority\n\n3 '1' he Special Additional\nLand Acquisition Officer\nBangalore Development. ALiihor'it_v\n\nK. P. West Extr1..  " .3. \nBangalore -- 560 020 ...Res;\u00a70*ndenLs  .  V'\n\n(By Sri N. Prasad. GP\u00bbViTor RI: ,  \nSri Ravi G Sabhahit. Advocate for _ar'id R3'),   f\nThis Writ Petition is filed, Linder'\u00ab.Ai*t.icles  arid 2.27' ()f'''.'\n\nthe Coristitution of India. pray':'ng---to direct the i'esp~oi*ideriis not-\nto proceed with acquisition pr'oi;eedi11gsV" iii 'ariy manner in\nrespect of the Lands measuri_ng_  acres .13 _guni.as in\nSy.No.165, 2 acres 6 g"untas."in 'E3y;.Noi;-.._l66 and H1 acre 27\nguntas in Sy.No.167 of'-.E1erohaE.jly; \\'f:'ll'a.ge, Yeshwanthapura\n\nI-Eobli, Bangalore North Taluk.\nWrit Petition No.8\u00e9l55go1'-_2OClA6(ib,r\u00a7+BDZ\u00a7)vd"_j_'~_uV'.  V\nBETWEEN: '  V ~ V  -- \n\nSri S V S Subramari}'a1_;Gup1,,a' _  "\nS\/0 late Sri:"SHV 'Sriif1ivasfa'She\u00bbt11fy\nMajor. 52 years . ' "   \nResiding at No.i.2 '\n\nVasavi T ernple\u00bb.St1'eei. \nVisveshwara Purarn" V \nBangalore' " " V V\n\n. . .Pei.i1.ioner\n\nV d  ._Sri Adarsh Patel, Advocate for\n    _M[s;_Holla <3: Holla, Advocates}\n\n  Afiumarapark West.\n.. Bangalore ~ 560 020\n"  Represented by its Commissioner\n\n\n\n9\n\n2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer\nBangalore Development Authority\nKumarapark West\nBangalore -- 560 020\n\n3 State of Karnataka\nBy its Secretary\nUrban Development Departn'3en,ty '\nVldhana Soudha  ' \u00ab y_  , _V  V' \u00ab\nBangalore  a  --;'.Respo:idei1t's-..' if\n\n(By Sri KN. Puttegowdaf A.dvoca'te lforVRii5vari.dv \nSri N. P1'asad--v.c.,r_GPb for R3).  h "\n\nThis Writ Petition is filedV,m1dlerllixrticlesl226"alnd 227 of\nthe Constitution of Indi-\u00a7l...\\'\u00ab.pl'a.yi\ufb02\u00a7gVliO._"q;,i'aSl"i the order\/letter\ndated 19-4-2006 passed' 'LFf:e'y\u00bb'Speieia.l Land Acquisition\n\nOfficer, BDA, the respondent\u00a52yVhelreln E'Anne\u00a7;t:;%e-J).\n\nWrit Petition .Nvo;F\u00a75l_{i;6_;of"2:CQ?;\u20ac};;{1htA;g\u00a75:i;);*9i_}_ . H\nBETWEENQ '    \n\nSmt. Saivigeethavlilviohan \u00bb '\n\nW\/o Pathi Mohan "  M \nAged about 35 years '  s3_;_\u00e9:f;w\nBETWEEN: 1 '\n\n \n\n.\n<\/pre>\n
oI’i2\u00a2ote>;i___I\u00abA4-Biazw <\/p>\n
SI'”l P N Praveeln\ufb02. H _
\nAged about 4} years”-~ M
\nResiding at No.25:3.._ ” to
\nMiddle Scho’ol_ Road’ _
\nVisveshwarapijrarn –\n<\/p>\n
__ Bar1ga_lore’~ ”  & V …Pet.itioi1er<\/p>\n
_v _  B [By Sri N. Rajanna for
\n= _ ” _ A.  – A’  Holla <3: Holla. Advocates]
\nAND.' '   V.\n<\/p>\n
A it _ 1 ‘l”‘Ban.g”ai’ore Development Authority<\/p>\n
 Kumarapark West
\n A. , i_Banigalore ~ 560 020
\n” _ Represerited by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
   The Special Land Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
kg”\/,<\/p>\n
Kurnarapark West
\nBangalore ~ 560 020<\/p>\n
3 State of Karnataka
\nBy its Secretary
\nUrban Development Department
\nVidhana Soudha   ‘
\nBangalore . . .Re-sp_o’nden:ts.<\/p>\n
(By Sri KN. Puttegowda. Advocateloi’ R1   A is
\nSrl N. Prasad, GP”lfo1’VR3} ‘ ‘ ”  ‘<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is tlledl._un.der A1’1;icles  227 of’ A<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, p1*ayingVto quash “the oijder\/letter
\ndated 19-4-2006 passed by t_he”~_Spwecial Land Acquisitioii
\nOfficer. BDA, the second “respondents-vide’Annexure–Ci.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.8_48l of 2’0os1:’:iA:Bi9AV_1  Q’ 2<\/p>\n
Sri K V Vish\\\u00e9\u00bbra11*:%_1_t};a P1’as.aldaVA_’ ._  7<\/p>\n
Aged about..5_l”yrea1″s::;,  ‘<\/p>\n
Residing at A’ A  <\/p>\n
No.49, 23?’ Cross  , <\/p>\n
Gavipuram E2xte11’sior;._jf_ ”  <\/p>\n
Bangalore –“‘5_6O V019 1 ” _  …Petit1’.oner<\/p>\n
 Ms. Aparanji Dinaliar, for
\n A. M \/ s\u00a7”‘l*i’olla 8: Holla. Advocates)<\/p>\n
l ‘ V BangaloTr_eiVDeve1opment Authority
\n“”K’u1iriara1i5ark West
\n Bang;-1lo1*e – 560 020
\nl ..  Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
    The Special Land Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
Bangalore Development Authority
\nKumarapark West, Bangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
la\/A<\/p>\n
3 State of Karnataka
\nBy its Secretary
\nUrban Development Department.\n<\/p>\n
Vidhana Soudha _– ..\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore . . .I{es}\u00a7~:1;1dts<\/p>\n
{By Sri G.K.V.i\\\/Iurthy. Advo(\u00a7ate”fo1′ a.1::i I{t\u00a7!._:  I
\nSrl N. Prasad. GP_fo11_-R3)’ –  ”\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed’ ui’1de1’V’A;*t1eles i2’f;A{:i: mid  o.fV ~
\nthe Constitution of India, prayfigig\u00e9to quash–._the ‘order\/letter<\/p>\n
dated 19-6-2006 passed by the Special”–Land Acquisition
\nOfficer. BDA. the respond\u20acnt–2 3Ii–de.}fLnn’e2gu1’e~G.’–A <\/p>\n
WI’it Petition No.8462 of 2oos'[;\ufb01A.–i*;3i3Aa:it’-\u00ab  <\/p>\n
BETVVEEN:\n<\/p>\n
1. SI’iD S’Nii’an:jar’1_V V  __  _
\nS\/ o D E; Sat_i,;’anafayg1i’iC_’ ._  V
\nAge.d.~55″‘years1i:;,   _
\nResiding”2;LNo.’263–\/32:? _
\n362%: Cross. ‘si\ufb01–z3ic.ck’–s.si ~ ‘
\nJay’anaga1’ ‘ _ i’  .\n<\/p>\n
Bang\u00e9IIo_1’e f” 5600.11 , <\/p>\n
 2 _;Sri os. Amgi<\/p>\n
 – KA.Satya1iai’ayan
\n,  Ageds\u00e9ifg yea1’s
\n= T ‘Res’ir:1ingii’ai_t 310.256\/to
\n._ “‘.._6?~””CI9oss,’~I.Block, Jayanagar
\n‘ V Bangaltoreitw 560 O1 1 …Petitioners<\/p>\n
[By Ms. Aparanji Dinakar. for
\nM\/s. Holia & Holla, Advocates)<\/p>\n
  Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
K’urr1a1’apaI’k West<\/p>\n
” ” Krishna Roads<\/p>\n
Bangalore ~ 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nKumarapark West
\nBangalore \u00bb- 560 020<\/p>\n
3 State of Karnataka   ..\n<\/p>\n
By its Secretary
\nUrban Development \u00a3)epar1:ment :\n<\/p>\n
Vidhana Soudha V    . A .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore  _V  …Respon.o’e–nI.s~ti<\/p>\n
(By Sri K.G. Laxmipathi,  for”R–il_and
\nSri N;?rasad;'”GP_:”for”R3)  <\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is-ii.led u’nd.\u00a2r”A.ftic’l\u20ac”s’.226 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution.–of*-Endiia, pr_aying*tco.VVqua’sh the order\/letter
\ndated l9w4–2Q\u20ac_)6 fp’a_ssed. by the ;.s’pe\u00a2’1’ai Land Acquisition
\nOfficer, BDA.; the_’respondeni:.j2~irie\u00e9yjein A1’1nexure–G.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition N5’j.i:,84\u00e9\u00a7E:g;”o{:’2olo5 {LA\u00a5B”i5A)<\/p>\n
Sri P R Ragl’1t_1_nathVVV” _  A
\nAged about 61 “years.\n<\/p>\n
Residing at No.7\/2=._<\/p>\n
5.’ B,asavanagu.diy ‘ ‘ ~._
\n“Bangalorev–;\u00ab E}6lO_O’Q4 …Petitioner<\/p>\n
 {By Sri N. Rajanna, Advocate for
\n=  M\/s. Holla 82 Holla. Advocates)<\/p>\n
    Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
Kurnarapark W est<\/p>\n
 ” Residing  No.63<\/p>\n
Bangalore ~ 580 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nKumarapark West.\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore —- 560 020
\n3 State of Karnataka vv
\nBy its Secretary  ..\n<\/p>\n
Urban Development Department.\n<\/p>\n
Vidhana Soudha   . _   —\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore   ‘;’…Resp=ondet1ts<\/p>\n
(By S11 B.V. ShankarnarayanalRa’ol,:”i’\\_elt=.Q’cate i”or”R’l and R2;
\nSri N  fe.r”R3} _<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition isfiled 1}i*:1ciE.ei” A:ti{:’ive’s 226 and 227 of
\nthe Constittition–of’–India,  the order\/letter
\ndated 19-4-2006 jp’a_ssedi by th_eSpee’i’a1 Land Acquisition
\nOfficer. BDA; the.ifespo_ndent52~herein A;’1nexu1’e–I-i.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition ‘iii5j;:s4eiii;’ bi ggo;e_”iL2-i\u00a7’BDA1<\/p>\n
Sri D N Praife\u00e9en  ” B
\nMajor.VAgeci 43 _\\(ea:”.s.* ‘
\nS\/o L)._\u00a7_S Nagaraj ”\n<\/p>\n
V. 7, S,hanka:r_ lvintt\u00e9 Road
\n“Shanka.rap.uli’ain_ ”\n<\/p>\n
B”anlga_iAore’   . . Petitioner<\/p>\n
 B  Sri Uciaya Holla. Senior Advocate]<\/p>\n
    Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
Kumarapark West<\/p>\n
._ j” ” S.\/o   Na.garaj
\n Aged abovut, 45 year’s
\n“Residing at No.” 152..\n<\/p>\n
B it _ Bangalore[– 55.0 070 …Peti’tioner<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Speciai Land Acquisition Oi’fice1*
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nKumarapark West
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
3 _ State of Karnataka
\nBy its Secretary 1
\nUrban {Development Def::artn1e1.1t
\nVidhana Souclha  –_  a I
\nBangalore    <\/p>\n
(By Sri M N Ramanjaneya AClvocate- ._l:orlRl and R2:
\nSri NPrasad-,”‘CrP_:for”-R3}  ‘<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is~fi..led u’r1’d.er A;-:;\u00a2’i’e’s 226 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution “-of  India,  pra}{i11gf’ to quash the
\norder\/letter beaijirig. _ i’\u20ac.o.BDA\/.0’O.AAf{1\u00a7A]\/V.BHOO.SWA.A\/
\nA4\/PR\/727\/2005706’Vdateda.V1″*E3g4′-i2CO6.– passed by the Special
\nLand Acquisition_ (;)f\ufb01ce1*. the second respondent herein
\n{1\u00a3\\IlI’i\u20acX11F\u20ac*l*’ll.,_V.’:\\    <\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.8\u00e9l6l3:of i(\u00a3;A\u00bbBDA}
\nBETWE3EN:”‘,_’ ” * * <\/p>\n
Sri D’, ti}. Pradeep lkarnai’ V<\/p>\n
29:_h”cros’s.\u00ab ‘1~v7}-h-:5;\/raili Road
\nBan:1,shan1_<ari -. if Stage<\/p>\n
(By Sri Adarsh Ganguli. Advocate for
\nM\/s. Holla 3: Holla. Advocate }<\/p>\n
M.\n<\/p>\n
V BETW_\u00a73EN;\n<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
1 Bangalore Development Authority
\nKumarapark West
\nBangalore — 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer _
\nBangalore Development Authority &
\nKumarapark West 1 .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore ~\u00bb 560 020<\/p>\n
3 State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
By its Secretary  <\/p>\n
Urban Developnient. Depa.:’tfn’e1it ll” — _<\/p>\n
Vidhana Soudha _ Va 1  ‘ V l’ l ‘A _<\/p>\n
Bangalore      vA’_;u,.Re_spo11de11ts<\/p>\n
(By Sri   fo’i’:vRl and R2:\n<\/p>\n
 V Y”–.F{uivjnar,  fol’ R3)<\/p>\n
This Writ   ll\/’\\1’ticEes 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of::;l11di*a; -pray’i’ng.\u00bbto quash the order\/letter
\ndated 1V9-4~2UQt3., pa.sse.r;l’\u00abby tlae Special Land Acquisition
\nOfficer.  the ‘r’e’s’po1;.de’nt\u00a52 herein Annexure~G.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition i\\io.84;f36_ oAt’._2oo6 {I..A\u00abBDA}<\/p>\n
   ‘ V._VlllSri.b}I{A\u00a2V.i\u00a7iianath<\/p>\n
~ V Agevd\u00bb about 63 years
\n Rfoijpta
\nA Residing at No. 1504\/l
\n“~3I”\u20ac’ Bloelil, Jayanagar
\nBa.ngalore ~ 560 004<\/p>\n
‘ ‘sn T V Nagendra
\nV’  S’\/o S1’i’l’ V R Gupta
\n60 years
\nResiding at No. 1504\/}
\nla\/”\n<\/p>\n
I\u00bb)<\/p>\n
Middle School Road
\nVisvesvarapuram V.\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560004 …i”ei.ltioner  <\/p>\n
[By Sri Aclarsha Ganguli. Advocate lbgf”   0′
\nM\/s. Holla & Holla. Advocates)  ”\n<\/p>\n
AND:   –\n<\/p>\n
1 Bangalore Development Authority 0 ”
\nKurnarapark West  ‘
\nBangalore \u00ab\u00ab 560 020 __ z
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land filequisitioln”Qlf}{loer..\u00a2
\nBangalore DevelopmentAutliiovrify  AA ”
\nKumarapark West  ” 1 ~ ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore +560 020  . if<\/p>\n
3 State of . 0 0 llll 00<\/p>\n
Byits .S”ec\u00a7’etary?; V .,  _
\nUrban VDeV5e_l{\u00bb)pn1enl:_Delp artrnenft<\/p>\n
Vidh9.na”S_oudl1a_ . .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalo’1eI,s~_V  ,  — …Respondents<\/p>\n
 Sri  C}_La\u00a7\u00a71″nip~alhy;”Advocate for R1 and R2:
\n S L’:’31_’l 1′-E’. Pi’a.’3ad. GP for R3}<\/p>\n
V. .’_I’l1lisA.Writ leeiltion  filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
 -%3.0ns_titui1ion oflllntiiia. praying to quash the order\/letter
\n dated }.S3-<\u00a7–200.6 passed by the Special Land Acquisition
\n'f)_fl7ieeI*;  ..t'l:e Second Respondent. vide AnneXure–H.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition: :z\u00a7'\u00a29;s862 oi' 2006 (LA-BDA}<\/p>\n
 4 '._B13:"rvw:::a:;\u00a71?_:.:_<\/p>\n
 0' Algella Shashirekha
\n T\\\/V.\/O–.SI_:'i A. V. S. N. Murthy\n<\/p>\n
–..fAged about 55 years<\/p>\n
  ,Residing at<\/p>\n
XL,\/’<\/p>\n
Market Road
\nBasavanagudi
\nBangalore — 560 004 …Petitii;–ner<\/p>\n
(By Sn’ V B Shivakumar. Advocate}   <\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
1 State of Karnataka
\nBy its Secretary   _
\nUrban Development Departmerlt  A
\nVidhana Soudha  .4
\nBangalore V ‘<\/p>\n
Kumarapark West   _ —\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560 020 V _.  V __
\nRepresentedtby itsv\ufb01ormfnissioner  \u00abV = , =<\/p>\n
2 Bangalore Development Prtitnorllty\ufb02v ‘ – ._<\/p>\n
3 The Special Lfancl Aeqtiisitlon Ol’fi::er”
\nBangaljolrelv Development “A;_itl_1ozf3ty. ‘
\nKu.maralpaiik;\u00bb’Wesi,’    ._  <\/p>\n
Bang–alojre,\u00ab–     …Responclents<\/p>\n
 {By-~sr;\u00bba.N’;-a.r\u00a2_\u00a3as_,ad, GP for R};<\/p>\n
St’? Abdull &1aCler.'”A’clvoeates for R2 and R3}<\/p>\n
This Wrlt .I:5etit.’1or1.”\u00a7sA.I5″1;lecl under Articles 226 and 22? of
\nthe Constitution ‘oflnella. praying to quash the notice dated<\/p>\n
 V’ ‘E.9~4’:v200iEi.v1de AnneXure~P<\/p>\n
‘:\\,1–g’:i:.?\u00e9t;:{t;g.vN\u00a3)’;e~9\u00a73~76 of 2006 {LA–BDA)<\/p>\n
BE*rw:4:13N_:.”~’:_ <\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘VT V Prasanna Kumar
\n  T S Venkataramaiah
\n= ‘ Aggged about 63 years
\n” _Reslcli:1r’g at No. 33\/2
\n“Sreienivasa Krupa’<\/p>\n
VA  -Plampa Mahakavi Road<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
Shankarapuram
\nBangalore — 560 004 …Petitioner <\/p>\n
[By Sri V B Shiva. Kumar. Advocate)   ~
\nAND:\n<\/p>\n
1 State of Karnataka   ._
\nBy its Secretary
\nUrban Development Departrnent
\nVidhana Soudha l’
\nBangalore — 560001<\/p>\n
Kumarapark West ‘
\nBangalore -560 020  _ _  V  AA
\nRepresented by its Comrr1isps1oner…  . <\/p>\n
2 Bangalore Development Au  .._g<\/p>\n
3 The Special ~I,.a’n.d A\ufb02cquisiiio-n l*O”ffi_oe.r
\nBangalore Dg%Jel.opn’2.erlt Authority
\n}{umarapa’1*l<;V'~fe':g;t ' V:  _
\nBangalo.re'\u00a5.+ \u00a3360 020  ..   …Re-spondents<\/p>\n
._ _l 1 " C'j_(13_y 'Prasad. GP for R1;
\nzsri" K G LaXmilpatl'1y,"A_c1vocate for R2 and R3)<\/p>\n
This mg pe\u00a3ia1($rl._i's,:\ufb01::ed under Articles 226 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution, ofellndia, praying to quash the endorsement:<\/p>\n
 _ dated\u00abfl.9–4*–e2006 vi~:1ev__Al_nr1exure–P.<\/p>\n
"".w*r5,\u00a3 'eat'-1*a.;3r; j\u00a7_o:."9977 of 2006 {LA-BDA}<\/p>\n
B"';r::*1*\u00a3*.2;;:\u00a7:'1x::""_~ll.__ – <\/p>\n
V B _ N P Srinaih. 'V <\/p>\n
'SH\/o Sri N i;;.Papaiah<\/p>\n
" V Aged eaboizt 46 years
\n _ Residirag at No.30
\nl e.M'a,rK*-sf' Road
\n  V; Puram
\n 'vBa:r1galore ~\u00ab\u00ab 560 004 …Petitioner<\/p>\n
kg\/..\n<\/p>\n
30<\/span><\/p>\n
The Bangalore Development Authority
\n‘1’ Chowdaiah Road<\/p>\n
Kumara Park West<\/p>\n
Bangalore ~ 560 020<\/p>\n
Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
The Deputy Commissioner<\/p>\n
Land Acquisition   s .. =
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road   ‘~
\nKurnara Park West  V
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
The State of Karnataka _ _y .\n<\/p>\n
By the Principal Secretary    _ -. .2 .
\nHousing and.Urban_Dep-artment ‘  jy ..
\nVidhana Sotidha _ ” \u00ab  –\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore’ —  0071  ”  Respondents
\n{By Srij_K_; Kri’shnal’jv’Advoeate for R} and R2:<\/p>\n
” ‘ _N.–.__Prasa’d,.._GyPV\u00a3or R3)<\/p>\n
This Writ VP’ei’it.i:o’n_ ‘1’sv.\u00a7i1’e.c1* under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the Constitution’of”l;ndia;;__pDpra3ring to quash the orders both
\ndated ll–7=.2,006 issued  the respondent-2 in terms of
\nAnnexu1fes-L and M in so far as the relief confined by site Nos.<\/p>\n
 147 site No.1-48’a’n_d l53only.<\/span><\/p>\n
v”._yAVv’rit”Petit_ion ‘No”.l’_5604 012006 {LA–BDA)<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
 \u00a5r\u00a7’Surendranath<\/p>\n
3\/ S Rajagopal
\nAged about 55 years<\/p>\n
*  it  ~f’Vaikuntarr1″\n<\/p>\n
 No.20, Ranga Rao Road<\/p>\n
3″ Cross, Sharikarapuram
\nBangalore \u00ab 560 004<\/p>\n
tithe’ \u00a73on:;.titI._;t”1oriof India. praying to direct the respondents to<\/p>\n
 –Vresporidents to issue katha certificate and eoiiect taxes by them
\n in respettof the schedule property.<\/p>\n
3%<\/p>\n
2 Smt. N S Jeevarekha<\/p>\n
W\/0 Sri N R Surendranath<\/p>\n
Aged about 52 years<\/p>\n
“Vaikuntam”\n<\/p>\n
No.20. Ranga Rao Road<\/p>\n
3″1Cross. Shankarapuram   u ;_. .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore – 560 oo4 gt…Pet.i.ti’one;<S_'"1 2'
\n{By Sri V B Shiva Kt1m21r;J\u00ab\\.dyoc*_ate}"it  2 B
\nAND:\n<\/p>\n
1 State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
By its Under Secretary  \u00bb
\nHousing & Urban Developnient
\nDepartment, M S Bt1\u00a7.lding”s 22
\nDr. Ambedkar Veedhif _ 7  V ‘
\nBangalore — 560 001 <\/p>\n
Kumara_V}:?ar1\u00ab:\u00a7’:rE’West}. _ _. V V
\nBangatore .56’0′–.O20.yjy~:–..vy    _ .
\nRepreserited  its _C.or”n’missionpver<\/p>\n
2 The Bangak-re “_DeVe1op:Ttent\u00abritithority<\/p>\n
3 The Speeiial\ufb01andey Aed’ui:si\u20ac’.io’:1 Officer
\nBangalore Devei.oprr1_e’r3.t “A_L1thority<\/p>\n
Kumara Par1{._[West_}  _
\nBangaiore    …Respondents<\/p>\n
(By.Sri.N. Prasad, GP for R1)
\n‘  Tlusis’Writ”‘Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
thecmnply  the notification issued by the respondents
\ndated.” 24\u00bb-.3–2C–U4, Vide Annexure-H and further direct the<\/p>\n
1%\/.\n<\/p>\n
*  ‘T ‘-\u00ab(By Sri K o Laxmipathi. Advocate for R1. and R2:<\/p>\n
33<\/span><\/p>\n
confined to site Nos. 23. 24. 26 to 30 {‘7 numbers} in the
\nSuprabhatha Nagar Layout.\n<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No. 18974 of2006 {LA-BDA)
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Smt. K Y Supriya Murthy<\/p>\n
W\/o Sn’ K Y Hemanth Murthy
\nAged about 41 years<\/p>\n
Residing at No.8, 24″‘ Main Road
\n15′ Phase, J P Nagar
\nBangalore – 560 78   ;,.I3e.Litfi_one1* H <\/p>\n
{By Sri A. Nag;arajar’E\\?a\u00a7{:_i’u..V\ufb01mlvocai\u00e9i’-A <\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
E The Bangalore.Develop’rr:er;t Arjrhoritgg. ”
\nT Chowd3\u00a71’VaI1′;1jROad’:–.    _
\nKuma1ja”‘P’a1fK~–‘.N’_est Q  V”    .
\nBangaIore\u00ab:~}~ V560  ‘ 2
\nRepresen’te\u00e9  its -CVo.r_n1Ii1ssio_ner<\/p>\n
2 The Deputy’ C:orn’111iSe_i[o”n.ei’ –<\/p>\n
Land Ac’.qu’1siVti’onr_ ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore vDe”velop1r;e’r;et Authority
\n _ChoWdaiahRoai:1 <\/p>\n
V, .]’K.uma1’a Par}; West<\/p>\n
~ .o..E3ang,aiore – 566020<\/p>\n
  By” “Lh”e,P1 i.1j’e’ipa} Secretary
\nV Housingand Urban Department\n<\/p>\n
 -V idh.aI1a” Sou dha
\nBangalore —- 560 001 …Respondents<\/p>\n
Sri N. Prasad. GP for R3)<\/p>\n
M.\n<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is \ufb01led under Articles 226 and 227′ of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated I L
\n7-2006 by respondent\u00ab2 in terms of Anr1exure–Q with respect to
\nthe schedule property.\n<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No. 16987 of 2006 [LA–BDA}
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Smt. Sheela A Kharche<\/p>\n
W\/ o P G Kharche<\/p>\n
Aged about 54 years<\/p>\n
Residing at No.706, 7*” Main Road<\/p>\n
HAL 2nd Stage . 4_
\nIndiranagar
\nBangalore ~ 560 038 A’ _y __\u00a7Petiti’oner<\/p>\n
[By Sr: A N NaiAd’u.V’Ar1vocate) A A<\/p>\n
T Chowd’a;’ivah5Road’   V’
\nKumara Perri; West  if
\nBan_ga1o’fey\u00a5 51soy,o2o’  ”\n<\/p>\n
R\u20ac;presen\u00bbtecl byfits _Cornmissioner<\/p>\n
1 The Bangalore::i)ev\u00e9lopn1e11t”Ai,ithorityi<\/p>\n
2 The Deputy CovrAn:1_1is.silo\u00bbn er
\nLa11d’ACq:1isitionf = V A’
\nBangalore Deve.lop:ne’1it Authority
\n Chowdaiah Road<\/p>\n
 _ 5___Ku;n_a1’a Park
\n‘ . 3 Bangalore._– 560 020<\/p>\n
3’ _   4S’tatef.lof”Karnataka<\/p>\n
V “By the’P_rii1cipal Secretary
\n“”–Ho14’sing”and Urban Department
\nVidhana Soudha<\/p>\n
 _  Bangalore ~\u00ab~ 560 001 …Responder1ts<\/p>\n
Rx\/..\n<\/p>\n
36<\/span><\/p>\n
(By Sri Abdul Khader, Advocate for R} and R2;
\nSri N. Prasad, GP for R3}<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is Filed under Articles 226 –a”I’1–d_””\u00a3Z_.’2’7Z of
\nthe Constitution of India, praying to quash Kl’1\u20ac2″”O.l’_'(ZV}\u20ac.._I_fd’ dated<\/p>\n
11-07-06 by respondent–2 in terms of Aianexure’-‘L eonfi’iiie_d”–to _
\nsite Nos. 3, 17 to 22 [7 members} in St1.prab.hatI\u00a3ia’_ \u00a3\\3aga.i1V <\/p>\n
Layout.   _<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No. 17858 of 2006 {LA–I:3IV)A\u00a7.’_Ai ”
\nBETWEEN: ‘  ”\n<\/p>\n
Srnt. K C Nirmaia  <\/p>\n
W\/ o Sri Late Sri K R Chandrashekar\ufb01fxupta
\nAged about 49 years A  dd —  5 V.  ‘3
\nResiding at No.3-O, 7″” ‘B’ Main Road’ _
\nCyber Arcade, 4″‘ Block. Jayarlagar  ‘ <\/p>\n
Bangalore ~–~ 560  A …Petitioner<\/p>\n
 Nagaraja ‘Naidui Advocate).\n<\/p>\n
AND: ____ H
\n1  B_ar1ga1o:i’e- .,I:)e\\{e’iioi3’i*r1e’nt Authority
\nT Chowdaiah Roa.d  ”\n<\/p>\n
Kumara Parkwest =
\nBangalore 44 560 020
\n4I3e’preser1ted.__by its vCommissio1’1er<\/p>\n
   x’I’he’Deputy Comrnissiorier<\/p>\n
 ” ~Lar’;d Acquisition\n<\/p>\n
 -.’_BangaloreDevelopment Authority
\n  Chov\ufb01daeiah Road
\n“=}_{ur.na1’a \u00ab-Park West
\nBangalore ~\u00ab~ 560 020<\/p>\n
A I  State of Karnataka
\n” –..By the Principai Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Department<\/p>\n
39<\/span><\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Department
\nVtdhana Soudha<\/p>\n
Bangalore – 560 001   .\n<\/p>\n
{By Sri K Krishna. Advocatefor RE  ‘
\nSri N. Prasad. GF’for’R3_)  ”\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed Lmder_Ar_ticies  arid” ‘oi:
\nthe Constitution of India, prayingto quash t’hei.orde~rs_;_:iaied Ii.–_*<\/p>\n
7-2006 issued by the responcieni;-:.2 in tern:sjVoi’A11Vnexure~Q<\/p>\n
which is confined to site No.44i’measVurir1g4A6’28  in the
\nSuprabhatha Nagar Layout. —\n<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No. 17861 of 2006  ”  .  <\/p>\n
\nBETWEEN:  \"   ' \nSmt. A K Chanrira  '      V \n<\/pre>\n
W\/o Sri A S KriSi\u00a27?E1n1ur\u00a3h\u00a7<.': '  r
\nAged aboutVj48'~yeai*s;_ _ _ "  "\n<\/p>\n
Residingat No….353_. 292″ May ‘ Road<\/p>\n
7″? Block, Jaya.:1agar_V ” _   ‘ ~
\nBangalore. &– 560 062.  _ _’   …Pet1’tior1er<\/p>\n
‘i”{.By S.rifA Nagaraj a Naidu. Advocate]<\/p>\n
  ” –The.,4VB”arxga1o.re Deveiopment Authority<\/p>\n
 Tichowdaiah’ Road
\n. “Kumai’a}f_ Park West
\n“-\u00ab.BangaI.ore – 560 020
\nReptresenied by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
A ‘T he “Deputy Commissioner. Land Aequisitiozi
\n*  Bangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road<\/p>\n
Liv<\/p>\n
40<\/span><\/p>\n
Kumara Park West
\nBangalore – 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Department
\nVidhana Soudha  ‘
\nBangalore ~ 560 001  b …R.esp’oride&’1tsA. <\/p>\n
(By Sri U. Abdul Khader. Ad\\}o4Ca1:e’for tailing
\nSri N. Prasad. GP for R3] ‘ ‘~  <\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed’~u:nd.er A.rti\u00abc1es.u2_’2\u00a3\u00a7’:ali{d 227 oi’
\nthe Constitution of India, praying to quash the order} dated 1 1-
\n7-2006 issued by respondzent.–2xi’n=f.erm”‘ss._oi’ Annexure–Q which
\nis confined to site  –_meVasu’r.i_ng”~4570 SFT in the
\nSiiilrabhatha Nagar Layout.  ‘  *   ” -.<\/p>\n
\nWrit Petition No,  \nBETWEEN: __     - '  4' \"\n\nSrnt. N Raj_eshwVa1'iV1.;,_ _  _\n<\/pre>\n
W\/o Sri’B N’ i\\ia.1idaki”finiar*._”
\nAged about .53 years-_y 4′ _   ‘ ‘
\nResiding at No. 126\/31 l\u20ac~.{“‘Maii1 Road
\nBSKIStage,   ‘ .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560    …Petitioner
\nl A [By \u00a7ri’z\u00a2;–\u00abPJagaraja Naidu. Advocate)<\/p>\n
I  The Bangalore Development Authority
\n CE’io’;*.\u00ab%daiah Road
\nKurnara Park West
\nx g Bangalore -~\u00ab 560 020
\n‘ ‘Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
bl”l’he Deputy Commissioner, Land Acquisition
\nBangalore Deveiopment Authority<\/p>\n
Banga;_1o’re,- 56063:}<\/p>\n
.3<\/p>\n
I    ”\n<\/p>\n
T. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State ofKarr1ataka
\nBy the Principai Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Departmerit
\nVidhana Soudha V  —  . V V .\n<\/p>\n
Bangaiore — 560 001   \u00ab __..Res;por_idei1ts’ ‘ <\/p>\n
(By Sri G K v Murthy, Advocate for R1 ai”_.id”R2′;
\nSri N. P1’asatd-,..__GPlot’-_R3)V  A ” =<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed Li”F’Id\u20ac1′.uAI’ti.C16S’ 226 \u00e9md 227 of
\nthe Constitution of India; .prayi&n’g’t*o_:quas_h the ‘o’r’dei* dated 1 }’~4
\n7-2006, issued by the redsxponcienitV2.”~-in~..iterr11s 0fAI’1I”1\u20acXL1I’\u20ac.’.-Q.
\nwhich is confined to siteiNo.4i;.,.7n’1ea_st1.tfing4585 SFT in the
\nSuprabhatha Nagar Layo1Ai”_t,”  ‘ ‘ is <\/p>\n
Writ Petition  17{;=fs\u00e93’:’s ofwgooe m..ss,4;\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN: ”    — ” ”\n<\/p>\n
Sri C Marljavppaf. ‘V _  _<\/p>\n
S\/ o Sri Chikka1jRa’Re’ddy”iV_eV .. ‘<\/p>\n
Aged aboiut 4.0 years  __  <\/p>\n
Residing at*No;247}’ 181.1% Main Road<\/p>\n
Wilson Garden V ‘  ”\n<\/p>\n
…Petitior1er<\/p>\n
It {By Sri A Nagaraja Naidu. Advocate}<\/p>\n
1  Bartgalore Development Authority
\n‘1’ Chowdaiah Road
\n‘ x j Kumara Park West:\n<\/p>\n
‘ “\u00a33ariga1ore ~ 560 020
\n”  Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
42<\/span><\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nBangalore Development r\\utho1’ity
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary J  _
\nHousing and Urban Department. ll ‘
\nVidhana Soudha  ‘  ” _ ~
\nBangalore — 560 001 V   …Resp;0n’dentss <\/p>\n
(By Sri K G Laxmipathi, Pi.dlVaCate fCr_lR*la
\nSri N. Prasad\u00a2___G.P_i”o..1j R3] B i<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition –:’.s\ufb01”.’ilecl’._ uni-:iller’V–Avr.tiCl_es 226 and 227′ of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, prayingltcsl  order dated ll-
\n7–2006 issued byVresp0r.1d.eni:e2′–inate’rms&”ovl” A11nexure–P with<\/p>\n
respect to the s(}h.ed-ale 1;j=;I’Op\u20acIft3?.    u<\/p>\n
Writ Petitioni\ufb01l
\n    ”\n<\/p>\n
S\/0 late Sri Parame;s.hwfa1*a He\u00e9gde
\nAged aboutu5l years a B
\nResiding at N’c..24\/B,’,15~’-,” Main Road
\n5%; Phase. ,1 P Nagar’ ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
 Banga;'{ore__;\u00bb~ 560 078  ———-  …Petitioner<\/p>\n
  Sri A. Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate}<\/p>\n
AND}  V<\/p>\n
…_..–………_s._<\/p>\n
‘V1 l’ll’l1.el’BVan\u00a7alore Development Authority<\/p>\n
. T tjhowdaiah Road
\n ” Vrliuinara Park West
\na _ Bangalore \u00abW 560 020
\nit Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
   ‘  . . . . .\n<\/p>\n
<33<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore ~– 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Department ' '
\nVidhana Soudha   _ _ y W'
\nBangalore ~\u00ab– 560 001  …Res.p.on'dents: '<\/p>\n
[By Sri U. Abdui Khader."Ad'i2=oeate f'o.r Ri.ar1d'_R2;<\/p>\n
Sri N. Prasad_,___G-Riioir R3] ' 1<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition   226 and 2.27 of
\nthe Constitution of India. prayi–ng!to._quash'_j.the order dated
\ni1~7~2006 issued by the 'respo~ndent:;2, in terms of Annexure~Q
\nwith respect. to theas-ehedzuiej p_:ijopeVrty',j-, pp
\nWrit Petition:'i\u00a7io.:of"2'Q-0&3' {I,A\u00a7~Eii3A)i
\n  " " '  *'<\/p>\n
Sri P S CI:Vaneshan'u< -.\n<\/p>\n
r S\/o Sri PR Shanmdgarn <\/p>\n
Aged about”4e9 years a ”\n<\/p>\n
Residing at No:36, 9,9?” M’ain”Road<\/p>\n
Link R\u00a7oad;.Ma11eswa1’am V<\/p>\n
i . . . Petit’ionei’<\/p>\n
 \u00e9f\ufb02yvfiri A. Nagaraja Naidti, Advocate}<\/p>\n
 Q ‘V1. ‘i’ii.eiB_angalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
A _T Ci”:-owdaiah Road
\n‘\u00bb V Fiumara Park West
\nV’ =.B’anga1ore u 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
‘Nit\/’<\/p>\n
44<\/span><\/p>\n
2 The Deputy Commissioner. Land Acquisition
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangaiore -~ 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Depa1*tn1e-int
\nVidhana Soudha <\/p>\n
Bangalore –\u00bb 560 001 _  ….Res1;;Aondents’  ‘<\/p>\n
(By Sri G K v Murthy. Adttoeate i”o’r 8
\nSri N. Prasad.  (‘or R3) ”   i<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is i’i1eo’* unider and 227′ of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying’ to qquashff order dated
\n1 I\u00ab~7–2006 issued by the resp.o.n,de.nt~–2 in te’:”m”s\u00bb_oi’ A1’1I’l\u20acXLEI”\u20ac-Q<\/p>\n
with respect to the schedule \u00a7prope”i:ty,_V <\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.;1’%\u00e94sibi”7:ao0eij;-LAigabaijt ‘
\nBETWEEN: , tttt     –  2<\/p>\n
Smt. Jaya P}\u00a2_Re_ddy V’ .\n<\/p>\n
W\/o Sri Prabhakar Reddyf ._
\nAged about 51 ‘years V’ ‘V A = V
\nResiding at No. 152, 271’} ‘;v1a’m Road
\n5″” Cross,’ j1~’3′ Phase  ~ <\/p>\n
    …..\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore  560 b’}’8V …Petitioner<\/p>\n
   Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate)<\/p>\n
” ” ‘T  The Baiigfaiore Development Authority<\/p>\n
V. 1″ ~  Chowdaiah Road
\n‘ Kumara Park West
\nEgangaiore –\u00bb 560 020<\/p>\n
M   ._Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Deputy Commissioner, Land Acquisition
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka   –<\/p>\n
By the Principal Secretary V
\nHousing and Urban Department
\nVidhana Soudha T.    , }
\nBangalore -~ 560 001 ” _   <\/p>\n
(By Sri U. Abdul Khader, Ad’v.oca.te f’o1;’R\u00ab.E.Vai1dVi\u00a7R2;<\/p>\n
Sri N: ~I\u00a7f1*asa,vd”.MGi? R3}<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is $11 .\n<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, ..p_r3,yi11g’V.epto quash the order dated
\n11-7-2006 issued-_by_thef_ respond.en~t{2  terms of Annexure~R<\/p>\n
with respect to ithej;1sChed4u,le1property.’ <\/p>\n
Writ Petition Nq.’:– “\u00a3949 \u00a7f’2oo’e*- {i;;{i–B\u00a73A)
\nBETWEEN ‘  <\/p>\n
Srnt. Jaya~.P. ‘Reddy *   4\u00bb
\nW\/o Sri. Pra3ohakvar”R_eddy’ _
\nAged about Slfyevarso  ”\n<\/p>\n
Residingvaet. No. 152., 271-” Main Road<\/p>\n
 ‘V V   81 .._Phase  “”” ”\n<\/p>\n
 J,Pi\\Fagar  B _
\n‘-Bazigal\ufb01regg i\u00a7~.6iO\\ C278 . . Petitioner<\/p>\n
Sri A. Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate}<\/p>\n
 p ‘MD: A<\/p>\n
it  it  Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
‘  =.’I7’Chowdaiah Road
\n‘ Kumara Park West<\/p>\n
led’under_.A1’tiCE’es. 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
46<\/span><\/p>\n
Bangalor –~ 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Deputy Commissioner. Land Acquisitioza
\nBangalore Development Authority  ‘
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore –~ 560 020   ._<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary .\n<\/p>\n
Housing” and Urban Deptartment
\nVidhana Soudha   r ._  . -‘
\nBangalore – 560 001  K …R’e.spon_ci\u00a7ents<\/p>\n
{By Sri K G  ._Ri and R2;\n<\/p>\n
Sri N. Prasad-,. GP  <\/p>\n
This Writ P\u00a21.:jtiQ..n is:_lfi1\u00a2d_j’;\u00a7na\u00e9;\u20ac”,A;\u00a7u’cies’V 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the ConstituI;ioni_’of }l_ridia,”-praying4_ l.ol’quas’h the order dated
\n11-7-2006 isst1ed”l:1y”*the re’s_p.ori~den1,–l2_ in, terms of Annexure-Q<\/p>\n
. with respect to the:_ s{\u00bb:_hedi1le_Vp’rfope’i’ty. <\/p>\n
Writ Petition No: i’s524_lof 20t(\u00a7T6v…{_IA~lBDAl
\nBETWEEN . . *”~*<"\u00bb=<\/p>\n
Sri S C KishorelE'{un1ar..'\u00ab
\nS\/o Sri 4553 G eChengalv_arayan<\/p>\n
'Aged avb__oiutb_–32 years  """ "
\n'Residing at Npo.44-7, HIG–1, 5"'? Main Road<\/p>\n
ERI .'3el1'ed1L1le'i'\u00bb{loga;'3–air
\nChennai+\u20acM\ufb02}O3?*"\n<\/p>\n
\u00bb.  Represented byliis GPA Holder
\n Sri S G”‘Che.n’ga}v’arayan
\n ‘S\/so late Sri Quruxrappa Naidu …Petitioner<\/p>\n
[By Sri A. Nagaraja Naidu. Advocate]<\/p>\n
R\/t<\/p>\n
Aged about 42 years
\nResiding at # 36. Model LIC Colony<\/p>\n
Basaveshwaranagar
\nBangalore 560 079<\/p>\n
Vmocl Kumar<\/p>\n
Son of Narayan M<\/p>\n
Aged about 37 years
\nResiding at # H39. 15″‘ Main
\n8″‘ Cross. 1 Stage<\/p>\n
1 Phase, BTM Layout
\nBangalore — 560 029<\/p>\n
Annapurna V B  .\n<\/p>\n
Wife of’N K Subravrfnaniyamllll ”  ‘
\nAged about 39 years  _ _  V
\nResiding atl#160, III ewes–.=’
\nV Phase. Banashanlzanf ‘HI Stage’ ”
\nBangalore .—.580 085 I  A’ <\/p>\n
G K Sa;u;’hy’anaga’lal<s.lfi–I}1i*~. V  _  V
\nAged a'i3.01il\/$0 y\u00e9ars.  .  V
\nReysidingg  #"iQQ.9."–351.** 'D' "Cross
\n2\u20aci"*Main;e'41'%e"PBI0cka
\nJayan–aga.r ll   d
\nBangalore + 56004:"\n<\/p>\n
Prashanih_vK. ‘ S <\/p>\n
,, Son ‘of Sanjeevappa
\n ._ V-.e.Aged: about 33 years
\n,  Residing at # 27, II Main Road
\n* _ ea ‘e;;oes,eVe1I”stage
\n._  ._Vija’ya”nagar”\n<\/p>\n
‘ _ Bangal’o1i_t:’– 560 040<\/p>\n
G Mahadevan<\/p>\n
 .. ,_Sor1’ofC M Ganesh<\/p>\n
Aged about 55 years<\/p>\n
”  Residing MP’ 16\/} 3, P Block<\/p>\n
Nandhini Layout<\/p>\n
Circular Road
\nBangalore — 560 096<\/p>\n
7′ Shankar Subramanian<\/p>\n
Son of late M S Balasubramanian<\/p>\n
Aged about 30 years<\/p>\n
Residing at # 15. 5″‘ B Main<\/p>\n
1 Floor, Obalappa Gardens __ <\/p>\n
K R Road, Bangalore – 560 082<\/p>\n
8 Lakshmi Venkateshwara [Guptalg it  . A<\/p>\n
Daughter of V Sathyanarayaiaa Gupta . _ ‘
\nAged about 40 years    ” .  .\n<\/p>\n
Residing at # 706, 15′” A Main <\/p>\n
7″‘ Cross. BSK 1 Stage ” – A
\nSrinivasanagar  _ ._<\/p>\n
Bangalore M 560 005 <\/p>\n
9 .l~INHarish _ _ A
\nSon of H Narayai\ufb01a _ V . llll ”\n<\/p>\n
Aged ab0ufL37_<yearsV__ _
\nResiding at ,# 5.8;_Kirlosl:arv_Colo'ny'
\n1 Stage;r–Ban;ga1ore\u00a7:,3\u00bb~~.5\u20acQ 'O79 " A …Petit1'oners
\nl*{By– Sri  Advocate)
\nAND: A it it
\n1__ V The }:f3ar1gaIorel'l3evelo'p:nent Authority
\n' l  . T Crhovcidaiah\u00e9 Road, K P West
\n_ . E3'a.n_gaIvore  __
\n  F{epre.se'rrted  its Commissioner
\n 'I'lI*u:=,.lSpeC.i.ali'  Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
 Bangalore …Responder1ts<\/p>\n
A if"  K N Puttegowda, Advocate for R1 and R2}<\/p>\n
53<\/span><\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying to gram. the order dated
\n28~8~\u00bb2006 vlde A.:1nexure\u00bbB passed by the respondent-2.<\/p>\n
‘Writ Petition No.2272 of 2007 (LA-BDA]
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Sri Krishna Kumar Madarkal<\/p>\n
S\/o Sn H Narasinga Rao Madarkal<\/p>\n
Aged about 50 years<\/p>\n
Residing at No. 153. 15* Floor, 7″} Cross _
\nTeachers Colony, Kumaraswamy Layui;i’t”*\u00ab . <\/p>\n
Bangalore W 560 078  ‘:.4..,’petitac;l3_ep I<\/p>\n
(By Sri A rajaf \u00e9ldmfocate}<\/p>\n
AND<\/p>\n
I The Bangalore I)eve:_1op:;me’ht”A1i:.}f1or_iiy?
\nT Chowd.aiah5R”oadv 7 \u00bb  .\n<\/p>\n
Kurnanii Pzifigwest,   A
\nBangalore \u00a5=–.51.’E_7’O 0250*  __
\nRcpfe’Sen\u00a7ed byfiliiis Co1’n1nissio’nVe1*<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land AAcc’1’u.isit.ion Officer
\nBangalore DeVel’op~men’i Authority
\n Chowdaiah Road”\n<\/p>\n
I F;:1Jf3~’1a1’% Park”W ‘<\/p>\n
 _ ‘iBarig;l_I\u00a21::_– 560 020-\n<\/p>\n
   liiarnataka<\/p>\n
” A  i’.he–V}f?rin=cipal Secretary\n<\/p>\n
-.’Hou’s1ngfand Urban Department
\nVidhana Soudha
\nBalrigalore — 580 O0}. …Respondents<\/p>\n
V’ =  ri\u00abBy Sri K N Puttegowda, Advocate for R1 and R2:
\nSri Narendra Prasad, GP for R3)<\/p>\n
LL\/’<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India,
\n12006 issued by the respondent~2 in terms
\nwhich is confined to the site No.97 measur
\nSuprabhatha Nagar Layout.\n<\/p>\n
54<\/span><\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 2.27 of
\npraying to quash the order dated llw
\nof Annrexure-A.\n<\/p>\n
ing 2948.431 the<\/p>\n
Writ Petition N0.227’3 of 2007 {LAwBDA}<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Sri S V Sivarudriya<\/p>\n
S\/o Late Sri Veera Gowda
\nAged about 55 years
\nResiding at N0.160, 9″‘ Cross<\/p>\n
Narasimharaja Colony
\nBangalore — 560 009<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
{By Sri A Naga’rajatNai:ci tu~’;..Au–y_oc’ate)<\/p>\n
The Bang-aJore”Deveiopnient;Autnority
\nTChoWd.aia}\u00a7.;_.Road_  ” r
\nK11rnar–a_ Park ‘\\}’;~”est” * . ,
\nBanga1ore’5.6GvO2’Q  – _<\/p>\n
Represented  its’ .C\u00a7or;rir:V::.\u00a7ssioner<\/p>\n
‘_1″heyASpe’eia1AALar1d Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
 Bangaiore De’vel.op:nei1t Authority
\n‘ y  Chowdaiah Road, Kumara Park West
\n” ~ _yBa\u00abng,alo.re”  560 020<\/p>\n
  ‘Karnataka<\/p>\n
A ._By t.heP’rincipai Secretaiy<\/p>\n
A ” * a.I_3angaIore – 560 00}<\/p>\n
Housing and Urban Department
\nVidfiana Soudha
\n…Responden ts<\/p>\n
A  “:{By Sri K N Puttegowda, Advocate for R1 and R2;<\/p>\n
Sri N Prasaci, GP for R3)<\/p>\n
it\/\/”‘<\/p>\n
…Petitioner<\/p>\n
55<\/span><\/p>\n
This Wrii: Petition is filed under Ariicies 226 and 22′? oi’<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated
\n113-2006 issued by the respondeni.V2 in terms of A1″mexure–R
\nwith respect: to the schedule property. .~<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.2274 of 2007 [LA–BDA]
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Sri S V Sivarudriya<\/p>\n
S\/o late Sri Veera Gowda   ~<\/p>\n
Aged about 55 years I<\/p>\n
Residing at No. 160. Qi” Cross<\/p>\n
Narasimharaja Colony  _  *  ;\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore ~\u00ab 560 019 V   ” _ ‘ _ ‘~.,_..P.eiIi”Lioi1ei’<\/p>\n
{By Sri A N\u00a71garajei.\u00a7\\I2iid.u;”Advoe\u00e9iie)_ <\/p>\n
1 The Bajrigalore’i”)eVe1o’prxieni,Ai:ytho1’iiy
\nT ChowdaiaiL’Roa=,i  ” A ~
\nKurIia;’a_ Park est” * , <\/p>\n
Bangalore ;.g!;’>..(_SG .020  –\n<\/p>\n
Repreisenied V by its\u00bb Commission er<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land ‘Acquisition Officer
\nBangaiorei-Deveilopineni Authority
\n~ ‘T. Chowdaiaii Road
\nA & V”i”Kuij’ier\u00e91A.i?ark West
\n” ‘~ .VBa–mgae1’o::e” ~–_ 560 020<\/p>\n
3 ‘~ A h ‘-The State of Karnataka
\n\u00bb._By theP’r’iAncipal Secretary
\nIiolising and Urban Department
\n Vidh\ufb01iila Soudha
\n” +..Bar1galore ~ 560 OOI …Responder1ts<\/p>\n
  Sri I. G. Gachchiriamaizh, Advocaie for R1 and R2:
\ni Sri N, Prasad, GP for R3)<\/p>\n
57<\/span><\/p>\n
{By Sri K Krishna, Advocate for R1 and R2:
\nSri N. Prasad, GP for R3)<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226  of<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India. praying to quash the~\u00ab~~oiidVe__ifi’ flaied<\/p>\n
11-‘\/–2006 issued by the R2, in terms oi’ A1j.’ii–exLii*e~ve_’P*i <\/p>\n
Respect to the Schedule Property.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.2276 of 2007 {LA–B:; A} ”
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Smt. D R Malini<\/p>\n
W\/o Sri Muniswamaiah<\/p>\n
Aged about 44 years   _
\nResiding at No.64\/ 1. 21″‘ “C”:’QSS”:9″‘.’ ViV’ia_i,:1;
\n4*” Phase, 73-” Biock, BSK”IIi S.ta-gei } V’ <\/p>\n
Bangalore ~ 560 085  ‘A:{\u00a7E’3′?3til,iOi1\u20acr<\/p>\n
(By s.yi’_’A. Nagaraga rigiiiaia .Ad\u00a7{IoCate}<\/p>\n
1 The’ g%;j;lore”f:DeveiopmenfV Pit: thority
\nT’Chowdaia;h–\u00ab.Road’g_  — f
\nKumara Park ‘  . . _.  ,_ V.\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560  ‘
\nRep1’eser,1tevd by its COII11’niSSiOI1\u20acI’<\/p>\n
 V.   “iThe_BASpecia1″Land..Acquisii:ion Officer<\/p>\n
A ‘i”Bariga1ore Development Authority
\n ‘~ .1’. {“3_hoWdaia_h Road
\n Ku1i1ai.ra  West
\n‘=Bar1ga1’o–re\u00a7+~ 560 020<\/p>\n
— 3 .44The”‘VStaf’e of Karnataka<\/p>\n
By vibe Principal Secretary
\n ” Viaiiiousing and Urban D\u20acpaJ’ti’3.’1\u20aciI}i.
\nr _ Vidhana Soudha
\nBangalore — 560 001 …Respondents<\/p>\n
. :97<\/p>\n
58<\/span><\/p>\n
{By Sri I. G. Gaehchiiiamaih. Advocate for R1 and R2;
\nSri N. Prasad. GP for R3) <\/p>\n
This Writ. Petition is filed under Articles 226  of
\nthe Constitution of India. praying to quash the orgcie-r_\u00ab’c%.a_t\u00a7’eid_._1J.-
\n7-2006 issued by the respondent–2 in terms Anuri-e’Xi1_rei–Sv.
\nwhich is confined to the site Nos. 1.2.3.4,5,6.,? ‘and’ -8ftoget.f1e.rg
\nmeasuring 18900 SFT in the Suprabh.aitha N:1gar’LefijyoiiiV._’   ‘<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.227’7 of 2007 {LA–Bvi5)A}  A. 5’
\nBETWEEN: ‘ ‘
\nSmt. Kiran Vi}<\/p>\n
W\/o Sri S P Vij<\/p>\n
Aged about 49 years __ i_ j
\nResiding at No.73, 3″-1 Cross. ‘<\/p>\n
Bikasipura _ . V r   _
\nBangalore – 560 0778   *  ”  I  7’i9’etii.ioner<\/p>\n
  Nagarajakaidu. iabivocate)
\nAND:\n<\/p>\n
1 “Hie Bangalore Dev’eio”pmeint Authority
\n‘1’ Crhowdaiah   .\n<\/p>\n
Kurnara Pai’ii.W”est_ ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore ‘~– 560 020-9
\nRepresented by its “Commissioner<\/p>\n
A “”The’Speeial Land Acquisition Of’ficer
\n V’ * .,Ba-n_gaIo\u00abre” ‘Development Authority
\n TI Chiofdvdaiah Road
\n~A “Kumar”a—-Park West
\n\u00ab_Bangai_0i?’e W 560 020<\/p>\n
‘I”iie_S’tate of Karnataka
\nby ” ‘r-By the Principal Secretary
\n2 _ Housing and Urban Department
\n‘Vidhana Soudha
\nBangalore ~ 560 001 …Respondents<\/p>\n
V.\n<\/p>\n
59<\/span><\/p>\n
(By Sri K. Krishna, Advocate for R1. and R2;
\nSri N. Prasad. GP for R3}<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 2126  oi’<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying to quash the ordeif’_\u00abdai.i’e?j,_l <\/p>\n
7-2006 issued by the respondentw2 in terms _.o’i7– Anrie\u00a7<.1ire'~oQv.
\nwhich is confined to the site Nos. 71 mezisun-'n'g._\u00a2q20.4O  <\/p>\n
the Suprabhatha Nagar Layout.   _<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.2278 of 2007 [LAwBl\u00a7)_Aj  A. it
\nBETWEEN: A A<\/p>\n
Smt. Kiran Vij<\/p>\n
W\/o Sri S P Vi}<\/p>\n
Aged about 49 years  j
\nResiding at No.73, 3"" Cross – '<\/p>\n
Bikasipura  _ 7   _
\nBangalore – 560 0378   —  "  I  "Petitioner<\/p>\n
   Nagairaja l__\\ia1fjdu, Adirocate}
\nAND:\n<\/p>\n
1 Tliie Bangai.i;re Develooiinient, Authority
\nT Chowdaiah *F'{oadv._.  A
\nKurnara Parit. VVe}st_ ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore =– 560 C20’… ”\n<\/p>\n
Represented by its’Commissionei*<\/p>\n
  o  Lan’d’Acq_uisition Officer<\/p>\n
 V’ * .,Ba\u00abng”al’ore” Development Authority
\n TI .C:h=.oWdaiVa.7i1 Road\n<\/p>\n
— A ‘=Kumar’a-.PYci1rk West\n<\/p>\n
-._Banga1o’\u00a7re ~ 560 020<\/p>\n
The}-State of Karnataka
\nV. ” *w.By the Principal Secretary
\nx _ Housing and Urban Department
\n‘Vidhana Soudha
\nBangalore ~ 560 O0} …Respondents<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
it\/\/’<\/p>\n
  V2 .   Acquisition Officer<\/p>\n
to  f<\/p>\n
K   __By the Principal Secretary<\/p>\n
60<\/span><\/p>\n
{By Sri K Krishna. Advocate for R} and R2;
\nSri N Prasad. GP for R3)<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226  of
\nthe Constitution of India, praying to quash the order. _da_ted ,_i is-
\n7-2006 issued by the respor1dentv2 in terms _o’E7– Anr1e_5m1:fe’~oR’v.
\nwhich. is confined to the site Nos. 82 n’1easuifi_ng’~–.c239_:3 in
\nthe Slmrabhatha Nagar Layout.    V”   I  ‘<\/p>\n
Writ Petition. No.4478 of 2007 {1,AuBnA_)
\nBETWEEN: ‘  <\/p>\n
Smt. H N Nagarathna
\nW\/o Sri H N Nagaraja Setty ..\n<\/p>\n
Aged about 52 years  is -. ‘
\nResiding at No.72 ‘- _ .\n<\/p>\n
Shankarrnutt Para1iei’–Road   *
\nShankar Park
\nShankarapurarn,    = 4* _     V .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560  ” b  ”    “…Petitioner<\/p>\n
 ” “(VBy.   Naihdu”. Advocate)<\/p>\n
1 The I3anga’–l.ore De”Je1oVpn’ient Authority
\nT Chorydaiah’-Road ‘
\n A_ Kvtifnaira Park West …..\n<\/p>\n
 .Ba’nga’foi’e\u00a5~.560 020
\n‘ ,Represented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
Ba.ngaiore Development Authority
\nV T. Chovwydaiah Road
\n_  Kumara”Park West
\nf, “Ban.gaioi-e ~ 580 020<\/p>\n
 ‘The State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
V’ 1′ E\u00e9angaiore M 560 020<\/p>\n
61<\/span><\/p>\n
Housing and Urban Department
\nVidhana Soudha
\nBangaiore -~ 560 001 …Responden._Ls\u00bbe.<\/p>\n
{By Sri R Sharath Chandra, Advocate for R1  A’
\nSri N. Prasad. GP for R3}   ..\n<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is \ufb01led unde.r,.Articles”2;2′,’*3jandV’2.2’f-Voi’ \u00bb _ <\/p>\n
the Constitution of India. prayingfto qu*ash_ tI1’e–V’o1*ciejr”dat,e\u00abd
\n11–7~2006 issued by the respon.4de1_i’t~2:iV in “ier’i”ns<\/p>\n
Annexure–R which is confined io ihe sire Nos;1’34″an=d”i35..L<\/p>\n
measuring 5295 SET in the Supiaiphatha. N’agaieiv’Lay.ou_1,,VV <\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.4479 of 2007 {LAl’soA: K
\nBETWEEN: ‘  ” L ‘ <\/p>\n
Smt. H N Nagarathna ” V .<\/p>\n
W\/o Sri H N Nagaraja\ufb01etiy   *
\nAged about 52 years ‘    r
\nResiding at No.72.    V \u00ab ~ _V
\nShankarrnutt Parrailrel Road. — ._
\nShankara Park V i ”  ”
\nShankarapu;rain—_ y-1 *
\nBangalore \u00ab\u20ac560    — f …Petiiioner<\/p>\n
(By\u00e9i Sri   aidu. Advocate]
\nAND: ‘ 1’<\/p>\n
  The Ban’ga1ore Development Authority
\n” 2 ‘ T ‘Chowdaiah Road
\nA  Kn-mara’ “Pa1’kfW.est,
\ni3a1:ga1ore SE30 O20
\nRe;;)resen~ted.=by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
__  The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nV, I:5an.ga1ore Development Authority
\n” .A’.i’;.>Ch’owdaiah Road
\nKurnara Park West<\/p>\n
\\UK\/\/…\n<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary
\nHousing and Urban Department
\nVicihana Soudha
\nBangalore w 560 001 …Responden_t_s<\/p>\n
{By Sri R-amanjaneya Gowda, Advocate for R1
\nSri N. Prasad, GP for R3}   a-  ‘<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition is \ufb01ied under Articles   it<\/p>\n
the Constitution of India, praying to qgash th’e”o”r*cie’ii dated ‘i.l–“” \u00bb <\/p>\n
7-2006 issued by the respondentw2 in terms of a’s.Ai:.:ir::X.t1re-W
\nwhich is con\ufb01ned to the site Nos. 9,’\u00bb._i0.p}1;’ 12., 1.4;” 15,,}a:3_d’ii.16
\n[7 number} on 30 FT X 40 FT each to’ta1I’y. Vrneeistiifing 84UO’SeP’Vi’,
\nin the Suprabhatha Nagar Layoi,1t..__ 7 ‘     _ ><\/p>\n
Writ Petition No.4~480 of 2()07′{LA~BDA_}   ”\n<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:  V    - ~ V -\nSri S. Dinesh    \n\nS\/0 Sri s V Sekaruw \n\nAged about 22V.yeai*s.\nResidingvi'at\"No..iL4 1  '\n\n<\/pre>\n
2*” Street Padi Pu’du._ Nalgar __ — A
\nAnna Na\u00a7{3r’West._
\nChennai –‘1._0i . . A ,
\nRepresented by his GPA~hOi~d\u20ac1’
\nSri S V? ‘Sekar ” V ‘<\/p>\n
 . S\/o Sr’; S _\\\/’enugogiie\ufb01 N.a.iou<\/p>\n
Prf:sei’1tiy;”;Fesiding at Anjanapura Village<\/p>\n
V7_VUttarahai1i”Hobii’ <\/p>\n
if-anga tor-.3″  ,, A  I A A  …Petitiorier<\/p>\n
 ‘  Sri A. Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate)<\/p>\n
  xi; v  The Bangalore Development Authority<\/p>\n
T Chowdaiah Road
\nKurnara Park West<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
63<\/span><\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer
\nBangalore Development Authority
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore — 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka
\nBy the Principal Secretary M
\nHousing and Urban Depaitnaeht
\nVidhana Soudha   B .5  = .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore – 560 00} V  ‘”._…Resp_oA1ide’nts=–‘
\n[By Sri K. Krishna, AdVo\u00e9’ate for R1 and; R2;
\nSri N Prasad, Advocates’ for R3} _ V<\/p>\n
This Writ Petition  un;de::_Arti.=:ies 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the Constitution efi.i’lndia,, p_1’ayingA._to quash the order dated
\nji1~7-2006 issue-d_ by-the r,es_pondent_42_,i:1 terms of Ar1nexure~Q
\nwith respect to t3\ufb011_e;.lscheciu_l”e~property’;<\/p>\n
Writ Petzition ‘Nof;2l4si’3.   {LA-sloA)<\/p>\n
BETWNEEN; ” _  ‘  ”\n<\/p>\n
Smt. Mopart}:–i_ylSud}iarai1jll
\nW\/0 Sri ‘Kotha 13’rasar1naE-tumar<\/p>\n
 . Aged_~’a’boni. 28 years  ….. 14 v<\/p>\n
Residing 2-“: No~..:;235. 13* Floor<\/p>\n
“._V2ogM’.\/Jaiiae, l2\ufb01<i\u00ab.Cross<\/p>\n
J-.P N-agta1'.['2f"' Phase
\nBangallore 4560 078
\nRep.  he1'~{_}I-EA holder<\/p>\n
 nsri Goyindaraj K N
\nB'-'\u00ab,__.'S\/o Nagaraj K. N …Petitioner<\/p>\n
(By Sri A Nagaraja Naidu. Advocate]<\/p>\n
\\x\/B<\/p>\n
 Aged about 3;' ~y_ears<\/p>\n
. .  :v\u20ac(J"U_3' Block, Jayanagar
\n.yy&Ba'nga1oi1'e.~w 560 082 …Petitioner<\/p>\n
64<\/span><\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
1 The Bangalore Development Authority
\nT Ch owdaiah Road
\nKurnara Park West
\nBangalore ~– 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Officer’ .. ”
\nBangalore Development Autholrityg” A.
\nT. Chowdaiah Road
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore W 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataka y
\nBy the Principal Se<:_1*eta1'v-,5  ._
\nHousing and Urban DeparLn'ient_._ <\/p>\n
Vidhana Soudha   .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore~l5.\u20aciQlO01  V  “~..”‘:.._u..’.Responder1ts<\/p>\n
{By smi: Kris-hlna,<-\u00a7a:l__yoc'a'tle my R1 and R2:
\n' _V . Pra_san_', y_GP"forV\u00a7R3}<\/p>\n
This \u00a7Writ Peiiition'?.is filed under Articles 225 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution' of lr:di'a,, lpcraying toquash the order dated 1 iv
\n752006 issued by th.e":eapon_derit–2 in terms of Annexure-P
\nwith respect. toihe schl'e_d'u'le "property.<\/p>\n
Writ Petition ix1o.58oa;V._\u00a2r20Q7 (LA–BDA)
\nsr\u00a3"'<}d'u1'_\ufb01da.{\u00e9ja.V "  _ _
\n8\/ 0 Sri Nanjappa<\/p>\n
Residing at NQ624, psi 'A' Main<\/p>\n
(By Sri A Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate)<\/p>\n
ix\/C<\/p>\n
 "\n<\/p>\n
V’  iVfah’a,_cle?.?a..rl5rasad<\/p>\n
V B _Residi’ng at i\\Fs’;’80. 7*” Main<\/p>\n
H H :”‘~–_Mysore W21 …Pet1’tioner<\/p>\n
65<\/span><\/p>\n
…._….._……….\n<\/p>\n
1 The Bangalore Development Auth0r1’ty
\n‘1’ Chowdaiah Road
\nKurnara Park West
\nBangalore ~ 560 020
\nRepresented by its Commissioner<\/p>\n
2 The Special Land Acquisition Civfficerl ‘  ”
\nBangalore Development Authority  ~ ”
\nT. Chowciaiah Road 7 B’
\nKumara Park West
\nBangalore -\u00ab~ 560 020<\/p>\n
3 The State of Karnataiga A
\nBy the Principal Sec~1’_et;ary’._ _ _ B A
\nHousing and Urban Depa1’tmerit
\nVidhana Souclha    B
\nBangai0re:{56O 001 V    ‘ l.=’..Resp0r1der1ts<\/p>\n
 for R1 and R2;\n<\/p>\n
V -f__ f_Sri”N Pras_a.d”,”GP for R3}<\/p>\n
This Writ5Petiti?9n -i.s*fiIed_1i;nder Articles 226 and 227 of _
\nthe ConstitutionBof”-~l,nd\u00bbia}V.pli’aying to quash the order dated
\ni1–7–2006\u00abissued’ by’::es_;jon_d”e\u00abrit–2 in terms oi”Armex’ure-R with
\nrespect to the__schedule’.prope1*ty.<\/p>\n
Writ Eetition No.:58–ClSv_of 23007 {LA\u00bbBDA}<\/p>\n
S”\/”0 Sri . K ‘Kal.ase:;’Gowda
\nAged yabout .28–.years<\/p>\n
Brindavan 3′:”.xte’r1si0n, 15’ Stage<\/p>\n
(By Sri A Nagaraja Naidu, Advocate]<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
 ‘Vl_l~7~2O\u00a3)6;g_ issued by the respondent~2._ in terms of
\nH ”  A”‘–.Ahnexure4vQ with respect to the schedule property.<\/p>\n
67<\/span><\/p>\n
Milpitas CA 95035<\/p>\n
Represented by his GPA holder<\/p>\n
Sri B N Gupta<\/p>\n
S\/o Sri C B Nageshiah<\/p>\n
Presently residing at Vasundhara Nilaya<\/p>\n
Subhash Nagar  _ V’
\nArsikere — 573 I03 …Pe_tiiione.1f.”~ ‘<\/p>\n
[By Sri A Nagaraja  bAd’.(ot:ate’) —  ‘–<\/p>\n
1 The Bangalore Developn1el1tAutho1’ity
\nT Chowdalah Road  . ” ..\n<\/p>\n
Kurnara Park West .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560  _ 3 ,
\nRepresented by its Commissioner’   * .<\/p>\n
2 The Special.Land i1~’_.equisiotionA”Officer  V
\nBangalore” Dt;’:jJi:iIfL’])l:’.’7lE}I\u20acl\u00a7lL “AuthQ_ri’ty” ”
\nT. Cho_w’dai.ah…Rf0ad\u00ab.:_-.,__ it    V ‘
\nKumara P:1I’l\u00a3 West _   g_
\nB&1?.5\u00a7\\a1OVf’\u20ac.9 5i3:Q.V.02-0 P<\/p>\n
3 The State.ol”‘3{:a1rna_gtal\u00a3a”’—- ‘
\nBy the Prineigpallj\ufb01eeztetiary
\nHousing and ‘U_rban Department
\nV_idhana*Soud_h–a  ”\n<\/p>\n
_]j%3angalo1’e”~–~ 560 001 …Respondents<\/p>\n
 Sifl K Krishna, Advocate for R1 and R2;
\n ”   “–“Sri N. Prasad. GP for R8)<\/p>\n
 g’Th1s_W;}-i_: Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of
\nthe Const_:1tution of India, praying to quash the order dated<\/p>\n
Xi\/.t<\/p>\n
68<\/span><\/p>\n
Writ Petition NO. 13819 of 2007 [LAJBDA]
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Mr. E Govinda Naidu<\/p>\n
S\/0 late E Narayanaswamy N aidu<\/p>\n
Aged about 54 years<\/p>\n
R\/at No.1 161\/(3-12. 9″} Cross
\nAshokanagar. BSK 1 Stage. II Block   ~<\/p>\n
BangaIore\u00ab5O   T’ .; . t.io’1*1er a   . T .’<\/p>\n
{By Sri Rajagopala _Naidij”,A;\u00a7\u00a7d\\roca1,e’}AA   .  3<\/p>\n
I The State of Karnz1’_za*E\u00ab;a<\/p>\n
By its Secretary  e-  ;. ;\n<\/p>\n
Department of Housing and :<\/p>\n
\nUrban Deveioprnemf’  ” –  ‘
\nMSBui1dvir1g     ”\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore.—-1g1′;jVL’V_  ~ ‘\u00ab   <\/p>\n
2 The BarigaioiieDeve’loVp3:1en_t_ <\/p>\n
Authox
\nRep. by its -Conin1is*-ai_o11.e1– .<\/p>\n
T. C_howdaiah’ \u00abRoad . _.\n<\/p>\n
Kurx1a_ra ParR.WesL,. ”\n<\/p>\n
Barlgalore ‘\u00ab-20 <\/p>\n
 3 \u00bb\u00bb’M1~,_V G Bhafath…Raj<\/p>\n
e “e”Maj-o’r( RA\/of Kembathalli Village
\n‘  V’ ” Ar137an~ap=uf’a.. Post
\n  Uoi:ar’ahaEii,Hobli<\/p>\n
‘– A “}3aI1gal7QreA’aiSouth Taluk<\/p>\n
— 4 u1″\\\u00bb”.fl.’. Raj anna<\/p>\n
. Major’. R\/of Kembathaiii Village
\n ” Vo\ufb01njanapura Post
\n2  U,tta1*ahal11′ Hobh
\nBangalore South Taluk<\/p>\n
ix\/%<\/p>\n
 ” ~10<\/p>\n
69<\/span><\/p>\n
Mr. Munireddy<\/p>\n
Major, R\/of Kembathalll Village
\nCrottigere Post<\/p>\n
Barlrlerughatta Road
\nBangalore South Taluk;\n<\/p>\n
Mr. Ramppa<\/p>\n
Major. r\/of Kembat;hal.li Village
\nGottigere Post<\/p>\n
Bannerughatta Road<\/p>\n
Bangalore South Talulc M<\/p>\n
Mr. D H Maruthi   A
\nMajor. R\/at No.3791, 13″‘ Cross’
\nBanashankari 11 Stage ‘<\/p>\n
Bangalore -70<\/p>\n
Mr. Pushpa\ufb01aj  B
\nMajor,r\/at.l\\”Fo.._l7\/51    :\n<\/p>\n
AliAskariRoa;dV .   4_  <\/p>\n
Bangalore’ V  <\/p>\n
SIVIJt..V\u00a3\\\/,{1i11i_yaii’i:;_n3_a  ‘ _
\nMajor, rx\/a”L..N0\u00a7ll,6\/’–1
\nKembathalll’
\nAnjarlapura
\nUttarah_alli_Hobli’.. ” A _.\n<\/p>\n
Bangalora South Taluuk<\/p>\n
 lljlli\/lr;E..a1\\\/Iarxgyapglalal ” “”” ” ‘V
\n Ivlajor. If\/at No.16\/1, Kembathalli Village<\/p>\n
V ‘V _ “;ln;a:;ap’u.ga”-Post, Uttarahalli Hobli<\/p>\n
‘B11<\/p>\n
 ._Baf1galo__re:;South Taiuk<\/p>\n
l””Mr.v~..’R.am’akrishna Rao<\/p>\n
Majolf. r\/at No.22. 413’ Cross<\/p>\n
 A. ,_’GarV1’dhi Gopura<\/p>\n
Mariyappana Palya<\/p>\n
ll  Magadi Road<\/p>\n
Bangalore \u00ab~23<\/p>\n
..:l:TT}1\u00a2ff’Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated<\/p>\n
 ‘f_”‘i;ere.iny’id’e\u00abAnnexure~Cr.<\/p>\n
70<\/span><\/p>\n
12 Mr. Sriramaiah
\nMajor, R\/ of G-ottigere Village 81 Post
\nUttarahalli Hobli
\nBangalore South Taluk<\/p>\n
13 Mr. Narasimhaiah
\nS\/o late Muniswamappa   ._
\nMajor, R\/ofKen1bathaI1i V illage
\nAnjanapura Post
\nUttarahalli Hobli V
\nBangalore South Taluk  <\/p>\n
14 Smt. Jayamma
\nMajor, R\/o Kemba-th.alli Vi’llagE:l’
\nzmjanapura Post  ‘ 5 ‘ V B’
\nUttarahalli 1-Iobli ._  \u00ab
\nBangalore South Ta.1.L1k_  ‘<\/p>\n
1.5 Mr.VChinna;ppai.’e~l’V    ”\n<\/p>\n
Major, R\/ofEiembafha1li_V’i(ill~:1ge_  ‘ ‘
\nAnjanal\ufb01ura PO.S?. B’ _
\nUttaral1alli_Hobli’=i::;;_  .\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore So::;;.h_Ta1uk. ‘V B _<\/p>\n
16 Mr. V Venkatasujainy.  \u00ab
\nMajor, R\/’of KembathalliiMillage
\nAnjanapura”‘Post-?* ‘ l
\n Uttairahalli Hob’ii._ _
\n‘ ‘  _ Bangalore South Taluk …Respondents<\/p>\n
   N. Prasacl, GP for R1:\n<\/p>\n
 P5; Puttegowda, Advocate for R2}<\/p>\n
  Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
 issued by responclent–2 in favour of the petiiioner<\/p>\n
in  “B_V\u00bbSl”i~.El:I’1<\/p>\n
7}<\/p>\n
Writ Petition No. 8454 of 2006 {LA–BDA}
\nBETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Sri P S Suresh<\/p>\n
Aged about 43 years
\nResiding at<\/p>\n
No.29\/4-. 38″” Cross<\/p>\n
8*” Block. Jayanagar<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560 083     :3 it<\/p>\n
[By Sri N. Rajarina. Advoeate I’o:i”l’   0
\nM\/s. Holla <31 l-lolla, Advocates)  l 0<\/p>\n
AND:\n<\/p>\n
I The Bangalore Dex;\/el.Qpm;ent_ Au.tli.oriI.y
\nK P West, Extension ~  ‘  1  ..\n<\/p>\n
Bangalore — 560020 0 V .   _
\nRepresentedvbyits,Comriiissi.oner I .. V’<\/p>\n
2 The Special  C)~fi’ift;ei*
\nBangalore Deikelopr:1en’tCAa3t’h.oA1?ity=_
\nK P West Extension ‘ * . 3’<\/p>\n
Bangalore 5 1550 ‘G20  <\/p>\n
3 StateltofKarriatal\u00abtas..:  it
\nBy its Secretary\u00bb. A _
\nUrban Dev-elopnient Departnieni;<\/p>\n
Vidliana Soud ha” ‘<\/p>\n
B_a’ngal__ore”   ….. .. v …Respondents<\/p>\n
ktarnarayana Rao Advocate for R1 and R2:
\nffsri N. Prasad. GP for R3)<\/p>\n
This W.:i~{‘:Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of<\/p>\n
the Cons”titt,i’tio1″i of India, praying to quash the order\/le’tter<\/p>\n
–\u00ab.l.0’rj’:vbe;ming No’;BDA\/o0.AA.(LA)\/ V.BHOO.SWA.A\/ A4\/ PR\/ 727\/\n<\/p>\n
4. ._2’OO5-06e–.’_dated l9~4-2006 passed. by the Special Land
\n Acquisitior; Officer. BDA, the second respondent. llerein<\/p>\n
Lip <\/p>\n
73<\/span><\/p>\n
The second notification is for Banashankar.i VlvV4Stat’;e VlSS:’ti6Vd., by ~ 0<\/p>\n
the Bangalore Development Authloritylgii.
\nsituated in Ganakalu VillageV__va~:je the “gofhthis
\nnotification. The plj<3liiI1i}'kEtI_f"t:f:' ~ .n0t_ifieation is: issued on
\n1.12.2000 and final I1VO"tl.f!'i"(:.E:l"\u00a3i"f_)ki1\ufb02lti'. on 23.8.2001. The
\nthird notificationis for  e;i<ten's'ior1vof;ftnjanapui"a layout.
\nThe lands   this notification are
\nsituated   notification is dated
\n29.3.200l'Vand'theifinalTn'o_tll'ieation is dated 21.3.2002. '}he
\nfourth  to further extension of<\/p>\n
Banashankari ..,\\v\/i'Stag.e. "The sites and the land situated in<\/p>\n
.00."-Vajliisahalli and Gtihharala are the subject matter of this<\/p>\n
   pi*elimina.ry notification is dated 21.11.2002<\/p>\n
andfinai.notification is dated 10.9.2003. The last notification<\/p>\n
his issu'C(if1~for the further extension of Sir M Vlshveshwaraiah<\/p>\n
 The subject matter of this notification is the land<\/p>\n
  situated in Herohalli and Giddanakonenahalli. The preliminary<\/p>\n
 notification is dated 8.4.2003 and final notification is dated<\/p>\n
9.9.2003. it'\/'<\/p>\n
79<\/span><\/p>\n
5. The petitioners in these writ petitions elo”nte”nd<\/p>\n
though under the sale deed, they haye  ,a”‘po’r_tion of <\/p>\n
the land measured in guntas, they Eii'{i””l–?}:’&1C’LtlEi-l lpos’seeasi’o;::i’ of<\/p>\n
well~planned sites in a private’layout.” Some csi’ ltl1en1_VVl1a_vL:e even<\/p>\n
put up constructions. and areHllVi.yliI1gV there  tlaeii’ family.
\nSome of them had’;_ehallengedVl”‘the:’acquisition of their<\/p>\n
lands \/ sitesyon yai”1’oi3I;s gr-oui”ld.s_.” V.Slli}’li’l’ll8.I’1\u20acOLISly. they had also
\napproacl*’ied.,tlie  “drop”th’e'”acquisit;ioI1 proceedings. It
\nwas tl’i’eir’ specifio ” ~ieasVell”‘a1;ha_tf: when these lands are being<\/p>\n
acquired  B:D.A’.._for_ll-~’the forn1at,ion of a residentiaf layout<\/p>\n
 in O.l’\u00a3;:l:\u20ac1′ to diSlI’i’b’1:l:\u00a7”‘\u00a31bie said sites to the needy and poor who<\/p>\n
 !:a’n–no1),afford’vt,_o purchase sites in the open market”. the<\/p>\n
acq\ufb02uisitilo\ufb01is nolt proper as these petiixioners also belong to the<\/p>\n
. same’ category. When they have purchased the sites.<\/p>\n
H  .i.aoq.u_.isitio11 of their sites would not be in tune with the object of<\/p>\n
  :n\u00a2”Ac3t and the very purpose of acquisition wouid be defeated.<\/p>\n
it ” -‘fliley aiso requested the aiithorities that they are willing to pay<\/p>\n
betterment charges to the B.D.A. as required under law and<\/p>\n
\\l”i\/<\/p>\n
 tg~.tvVi’thdratvthe’trV respective petitions. Accordingly, leave<\/p>\n
  ugrailtiedlualjidiupetitions were withdrawn. After withdrawal of<\/p>\n
coiiect betterment, charges from these persons as per their<\/p>\n
Wreiuest and to dro these lands from ac utsition. it is in
\n_  _ P (1<\/p>\n
‘ oigirsuance of the said Boards resolution notices were issued to<\/p>\n
ail the petitioners clainiing betterment charges at the rate oi’<\/p>\n
80<\/span><\/p>\n
they want those sites to be given uijgfrom  and.”
\npayment of betterment charges, they
\nfaciiities which are extended ta’it’he sit;e’ovvi1e:*sVoi”  F
\nDevelopment, Authority Layout.  thei1*   that the
\nauthorities insisted,  ‘the iippiitittons ftiedi chailenging
\nthe acquisition are  would not be
\nconsidered  reqt:ieist’v–.vviou1d be favourably
\nconsidered    “fietitions. Under those
\n had liked such writ petitions<\/p>\n
chaiiengtngthe’acqutsbitionzgtiled a memo in their respective<\/p>\n
writ petitions” s_t.at\u00a3ng the 2ii;o1’esaid facts and sought Eeave of the<\/p>\n
\\Arrit.’pte._tiittons. the authority in its meeting resolved t.o<\/p>\n
Rs.30\/~ per sq.ft. On receipt of such notices. all the petitioners<\/p>\n
 andispuhjstance of their stand is that they did acquire these<\/p>\n
 for”_’i\u00bbmp\u00a7l.ernentation of the project proposed by them.<\/p>\n
 .r,V:aeqtiisiti’on proceedings, the authority thought of dropping
\n‘  fnrtlier execution of development scheme proposed in the said<\/p>\n
it ””’*land. They collected the betterment charges from the<\/p>\n
81<\/span><\/p>\n
have paid the betterment charges. When they were hoping that<\/p>\n
everything would be regularised, khata would beWi1idde\ufb01nti’t.. in<\/p>\n
their names, tax would be collle’c–ted
\nbe extended to them, they  it   impugned
\nnotices informing the   riouauthority to
\nimpose such betterrnent.iihchargles ‘l.:lc_’L;pl~1’e-refore. they are
\nwithdrawing  pghvticie thy.-\u00a7.f’ they would proceed
\nwith the    circurnstances, all the
\npetitioners    challenging the impugned<\/p>\n
notices. ”\n<\/p>\n
  The  has filed its statement of objections. T he<\/p>\n
However, when the petitioners gave representation for dropping<\/p>\n
petitioners and issued NOC pertaining to the disputed land as<\/p>\n
\\a\/”\n<\/p>\n
Vfroml th’o.us_a”I”.\u00ab.ds of citizens from Bangalore has given up<\/p>\n
“acq-lu_islit’io:fi.,notWi’thstaradir1g final notification u \/ s 1.9 of the Act.<\/p>\n
b  :'”coui”t  to summon all the records of the B.D.A. regarding
\nit tlieheltterment tax collected from other citizens, it would clearly
\nl  .. _.V:’e5\\real that, in the case of the petit.io11ers, the E3.D.A. is trying to<\/p>\n
it contend that collection of betterment tax was bad in law. In<\/p>\n
84<\/span><\/p>\n
the note sheet which shows that allthe
\nafter reviewing the whole thing.
\nimposition of betterment.\n<\/p>\n
and therefore, the said  is  and
\nacquisition pI’OC\u20ac\u20acdlHgS:l;1\ufb01\u20ac1\\i\u20ac:'{).i7l\u00a3l\u00e9\u20ac\u20ac’d\u20acCl  In fact,<\/p>\n
they have also obtained aV_le:’gal  ‘tlhi–sl”regard.<\/p>\n
8. A by –.s:o%rie oi’ the petitioners. They
\ncontend__t:_hvat’*Seetioii_   ii’ideperlder1t of Section 20 of the
\nAct. Ll’\u00a3f1de.i”Se3V(fl;i.O’r}.:l2Qb.lCililt’h\u20ac’ACE. the B.D.A. is competent to<\/p>\n
collect the”betterIneriiiVt.a;2c”‘.%e1’efore, the stand of the E3.D.A. is<\/p>\n
untenable.  having collected the bettermerit. tax<\/p>\n
The””\u00abpetiV.tion.elfs are treated with hostile discrimination. If this<\/p>\n
Nearly seven years have elapsed i3:io”r’n’*–Lhe ‘date _t)’i7l.i’_i*1i’ti2.vl’.etter’rnent charges if
\nthe petitioners  acquisition, the
\npetitioners  thus gave up their
\nchallenge”toutheV1’a.eqluilsi’ilipo:ili.” the petitioners’ position
\nstandsijv of C the representation of the
\nrespondelritsl   authority kept its promise by<\/p>\n
issuing a noti-eeleallirig upon the petitioners to pay the<\/p>\n
it-‘bette’rn1e-ht leharges and in turn. the petitioners paid<\/p>\n
 beltt_erlrrien*t_t”Charges claimed by the authorities. in fact, one of<\/p>\n
the ~:;_uid_.g)~rolfquo for giving up the land from aequisiiiori. was<\/p>\n
 -v,_l’i.hat the petitioners have to give up their land which is required<\/p>\n
   B.D.A. for the formation of the road free of Cost. as<\/p>\n
 –..ljagr5eed. They gave up the land to B.D.A. to forrri the road. thus<\/p>\n
ifagain. altering their position to their disaidvaiitagc\u00e9. Thus when<\/p>\n
promises and reciprocal promises are kept up, it is not open to<\/p>\n
87<\/span><\/p>\n
the authority now to go back on the ‘pi’ornise_..a_nd._expose the T<\/p>\n
petitioners to the threat of acquisiti\u00b0onfv_Ttierefbre; he conieri\ufb01ls<\/p>\n
that on the doctrine of proInisso’fg.V_estoppet  *re.s’pon’dents are<\/p>\n
preciuded from going back on VA’th.eii”i’f..pro.n1ise’ a’nd..in\/ipassing the
\nimpugned orders. Evencontends. in the land
\nwhich is the    which was
\npurchased     .5: it acc1L1isit.i<J1'1 proceedings.
\nsome of   and are Eiving with
\ntheir favmiI_y.A1 has not passed any awards.
\npossession  it is too late in the day<\/p>\n
for the=respondents'1t.oresiie from their stand and to proceed<\/p>\n
tt"'Vith'"any-.'further acqtiitsition. Section 20 of the Act provides for<\/p>\n
i;nposition.._AQ'i"betterment charges. When the statute provides<\/p>\n
foriirnpositior\u00e9is of betterment charges and the authority in its<\/p>\n
  Vwisdorn" passes a resolution to impose betterment charges and<\/p>\n
 "the_\u00bbs'a1ne is given effect to and betterinent charges are<\/p>\n
  ieoliected, on the ground that the Government has issued an<\/p>\n
iforal order not to collect betterment charges and to proceed with<\/p>\n
 ~.thev-':Act,:_..c;;t. two stag'es'the authority has the power to impose
\n bet.teriT1e_nti charges. First. while framing the scheme it is open<\/p>\n
to tile' atiti'1"_orit3rto decide in respect of which lands which are<\/p>\n
V"~chargesv,__i\u00abh which event. the same has to be menizioried in the<\/p>\n
'a_"scherne under section 17(1) notification and then individuai<\/p>\n
88<\/span><\/p>\n
the acquisition. it s not open to    ii
\nimpugned order.\n<\/p>\n
11. Sri Sanjay Gowda: ._ie’arnedA.”C,ounseviV_ apvpeaiijng for
\nsome of the petitioners ;_contenAde.dl”that,pthe sai.dAau\u00a7thority has
\nnot passed any resoiution   the betterment
\ncharges. The, AcquisitionsAdtjf\ufb01cehrajwho has issued the
\nimpugned 1}G{,iC\u00a7S{:1’1&t.S  __itti:isd–ict:i”oi1 or authority to hold that
\nthe resolution  by Board. is iilegai, contrary to Iaw<\/p>\n
acting  thdeorai  the Principai Secretary to<\/p>\n
Revenue.’ l3epari;rn’e’ni;V iioifi-hep…Government of Karnataka and
\ntherefore, on tthatxshoifti g,1i”C:1:lI1d, the impugned orders are liable<\/p>\n
to be; s’et_aside’;\u00bb _ aiso contended that under the scheme of<\/p>\n
inci’i,1ded__”tir-zder the Scheme it proposes to levy the betterment.<\/p>\n
 collvetfi be’ttei’i11ef1i: \u00ab\u00a7’.\u00a31’_}'(.”.’:”I’Ol’l’1 these pei,1′.iior1e1″s. on the ctm’:.1’a1’y
\ni’misiu11ide.;fs–iar1ci’in–g of the Eaw. the bei,te1’mer11, tax was ievied and<\/p>\n
 they ha\\fe.1″etrace<;i the steps as their aci, was contrary to law.<\/p>\n
92<\/span><\/p>\n
forms part of Notification u\/ s 17_{i.} oi’  iVr’1di_ivVidt,_1Valu’
\nnotices have to be sent to those persons’_A_i’1’oh1 w.h’c;;\u00a7
\ntax is to be collected. ii is ai’ie_f*hearihg theii-i’obj’e_cti.ons if i’1″1&”.i’<\/p>\n
same is over-ruled. the entire Echeiiie is ftoiube }placed for<\/p>\n
sanction. If the Goveitrinieiii acc.orci”s._ sanctioh, then the
\nScheme has to be i1np1e”mienAted__  pei\ufb01the sanction accorded.<\/p>\n
It is only after the.imp1emcntatio11&the  ii’ the market.
\nValue of the 1a_hdi”;;.on1pfise\u20ac1  tiie.VSci1e.nie which was not the
\nsubject mat\ufb01tei’ ac’q$iisi’tionA’ViaasAi\ufb01ereased, ihe B.D.A. gets the<\/p>\n
authori_tyi—-VtoA  in respect oi’ increased<\/p>\n
Value oii\ufb01the  21.” of the Act provides for a mode
\nin which vvljettermeritoi’  to be assessed and collected.
\nTherefore. viiheh .a(–imittec1ly the B.D.A. did not propose to<\/p>\n
their _v1ands.*., were notified for acqtiisitioii, on 21<\/p>\n
coI1ectedv_aIici–.V.t)n coming to know the error committed by them.<\/p>\n
X”\n<\/p>\n
93<\/span><\/p>\n
‘I’heref01’e, it Cannot be said that they eo1I1mii.’ted:’any il-luegalitiy <\/p>\n
in passing the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
16. Sri Shankara Narayaiia V’Ra_o;  learned’ cstounsel<\/p>\n
appearing for the B.D.A.,.contende.d–.that, Section  of the Act<\/p>\n
provides for Collection  what the
\nauthorities  L_’eolle_et.e_gd  is”.  charges. The
\nresolution   charges and not
\nbetterririenft   not withdrawn the<\/p>\n
petitio11″e_i’s’ _la’I1r:_l iro’m “aoqitiisl_tion, they are only staying away<\/p>\n
from acquils’i1;ilon,V In  betterment charge is paid by the<\/p>\n
 pet_Ltioi1:elrs v”VOl11’AIi'[E1.’.T.l.1}f.,N it was not imposed on “them by the<\/p>\n
 ‘a,uth0rit,ytherefore. it cannot be said that the authority<\/p>\n
hasno poxlife-r towithdi’a\\v the levy which they have made.<\/p>\n
i~ll:”sul:)dmitted that the aforesaid levy was lI1a\u20ac\u00a7V\u20acI.’l,\u20ac’,l’1t. and after
\n.’ realising the mistake. knowing the correct: legal position. the<\/p>\n
authority wants to retrace its steps. which cannot. be found<\/p>\n
 Sri Puttegowda, learned Counsel for the B.D.A.<\/p>\n
\\h\/<\/p>\n
 ‘siiibjveetz_rVnatte'”r’ -of acquisition are the lands beionging to the<\/p>\n
 objections fiied by the petitioners were over ruled and the final
\nnotification was also issued. In other words, the Government
\nhas “accorded sanction to the Scheme proposed by the B.D.A..<\/p>\n
m’Thereafter. awards have been passed. possession of the land is<\/p>\n
94<\/span><\/p>\n
fault with. Therefore. he submits__.tha_t. tlieiieitis’.f1’1o”i:nei’ii;.Vin <\/p>\n
these writ petitions and they are liable  be dlisinissedl.  ijf<\/p>\n
18. In the light of and the
\nsubmissions made. the   “arise for
\nconsideration:- h V Z V 2 it h<\/p>\n
{1}     power to ievy<\/p>\n
what stage and how the<\/p>\n
 “””  .   the Act?\n<\/p>\n
‘ ‘    of Promissory Estoppel<\/p>\n
it  applies to tia_.e..fact;s ofthe case?<\/p>\n
  _33_ointu :~– The facts are not in dispute. The<\/p>\n
[.)’Cti”‘U,’OI1\u20acl’S;”.:’: The preiiminary notification was issued. The<\/p>\n
taken. layout is formed and thus. the Scheme proposed by the<\/p>\n
‘Ni<\/p>\n
at”the”‘peti’ttoners are to give up that much of land free of<\/p>\n
 l’the%..b’e-tternient tax can be imposed on the remaining<\/p>\n
V”-subjeet\u00bb.i;_o those conditions. they would consider the ease of the
\n ,Apetitioners. The petitioners agreed to give up that extent of<\/p>\n
     which is required for formation of road. <\/p>\n
95<\/span><\/p>\n
B.D.A. is substantially implemented. But.
\nState has not taken possession ot”t:he’\u00abl.a_n”d,  at-l’1(;.’
\noccupation of the petitioners exceptlbiingg
\nfew exceptions. no award  .__in’ ‘of these\u00bb
\npetitioners. Most of t;he’.paet,itioiie:s  the acquisition
\non Various grounds hefore this Court.
\nSimultaneottsltrg  if’-vthet\/””‘also approached the
\ngovernrnerit  dropping the aequisit;ion
\nproeeeidingsli_25._7.2002 gave an endorsement; to
\nthe petitio.nerS ttatirtig’thlatjrelpresentations given by them have<\/p>\n
been; examined. ‘They have to form 80ft. road in their lands. Ii”<\/p>\n
extent of ianfdias is done in the ease oi’Anjanapura Layout and<\/p>\n
V *  water supply, UGD and electricity from main<\/p>\n
96<\/span><\/p>\n
20. Three resoiutions are passed\u00e9by  <\/p>\n
regard from time to time in 1*espee.l oiflltiie af0i’e_s’aid ~vi\u00e9zyoiits.<\/p>\n
The first of such resolutions ‘\u00a7s_’t’eso1ution No.8.3\/’Q2′;*v-in respect’<\/p>\n
of Anjanapura Layout which rea_d\u00a7’a$ ‘fQ1}OVlF.$I”‘  <\/p>\n
“Subject No. 33\/02  AV _ _ z _ _
\nSub: Fixalfiort of \u00a7betier’rncerit’\u00ab.:eiftaryerg for Private
\nLayouts  wilhi}: Arya:wp”ura.”To wns hi p.<\/p>\n
 “””   -To*wns\u00abh’lp’*a\u00a7as formed during
\nthe year. 2’C’\u00bb’J.\u20acl-_200″1~.tto**de-uelop 449 acres of land<\/p>\n
_f’cn4a_llotznen.t  Sites to General Public.<\/p>\n
. _ vThere-‘.are_vtwo private layouts existing
\nwithin “the Township covering an area of 40<\/p>\n
V 2’lVe1*e&s;’ V<\/p>\n
 site holders of these private layouts<\/p>\n
‘ seelcirag ba.slcfacz’.lities such. as approach. roads.<\/p>\n
Ellrtes, have come forward to pay the betterment<\/p>\n
Charges to B.D.Afor providirlg suCh_facl.lil’ies.<\/p>\n
kw\/’<\/p>\n
98<\/span><\/p>\n
14) 6065611) 505:2: 83\/02
\n aac\ufb01oczi<\/p>\n
was\ufb01 zJc:\u00e9”~a>c:5z23’ri\u00a2?r<I er'a:e{53\u00a7–;r\u00a7' " <\/p>\n
-0-0-0*<\/p>\n
5d5E>c9e3’5cx=;a%;a>.  .\u00ab’j03c3.<\/p>\n
033,;-:;(1i}cfL?’= zadgcj owai\u00e9\ufb02 a>c3a~c:3’5~5r<;\u00a2?r"\u00a7  s5.*3c\u20acV.=ejz,\u00e9;#\u20ac:"'\/:33; _ <\/p>\n
30\/–<:\u20aco3" e\ufb02asisb\u00e9 :\u00a7v@;f35L'_ c'3\u20ac:=,\ufb01c;U  V.<\/p>\n
(gang   '  :\n<\/p>\n
aiod\ufb02r\u00e9\u00e9uaoa\ufb02 ,<,-zjgsin m';sg.<::.\u00bba,eo5\u00e9\u00a2a%\\;.  "<\/p>\n
* A
\n23% #33 }:9a;);:;:\u00a7;  abaac\ufb01,
\n ziori \u00a3;;V  ,<\/p>\n
\u00abii-\/’F5475 5-35,7356 ‘gsax <\/p>\n
‘recfgsta a3Gr\u00a7\u00a7ir;\u00ab;::><\/p>\n
\u00ab*e.~::;f.5:’z9.r?;=\u00a7J.\u00abD?I\u00a7;C’i5D;O?\ufb01,<\/p>\n
Xx\/%<\/p>\n
caozsaaaad<\/p>\n
asioa~s;Uc>a;,J:v’ ‘\u00a23’c%a:*’3$;;\u00e9?d”;’\u00bb ;<\/p>\n
\u00e9:55l\u00bb’a%\u00e9;’~’;\u00bb3-A * -. ..\n<\/p>\n
(FAA<\/p>\n
‘V :”J){>C3}’C-.”i7:-}C.”g a3’a;\\\u20ac\u00a7@fu{Cg.. <\/p>\n
E01<\/p>\n
e;bew\u00a2;;_3r’\u20acd-3: arzjggacfq 55;,;\ufb01.%__s’*\u00ab
\n\u00e9oa\u00e9aegoamag\ufb01. sicj\u00e9acj, G1? J;\u00bb%_:.~\u00b092>.\u00bb”\u00a7_u’  <\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00b0i?_E”cD\u00a7 ;m>_ 9% :Z}\u00bb%;:”:”JFi e\ufb01o\u00e9-as e\ufb02\u00e9izd-ra\u00e9\u00e9si \u00a3;Ia:’;ei5F;-\u00aba)(:Txgv:m,_*s;73.._<\/p>\n
K  \u00a2 – 7′ – 1.’ ‘\n<\/p>\n
 -x\u00bbc\u00b0i2\\:L>’, ‘-“-‘_V}C.\\1\\,’<\/p>\n
m9\u00a2.’?:\ufb01o\u00a7 55350235  L
\nnjaagac\ufb01e\ufb01 max #95? 33513 a\ufb01r=\u00a25o.1;ep=
\n782 M5 :7 rboa\ufb01   :.g;:a. ::a;;m-5:
\ne;\u00a2\u00a7,’r$tz5i&ig_ ago,-:__8,%,   599351)<\/p>\n
saga-ma3a\u20aco3ac:__4 .$ma__:5soas:3?.-:2\\>as;a;\u00bb(:’:ia,-“\u00bb:5; z:j\u00a7::5_a;r’u3;_. 9:;  <\/p>\n
ojE3\u00a7J’\u20ac3BCj_.   c5’J3._a,:>va5;-Q  ‘~.?Q’c’;3D-;;;iEe\u00a7’OJ:> %O\\:f\u20ac–.JEf:jF\u00a7\n<\/p>\n
a)ci35\\\ufb01)53\u20ac3Qc:1,–i:_;\ufb01;:S@  “–:\u00a7r;ri=\u00a7*;radJ” eaafaajg <\/p>\n
af;of’:\u00a7:’_’VT’5<c2Q  2oc5 "f'r:rai;).i5'u\u00a7::’@.*”x:\ufb01.<\/p>\n
as  ,a9q’\u00a7_>};\ufb01fv\u00a7r?’ 23<:a;;o;\u00a75-jago\u00e9 atmjaadcj wefscajoogd<\/p>\n
aiegaaxw o\\i;:%&\u00bb&'a:ajdi”:e;::<\/p>\n
” V _ a’e;:so:;.q;w;g’__9:%_.\n<\/p>\n
1,””335?>p2~:\u00b0o1\\.  c-3oa92:,A;> {La 2 15\u00ab1w0o igasasr\ufb01g\ufb01s<\/p>\n
3L'”ZJ\ufb01’v5l\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7C\u00a5.i)  ajaiweza\u00e9 5:4\u00bb) : 195~oo \u00a7;an\u00b0a=.\u00a7.r”‘\u00a7\u00a7’>\u00a2<\/p>\n
‘ 3. ervez\ufb01aaaia are 3 32430 &\u00bba:%5r”m\u00a2w<\/p>\n
4.  5′;-:,:i3a\u20ac.s3\u00a7M_ 43\\E:?_;’f\u00a7i\u00b0r\u00a7,{-c”3E31″)2Q’3 <\/p>\n
7 5 0 as :\u00a5:%.\u00ab-“eai%’><\/p>\n
-3 \\.\n<\/p>\n
3..-&3g)’_ ZQUEXUCCL) :;~%_f’2″\u20ac~:-”<\/p>\n
1\\%x\/<\/p>\n
V .  323:). oira r=25:{i2;’A ._\u00a7-.::’:’___ci> 630:-a.>a\u00ab_d)<\/p>\n
E04<\/p>\n
\u00e9\u00e9ri (a5.=:5:>*’&>c=a;~’   :4i:i\/.j:\u00a7.:.)(.”if;’\/{I\u00a7j’\u00e93.._$_;’j{5k{}{:-S   ‘<\/p>\n
c:$J.:}c’3\u20acl:\n<\/p>\n
mm\ufb01\u00e9 avac\ufb02 5:1>\u00e9aT   o5,4=;w*;__\u00e9:\u00a7oc3;2 <\/p>\n
750 $65 wauear\ufb01 zc?_gJc*L>w s,~se_\u00a7?’\u00a2\ufb01\u00a75″\u00e9\u00bb s9a%r\u00ab*$<;iC1}_.' 3'\u00a3;:'\u00ab\u00a7527& <\/p>\n
aD,%\u00a7a'ae1:5 asrmza\ufb01 e;a(i\u00bb;"\u00bb';\u00e9i";'   \u00ab:'3.a'-5:1\u00bb s:'.rar=\u20ac=<\/p>\n
EMS} i':_\ufb01'C:'C,1)J\u00a7(i'\/  ':';<~?_7:1C:iu,o:e'ci U\u00bbu<f52v_.a'5.} -371335 <\/p>\n
.550'\/-4 *   \u00bb  mg\/–\n<\/p>\n
‘ ;”;m;f3aadc3 ,:iz\u00a7ai> zaaoaoz\u00e9g 28-5-2003<\/p>\n
&>\u00ab3$a1> $009.; 177\/03<\/p>\n
  sima\ufb01  <\/p>\n
:E\ufb01<5\u00a73FI9C&)E>5J’ a\u00e9a\ufb01raft: 530355, $605303 \\.%:’)\u20ac:)i:’Q\\;7’u\/'{\\:’y=;{:J\u20ac;'(‘|}{:},!1\u00a7\u00a3-hi).<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
108<\/span><\/p>\n
5’e:?;_aa:~>& 55+ :Ur%r9e?–:j ;:’aiw5>r’? 230353.: e\u00a7$,aL:’c>z5e\u20acf7 3:1-‘;:*.@:-\u00a3132\u00bb ”<\/p>\n
\u00a7JE}f”\u00a7  .,\ufb01@.>*5_5av <\/p>\n
m:3aada,s; m\ufb01wm\u00e9aa\u00e9vrag\ufb01e .=w;_:;c:< 'a<;:\u00a7m';e::@_  <\/p>\n
fc:iJa?m@g\\, 2;-uaa\u00a7a@r6d> eoma\ufb01p\u00e9  <\/p>\n
RiJ\u20ac’2\u00a2?JCjL’i?: mom ai\u00bbgdpa::\u00a7c;:2_= Visy\u00e9uegaapgqzg .\u00e9a,~ia:.;;5’;g, _(BeItc:’m1e:-at<\/p>\n
Tax} ajzwaa magic\u00bb C’~’\u00a2,-!;\u00ab\u00e97.  ‘ \ufb01gogwj  \u00e9\ufb01\ufb01abab’<\/p>\n
‘_dE9rI5g.%:’3J5JE)\u00a7\u00a7j’_ii1?.)  _:s\u00a7r*3.:i>\u00e9\u00a7y-‘e}O}2~3c’o5d _  5_:’a\\:oa\ufb01;$i” ,2J_._<\u00b0\u00a7rIz-rv\u00e9ri-\u20ac13<\/p>\n
3E"'_iE}’V V
\n1&3.\/’ —\n<\/p>\n
*3\ufb01E,5_5′.C1.’\u00ab.\n<\/p>\n
:34) 6:5  af3<,:r<<\u00a7E-sci).\n<\/p>\n
 The tAIiird——res01ut.i0n is resolution No. 104\/04 in<\/p>\n
 re:”{pe{;t”vI)Q’i’I3’a;\u00a7ashankari Sixth Stage, Sir M.Vishweshwaraiah<\/p>\n
Extension,’ ‘further extension of M.Vishweshwaraiah Layout and<\/p>\n
 further \u20ac:’;\u00a7_<t\u00e9nsion of Bar1ashan}\u00ab;a1'i Sixm Stage which reads as<\/p>\n
V' 'v_d1'aW:'eiie<:trieity i'rorIi"'S1\ufb01b\u00abstation. W\u00e9ttfil' supply from main ianes
\niofihe  These betternlerit eiiztrges does not include<\/p>\n
the'-p1"ovi'-suion for water suppiy distribution. sexve1'ag;eai i21E.era.is,<\/p>\n
1nayouts.v__Q:'r\/Recording to the detailed cost Emaiysis. the cost per<\/p>\n
 ,s'q.1,_1ere meter works out to 320 or R330\/– per sq.ft.. "The said<\/p>\n
111<\/span><\/p>\n
in the third meeting in 2004 heId,or1._1 11%;’J{jm\u00a7.’;2oe4_.A.\u00a2m;1E\u00e9\u00bb_ 2
\nwere in 211} nineteen members  cor1isiLVit1,iiteci”
\nand five members remained a{:~se*:;t.<\/p>\n
24. From the aforesaid ,three’-re”soiution:s;~ we can make
\nout that. in Anjan3.pt1ra_ Layout;V’_Ehe’1*eV22retwo private layouts<\/p>\n
existing within tne townehiip.eovering”an’ of 40 acres. The
\nsite holders in~’ti\u00e9ee.e private  come forward to
\npay better:-n’en_t—.    for providing basic
\nfacilities. sL1_el”1~._ets;\u00bb’:a;ppro.etV(,3riVroadst .vvat’,er suppiy and electricity
\nfrom tine  > I’1*i>’:V.Cv1Tdt3I’-‘ to integrate these two private
\n1ayouts”w_1t3t1in ‘the  the authority proposed to levy<\/p>\n
betterment eharges towards provision for approach road. to<\/p>\n
int\u00e9”;rnaE__” ‘eieetrifioation and street Eight within the private<\/p>\n
E’\/A<\/p>\n
.'”=propose*d” to” s,cqui1*e”m1″532 acres 17 guntas of iand out of which<\/p>\n
 to VVa{:og~,iire lands to the exterit 01″ 782 acres 17 guritas<\/p>\n
V’-.ur1der”.Sy_ection 20 of the Act, they have decided to Ievy
\nV.’-Vdbettdetment tax. The said proposal was approved in the said<\/p>\n
  in\ufb01eetirzg. The proceedings of the Authority clearly shows that<\/p>\n
112<\/span><\/p>\n
subject was placed before the authority whic_h'”‘iyas.A_a;a’pravec1.b
\nIn Resoiutiora No.17?\/O3 the  “decided_tQ:”‘collectt it
\nbetterment charges in respect of 78.v’ZVac’res El1’1C:1VA7 ‘guhtas’;Vy’]’Th–ey<\/p>\n
preliminary noti\ufb01cation was ‘U’3_\u00a7;..”SE,Eb_]’\u20acCt..iI1\u00a3’3,To.I.=\u20ac1’V.”.{)i:”U16 said<\/p>\n
meeting. It is in respect”  there were objections
\nwhich were uP1′}_F*M1._-  :’.vi”‘c’1\ufb011″ic1 faii within the
\nlayout as    authority decided to
\nimpose  ‘V V’ <\/p>\n
25. _Secorid..re\u00absoi’utio1f1 NQLI77\/G3 relates to the note put.<\/p>\n
up by the 4’autho.r1’Vty.A’~aii’d__for sanction of the scheme under<\/p>\n
Section 18 of theAc’t. it  stated therein that, in all. they have<\/p>\n
iSAL.\u00a3p heic1._j’..–As the aforesaid Lands form part of the scheme<\/p>\n
115<\/span><\/p>\n
challenged in ihese pr0Ceedi1*1gs.~””‘Orye \u00e9guch’ “cl:’;d:5’v”,f;’27\/a\ufb01.5~V~o5′ — ..<\/p>\n
” ”  5932;; apasgza\u00e9ksaaaaaama
\nu  ‘if?2,’353′:\u00ae_
\n e:f3or’\u00a7r:’\u00ab’;}\u00ae:iJ $533053 19\/4\/06.<\/p>\n
 ——–  502768 551;-ar=2x?_. mpa\u00e9cxigt<\/p>\n
  _  “;2:;:3_;c’. [$0.3\/1(\u00abb), 3\/2A, 3\/2.8,<\/p>\n
% ‘3?’\/1;:.,;:\\”L.._’3,:3’A2. 3\/3C1. 3\/3C2. 3\/313,<\/p>\n
“3\/BE,\u00bb Vim 505:5 4\/5C5 ad;\u00a7>ar”\\.'<:?<\/p>\n
_ \u00bb?_\u00a7;~–,a\ufb01ad~\u00a7\u20ac3″‘ 5r61r 5603 2oca’ao\ufb015a’cu> c\u00a70\u00e9;i><\/p>\n
cg(:;z.q;a3sr$ae2aae;_cj,;, $9 mi1J\ufb02a5ac:j5\u00a7oJae?:<\/p>\n
 r1)OF$s?3%{D’Ja\u00a7 \ufb01’D5\u00a7:”\u20ac5rU  240’ &53″6’\u00e955\\:*ai<\/p>\n
” erv\u00e9fajo\ufb01 &>i3\u00ae_5;:iai3\\. c;’3cf,3,%c’x>5:\u00a7 5-ju\u00ab:f13\u00bb;:<aL\u00a7 0221).:<\/p>\n
C-\u00ab.:J..l\u00e9\u00a7f'% aaawaadaai $595551): -c\u00e9saaadaacj
\n3:90-.%i3r"':FCL3c\ufb015 23::\n<\/p>\n
. ‘ erv\ufb01gf *3 1. {#9 5~2\u00a7e\u00b0\u00a9a:i)  ;*aai_g 2,3o.sa.5a’a.,\/aq.>e3(2,LaA3;2;\/
\n” –_ _ ?92,1\/axggw\/934\/\u00a325305\/551\/2003-04 5396305: 39\/59\/2003 ”<\/p>\n
2. 55\u00b0 E>’.2.’\u00a7<\u00b0(3'(1i)  \ufb01oaig\n<\/p>\n
330.\u20ac9.o:’3$P’.\/Ei?)\u20ac;’?{“?,,”iJ2~3\u00bbT:’gTj\/
\na3(g\ufb01Ja.:;Q_,e5\/as4\/ezbeiof\/85:\/2oo3~o4 a.”-Jaws:
\n24\/03\/2004 \\a1<\/p>\n
“117<\/p>\n
a::g_mac:\u00a7_ arse  5C}E,?\u00a3’:3E\u00a7ECj\u00a7_\ufb01. a-;aas2.2e>a;s e1>3;:j)\u00a7 .”js;or:5A
\nc\ufb01dodmz\ufb01o\u00e9 sis means 3c:i>r”‘:’ wzemaa\ufb01. ”    <\/p>\n
(am; 539:5) em;-3 eaa3.1)afci> {2;t;az@_;  ._
\nraa\ufb01aocd wmaieed\ufb01oaxa\ufb02w\u00e9\ufb01) 1<\/p>\n
  ‘_ _
\n a,:}a,a~;\u00a7j;:3mg3aae.”\n<\/p>\n
‘ E 2\u00a7or1e:,t@m.\n<\/p>\n
“\u20ac’E55\/”\u20ac,
\n%_,x\u00b0 cam}:-:”P’. $5533”\n<\/p>\n
$0.29\/4, 335%
\n8:66  35ai)a,’rf’iU~,.A\u00ab’
\nz\ufb01orm\/ado — 555  <\/p>\n
 Befovre {ye .e'(‘m’ei(ie1′. the iegality of this impugned
\nendorseinent, it  \u00abto look into the scheme of the ACE;<\/p>\n
and what atucieyfeitaphmeklt \u00e9eheme under the Act means:<\/p>\n
   A’.”D:E:vjELoPn\/mm? SCHEME<\/p>\n
‘.29.-.A\u00ab:’Chapter 111 of the Act deals with [Development<\/p>\n
 S(f,hern’e-ss. Section 15 of the Act. deais with the power of<\/p>\n
‘~AL2thority to undertake works and incur expenditure for<\/p>\n
 = …\u00ab.*\u00a7eve10pmem,. Subsection (1) of Section 15 provides that the<\/p>\n
it\/e<\/p>\n
118<\/span><\/p>\n
Authority may draw up detailed schemes  reierfed, <\/p>\n
to as “development scheme”) for  inc ‘<\/p>\n
Bangalore Metropolitan Area’: ‘\u00abSub–\u00a7cciion (;2v)”l’\u00e9:Vov..$ccL_:iond <\/p>\n
deals with new or additional deveEo\u00a7\u00a711a.eni s.Ch.\u20ac::l11’1″c.
\nEvery development  scfl.cni.e:v  \u00abSection 15 should<\/p>\n
contain the pariicularga.”1Iien:ioI’:ed_ S\u00e9’c.t\u00a7ion 16 of the Act<\/p>\n
which reads  :~.–\n<\/p>\n
“16,__VPa)*iiciilarf$V  xifor in a development
\n\u00a7;_chen1el}”  Vddeiaelopniehnid”scheme under Seciiori
\n{I} Vdshaligv  i’he:iiimiis of the area comprised. in
\nd ‘  the sclierfie, g\u00e9rouidefor, ~
\n (ci]_ihe dactjilisiiion of any land which. in the
\n :v”vi.opinion of the Auihoriiy. will be necessary
\n  or affected by the execution of the\n<\/p>\n
(b) laying and re-laying oiii all or any land
\nincluding me consi’ruci.ion and
\nrecorzsiruciiori Q\/’ buildings and formation
\nand alteration ofsireeis:\n<\/p>\n
{C} drainage, water supply and eiectiricziiy:<\/p>\n
. 2    reading of the aforesaid pravisimrx makes ii. clear<\/p>\n
men1;:o::’ed in the aforesaid Section. Subsection (ma) of
\n 18 categorically states that, every development scheme<\/p>\n
ll “shall Within the limits of the area comprised in the scheme<\/p>\n
119<\/span><\/p>\n
(ct) the reservation Qf not less than j~’g::;\u00a72en,
\ncent of the total area ofthe_layoL\u00a3i.jb*r:pLrhlic” ,
\nparks and playgrouncis aindh
\narea of not less than teri’per.eeni: o.f_{rhe’vI:’0tal*:.”.l’
\narea ofthe layoatfc__5’r’r.cViuicAamemiaes,   l<\/p>\n
(2) may, within the limll:sV”r:gjbr*esaicl’ p.._r\u00a2fu.idefor,e\n<\/p>\n
(a) razlsiraah “any i  . the thority
\nmay cbhslid\u00e9r. .l’exp\u00a2;zz:\u00bbre;l:le :9 raise to
\n‘_ifacilitatebei:a>r”drair:ageE\u00abV’  ll ‘
\n(bl   }f<\ufb01rr'r:ir{gr i2b\u00e9n14.4'sp;i\u00a2\u00e9s—–~;ybr the better
\ntheuarea comprised in {he
\n""" " Or'ar\u00a3y'*@hinir1g area:\n<\/p>\n
 -. ‘  sjahiitzargarrangernent required;
\nI3)’  4′ _ l  a5t–::hii:”and without the limits
\nL4 l af(‘)res;;1it:i’~’Qt-rouidewfbr the construction<\/p>\n
A’ “of f’lQL!S\u20acS”.\n<\/p>\n
thai” a “‘*l:\u00a7ei’relopment. Scheme should contain the particulars<\/p>\n
121<\/span><\/p>\n
(d) a statement specifying the land whicii’\u00a7s=pri>posed__  <\/p>\n
be acquired; and<\/p>\n
(e) of the land in regardii-o__ which_ is beit.eriifient  <\/p>\n
be levied.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore, it is clear  oz_\u00abii;Wofivs–:lilies’Eahdiproposed to be
\nacquired some land is  l’_r.i:1_’i’ihebllexecution of the
\nscheme, son1e\u00a7.viahdi3    execution of the
\nscheme. buii by such execution of the
\nscheme; “””   lands are to be notified
\nsepa1’atleiy.”   which will be affected by the<\/p>\n
execution of-._ihe scher.je.’\u00ab.ihe Authority has the power to levy<\/p>\n
a –  b\u20actl.Ef’m\u20ac.l\ufb01 tax. hi  \u00ab     -A i<\/p>\n
H ‘–   (5) of Section 17′ provides whai. the Authority<\/p>\n
~V shoiiid.  afier issuing ofa notification under subsection i7(l}<\/p>\n
“poof the Act. An obligation is cast: on the Authority to serve a<\/p>\n
.  notice on every person whose name appears in the assessment<\/p>\n
V’ “list of the local authority or in the land revenue register as<\/p>\n
ii\/4<\/p>\n
125<\/span><\/p>\n
Authority to ievy betterment tax and recover by xvayVoi’..t}:u<_V. the<\/p>\n
benefit which that land owner or building owne:"'ge\u00a7$–.vyttiho'e1t<\/p>\n
any efforts. The object \\:itt.h_.y.\\vhVi2c.-htttthese:
\nenacted are very laudabie.  god no Ceirl have any
\ngrievance whatsoever. VJ'-Er'._1z1V:t'\u00a71~'\u00a2f-{)re:,–_.t"i'1et:_b Authority does not
\nneed this developed bAu,i1c:1'_in.g 1a'r'Irv.1.'.V"':byr'–V"inCludix1g in the
\nscheme, before  owner of such. land
\nor buiidingite  intention on the part of
\nthe  and then hear them before<\/p>\n
such taxis ievied, ''   3<\/p>\n
 *  _wI\u00a3A.*r  BETTERREENT TAX'?\n<\/p>\n
     20 of the Act deals with Eevy of betterment<\/p>\n
taAx._4VThe.  has been vested with the power to levy<\/p>\n
V’-.}3etter”1ne’nt Tax. What is a Betterment Tax, is defined under<\/p>\n
V”–h_A:”3~e_et’i'(_>r1 2(d) of the Act, which reads as under:<\/p>\n
” 2{d) — ‘betterment tax’ means the tax<\/p>\n
payable under Section 20 in respect’ of an<\/p>\n
3\/.\n<\/p>\n
it “‘–Authorit;’y. is the date”ot commencement of the execution of the<\/p>\n
 ,._.st\u00e91f1er11e:,:”‘and”the_:..date of the completion of the scheme. To levy<\/p>\n
\\,coInplet;ed in all respects, as it may not be practicable. When
\n“-the development scheme is sufficiently advanced to enable the<\/p>\n
it amount of betterment tax to be determined. the asse-ssrnent of<\/p>\n
129<\/span><\/p>\n
betterment tax on two types of lands. They
\nwhich will be affected by the exeet:;ti6h”e-{the (hi
\nany land which is not requiredjfor the
\nThe condition precedent for   ‘tax
\nincrease in market va1i,1e__of  \u00e9bh\ufb01\ufb01qu\u00e9nc\ufb01 01’ 313
\nexecution of development  who is liable to<\/p>\n
pay the betterr.nrentv..tax  thefoywnei:.oi” such land or any<\/p>\n
ggson havinf  tin-tereet therein”.  ‘ _\u00bb
\nTE OF B ;”E:RMENT’i1fAxv.PAYABLE<\/p>\n
   tax payable is provided
\nunder st1b–Seeti’on l'{AA\u00bb.’l7\u00a7y’l~.loi’~..\u00a7ection 20 of the Act. The two dates<\/p>\n
whic15_._,are i\ufb01ipiortant to  taken into consideration by the<\/p>\n
 the Authority need not wait till the scheme is<\/p>\n
.  _ exaf1’i’pl?ee,~.\n<\/p>\n
130<\/span><\/p>\n
betterment tax could be done. In order to assess ‘bett-erinent <\/p>\n
tax what is to be found out is, wi1at;isajt3ne’eaya\u00a31t1Ve OfV:th.e”iA\u00a7;a11d<\/p>\n
prior to the execution of the sch.eme.V”   yaluiilr of the<\/p>\n
land on the completion of 1  scheme.
\nHowever, if there are  purpose
\nof calculation Q[‘pei;[\u20aclTI1\u20ac3I’1:K.t:  the building is to
\nbe excluded.”     is to be taken into
\nconsideraticn  buildings. If there is
\nany   in value of the land is
\nthe basis tax. The betterment. tax<\/p>\n
leviahie shail V_be.tc;–ne”v.third of such increase in value. For<\/p>\n
  {:a}._= of (b) Market value of {:2} Increase<\/p>\n
‘ ‘ V 1ax1d.p’ri:\u00e9:;’Ac:i:o the the land on the in the
\n“‘exec;u.1’o”n of completion of the market<\/p>\n
_ theschenie scheme value<\/p>\n
 .   100\/– per sq.ft. RS250,\/~ per sq.ft. Rs. 150\/\u00bb<\/p>\n
per sqft.\n<\/p>\n
Betterment Tax — 1\/31″” of increase in value<\/p>\n
1\/3 X150 = Rs. 50\/– sq. ft.\n<\/p>\n
iv”\n<\/p>\n
13}<\/p>\n
MODE ore’ ASSESSMENT OF BETTERMENT TAX f ‘f -V<\/p>\n
39. After specifying the rate of bet’Lernie_;:it.:;a:Xn <\/p>\n
sub–section (2) of Section 20 of tlfiemMAc:;\u00ab,atL1e .;1;e\u00a7is]_e.I::u’re=  9<\/p>\n
provided for the assessment oi’Vbetter’;1:_1en_’VL tax by the ‘.a{;L.horiiyV<\/p>\n
under Section 21 of the Act whic-hliieads “as. or’.=.de::: <\/p>\n
” 21   *l:)Lel’\u20acerment lax
\nbyt}1_eAulho:’\u00e9{y} V   <\/p>\n
. ll  ag45pec’ir”s”to” lhe Aulhorilgy<\/p>\n
1: _V   sc:fle’n’1e is slg\ufb01cienlly<\/p>\n
“””  ‘”-io”~-enc1b’leV–‘lhe amount. of the
\n  be determined. lhe<\/p>\n
4′ lALl1:hoqri!.y   a resolution passed in
\n.. behodfoleclare tllalfor the purpose of
\ndele;’m_in.lrvLg such tax, the execution of the
\n,4:”s.chen1e shall be deemed to have been
\ncofflpleled and shall thereupon give notice
\n writing to every person on u.>hom_ :1
\n4′ notice in respect’ of land to be assessed
\nhad been served under sub~secl’i.on. (5) of<\/p>\n
Section 17 or to the successor in interest of<\/p>\n
132<\/span><\/p>\n
such person, as the case may be, that<\/p>\n
Authority proposes to assess the ‘7’ <\/p>\n
of the betterment tax payable tn..respectV–tof ._<\/p>\n
such {and under Section 20} t ._ <\/p>\n
(2) The Aut’hon’ty.__s}’:att   bv<\/p>\n
the amount of “tax VpVagVabtfe”‘by
\neach person corlcerned .Vaj’ter’g.tutng such
\nperson an:opportuntty’-  heard and
\nsuch person .c_st1a-LL?  months
\nfrom the    in writing
\nH  sect};   Aut.hon’ty tn<\/p>\n
torttingj ujheft-her~._  hart’ V he accepts the<\/p>\n
 “””  _ _ ‘ass\u00e9;’sn1ent.’-._ ‘<\/p>\n
 * if -~  5  the assessment proposed
\n4’   is accepted by the person
\n” soncerned toitilirl the period specified in
\nsutd\u00a5sve.stion (2), such assessment shalt be<\/p>\n
‘ \u00ab  final.\n<\/p>\n
{4} If the person concerned does
\n3 not accept the assessment made by the
\nAuthority or fails to give the Authority the
\ninformation required. under subsection (2)
\nwithin the period specified therein the<\/p>\n
Authority shati make a reference to the<\/p>\n
\\.?\u00a7:\/E\/\/”\n<\/p>\n
133<\/span><\/p>\n
District Court’ for WCi\u20acI’.\u20ac3I’Ti1.17f’ii’I’t_(,t.::”.,the\u00ab.<\/p>\n
betterment tax payable by ‘_such”per?so.r__i. ” _   ‘V<\/p>\n
40. Therefore. the  for the’
\npurpose of determining _,-3 l1,1Cl’l  that ‘t}1\u20acfii’\u00a3\u20acCu[i0I] of
\nthe scheme shall be deernedii’ completed. The
\ndeciaration by  of ‘5″  Authority is a
\ncondition     tax. The said
\nresolution.Vc;i:1.1be;\u00bbV’1p;;ssed’   development scheme is
\nsufficiently   on the subjective satisfaction
\nof the At1t’h4orii:y.xV’  the Authority cannot fix the<\/p>\n
am,0j;into’oi’ betterrinerit tax payable. No such power is conferred<\/p>\n
ton,tiie\ufb01ixuthority. Elaborate procedure is prescribed under<\/p>\n
SeeEiOn” of”‘the Act for the assessment and fixation of<\/p>\n
bettermVent=”V’tax. It is incumbent on the Authority to<\/p>\n
 meti.cuV1ons1y follow the procedure prescribed under the Act<\/p>\n
‘ Tbei’ore determining the betterment tax payable. Section 21 of<\/p>\n
it ‘ ~ the Act do not provide for assessment of betterment tax, by way<\/p>\n
of general or common order. It is because the increase in the<\/p>\n
xi\/<\/p>\n
 sop  t}te””\u00a3i’Lithority under Section 17 coritaiiis, a<\/p>\n
 statement’isrieocvifgfing the land which is proposed to be acquired<\/p>\n
 levied.\u00bb  obligation is cast on the Authority to serve a notice
\nevery person, whose land is proposed to be acquired and of
\nd’ the iarid in regard to which a betterment tax may be levied.<\/p>\n
Wfdlven the person whose land was proposed to be acquired for<\/p>\n
134<\/span><\/p>\n
value of the market value, may var_v..from larid   1 1
\nregard to its location in the layout and ::lhe’i’ad1va1itages its’-gaiinied
\nby the execution of the develo:p’m_ent scheme ar:1’dA{oth.er host <\/p>\n
relevant COi’1Sid\u20acl”c1UOi1S.\n<\/p>\n
41. Therefore,  of individual
\nnotice to  “th–ei\u00abiar1d to be assessed
\nunder   to the successor in
\niriteresvtddot   to asses the amount of
\nbetterrrient   of such land under Section<\/p>\n
20 of the  Heredit is to be noticed that the riot-.1f1c:atioi’i<\/p>\n
atnddwof th.e’b\u00a71″aEi3d in regard to which a bettemient tax may be<\/p>\n
the execution of the scheme is notified under Section 1′?[E) of<\/p>\n
3;’<\/p>\n
I36<\/p>\n
42. Sub\u00bb~section (2.) of Section  l
\nthe procedure. the Authority oh-as. to i’ol.l_ow in the
\nbetterment tax. The p1’ocedt1re’~bres_cribed. ‘iVs’t:he’:’:principle of
\n“Audi aiterm parterrn”; “should have<\/p>\n
an opportunity of being   as aforesaid
\nindividuai   person shall. be
\nheard and   by such person
\nassessfsdtllketebin\u00e9iitgn’ mind’tlie\ufb02isrihciple enumerated in sub-<\/p>\n
sectionz'{.2] of  said assessment of betterment:<\/p>\n
tax shouldl”disclos’e the”~~basis of arrivinf at the amount of<\/p>\n
 i_v_bet.tern1en’t tax payabkdand the same should be w;.itin,g”to person. because the assessee. has the option<\/p>\n
toacceptl not to accept such assessment. lf the calculation<\/p>\n
j on \u00e9thebasis of which the tax payable is determined Is<\/p>\n
:\ufb01,reas.onable, the assessee may accept the assessment. The law<\/p>\n
 contemplates that such assessee should inform the Authority<\/p>\n
it with writing his acceptance or denial of the assessment. within<\/p>\n
three months from the date of receipt. of the assessment, order.<\/p>\n
   Z   _____ <\/p>\n
  tax. The betterment tax determined
\nV . under  21 shall be paid Within the time stipulated by
\n,lti:eel_Authority and in such number of installments not<\/p>\n
  exceeding ten as may be specifiecl by the Authority together<\/p>\n
137<\/span><\/p>\n
Sub–section [3] provides that, if such..int_iInai,ioln” ~ _
\nof assessment is given in writing   \u00abthree
\nmonths. the assessment shaltbeeonie’-.i’inal.
\norder attains finality and the   stands
\ncrystallised.  _   V _L  <\/p>\n
. 43. Sub–section  the Act provides a
\nremedy for pe\u00a7.rsdns”wh:o  the assessment of
\nbetterment   does not accept the
\nassessmelntllto thell\ufb01tithority his acceptance in
\nWriting   shall make a re\ufb01erence to<\/p>\n
the Districtflourt forddeterlmining the betterment tax payable<\/p>\n
 _V  S:eeti_0n 22 of the Act provides. the manner of<\/p>\n
a”st1,V1c’h lbettefinent taitllland the mode of payment and mode of<\/p>\n
   default in payment.\n<\/p>\n
 –.sh~al.l=be levied or collected except by authority of law. Entry 49<\/p>\n
A  ..  List If to the Constitution empowers the State Legislatures to<\/p>\n
\u00a338<\/p>\n
with interest at such rates as may beA\u00bbp,1feSC1filbed4I.::l of _
\nthe Act provides, the mode in which t,h’_ei
\nbe recovered if there is defa13l_t”‘in payineiii.
\nSection 24 of the Act declai’es_:that   liability to
\nbetterment tax under  \u00e9ection 21 or payment
\nof the said tax after  22 shall not
\ndebar   “land concerned. if such
\nacquisitionl    purpose of this Act.
\nTherefore,  the Scheme of the Act<\/p>\n
clearly declines what}?:_4bet’tctrnent tax is, at what stage the<\/p>\n
bClftE’5i;.T).<3_fll   be assessed and calculated. the basis for<\/p>\n
 Article 265 of the Constittition provides that no tax<\/p>\n
pass laws in respect of tax on lands and buildings. The<\/p>\n
l\u00bb,\/<\/p>\n
140<\/span><\/p>\n
Point No. 2: ~ DOCTRINE or’ t5:1zoM1$f$oRi?i’Es*r_::;j_p_;5E3_..’<\/p>\n
46. The doctrine of p1*oOrri’i$sory’estoppel_ :’s..j;;1:\u00a2\u00a7s\u00a2d into’<\/p>\n
service to sustain the advantage:l’aocrL;ed to  petitioners by
\nthe representations in 2.  BDA to them which
\nis not in dispute.__ T’1*1ere.fo_r.e_,fit  know the scope
\nand ambit of it is applied to the<\/p>\n
facts of the lc.ase,l;_<\/p>\n
.Tl’1’e Apexi.   ease of COLLECTOR OF
\nBOMBAY ‘vs  OF THE CITY OF<\/p>\n
BOMBAY SC  recognized the exposition oi’ the<\/p>\n
 _ princfiplee of pi*om.issory estoppel for the first time as under : m<\/p>\n
H , Kcomrnitled. if the resolution can be read as<\/p>\n
H &  the Government be now allowed to go
\n._    representation, and, 1;\/’ we do so, would
\n‘iii: nolil*Vl:rmt\u20ac9unt’ to our coumenancirig the preparation
\n oj’—ltoiidl can be compendiously described as legal<\/p>\n
fi”C1Ll(i which a Court of equity must. prevent being<\/p>\n
E\/..\n<\/p>\n
 SCv77\u00a7l\u00abE’3v]iI6\u00bb’herel’lt wa\u00a71’_1j1\u00a2.1d as under : —<\/p>\n
141<\/span><\/p>\n
meaning that the grant was Q;r.m1c:;’rt’\u00a2;\u00e9”tg:a:;:,’
\ncase would come strictly w:tt’h.tn’–Athfe
\nest-oppel enunciated tn Section   thegl.\u00a3’3utdei’1ce3*. ll
\nAct. But even otherwt;9e..Vg:l””thgat
\nmerely the holding out of__:a-pt-o.rjjtse..’th(ll_nogvfirent<\/p>\n
will be charged tr:  VCiv\u00a7o:2ernmer1tAn’1LLst<\/p>\n
be deemed tn the “ojT,\u00bblttgats case to
\nhave bound’t.hem\u00a7;elue3:l;tofu,l\ufb01.l_ ttf ::.l..VV’lCourts must
\ndo    and good
\nfaith,  ltensi\ufb01l their pcftoer. ”<\/p>\n
48f ” 4Su13v%sV’e\u00a7’\u00ab;’V1″,1ei:etV1:3V};rVe._:this”principle was built upon in<\/p>\n
UNION of mrnmltrsll  AFGHAN AGENCIES [AIR 1968<\/p>\n
V   our jurisprudence the Government’ is<\/p>\n
A  not ‘ e}\u00e9ernpt’ed from liability to carry out the
\nrepresentatton made by it so to its future conduct<\/p>\n
AA ._and it cannot on some u.rtdef\u00a3n.ed and undiscrlosed
\n“ground of necessity or expediencgfatl to carry out
\nthe promise solemnly made by it; nor claim to be<\/p>\n
the judge of its own obligation to the citizen on an<\/p>\n
\u00b0’whein..th.e3′ were called upon to surrencier 3. portion of the iand<\/p>\n
 of road, the iand is surrendered and roads<\/p>\n
V’-sought :t:o’3~be withdrawn on the ground that. it is not sanctioned<\/p>\n
  and without authority.\n<\/p>\n
” irstiy, that they intend levying betterment: tax in respect oi’ the<\/p>\n
151<\/span><\/p>\n
completed. In the instant case such’
\nThe same was communicated to allvit:hefbe~i’:iet’ic~ieti*ies :.{t1eTs\u00a7iid .
\nresolution. They were Called  tollipety
\nthe representation of the   p:u:1isuetiti(1e of the
\ndemand made thereof. petitics:ne,.19s’– paid the amount of
\nbetterment tax levied and  payment is duly
\nreceived and   ~ Thereafter. the
\npetitioners   on such representation<\/p>\n
by lint?’ 051$\/’ Cgemanded but also made<\/p>\n
improVen;;en’tS, ‘co11str–ttc’ti.ons”‘ on the property in respect of<\/p>\n
which the bette,1’me1it tax is levied and collected. In some cases<\/p>\n
are\u00bb..t’or1nVed:b;y’lthe B.D.A. It is thereafter the representatiozl is<\/p>\n
55. The representation made by the B.D.A. is two fold.<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
152<\/span><\/p>\n
sites and lands in question as they~do_notflneede .l;11c\u00b0s.sn1e*_Ior’ .<\/p>\n
execution of the scheme. Secondi3:f;.&t.hesite’and:lla\u00a7idl’l_t:o.ytli;ers
\nhave to pay at the rate of     Ma’
\ncase may be. The question   conferred
\nupon BDA under the  to “o_et’te’r:;{1ent tax and at the
\nrate specified or the  orproniise is contrary
\nto law or  the  of the B.D.A to<\/p>\n
make’? The answer isparti.elly’*”yes”gand partially “no”.<\/p>\n
  is the charging section which<\/p>\n
confers power onlthel to levy betterment tax. Section 2}<\/p>\n
casts; an_obligation’ on the BDA. to pass a resolution declaring<\/p>\n
.l’*thVa’t” 1l\u00b0.or35″tl1e Apurposlellloi’ determining the betterment tax. the<\/p>\n
_eXe_cistion&.loi”‘..sthe scheme shall be deemed to have been<\/p>\n
c’orr:’pleted..”_’i-t also mandates giving of notice in w’ritir1g to every<\/p>\n
person V-pro’p’osir1g to assess the amount of betterment tax<\/p>\n
V'”payable.V__li’herefore. the representation made by the B.D.A. is<\/p>\n
 on the power conferred under the statute. It is not
\nl  contrary to law. it is not outside the aut.l1orii.y or power of the<\/p>\n
tv,<\/p>\n
153<\/span><\/p>\n
B.D.A. Therefore. the B.D.A can legjt1i.IIy1;1tely’be” V<\/p>\n
its promise to levy betterment taxiby;’gi*.?fng<tip 'and<\/p>\n
land from acquisition. as the7site andxlancl owne;'s..chave paid\u00bb<\/p>\n
the betterment tax levied and  ibroplerties thus
\naltering their position.A"\u00ab-._\u20acl'ot1r':ts   justice by the
\npromotion of honesty qllas it lies in their
\npower. Since clo:l'etri:_1e.x   estoppel is an
\nequitable   the equity so requires.\n<\/p>\n
There    for enforcing the said
\nrepresentatilon.  is sanctioned under<\/p>\n
law. It isqlegal  is not tainted with any illegality.<\/p>\n
 lnqso  determi’nation of betterment tax is<\/p>\n
  .ths;B];)A has resolved to levy betterment” tax at the<\/p>\n
raterof  and Rs. 40\/” per sq. ft. The said levy is<\/p>\n
l’._y.contra-i_*’yll”;.to Section 21 of the Act. Section 2(d] defines<\/p>\n
“l.”betlte~:fment tax’ means the tax payable under Section 20 in<\/p>\n
l  respect of an increase in the value of the land rest11t.;ing from<\/p>\n
the execution of a development scheme. The betterment tax<\/p>\n
it\/as<\/p>\n
V’ ‘=.;\u00a7et:ern?1in’e the tax paylable. After such determination, the BDA<\/p>\n
 ..sh>:;llu 4fl1C’lt.}W\ufb02\u20acI’ of the land and site the betterment tax<\/p>\n
V.,whethe”r_ Ci’ not he accepts the assessment. When such
\n“assessment is accepted by the person concerned. such
\nl  assessment: shall be \ufb01nal. if the person concerned does not<\/p>\n
 accept the assessment. then the authority shall rriake a<\/p>\n
154<\/span><\/p>\n
represents the increase in value of the land
\nexecution of a scheme. The betternient  V
\nof such increase in value. it is
\nSection 20(2) of the Act. Section Ellldeais  <\/p>\n
betterment. tax by the autho’ril:yu.””* the ‘auutho1’it$\u00ab’\u00a7 decides to<\/p>\n
levy betterment tax for.~the::’puvri}ose.l.’t)\u00a7p:\/\u00e9\ufb01iterniiiiing the tax
\npayable it has   anoltice lsubisection (1) of Section
\n21 of the    contain a proposal to
\nassess bett1e.rrne1jit’,Ht,ax payable. It is only after<\/p>\n
giving an’ VVopppoi’ttin1tyV.1\/\u00a7..,,i1:l”ie”ownei’s of the sites or lands in<\/p>\n
‘respect..of which bett,errnent. tax is proposed to be levied it can<\/p>\n
assessedv… l’i”%_1el owner has to inform the authority in writing<\/p>\n
reference to the District Court for determining the betterment<\/p>\n
‘~..r.roo’in{‘fd.i”v. any adniVi’riisti~ative action or for doing the thing<\/p>\n
 statute otherwise than in accordance<\/p>\n
”._which. “this tax is to be levied and coiiected, the Authority
\n strictly act in conformity with the said provisions. It
\ni  isgwell settled that where a power is required to be exercised by<\/p>\n
 certain authority in a certain way. it shouid be exercised in<\/p>\n
155<\/span>
\ntax payable by such person. Admittedly. in
\nthe said procedure prescribed for asJs.e.s.srr1en’t”o’i” . 1
\nis not foiiowed by the EDA. if the
\nihvahd and ineffective for ;1o:i{\u00a2e;3ap1i;:m{\u00a2 <\/p>\n
requirements of law. it would hot –constitu.te a promise or<\/p>\n
representation for the\u00bb the rule of
\npromissory\/epduitatile  _”:.4Suiic.l’1VViahcourse would render
\nthe mandatogjyf.#\u00a7;jovisio11:sVA”‘:o’f eriact.ment meaningless and
\nsupe1’\ufb02.uous’; it “v;rf}iei:eEi.tl1e is pied by an e11actment. the
\nauthority has to.rac\\[.bif;–.:_:’:aeco1’dai1ce therewith. particuiarly<\/p>\n
where the prcvisioris areiimandatory in nature. There is no<\/p>\n
theijevritliywheh the Statute meticuiously provides the mode in<\/p>\n
that manner or not at a1}. and all other modes of performance<\/p>\n
M.\n<\/p>\n
156<\/span><\/p>\n
are necessarily forbidden. {HUKUM CHAND SHYAM__._LAL vs<\/p>\n
UNION OF<\/a> iNDfA [AER 1976 SC 789}.\n<\/p>\n
58. Therefore, when the statute de\ufb01nes'”nie:3.nt”. <\/p>\n
by betterment tax, then.’iiicoiipoija:te’s-fa.:c’harging section and
\nalso provides how the  calculated and
\nthe procedure 0.1:; V t:;’V1ef’b:e’ttern1e11t tax and also
\nprovides   tile \ufb02jperson. affected by such
\n statutory provisions. if the BDA
\npasses   a particular amount as<\/p>\n
better_—‘”i1.ent  wivthout “any basis and contrary to the<\/p>\n
“‘vmarzdatoi’3r “i’equirezii’\u00e9nts of statutory provisions and then<\/p>\n
_r_.ni3,}~:_es– _fa’=._representation, it is neither a promise nor a<\/p>\n
represei1tati’o’n’dVi.i1 the eye of law to attract the doctrine of<\/p>\n
*promis”soii}’ estoppel. in determination of such betterment tax.<\/p>\n
‘i.Vpu.biic’_\u00abinterest. is involved. Any action of the EDA contraiy to<\/p>\n
such public interest i.s unezaforceable. Therefore, the<\/p>\n
 representation of the BDA to give up land from 21cq_ui.sit.io1i. as<\/p>\n
it is not required for the execution of the scbenie, is not outside<\/p>\n
i,\/,t<\/p>\n
I57<\/p>\n
its authority’ or power. It can leg’itir_1:rat._e_ly  r 5′ <\/p>\n
promise and is enforceable against {the
\nof betterment tax is not in aceo_r’d_.a11ce”wlth
\ncontrary to law. It is deither  ilfehresieiltation in
\nthe eye of law. Therefore; the  be held bound by
\nthe said represe.r1tatiorl.~– Therefore, the
\nBDA has to”  jaceiordance with law as
\nindicated   to bay the same if
\nthey    arising out of the valid
\nrepreseritati’orl  namely giving up their land<\/p>\n
from_acquisition.’ –\n<\/p>\n
. _ REQOTHER CONTENTIONS<\/p>\n
‘    contended by the learned counsel for the BDA<\/p>\n
yggqatldis collejctled is the betterment charges and not betterment<\/p>\n
f tax arid, therefore, the aforesaid provisions have no<\/p>\n
ap’p’lica’don. The power to levy should flow from statute.<\/p>\n
Qthelwise such a levy is without the authority of law. What<\/p>\n
ll’\/.\n<\/p>\n
 bettefinerxt tax is”–le\\gf_i_al;>ie not only in respect of land which is<\/p>\n
 acqviredv a.nd_1″1o__t required for the scheme but also the lands<\/p>\n
. there” is ‘ho .StElj)Slal1C\u20ac in the said Content.io1’1. It appears the
\n “issued the impugned notices on the ground that they
\nh’a.ve “acted contrary to the provisions of’ the Act: without<\/p>\n
V’ ‘knowing the correct iegal position and. thei*efore. in law they<\/p>\n
158<\/span><\/p>\n
the statute provides is the levy of
\nnot provide for levy of bettern’1e.r1t.1’_’_cha1ges:”‘
\ndescribing it as b\u20acll\u20acI”TI”i\u20acI1[‘>V\u00a3?.fi?3l”gC$i.”
\nabsolve of its responsibility of  in with the
\nmandate of law. Therefore,_Atlli_ere’substance in the said<\/p>\n
contention.   ‘–_ v_ \u00abV\n<\/p>\n
80. It (:OI3t(:\u00a7fid(:E’,C1_,’tl’1’E3,\u00a7,”‘vill\ufb01vVBEA has no power to<\/p>\n
collect bettermleet.”c’h’arges;..i;i”–i?espeet of the land which is the
\nsubject,m’atte.r’f5of ae;qiiisiti’on vul’h’ie;’i’V’is yet to vest in the State<\/p>\n
itself arid, thei’efoi~lg\u00a7:’f-~ a mistake and the BDA want<\/p>\n
to retracellits v.step_s.7Tlhi._s’ argument ignores the fact the<\/p>\n
vlvhilehfare ll_l’ikel\u00a7;”lto be af’feeted by the acquisition. ‘I’herefore.<\/p>\n
1;”\/it<\/p>\n
159<\/span><\/p>\n
have a right to retrace its steps.  out ablove; . l<\/p>\n
taking a decision to give up from alC;quislii’io1″t.l
\nacquisition on the ground thatll_i'[..1\u00a7
\nthe power and authority to  i.t’V_visll”‘–\/*i.: of acting
\nwithout authority. The’re:f’o_1fe;f_Loi:i’  they cannot go
\nback and 1’et’raCeathe   power to levy
\nbetterment.ta}%   manner provided
\nunder the  There’fore. they have
\nto retrace st.ep\u00a2VVihVs<J.lHar..vas_t}_1eWt3rocedure they have followed
\nand the"(galeulatiorhihey.:_:lha\u00a7}e made in so far as levying oi"<\/p>\n
betterment tax. isioone-erned which is permissible in law and<\/p>\n
l  .the'y– areperrnittedtomdo so.<\/p>\n
V x " l_itxlwas contended at} the persons to whom the<\/p>\n
notifies werej' isistied are not before the Court and only a smeill<\/p>\n
 portion snared before the Court and the majority of them are<\/p>\n
 these proceedings. Though in these Writ Petitions<\/p>\n
 each" of the petitioner is seeking for an individual relief. the<\/p>\n
V Wgrant or refusal to grant such relief is based on the findings of<\/p>\n
160<\/span><\/p>\n
this Court regarding th.e power of the BDA to <\/p>\n
tax and at what rate by interpreting ‘-oi’  <\/p>\n
statute. It is not dependent on the=,A_factsio:i’ eao’h..’C’a,se’t.V”V-Thatis<\/p>\n
a common question of law which arise for cons’ideration; in a_1i*.<\/p>\n
these Writ Petitions and, therefore, once ‘theiaw  deciared,<\/p>\n
authority is bound to giy-e   irrespective of the
\nfact whetheijaii   that are before this
\nCourt Cha11engi:’ngrt_their\u00bb   Court is granting reiief
\nto thenror’ ndot;  biegthoseiCjiieisions who are not willing to
\npay the7-betternvae’n-‘ti’Chatter eaicuiating by resorting to the
\nprocedure=prescribed’ and as directed by this Court,<\/p>\n
they bean give u,Vp’th’e advantage of their lands being given up<\/p>\n
 v.froIr1_.”ae:guisvittioi’1. H ‘B’ut,’Vif they want the lands to be given up<\/p>\n
 ifrotniv.aCqiiisVition, then they are liabie to pay the betterment.<\/p>\n
cha1*ges.to’C.’be ‘Eeyied by the authority in terms of the provision<\/p>\n
of th’i–s Act avsgindicated in this decision. The)’ Cannot avoid the<\/p>\n
 *2]*nabi1:t;%.t  * <\/p>\n
16}<\/p>\n
62. It was also contended on behalf oi’ the—-  . <\/p>\n
Section 24 of the Act do not debadre\u00e9
\nthe land Concerned if such VE:l.C{T\u00a7t1iSit’i01″i!’iSV Iieeessaiijy \u00a3301″ dthe
\npurposes of this Act and, therefdfeivdthe Auiii”;o’1fi’ty is}ju.stified in
\nrefunding the betterment  ‘i_ev’:'[ed  :c’:01_1ecte<:l and proceed
\nwith the acquisitizm. SC\u00a3*iieri5 24 AQ'{.tiie'_A\u00e9i},i*eads as under: ~
\n__ 5\u00a7c:.um\u00a2:it;…ete.,:f\u00a2' no .  to future
\nacguisit_\u00a79g,_– it ' \u00ab.VV'V}AiCC\u00e9'1!5I;Cti"id?\u20acV of liability to
\n::\u00e9ti\u00e9r':~:=gn.:  'z;n1::ef'sub\u00bbs\u00a7\u00e95t3:ion (3; gr Section 21.
\n0}'. p'agnieiit':t'of "tax cgfter deterniination
\nunder iSecti0ri"' not debar subsequent<\/p>\n
X qcquistitiqdn '  '::h\u00e9"\u00b0 {and concerned, if such<\/p>\n
  vnecessaryjbr purposes of this Act.
\n ha–re perusal of the said Section makes it Clear<\/p>\n
thafeveii .etfte151'c01Iecti0n of betterment tax if the iahd notified<\/p>\n
f for acqtiisitioii is given up from acquisition as being not<\/p>\n
"_:i'..neCessa1\u00a7z, stiii it is open to the authority if such iands<\/p>\n
–  hnecdines necessary to acquire the land. With the imposition of<\/p>\n
 mbtetterment tax and collection of the same. the acquisition<\/p>\n
:L:_,\u00bb\/\ufb02<\/p>\n
l62<\/p>\n
proceedings initiated in respect of t_he~la_nd c;on1le’sAs.t;o 2;i”n4end’t;V_y  L’ x<\/p>\n
the authority wants the land again
\nfresh notification for acquisitiovri–~.V.ancillthen
\nthe land. This is clear ~:__t’h_e  isubsequent
\nacquisition” used in \u00e9\ufb02gce-.tyi<1%fy1x~~-A._<\u00a3g\u00a7v1\u00a7Alfef:O}'\u20ac- they have no
\npower to returnathe  .?roc.eed with the
\nacquisitiory   virtue of the said
\nprovision,  to levy betterment tax
\nand gitre 11'–oh'1:.'acquisition. they can continue with
\nthe earlietj' 'land without any substance. if<\/p>\n
theyy.-intenc\u00e9i"   land. they should issue fresh<\/p>\n
'  ._nAotifiaca5tion"*and thenlllproceed to acquire the land.<\/p>\n
  t\u00a7oNcERN<\/p>\n
 x y 64".-flli"lie three resolutions referred to supra by which the<\/p>\n
 resolved to levy betterment tax clearly exposes the<\/p>\n
 is Wcaliousness with which this power of acquisition is exercised<\/p>\n
by the Government and Authority to formulate a scheme of<\/p>\n
iw <\/p>\n
lVeXefcise:d'ivi'th_ more care and caution. The law provides for<\/p>\n
Ae–lev;y-oi'b.etten1icif}.t charges in respect of those properties which<\/p>\n
 "\u00ab\u00ab.__l"\u00bbdevelo1\u00a7Iir1__e'nt of a layout by the BDA and provides for levy of
\nl"'betteifiment tax after hearing such land owners. The said
\nN ptbcedtire is rarely followed by the BDA. On the contrary even<\/p>\n
 those developed land or buildings are included in the scheme<\/p>\n
163<\/span>
\nproviding residential sites to needy “:.–l, .4_law”._Vis ‘ T
\nobserved more in breach. It clea’i.’ly
\nblissful ignorance of laws b’ut>lal’soV scant   ilawl
\nclearly points out the  in the of the
\nscheme by the BDA in  ii. is obvious that
\nbefore notifying tlhe land”for.acqtii.s’itionV.;  attention is not
\ngiven to fincix\ufb02it  li:.\u00e9’.”.: ll’, in the land which
\nfalls   buildings have come<\/p>\n
up  peopAlAe’la3V’e_i*esi’d.in;g..__ and what are the developmental<\/p>\n
activities ‘which has”tal*;ei”i..place. Though power to acquire is<\/p>\n
not diiisputedl the “said ipower before it is exercised should be<\/p>\n
fail ‘vvithin~i;h\u00a7e scheme and which is going to be affected by the<\/p>\n
and notified for acquisition. When objections are filed pointing<\/p>\n
it <\/p>\n
164<\/span><\/p>\n
out the said facts instead of giving relief <\/p>\n
persons, in most of the cases they  \u00ab.oienie’cil’:o
\nwhich they are entitled to in law.  the coni;it’ary, the lands
\nwhere there is no cievelop1ne’n:t”~.ai hdroppled froml<\/p>\n
acquisition. obviously  extraneotis ‘Veonsideratioln. Money.<\/p>\n
power, nearness to the se’at\u00bbolf*power and host’ of other factors<\/p>\n
come into full’ fa-a’y  the for dropping the<\/p>\n
T acquisition  _  ‘facet  breed of professionals.<\/p>\n
as a ciass,” –h_a3;:re coijiie ‘into existe’ri’ce who have specialized in
\nthe art\u00bb, of geti;in:g_Vthe”=._lands’ denotified from acquisition
\nproceedings” hPoVlit:i’cians,” ih_’i:reat1c1’ats, land mafia and other<\/p>\n
professionals a”r’eV_all partners in this lucrative enterprise. That<\/p>\n
 hoiv5\u00bb~.iii Bangaloretinext to IT industry. this real estate<\/p>\n
gbusgirieslsv.\u00bb_ most attractive and lucrative business<\/p>\n
re.sta–l,tinVg \u00abin.._people who are nothing in real life have become<\/p>\n
si;in’i:.ing__v’rich? and powerful overnight. Thanks to real estate<\/p>\n
V’-.busine”ss.’3~ The money from this business has spread its<\/p>\n
f’i:eni:a’eles in all walks of life. thtis polluting the health and<\/p>\n
—  \u00a21;g1tt1’i~e of the society. After considering the objections, when<\/p>\n
186<\/span><\/p>\n
professionals who again become ,acti\\re Ejehiiidf’rhVe._’_scene, <\/p>\n
indiscrirninateiy lands are denot.iiied, (\u00a7:bv’ionlsly’;’
\na price which is not accountedl_ai”.ywl1eAfe.V _<\/p>\n
65. When the statute 4l”‘e>'<p1jessly'* _states.} it while
\nimplementing the scherne tlie A:–ut'l'io_i'ity'vfinds that any land
\nnoti\ufb01ed for   re\u00a74;n:'rv'edVVl'o'l* the execution of the
\nscheme, Section'_\u00bb.2'O'"einf5'owei*s…tl1em"to levy bettennent tax.
\nEven if"tl'ie-C}'OVeni\u00a7'f:*eri't.swantsmtohdenotiiy a land after final
\nnotification,' w11en:"suVch"l'an(l.9lare denotified a duty is cast on
\nthem to  a11d"eol'i'ect,. the"bJettern1ent'. tax. When the statute<\/p>\n
provides for Ofz\ufb01\ufb01tli\ufb01firl\ufb01lill tax on a land which is effected<\/p>\n
by ._':a'Cqt1_i'sition and-won a land which is not required for<\/p>\n
 'irn'pleVn2er1'tationof the scheme after the acquisition, non–<\/p>\n
'e0ll'e.ctio'1'17_olf_i:1ette1*rnent: tax in respect of a land which is<\/p>\n
denotified i7r"on1 acquisition is an act which is illegal and<\/p>\n
 :"eontrary'.—-to law and against the public interest. Such an owner<\/p>\n
l'oi"t\u00bbl1e*l land walks away with his land with all benefits accrued<\/p>\n
%  .. No.15 attached to it by virtue of the developmental scheme and the<\/p>\n
it <\/p>\n
'V"d.eiiberate1ylVi' ignored. It is a matter of serious concern which<\/p>\n
 r–.re-qtiiresvt"i.zn'rne';liate attention by ail the concerned who have<\/p>\n
Win protecting public property and public interest.<\/p>\n
 _  One instance of arbitrary exercise of this power of
\nl  acquisition giving up the acquisition could be gathered from<\/p>\n
the resolution No. 177\/2003 referred to supra. A perusal of<\/p>\n
187<\/span><\/p>\n
formation of a layout by the BDA,  ‘ _
\nbecome a gold mine and he
\npublic exchequer and the inrioce-_nt  at
\nwhich has made the real   Bangalore
\nlucrative business and  of unaccounted
\nhard cash into the systenigi  neither the
\nGovernmentnor    in this regard in
\nspite Qf the    has passed an enactment<\/p>\n
providing suffic!.’en_t_.V’saiegtiards._’ The oniy inference that could<\/p>\n
be drawn isnot  not aware of the iaw but, they are<\/p>\n
the bene\ufb01ciaries Voflsuch illegal actions. These provisions are<\/p>\n
respect f’o~r:thel ruie of law. well being of the society, interested<\/p>\n
ll’\/..\n<\/p>\n
168<\/span><\/p>\n
the same shows an extent. of 1.532 ..l..7_ac:resl KV21s’.’:vnotii’i’ed -fvorl\u00bb<\/p>\n
acquisition for Banashankari Vi Phaise~’l7ulrt_h’e1fl’_I\u00a7:te:1slio_n.<\/p>\n
After issue of 17(1) notification’=under>.tht: Hret:eived.Vl’<\/p>\n
2.258 objections. In the enc;uii’y:it- 11O’t.i'(:\u20ac:(_lHll’l8.l\ufb01i\u00a7 they have
\nnotified lands in respeet..l:”ol”A   of conversion was
\npassed for non\u00a2agriCu.1t.1iral in some Cases
\nunauthorised”\u00e9_ons31ruetihns had been sold.
\nin some Cases’  farnilies were living
\nand     horticultural operations.\n<\/p>\n
Upholdingtlie  persons an exterii. of 782.17<\/p>\n
acresewas mien lu iron’: at: uisition and on] in res eel. of 750
\n. .. q<\/p>\n
hvacres 1.A9.[1j’i–.. notifieation came to be issued. lt only<\/p>\n
 Callousness on the part of the BDA in<\/p>\n
drawin 5 u develo ment scheme and virtuallv there is no due
\n tp _ .1<\/p>\n
ladiligeneel and no proper homework done before formulating the<\/p>\n
i,:llS2hel’m_.e. Though right to property is no more a fundamental<\/p>\n
l  right guaranteed to the citizens of this country under the<\/p>\n
 Constitution of India. still the Constitution recognises such<\/p>\n
right as a Constitutional right under Article 300–A of the<\/p>\n
g’\/it<\/p>\n
 is  {dill In the light of the aforesaid cleclarations, the<\/p>\n
173<\/span><\/p>\n
{a} All the Writ Petitions are_par!”_ly  <\/p>\n
{b} The decision of the a:u1.horiti;; to ‘g\u00a7i’i>e” jlifoni<\/p>\n
acquisition the lar_icls,V_ LU_l’liCl1.”-Clfve riotified for
\nacquisition  collect bett’errhen\u00bbt’ charges in respect<\/p>\n
of thesame :r_bheldo  V\n<\/p>\n
(c) The ‘Ctec’isioh_ of the “aLlth.orit_i_;H.flto collect. betterment:
\n%’:\u00a2x_.’ar:; rate}  or Rs.40\/~ as the case<\/p>\n
 be?asllresoloeciulby them in their resolutions<\/p>\n
ll Jbocly of the order is declared as<\/p>\n
2 “or1le*  aliithority and consequently any levy
\n.macle”on…that basis is also without the authority of
\n  and are liable to be quashed and conseqiterltly
\nV l  of withdrawing such levy which is more<\/p>\n
est in the eye Qflaiu would not arise.<\/p>\n
impugned commimication issued by the authority to<\/p>\n
to<\/p>\n
174<\/span><\/p>\n
these petitioners iFtfOI’ITtL’I_?g..I’i}f1_.{3fTl _io’rece_ive”bdc}c E’,-he” \u00bb 1 <\/p>\n
betterment tax paid is i’ie;?.’eby”q~:iasi1ed. <\/p>\n
(e) The authority shalt’ initiate” .ttpprop17\u00a3ate. * s
\nunder the Act for ‘bettern1eriVt’ttix  respect of’
\nthe lands  Vangijorivvtevying the
\nbetterment   Qf the Act or the
\nZarjtds’ are acquisition on the<\/p>\n
igrozgtridhthat i’t5i;s=i,no–t.,nec.es’sa1y white irnptementing<\/p>\n
V  20 of the Act and
\nit  pat\/able and Zevy the same.\n<\/p>\n
U?  dnzoitnts  paid by the petitioners and
\nit V;oerso’ns.V___mtt=ho are stntiiarty ptaced which are in
\nA   with the authority shall be kept with them
\n  shalt be adjusted towards the betterment tax<\/p>\n
to be levied after foilowing the procedure and<\/p>\n
payable by such owners of Sands.\n<\/p>\n
k%e1d\/e:<A\u00e9:a\/\u00a3131:\n<\/p>\n
175<\/span><\/p>\n
(g) Those persons who are. not     e.\n<\/p>\n
betterment tax to be  LSEEI1
\nlaw are at ll’b\u20acI”Ij_1j”vlG_ .Q-a}\u20ac(e’ b\u00a7C}f  gibigkg,
\nup the benefits  “;.”:25,fvv’_A;h\u00a7\u00bbvi?clec\u00a3sior1 Qf
\nthe BDA. . V L .\n<\/p>\n
 ….<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010 Author: N.Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 26*” day of February, 2010 BEFORE- THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTZCE\u00abN\u00a2” Writ Petition No. 3980 of\u00a7f280ij8 V QLEE. Writ Petition Nos, 4602, 5142, 5494- 8488;-= 84558457, 8458,8460,8461,8482,8463,8464,8465,8488,8487,8881, 8882,8863,9088,9104L8978;99?7;1o248,15089,15560, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"90 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":16602,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"90 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010"},"wordCount":16602,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010","name":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development ... on 26 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-10T01:31:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangaiah-naidu-vs-the-bangalore-development-on-26-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Gangaiah Naidu vs The Bangalore Development … on 26 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}