{"id":92974,"date":"2008-03-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-18T19:41:43","modified_gmt":"2018-10-18T14:11:43","slug":"ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<pre>are THE 1\"\" CCU\"? OF' A NATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 2\"'-\"r= 3\"!\" OF' MARCH \"\n\n   \n\nB.angalore-560 05'}?  L _:_ie  :Petitioner\n(By Sri. A.N.   t\n\n : Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri.  <\/p>\n<p>,,.&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;li*.s~  Re-f-vision Petition is  under Section<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;397 r\/&#8217;W:-4~.0  .Cr.P.C;&#8221;&#8221;by the Advocate for pctitietier, praying<br \/>\n set asicie -the Judgment of conviction and sentence dated<\/p>\n<p>  by the by the or-.1,-.=..:&#8217;<br \/>\nBang&#8217;alorc&#8217;R_uI&#8217;a1 district, in C. O. NO. 867\/ 2002 con\ufb01rmed by<br \/>\nthe A   Co-art-i&#8217;v&#8217;, Bangalore Rural district,<\/p>\n<p>   eBangaiore.56\/2003 Dated 10.12.2004.<br \/>\n&#8221; ~   A This. petition coming on for hearing, this day the Court,<br \/>\n\u00ab  4&#8242; ma\ufb01a renewing:\n<\/p>\n<p>Qt<\/p>\n<p> V. ._  The petitioner-accused is  for a.-1. et&#8217;!&#8217;e.-aw<\/p>\n<p>(.0<\/p>\n<p>X  1juI1isl1a_b1e LI,\/s. 32- 1. \\.J, he is we-:&#8211;t&#8211;d to undergo simple<\/p>\n<p>Q~ Q&#8217;r&#8217;v&#8217;~\u20ac&#8217;L}.4&#8217;\/L.\n<\/p>\n<p>  1 III 4;: nrnina<\/p>\n<p>irnp\ufb01sonmc\ufb01t for a w\ufb01 of fno\ufb02ths.  00 pe3t_ a \ufb01ne<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.500\/ -, in default of payment of \ufb01ne, to ..for-<\/p>\n<p>one month by the Judgment of  <\/p>\n<p>sentence dated 03.09.2003    -; I <\/p>\n<p>Ilaniafsmfq nnnnninnn &#8216;Diurnal it-L<br \/>\n:.uq.5|nunu. , :..:unaIJ5Ia.|ru.|\\a n\\I.uaau.V,u.s wave; &#8220;L_&#8217;loIu.J\\.ll&#8217;&gt;[._I&#8217;-.If|aAl&#8217;\\J=-&#8216;L-o &#8216; &#8216;urn;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; appeal, the  District   <\/p>\n<p>Bangalore. rural man-ict.  Juagnaent dated .<\/p>\n<p>10.12.2004 passed in  appeal-<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01l-_ ~y the    0;: ..Im,;,_mc_=I;L<\/p>\n<p>follows:\n<\/p>\n<p> o%n0.05.01.:a001 at. about. 8.30 .111, when<\/p>\n<p>E?!&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>luI.r&#8217;|\u00ab 5&#8243;,&#8221;! .8. vvluln.-I J&#8217;-ovwtollulal-Ila<\/p>\n<p> at Jakkasandra viiiage. there was<\/p>\n<p> .disr1ip\ufb020r\u00a7&#8217;of&#8221;:i\u00e9iecuicity in the street and lights had. gone o\ufb01&#8217;,<\/p>\n<p>0 W H K   also joined PW.1  they. were discussing about<\/p>\n<p> Subet lights. At that point. of time-_, accused-petitioner<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;  4; _, :1 , ___ , &#8220;1 , l&#8221;I _ _<br \/>\n Lvi\ufb01lllca LU LI..l\\v 3vI4I.I.&#8217;u IIIJIIJII  913.111 all<\/p>\n<p>E<br \/>\nI<\/p>\n<p> i-n I-I-us run-u: I-nn.&#8217;Ia-II rt turning<\/p>\n<p>11 1&#8242;-&#8216;li\ufb01 1&#8217;ll&#8217;I&#8217;I.&#8217;|&#8217; nn_-n-I<br \/>\nlull&#8221; I &#8216;1 &#8211; aJ4l\\-l<\/p>\n<p>[-\n<\/p>\n<p>CL<\/p>\n<p> P&#8217;v&#8217;v&#8217;.1 on his back, when P&#8217;v&#8217;v&#8217;s. &#8216;2 8: 3 went -to<\/p>\n<p>rescue PW. 1, petitioner assaulted them  <\/p>\n<p>caused bleeding injuries. On the same   <\/p>\n<p>the jurisdictional police, lodged c:oiopLsxi; al1smn:-    1 <\/p>\n<p>  a dim&#8221;: 1- lnnhnqnu  &#8216;1&#8217;:&#8217;~:.&#8217;u-I<\/p>\n<p>accused with regard to a<br \/>\nassaulted him. After&#8217; 1.\n<\/p>\n<p>police filed  sheet   for the offence<br \/>\npunisiiable Lus;  ziiisos  so  A<\/p>\n<p>3.    oi&#8217;: its case, examined<br \/>\nP.W.1 l as 2 and also got marked<\/p>\n<p>M.O.1 O1iie&#8217;iopprcciaoon of the oral and<\/p>\n<p>V docuixientaiy it   the Courts below  the<\/p>\n<p>Mm _ and s.*;Iit.e:1.cm&#8217;d ..i.&#8217;11  stated herein bsfom.<\/p>\n<p> _    witnesses examined. P.W.1 is the<\/p>\n<p>V it . He in. his evidence has stated that on-<\/p>\n<p>  :z_iate&#8221;&#8216; of incident, after completing  wo:-rk, he was<\/p>\n<p> to his house; as thorns was no electricity, he mid<\/p>\n<p>,,_..1gx<\/p>\n<p>u&#8217;v&#8217;s.&#8217;2 6%. 3 &#8216;v&#8217;v&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;\ufb01 &#8216;ul\ufb01ikiii\ufb01 &#8220;&#8216;u:-out these-me, -&#8216; &#8220;-<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;t &#8220;*&#8217;-&#8220;&#8221;t of<\/p>\n<p>9&#8242;-\n<\/p>\n<p> li.;t.=.0w;v<\/p>\n<p>4.3&#8230;. 1.1.. &#8230;.._4..l4.S&#8230;_.. _&#8230;.= &#8230;._._.._,&#8230; ____&#8230;_J &#8221; _ _ &#8221; &#8230;_.&#8217;IA___&#8217;I 1_J__ __.u_&#8217;I_ .___I_ _I_ A;_<br \/>\nLI.I.l1C, LL16 IKJUUCHIEI CHIIIC EIIIG. asaaulwu fll\ufb02l WIUI Cy  CD311}<\/p>\n<p>on his back, on. hearing his cry, P013. 2 8; his<\/p>\n<p>rescue and the accused assaulted them  .  <\/p>\n<p>complaint as per Ex. P. 1, on the m\u00e9ithdaar, he   <\/p>\n<p>the I*lel9.:%% ..eap.tal   A &#8221; ~ He &#8216; <\/p>\n<p>deposed that there &#8211;was 1<br \/>\nwith regard to site     the sisters<br \/>\nof PW.l and injured   the<\/p>\n<p>cvidchcc of  1&#8217;;f;f  cf EH3, 1 1:9 3<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I&#8221; 1&#8243;&#8216;s  _V&#8221;t-:a&#8221;_j&#8217;__&#8217;t:&#8217;t:_u&#8217;.&#8217;; =91 g-14&#8243;&#8216;-.;~..:;+t  th- =&#8212;1.1&#8212;.t. I-&#8220;fu&#8217;.5-<\/p>\n<p>a~<br \/>\npanch   of  and eyewitness to<\/p>\n<p>the  _  pm&#8217;-Ich witness. for scene of<\/p>\n<p>V oocutfmmc, &#8216;i\u00e9  as Ex.P.2. For the reason best-<\/p>\n<p>F<br \/>\nVII-;I.IuIIn.fJ.lo Allan! manna IA: loll\u00bb!-I<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;,&#8217;1&#8217;;h\u00a2 pm\ufb02&#8221;e(&#8216;l,IHn. n fnilg fn nvnmin\ufb01 {-<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;I&#8217;ll-\n<\/p>\n<p>iii tile case i.c.,  investigation oi\ufb01ccr, <\/p>\n<p> _ doctbr  the injured persons and it has to<\/p>\n<p>W H K   wound certi\ufb01cate.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V&#8217; :14-1,11,!-Ina:-I I111&#8242;&#8211;&#8216;I-&#8216;run-IQ:-I II&#8217;!&#8217;:&#8217;u&#8217;I_ Inga-In-II-I4-I +1&#8242;  tutu-st-nan:-Id\ufb01ur<br \/>\n lull&#8217;: air&#8217;:-13\\.I.&#8221;_lilI-I ll&#8217;-74&#8242;: &#8220;&#8216;\\I.&#8217;IuI:I [$3.31 II) 31&#8221;;  to&#8217;:<\/p>\n<p> 5. Admittedly, there is.an.enmity.between P&#8217;W.l and<br \/>\n&#8220;Inn;\n<\/p>\n<p>\\<br \/>\n5% \ufb02twsu. &#8216;v*~&#8217;1\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>A__!_<\/p>\n<p>s  by the  viz,<\/p>\n<p>I-&#8216;Ws-. 2 to 4 are closely related..to PW.1,t as <\/p>\n<p>sisters and mother of PW.1 and as such, <\/p>\n<p>witnesses. The oral testimony ozfs. 1     <\/p>\n<p>f.!f_lI&#8217;!&#8217;\u00a3.!l&#8217;J\u00a3=.5&#8230;!*.l;9!.! by any ind.e,rz-ex-&#8230;ri|.mt;.!.Iarit;,:1.ee-n.es.  <\/p>\n<p>of non-examma-&#8216; t tion of     V&#8217;<br \/>\nand non-marking of \u00abwotgi\ufb01i 6f\u00b0tl1e injtmed<br \/>\nwitnesses,-. the prosecutjpnt    the<\/p>\n<p> PWs=.\n<\/p>\n<p>. &#8230;-. 31   .;.;. -&#8230;..&#8217;x..&#8221; 1.. .._- .. &#8230; ._..____<br \/>\nare ass&#8217; -tea; fer .e;T&#8217;1{:-&#8216;i&#8217;i*\u20ac&#8221;:.&#8217;-iu1n;is;n=&#8221;ta%x1u&#8217;:; i&#8217; t: =  itneasca,<\/p>\n<p>the  All these aspects<\/p>\n<p>of the   \u00e9onaidered by the-Courts below-<\/p>\n<p>and    arrived at a wrong conclusion<\/p>\n<p>    cf   t.h.e\u00abe\ufb02&#8217;eI1%<\/p>\n<p> ti&#8217;ir&#8221;:.,v&#8217;5r*f_&#8221;==&#8221;*&#8221;mu1er1y cf  wiiznesses. <\/p>\n<p>   _is ex\u00a7\u00a7Iae\u00a7\u00e9.tion for the  delay in lodging the<\/p>\n<p> The incident has  on 05-0-1&#8211;2001 but<\/p>\n<p> euinptamt is. lodged on 06-01,2001. The. material on<\/p>\n<p>~  may 1-=-&#8230;&#8230;.t=d to 9. seem eusp*n*m=- M&#8217; *&#8217;=&#8211; -W&#8221;&#8211;&#8220;&#8216; be-.1:-g<\/p>\n<p>lllolllll W-Jul\u00bb Ialnlld Q1!&#8217;-II-4|1.\u00a2I.I<\/p>\n<p>(Q: Q&#8217;~\\.\/\\,aI_,I\\t_{,L__.,<\/p>\n<p>guilty of  offence, but meme. suspicion <\/p>\n<p>would not by itself be su\ufb02icient to -hold. the <\/p>\n<p>The prosecution should prove its case   <\/p>\n<p>doubt. Thus, the order of oonv1c;i1e:i  7. V<\/p>\n<p>-I-&#8216;In<\/p>\n<p>by us\ufb01 Ceurt&#8221;    ~ 1e1,i-L .w&#8217;*im in&#8221;vth1-&#8216;Eta:<\/p>\n<p>revision  Hence, the<br \/>\nThe   1se%a11ewede. The<br \/>\njudgment; e ] ooxavicmen   L .\u00a7\u00a7&#8217;:fntenee dated\n<\/p>\n<p>10. 12.:;oe:1\u00abk  *Di\u00a31*ict Judge, Fast<br \/>\n     Rural district,<br \/>\n Appeal No.56] 2003 and<br \/>\nt11c&#8221;Juudg1ner_1tAIedet:e:\u00a7&#8221;\u00bb\u00bb03.03-.3003 passed by the<br \/>\nChief  &#8220;Judieie1A&#8217;~\u00ab._Nian&#8217;giatrate\u00bb Bangalore Rural<\/p>\n<p>\ufb02aistfiet, i&#8217;11&#8243;&#8216;~.x&#8217;.&#8221;,;v.\u00a7;,_.1&#8243;t&#8217;:. 130 -zwz are set aside.<br \/>\nI<\/p>\n<p>  by the  shall. sit.-a..r1r1<br \/>\n The fine amounts if any paid by the<br \/>\n~*.pct1 t&#8221;ioI1er shall be refunded. to him.<\/p>\n<p>Rd,-\n<\/p>\n<p>..,w&#8211;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik are THE 1&#8243;&#8221; CCU&#8221;? OF&#8217; A NATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2&#8243;&#8216;-&#8220;r= 3&#8243;!&#8221; OF&#8217; MARCH &#8221; B.angalore-560 05&#8242;}? L _:_ie :Petitioner (By Sri. A.N. t : Respondent (By Sri. ,,.&#8217;\u00a3&#8217;li*.s~ Re-f-vision Petition is under Section &#8220;397 r\/&#8217;W:-4~.0 .Cr.P.C;&#8221;&#8221;by the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-92974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":967,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008"},"wordCount":967,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008","name":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-18T14:11:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-srirama-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-27-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramesh @ Srirama vs State Of Karnataka on 27 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92974"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92974\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}