{"id":92350,"date":"2011-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011"},"modified":"2017-11-02T16:03:00","modified_gmt":"2017-11-02T10:33:00","slug":"sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                              Cr.\u00a0Revision\u00a0No.\u00a0153\u00a0of\u00a02005\n                                          ...\n<\/pre>\n<p>              Against the order dated 20.01.2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, VIth,<br \/>\n              Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 355 of 2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                 &#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a01.\u00a0Sunil\u00a0Kr.\u00a0Pandey\u00a0@\u00a0Gudul\u00a0Pandey\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02.\u00a0Ranjan\u00a0Prajapati\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a03.\u00a0Durgesh\u00a0Gupta\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a04.\u00a0Bablu\u00a0Pandey\u00a0@\u00a0Chuttu\u00a0Pandey            &#8230;   &#8230;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Petitioners<br \/>\n                                        \u00adV\u00a0e\u00a0r\u00a0s\u00a0u\u00a0s\u00ad<br \/>\n                    The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0                    &#8230;     &#8230;         \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Opposite\u00a0Party<br \/>\n                                                 &#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>                    For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioners          :\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0Mr.\u00a0H.K.\u00a0Shikarwar,\u00a0Advocate.\n<\/p>\n<pre>\u00a0\u00a0                  For\u00a0the\u00a0State\u00a0               :\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Anita\u00a0Sinha,\u00a0APP.\n                    \u00a0                            ...\n                                        \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0PRESENT\n                          HON'BLE\u00a0MR.\u00a0JUSTICE\u00a0PRASHANT\u00a0KUMAR.\n                                                 ...\nBy\u00a0Court:                 This\u00a0revision\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0filed\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a020.01.2005\u00a0\n<\/pre>\n<p>              passed \u00a0 by \u00a0 VIth\u00a0 Additional \u00a0 Sessions \u00a0 Judge, \u00a0 Hazaribagh \u00a0 in \u00a0 Sessions\u00a0<br \/>\n              Trial \u00a0 No. \u00a0 355 \u00a0 of \u00a0 2004, \u00a0 whereby \u00a0 he \u00a0 rejected \u00a0 the \u00a0 application \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a0227\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Code\u00a0of\u00a0Criminal\u00a0Procedure\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n              concluded\u00a0that\u00a0prima\u00a0facie\u00a0offence\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a0302\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0I.P.C.\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\n              made\u00a0out.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>                      It\u00a0is\u00a0submitted\u00a0by\u00a0Sri\u00a0H.K.\u00a0Shikarwar,\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners, \u00a0 that \u00a0 there \u00a0 is \u00a0 absolutely \u00a0 no \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 to \u00a0 show \u00a0 that\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners \u00a0 committed \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 crime. \u00a0 It \u00a0 is \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners \u00a0 were \u00a0 charge\u00adsheeted \u00a0 merely \u00a0 on \u00a0 suspicion. \u00a0 It \u00a0 is \u00a0 further\u00a0<br \/>\n              submitted\u00a0that\u00a0though\u00a0two\u00a0sisters\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0claimed\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0will\u00a0<br \/>\n              identify \u00a0 the \u00a0 culprit, \u00a0 if \u00a0 they \u00a0 would \u00a0 be \u00a0 shown \u00a0 to \u00a0 them, \u00a0 but \u00a0 no \u00a0 test\u00a0<br \/>\n              identification \u00a0 parade \u00a0 conducted \u00a0 to \u00a0 establish \u00a0 the \u00a0 involvement \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0crime.\u00a0Accordingly,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\n              the \u00a0 absence \u00a0 of \u00a0 any \u00a0 legal \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 petitioners \u00a0 are \u00a0 entitled \u00a0 to \u00a0 be\u00a0<br \/>\n              discharged\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0provisions\u00a0contained\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a0227\u00a0of\u00a0Code\u00a0of\u00a0<br \/>\n              Criminal\u00a0Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>                      On\u00a0the\u00a0other\u00a0hand,\u00a0Smt\u00a0Anita\u00a0Sinha,\u00a0learned\u00a0Additional\u00a0P.P.\u00a0<br \/>\n              referred\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a021,\u00a022,\u00a023,\u00a025,\u00a032,\u00a033,\u00a045,\u00a052\u00a0&amp;\u00a0119\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\n              case \u00a0 diary \u00a0 to \u00a0 show \u00a0 that \u00a0 there \u00a0 are \u00a0 circumstantial \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 against\u00a0<br \/>\n              petitioners \u00a0 from \u00a0 which \u00a0 it \u00a0 can \u00a0 be \u00a0 inferred \u00a0 that \u00a0 petitioners \u00a0 had\u00a0<br \/>\n              committed \u00a0murder \u00a0 of \u00a0 informant&#8217;s \u00a0son. \u00a0 Accordingly, \u00a0it \u00a0is \u00a0 submitted\u00a0<br \/>\n that\u00a0the\u00a0court\u00a0below\u00a0had\u00a0rightly\u00a0rejected\u00a0application \u00a0of\u00a0petitioners\u00a0<br \/>\nunder\u00a0Section\u00a0227\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Code\u00a0of\u00a0Criminal\u00a0Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Having\u00a0heard\u00a0the\u00a0submissions,\u00a0I\u00a0have\u00a0gone\u00a0through\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0<br \/>\nof\u00a0the\u00a0case.\u00a0Admittedly,\u00a0first\u00a0information\u00a0report\u00a0was\u00a0lodged\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nfather\u00a0of\u00a0deceased,\u00a0wherein\u00a0no\u00a0allegations\u00a0made\u00a0against\u00a0petitioners.\u00a0<br \/>\nRather,\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0information\u00a0report\u00a0informant\u00a0(father\u00a0of\u00a0deceased)\u00a0<br \/>\ncategorically\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0deceased\u00a0was\u00a0driving\u00a0the\u00a0maruti\u00a0van\u00a0in\u00a0rash\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0negligent\u00a0manner\u00a0and\u00a0because\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0maruti\u00a0van\u00a0dashed\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nstone\u00a0causing\u00a0injury\u00a0to\u00a0deceased.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0information\u00a0report,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0<br \/>\nnot\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0two\u00a0sisters\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0also\u00a0accompanied\u00a0him\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nclinic\u00a0of\u00a0Dr.\u00a0Manoj\u00a0Jain.\u00a0However,\u00a0from\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0statements\u00a0of\u00a0two\u00a0<br \/>\nsisters\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0at\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a021\u00a0&amp;\u00a022\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0dairy,\u00a0I\u00a0find\u00a0<br \/>\nthat\u00a0they\u00a0claimed\u00a0to\u00a0have\u00a0accompanied\u00a0deceased\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0clinic\u00a0of\u00a0Dr.\u00a0<br \/>\nManoj\u00a0Jain\u00a0and\u00a0during\u00a0that\u00a0period\u00a0they\u00a0came\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nafternoon \u00a0 deceased \u00a0 along \u00a0 with \u00a0 petitioners \u00a0 Ranjan \u00a0 Prajapati \u00a0 and\u00a0<br \/>\nDurgesh\u00a0Gupta\u00a0went\u00a0to\u00a0tea\u00a0stall\u00a0for\u00a0taking\u00a0tea.\u00a0Apart\u00a0from\u00a0that,\u00a0they\u00a0<br \/>\ndid\u00a0not\u00a0state\u00a0anything\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0persons.\u00a0It\u00a0further\u00a0appears\u00a0<br \/>\nsisters\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0claim\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0could\u00a0identify\u00a0culprits,\u00a0if\u00a0shown\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\nthem,\u00a0 but\u00a0 unfortunately,\u00a0T.I.\u00a0Parade \u00a0not\u00a0conducted,\u00a0 thus,\u00a0whether\u00a0<br \/>\nthese \u00a0petitioners\u00a0are\u00a0involved\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0present\u00a0crime\u00a0or\u00a0not\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\nbeen\u00a0established.\u00a0At\u00a0paragraph\u00a0nos.\u00a023\u00a0&amp;\u00a024\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0diary,\u00a0two\u00a0<br \/>\nbrothers \u00a0 of \u00a0 deceased \u00a0 only \u00a0 cast \u00a0 suspicion \u00a0 against \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 Ranjan\u00a0<br \/>\nPrajapati. \u00a0 The \u00a0 informant \u00a0 (father \u00a0 of \u00a0 deceased) \u00a0 in \u00a0 his \u00a0 subsequent\u00a0<br \/>\nstatement,\u00a0at\u00a0paragraph\u00a0no.\u00a025\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0dairy,\u00a0also\u00a0cast\u00a0suspicion\u00a0<br \/>\non\u00a0petitioners.\u00a0Paragraph\u00a0no.\u00a046\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0diary\u00a0reveals\u00a0that\u00a0I.O.\u00a0<br \/>\ngathered \u00a0 some \u00a0 confidential \u00a0 information \u00a0 showing \u00a0 involvement \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioners \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 present \u00a0 crime. \u00a0 However, \u00a0 I.O. \u00a0 did \u00a0 \u00a0 not \u00a0 disclose\u00a0<br \/>\nsource \u00a0 of \u00a0 aforesaid \u00a0 information. \u00a0 Thus, \u00a0 materials \u00a0 available \u00a0 at\u00a0<br \/>\nparagraph\u00a0no.\u00a046\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0diary\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0evidence.\u00a0Now\u00a0coming\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\nparagraph\u00a0no.\u00a052\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0diary,\u00a0one\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0brother\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0<br \/>\nstates\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0came\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0that\u00a0petitioners\u00a0had\u00a0committed\u00a0\u00a0present\u00a0<br \/>\ncrime,\u00a0but\u00a0this\u00a0witness\u00a0also\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0disclose\u00a0source\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0information.\u00a0<br \/>\nThus, \u00a0 his \u00a0 evidence \u00a0 at \u00a0 paragraph \u00a0 no. \u00a0 52 \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 diary \u00a0 is \u00a0 not\u00a0<br \/>\nadmissible\u00a0being\u00a0hit\u00a0by\u00a0Section\u00a060\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Evidence\u00a0Act.\u00a0At\u00a0paragraph\u00a0<br \/>\n                no.\u00a0119\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0diary,\u00a0a\u00a0girl\u00a0namely\u00a0Manila\u00a0also\u00a0cast\u00a0suspicion\u00a0<br \/>\n               against\u00a0accused\u00a0persons.\u00a0Thus,\u00a0from\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0entire\u00a0case\u00a0diary,\u00a0I\u00a0<br \/>\n               find\u00a0that\u00a0save\u00a0and\u00a0except\u00a0suspicion,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0absolutely\u00a0no\u00a0legal\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n               positive\u00a0evidence\u00a0against\u00a0the\u00a0accused\u00a0persons.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0well\u00a0settled\u00a0that\u00a0<br \/>\n               suspicion \u00a0 howsoever \u00a0 stronger \u00a0it \u00a0 may \u00a0 be,\u00a0 cannot \u00a0 take \u00a0 the \u00a0 place \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n               evidence. \u00a0 In \u00a0 my \u00a0 view, \u00a0 merely \u00a0 on \u00a0 suspicion, \u00a0 petitioners \u00a0 cannot \u00a0 be\u00a0<br \/>\n               tried\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0murder\u00a0of\u00a0deceased\u00a0Rahul\u00a0Gupta.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       In \u00a0 view \u00a0of \u00a0 discussions \u00a0 made \u00a0 above,\u00a0 I\u00a0 find\u00a0 material \u00a0 illegality\u00a0<br \/>\n               and\/or\u00a0irregularity\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0impugned\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0court\u00a0below.\u00a0Thus,\u00a0<br \/>\n               the\u00a0same\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0sustained.\u00a0Accordingly,\u00a0this\u00a0revision\u00a0is\u00a0allowed\u00a0<br \/>\n               and\u00a0impugned\u00a0order\u00a0is\u00a0set\u00a0aside.\u00a0The\u00a0court\u00a0below\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0<br \/>\n               fresh\u00a0inquiry\u00a0and\u00a0pass\u00a0order\u00a0in\u00a0accordance\u00a0with\u00a0law.\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                                                     \u00a0\u00a0             \u00a0(Prashant\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0J.)<br \/>\nJharkhand\u00a0High\u00a0Court<br \/>\nDated\u00a0:\u00a009.09.2011<br \/>\nSunil\/NAFR\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 Cr.\u00a0Revision\u00a0No.\u00a0153\u00a0of\u00a02005 &#8230; Against the order dated 20.01.2005 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, VIth, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 355 of 2004. &#8230; \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a01.\u00a0Sunil\u00a0Kr.\u00a0Pandey\u00a0@\u00a0Gudul\u00a0Pandey \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a02.\u00a0Ranjan\u00a0Prajapati \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a03.\u00a0Durgesh\u00a0Gupta\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a04.\u00a0Bablu\u00a0Pandey\u00a0@\u00a0Chuttu\u00a0Pandey &#8230; &#8230;\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Petitioners \u00adV\u00a0e\u00a0r\u00a0s\u00a0u\u00a0s\u00ad The\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0Jharkhand\u00a0 &#8230; &#8230; \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Opposite\u00a0Party &#8230; For\u00a0the\u00a0Petitioners :\u00a0\u00ad\u00a0Mr.\u00a0H.K.\u00a0Shikarwar,\u00a0Advocate. \u00a0\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":782,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011"},"wordCount":782,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011","name":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; ... vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-02T10:33:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sunil-kr-pandey-gudul-pandey-vs-state-of-jharkhand-on-9-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sunil Kr.Pandey @ Gudul Pandey &amp; &#8230; vs State Of Jharkhand on 9 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92350\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}