{"id":9338,"date":"2008-10-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008"},"modified":"2014-07-06T06:57:14","modified_gmt":"2014-07-06T01:27:14","slug":"sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n<pre>?l\u00a7P\/,\u00bb\/\n\nm THE HIGH coum or  \n\nDated this the 24th dv\u00e9ay  :7'\n\nBEEQRE % '\n\nTHE HOWBLE   '$HY\ufb01ENDi2A KUMAR\n\nBETWEEN:  \n\nWrit Petizio\ufb01 Ht; 1's\u00e92_g [LB-RES]\n\n     V\nSON 'O.}?\"'31%L_SHE_K.%_RAPPA HQLEGUND1\n\n' AG}\u00a3;' MAJOR'; VCHAIRMAN \n\n KOPPAL'-'UE2_B\"AVN'DVEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY\n\n\"=2\u00ab;o?PA:.._ DES'? VKO_P?\ufb01L._.\n\n PETITIONER\n\nA'  k'%gVB3{sz&amp; s N Hatti, Adv)\n\n- 'v.TPiE~$;T{'\u00a2XTE OF' KARNATAKA\n' v..\u00a3s\u00a7r1*rsT~s:s;cRETARY\n\nD13':-?r.'cf.~\u00a7* URBAN DEVELOPMENT\n1\u00bb: SIILJILDINGS\n\n&lt;;\u00a7M3a&#039;EDKAR VEEDHI\n\n&quot; _E;&#039;&amp;NGALORE--01\n\nTHE DEPUTY CC)M\u00a7\u00e9ISS\u00a5ONER\nKOPPAL DISTRICT\n\nKOFPAL ., RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>[By Sri K Vxdyavati, HCGP]<\/p>\n<p>THIS WRIT PETYFION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 EFF&#8217; THE<\/p>\n<p>CONS&#8217;f&#8217;I&#8217;TUi&#8217;l&#8217;ION OF&#8217; INDIA, P\u00a53AY1NG TO QUASH THE CIRCULAR<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>DATED 7-\u00abK11-~2007 ISUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OFKARNATAKA<br \/>\nVIDE ANNEXUR&#8217;E&#8211;D AND ETC. M  <\/p>\n<p>ms PETITION comm om FOR ogoms icoum<br \/>\nMADETIEFOLLOWING:  v_   <\/p>\n<p>Writ &#8211; petition by a      Las<br \/>\nchairman of Koppal Urba\ufb01   in tef\ufb01as<br \/>\nof the government .or(1_er  [A o11exure&#8211;A to<br \/>\nthe Writ petition]  if  member of the<\/p>\n<p>Karnataka   V&#8217;  Bank [KDCC],<\/p>\n<p>  claims to be a. director of<br \/>\nAutoliiobiles  &#8216;Consumers&#8217; Co-operative Soceity<\/p>\n<p>Ltdg,-V Ha1i\u00a7a;., has q::_e\u00a7iioned the mazity of the order dated<\/p>\n<p>. . &#8221;  to the writ petition}, is aggrieved that<\/p>\n<p>I  flee  to tender resigantion in terms of the<\/p>\n<p>eommmiie\ufb01\ufb01on dated 9&#8211;11&#8211;2007 [Armexure-C to the Writ<\/p>\n<p>   .. originated from the of\ufb01ce of the deputy<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; &#8216;._ &lt;:&#039;o:\ufb01missioner of Koppal district, purporting to be on the<\/p>\n<p> &quot; * &quot;oasis of the gevemment circular dated 7-11-2007<\/p>\n<p>{Annexure-D to the writ petition]; that the mtitioner is<\/p>\n<p>sought to be relieved of his of\ufb01ce before three<br \/>\nyears as has been mentioned  ojrtieii-j V30;<br \/>\nthat a request of the deputyf   fort]<br \/>\npetitioners resigiation  or<br \/>\ncircular under  any basis or<br \/>\nreason; that it is at application of mind,<br \/>\nan  &#039; tftierefore liable to be<br \/>\nquasheti;  is \ufb01led questioning the<br \/>\nlegedjtye    the request of the deputy<br \/>\n   VV  .4 &#8212; . an &quot; i &#039;<\/p>\n<p>2.  _v  isued to the respondents and they<\/p>\n<p>  Ms K Vidyavati, learned government<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   Statement of objections has also been \ufb01led on<\/p>\n<p>i&#8217;   respondents. An application is moved seeking<\/p>\n<p> for&#8221; agitating the interim order of stay, on the smzngth of<\/p>\n<p>it *  the petitioner has continued to be in o\ufb01ice of the<\/p>\n<p> chairman, Koppel UDA so far.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Appearing for the petitioner, Sri S__<br \/>\ncounsel, submits that the question  to:<br \/>\nthe interim order and dispose} of  .1?-&#8216;$3<br \/>\npetition itself can be heat\ufb01egn  p   is<\/p>\n<p>taken up for dispesal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Sri Hatti, petitioner would very<br \/>\n  I under the impugned<br \/>\ncircmei&#8217;..pe.$.44_\u00a7;eii:&#8217;tee  of the deputy commissioner<br \/>\n A&#8217;   of the pe\ufb01tioner and like<\/p>\n<p>pereo.1:ie,te is  arbitrary action; that it is without<\/p>\n<p>3 Ieese3:1_V&#8221;o&#8217;1r jueti\ufb01cation and Without evaluating the<\/p>\n<p>A =._&#8221;&#8216;pet&#8217;i&#8217;o1*:t1e;1ce or merit of any of the incumbents in the o\ufb01iee;<\/p>\n<p> ae\ufb01on of this nature seeking en masse resigantion<\/p>\n<p>titer  out threat to terszninate the services in the event<\/p>\n<p>i &#8221; * of Vo\ufb01iee bearers not obiigng to tender their resigantion, is<\/p>\n<p> itiothing short of a gees arbitraiy action opoeed to the<\/p>\n<p>requirement of the state action being fair and the power<\/p>\n<p>being exercised in 3. bone \ufb01de manner and only for<\/p>\n<p>ye  <\/p>\n<p>5. On the other hand, Ms K vidys:;\u00ab.;i\u00e9.ti,*i<br \/>\ngovernment pleader, would sub_mit,__tha_i:&#8221;<br \/>\nnature questioning the legality ::&#8217;of<br \/>\ncome in for examination   __c&lt;\u00a7<br \/>\noccasion and such &quot;_i*1a&#039;ve&#039;beer1&#039;t1is1I;issed; that<br \/>\nsuch is the videw    following<br \/>\nWhich, a   has dismissed a<br \/>\nsimilar writ  case being in pari<br \/>\nmateriga&#039;  by this court earlier in<br \/>\nWP NoV:&#039;1.84o1&#039;  :14-to-2008 in the case of Sri M<\/p>\n<p>Ravindra  &#039;\u00a3I(?,VIfS1A1&amp;3-_b&#039;SV&quot;t2\u00e9&#039;:;ittt3 of Karnataka, this writ petition<\/p>\n<p> V&#039; \u00abis to&#8230;be:,_Adismissed&#039;&quot;ar1d there is no justification to continue<\/p>\n<p>  of stay; that the interim order should be<\/p>\n<p>vziie\u00e9-ited&#039;;r:onseque:1tIy the writ petition should also<\/p>\n<p>1&#039; &#039; V&quot;  .  &quot;d.ismis$e_d.\n<\/p>\n<p>  ii &#8220;Atte:1&#8217;o&#8217;on is also drawn to the provisions of Section 5<\/p>\n<p>.  V  ii  the Karnataka UI&#8217;be.&#8217;:%.!T} Development Authorities Act, 1987<\/p>\n<p>and submits that the very appointment being at the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;pleasure&#8217; of the government, the  <\/p>\n<p>any gievance if such appointme1_1Li\u00bbs teririii1aied;&#8221;&#8216;ihat <\/p>\n<p>aspect had been indicated in tile Vex}; ;t.&#8221;&#8216;\u20ac51fder.&#8221;= &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>and therefore the 2   iofvi<br \/>\nvioiation of principles ;ofnati1reifjiustioe&#8230;&#8217; &#8221; ii I V\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>7. I have examinedxatiie&#8217;  vesiihmissions and also<br \/>\nthe earlier decision  judgment of the<br \/>\nSupreme   Vzomntctir<\/p>\n<p>8. _Whiie~4i&#8217;tie\u00a3at any arbitrary action is frowned<\/p>\n<p>   v*i.o1ati{?e&#8217;oi&#8217;\u00abA1&#8217;tic1e 14 of the Constitution of India<\/p>\n<p>  the State is required to be fair and any<\/p>\n<p> is. required to be exercised in a fair and bone:<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01de mariner, in the present case, the ratio of the decision in<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;iii_1;r;ei f&#8217;.r case of SHIQILEKIIA VIDYARTIH [supra] is<\/p>\n<p>  .i _\u00bbV_&lt;_\u00a7istjng11ishabie for the simple reason that the exercise of<\/p>\n<p>power in the ease of SHRILEKHA VIBYA.Rfl&#039;.Hif [supra] was<\/p>\n<p>being examined in the context of en masse termination of<\/p>\n<p>services of district government counsel by of<br \/>\nUttarapradesh, who had been<br \/>\nthree years after undergoing seine<br \/>\nakin to probation. The  of<br \/>\nabout the termination&quot; and  frowned<br \/>\nupon saying that it   eras uncalled for<br \/>\nparticularly   of the service that<br \/>\nis being  government counsei.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. &#8216;&#8221;i&#8217;he&#8211;. &#8216;  _ ieittzation was one involving the<\/p>\n<p>appoiritnieni _ oi&#8217; _  to public bodies and the<\/p>\n<p> AA agpoin\ufb01nente  purely political. It is not as though<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; either-.tf1e&#8217;siiit;=ibiIity or quali\ufb01cation or merit of the persons<\/p>\n<p>. intoyinor are they examined for their performance<\/p>\n<p> in   The appointment itself is pnrely political and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; [7  pleasure of the governor, in the sense that it can be<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   terminated at any time within three years.<\/p>\n<p>10. While Sri Hatti, learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>submits that the circular having been issued in the context<\/p>\n<p>of change of government and the state being broughtteider<\/p>\n<p>the Presideri\ufb02s rule and therefore submits that <\/p>\n<p>is bad in law etc., even this being purely a   K  <\/p>\n<p>and not involving any right of  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>need for this court to enter  iipo\ufb01ticsi  <\/p>\n<p>examining such action on the  T  14 of<br \/>\nthe Constitution of II1di.\u00ab&#8217;Ai~14_.. \ufb02~  14esse111:ial1y<br \/>\nmandates the state not,.to:&#8217;_ iffom person to<\/p>\n<p>person &#8220;of&#8217;-the state,&#8217; one dimension of the<\/p>\n<p>Ar\ufb01cle 14&#8217;i&#8217;is&#8221;  to the state to desist<\/p>\n<p>from arbitraI&#8221;y&#8217;ac&#8217;tionV-.  is how arbitrary actions are<\/p>\n<p>else     These are normally in the<\/p>\n<p>T.  bene\ufb01t in favour of a citizen or in the<\/p>\n<p>i   sense   of any existing right. The very<\/p>\n<p>-.  to the of\ufb01ce being at the discretion and during<\/p>\n<p>it   of the govertunent, such matters carmot be<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;j&#8221;exe,Irii11ed on the same touchstone.<\/p>\n<p>We<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">10<\/span><\/p>\n<p>11. Be that as it may, in my opinion, the rfagiiio&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>in the case 9:&#8221; smzrmxrm vmzggmz  teapot&#8221; be<\/p>\n<p>invoked for the examination of eIii\u00aeI\u00e9&#8221;it&#8217;S&#8217;-{if   <\/p>\n<p>particularly in the wake  faets<br \/>\ncommissioner has e11_1y    from<br \/>\npersons like pet:itionq\u00a71*si7 T ._  is yet to come<br \/>\nand at this stage; the  this court.\n<\/p>\n<p>Even if     acting as per the<br \/>\ndirectio:r2s.r.o f  then, no thxeatenned<br \/>\naction ihas   es against the petitioner and<\/p>\n<p>therefore Iie..;r1eed&#8217; 1r._of1i1*t1\u00a7er examine the merits of this writ<\/p>\n<p>   &#8216;V  the interim order of stay granted earlier<\/p>\n<p>153115 wjitfgeii\ufb01on is vacated and the writ peti\ufb01on itseif is<\/p>\n<p>L V .\u00a71ismsise\u00e9;_<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/&#8211;A<br \/>\nIudqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar ?l\u00a7P\/,\u00bb\/ m THE HIGH coum or Dated this the 24th dv\u00e9ay :7&#8242; BEEQRE % &#8216; THE HOWBLE &#8216;$HY\ufb01ENDi2A KUMAR BETWEEN: Writ Petizio\ufb01 Ht; 1&#8217;s\u00e92_g [LB-RES] V SON &#8216;O.}?&#8221;&#8216;31%L_SHE_K.%_RAPPA HQLEGUND1 &#8216; AG}\u00a3;&#8217; MAJOR&#8217;; VCHAIRMAN KOPPAL&#8217;-&#8216;UE2_B&#8221;AVN&#8217;DVEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1177,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008"},"wordCount":1177,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008","name":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its ... on 24 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-06T01:27:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gurubasappa-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-by-its-on-24-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Gurubasappa vs The State Of Karnataka By Its &#8230; on 24 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}