{"id":9344,"date":"2008-06-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-04-08T20:02:36","modified_gmt":"2016-04-08T14:32:36","slug":"st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
--....,  ................. nuan Wu.\" VF mmmmm rm-an cmm or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or XARNATAKA man com'\n\nmy\n\n.1.\n\nnu ms area oomrr or x.mrurr.u\u00a2A AT \nDATED mxs ms 2!\" DAY or     ~ _\n\n1-rm Horn: ma. Jtxsn\u00e9s om  5\n\nown. REVISIOH ~? $?I'1TI( )K \n\nBetween:\n\nST. GREGORIOUS OR'I'HO_JOX._  \n\nCATHEDRAL, ' . V V\n\nN0.18,HOSUR\"RQAD.v.\" 1  - \n\nRICHMONDTOWK;    \n\nBANGALORE\u00bb 5::';ja'o1.0254~_   \n\nREP BY rrs H,r3N\"'~rR.EAsUR_E-22..  ,\n\nMR, MATHEW'-GHANDY'.-V  ~ _   PETITIONER\n\nM T' \"  Rwy Aiyappa. Adv. for\n \" ' _ 'id;-5.  Associates, Advs.]\n\n1. . . , AGA 11%;: ASGAR WAKF',\n A WAKFREGISTERED WITH\n'~ rrna. KARNA'FA\"KA STATE BOARD\n'OF WAKFS UNDER THE PROVISIONS\n~. _ 'V .012' fI'HE 'wax? ACT, HAVING rrs\nvv..Qv\u00a7\u00ab'_P'lCE}?%\"AT NO. 15,\n\nHOSIJE ROAD, RICHMOND TOWN,\nBANGALORE -- 560 025,\n\n\"REP BY ITS comuxssxomsn\n\n\" .391. am. BADAMI.\n\n's\/o sm. AKBAR ALI BADAMI,\nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,\nRESIDHIG AT BANGALORE.\n\n\"E2. KARNATAKA STATE BOARD OF WAKFS,\n\nA BODY CONS'I'I'I'U\"I'ED UNDER THE\nPROVISION OF' THE WAKF ACT, 1995,\nHAVING ITS OFFICE AT DARUL\nAUKHAAF, NO. 6,\n\nCUNNIGI-{AM ROAD,\n\nBANGALORE ~-- 560 052,\n\n.53..\u00bb-.- ._..-- VIVV3 -_\n\n\n\n' -W\" ' ~vv-\\tfe..w;v- nnnlvninnn ruun uuum Ur ISAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1\n\n-3-\n\nplaintiff had sought for the relief of peI'mane13$,V_iI1;'jt:11ction\n\nto restrain the \ufb01rst defendant in the  \n\nhad owned the suit schedule prope1fty,fiis  age-;n:s'i \n\nfrom interfering with the  of   of \"\n\nShia Muslims to reach  \nto the plaintiff   to reach\nwhich property the   were to pass\nthrough a_    in the suit\nmduigloiiqieaey demam.\n\n3.  Theii b also sought for further relief of\nrestraintji order   from putting up a gate\n\n ofthe mssage and for incidental prayers\n\nV 1    injunction.\n\n  ex parte ad interim order of injunction had\n AA  initially, an application flied by the first\n ' defendant to vary this order of temporary injunction\n\n through an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 of the\n\nCodeofCivi1PI'ocedurecametobedismissedintern1sof\n\nthe impugned order dated 10.6.2005. \n\n\n\n\"\"\"'-\u00b0-e  u..-mu.-unm-u niun \\.\\JU!(I Ur ISAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT\n\n.\n<\/pre>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
I
\n.\n<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
,4-\n<\/p>\n
5. It is aggrieved by this order, the  <\/p>\n
petition by the \ufb01rst defendant.<\/p>\n
6. The first defendant had    it<\/p>\n
tribunal lacks  it  Wtl”V:1e suit,
\nparticularly, as the   qnestioii admittedly
\nbelonged to the i  was not a Wald’
\nproperty and:  euit could not have
\nbeen   is a tribunal which
\nnadttiie {to exclusively deal with the wakf
\n to Wald’ and not with other<\/p>\n
pI’cp6\u00a5'”55-  = <\/p>\n
‘  ., objection was that the subjwt<\/p>\n
H ”  suit did not come Within the scope of either<\/p>\n
sn’he<.\u00a7eetions (I) or (2) of section 83 of the Act and<\/p>\n
it * ii_therei'o1'e the tribunal cannot entertain the suit for<\/p>\n
 grannng any relief temporary or on regular basis.<\/p>\n
8. The tribunal had formulated the question regarding<\/p>\n
the maintainability as a preliminary point and having<\/p>\n
a\/ <\/p>\n
“‘” “”””l-A”{” “”‘””””‘*””” ‘”‘”=”* ‘vvvnl var Mmntaaaim mun count OF KARNATAKA H16!-I COURT OF KARNATAKA I-l|Gi~l COURX<\/p>\n
E
\ni<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
answered this in favour of the plaintiff and  the<\/p>\n
fast defendant, had proceeded to  <\/p>\n
for ganting the relief soug,i1t~ for     <\/p>\n
confirmed the ad interim    exlh 5<\/p>\n
parte earlier.\n<\/p>\n
9. Civil revision—-4.’_’.f;’etit:loI:gV  admitted. The
\nrespondents had  “‘l’he plainti\ufb02 — Wald’
\nand  uof”Wakfs which was the
\nsecond   are represented by Sri.<\/p>\n
   “learned oounsel.\n<\/p>\n
10_ . _, matter  been set down for hearing, I have<\/p>\n
  Ms.  Aiyappa, learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
    Sri. Prabhuling K Navadgi, learned counsel<\/p>\n
 therespondents.\n<\/p>\n
2 V\u00bb  11.’ The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner
\n that the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to entertain a suit<\/p>\n
‘ of the present nature; that the property admittedly<\/p>\n
belonged to the \ufb01rst defendant; that the plaj11ti\ufb02’ if at all<\/p>\n
had only a right of easement which is also not disputed;<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
 WU”! IMF I\\I'”\\iW”\\il’\\I\\f’I l’II\\5r3\\.J-JlJKi,_.l.;f “l.’\ufb01I”,’!,”” rib?’ ‘-‘JQK _ _
\n A’ ._: 3 UP KAKNAIAKA HIUH K.-‘JUN! K)!’ KAKNAIAKA HIUH QUUKI WI’ KI’\\KE’lI’\\i.F\\I\\.H l’NL’\ufb02’I LUUKI<\/p>\n
(4)<\/span><\/p>\n
,3-\n<\/p>\n
shall deal with the appliomion
\nstage which was ‘reached
\nbeen so transferned,
\nTribunal is of opirzionwthat :’t_ is
\nin the interests ofjaastioestcira deal  <\/p>\n
application afresh.\n<\/p>\n
Every ”\n<\/p>\n
person, who  beu a   the
\nbelow that:e”of ct   or Civ\ufb02
\nJudge, Ciass   of
\nevery    either by<\/p>\n
  deemed to be a civil?\n<\/p>\n
   the same powers as<\/p>\n
~ edwby a civil court under<\/p>\n
~  Procedure, 1908 (5 of<\/p>\n
  a suit, or executing Ct<\/p>\n
 anything contained in<\/p>\n
.._the Code” ””’ ” of Civil Procedure 1903 (5 of
\n “$908), the T\ufb01bunal shall follow such<\/p>\n
an<\/p>\n
(3)<\/span><\/p>\n
 dectston ofthe Tnbunalshall befinal<\/p>\n
and binding upon the parties to the
\napplioationanditshallhavetheforceof
\nadeaeenladebyacxtwilcmut<\/p>\n
The execution of any deasion of the
\nTribunalshallbemadebytheciviloaurt
\nto whtchsuch decision is set for execution
\ninacoordanoewiththeprovisionsofthe
\nCodeofCivilProcedure, 1908(5of1908).<\/p>\n
 ,v_.. …………….. .-mm Wu… w Mmnmm men COURT es xAmAm<A Haewceum es KARNAEAKA masseuse<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
(9) No appeal shall tie against any
\nor order whether interim or  <\/p>\n
given or made by the   V <\/p>\n
Provided that a
\nHoard or any   can\ufb01vret
\nand examine records relrm*3ag_:’to any
\ndispute, er other
\nthe   its’e\u00a3.*–‘..as” to the
\n other buts-r asj may think \ufb01t. ‘<\/p>\n
and   go before the tribumal
\n   the jurisdiction of civil courts is
\nousted    85 of the Act are such matters<\/p>\n
 eiqtliei\ufb02yienumezated in sub-sections (1) and (2)<\/p>\n
 1 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
.’  V_ of learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n
 AA  on the premise that it is only when the subject<\/p>\n
V _  is wakf property and the disputes relate to the
\nh  \u00e9wald’ or property claimed as a wakf property that the<\/p>\n
Tribunal gets jurisdiction and the seeps of the subject<\/p>\n
matter which can go before the tribunal in terms of<\/p>\n
it stetmta W: mm<\/p>\n
-12-<\/span><\/p>\n
him in respect of anything which is
\ngood faith done or intended to be donegm.  -.   t
\npursuance ofthts Act or any rules    ”<\/p>\n
(4) The list of walqf  unless’-serif… is
\nmodgfied in pursuance of a’d_ec;’s1bn orthe 2 V’  <\/p>\n
(5) On and from .\ufb02’E.E,_’  of
\nAct in a State,  arjo\ufb01uer legal
\nproceeding shall’    or
\ncommenced in=21’*cou.z1  in
\nrelatiqn”‘:q1′–ang; question’  to in<\/p>\n
     dispute:\n<\/p>\n
* (1)9:  of this Act,
\n‘V any  arises, whether a particular
\n specfed as wakfpmperty in a
\nV. \u00abqfn-*ak_:fs is walg”-property or not, or
\n  Cl wakfspec\ufb01ied in such list is a
\n   wakfora Sunni wakj} the Board or
\n   mutawalli ofthe wakj; or any person
\n interested therein, may apply to the
\n Tribunal having jurisdiction in relation to
\nsuchpmperty,forthedecisionQfthe
\nquestion and the decision ofthe Tribunal
\nthereon shall be\ufb01nal:\n<\/p>\n
au-nut:-*\\|.r”\\I\\.r1 nuwn uuunl ur RHKNRIRKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT”<\/p>\n
Provided that –\n<\/p>\n
– -UV-yuan’: V’<\/p>\n
(at) in the case of the list of walcfs
\nrelatingtoanypartofthestateand
\npublished c\ufb01er the commencement<\/p>\n
I ofthisActnosuch applicationshall<\/p>\n
I be entertained after the expiry of<\/p>\n
 V<\/p>\n
wu-\n<\/p>\n
Mllll\ufb01l vr nnnnnannn \ufb02lvn MVUKI ,5-Ir nnluvnlnnn nnan HQJUIH Ur IEHKNAIRRA till.-RI i.sUUK\u00a5 U!’ IKAKNAIA ‘” ‘ ‘ ‘
\n  KR l”!I(.’.1tI”E LUUKT Q? KARNATAKA H\u00a5GH’COUR\ufb01<\/p>\n
-13-<\/span><\/p>\n
one year from the EV’
\npublication ofthe list ofw\ufb01fs;  Y <\/p>\n
(13) in the Case Of the
\nrelating to any pa.rt’of’_tPce’;\u00a7:xte”an;1
\npublished at} any   a, j
\nPe\ufb02bd of one 93′?\n<\/p>\n
preceding __the ”  jof”\n<\/p>\n
this Act,  arc  ‘ may
\nbe  by rm-tuna:\n<\/p>\n
 Provided  where any
\n   bye civil court in a<\/p>\n
  V _ ” ” ‘ ‘ez,\u00a2i’t’-(ff; , _  before such
\n” \u00a5:,__  the Tribunal shall<\/p>\n
 Tribunal has no<\/p>\n
A   *  reason of the provisions of<\/p>\n
”  (5), no proceeding under th\ufb01
\nsezrtiony\u00e9n respect of any walg’ shall be<\/p>\n
..  by any court, tribunal or other<\/p>\n
 by reason only of the pendency<\/p>\n
‘A ” ‘foVf5~any suit, application or appeal or other<\/p>\n
 5 fl-orooeedr’ng arising out of any such suit,
\n application, appeal orotherprooeeding.<\/p>\n
 (3) The chief Executive omoer shall not be<\/p>\n
madeapartytoany applioationunder
\n (1}<\/p>\n
(4) Thelfst ofwalgk andwhere anyswchlist
\nismodtj\ufb01edinpursuanceoj’adea’sionof
\nthe\ufb01ibunalundersub-sectitm (1), thelist
\nassomod1;\ufb01ed,$ha\u00a3lbe\ufb01naI.<\/p>\n
va\/<\/p>\n
 ……..,………… ulnar: Wu… us” nnxmmaltn men COURT or KARNATAKA. HIGH COURT o:= KARNAYAKA i-HG!-i COURT<\/p>\n
-15..\n<\/p>\n
or other property encroached upon A4
\nmutawalli of the wakf ” _  .  .___j   <\/p>\n
and if so understood, dispute”  . ate”    <\/p>\n
concerning a right of easemet*;t__ olfthe  a A<\/p>\n
property admittedly
\ncannot be constzwgede as.=ii”   scope of
\neither sub-sections   83 of the Act and
\ntherefore   civil court which
\nhas the   \u00a31 dispute of such nature if
\noneiil\u00e9ot   and as such the tribunal<\/p>\n
snougictnot’ have the suit.<\/p>\n
  In   learned counsel for the petitioner has<\/p>\n
  on the following two single Bench<\/p>\n
% * .titv:isiot\u00e9s–3_oi’>.tt1e Madras High Court.<\/p>\n
 I. V\u00a5”.!\\\\T.Vt.”ALA.l\\fI as. P. LAKSHAVATSALU CHETHAR<\/p>\n
L’ \u00bb  fepozted in AIR 2001 moans 257
\n ‘MALI Amaze AND woman as. zmemsxzanar
\n  sozmar smear JAMAITI Maw PA.Rl’.PALA.NA<\/p>\n
C\ufb02\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 AND OHERS’ reported in AIR 2001<\/p>\n
MADRAS 431.\n<\/p>\n
E
\nF<\/p>\n
m
\n:3
\nO
\nU
\nI
\n9<\/span>
\n:1:<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n5<\/span>
\n<
\n2<\/span>
\nIr.’
\n5<\/span>
\nI8.\n<\/p>\n
0<\/span><\/p>\n
\nQ
\n:3
\nO
\nU
\nI
\nQ
\n2!:\n<\/p>\n
S
\n‘&
\n2<\/span>
\nM
\n\u00a7\n<\/p>\n
9.
\n9<\/span>
\nE
\n:3
\n0<\/span>
\nU
\n1′:\n<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
\nI:\n<\/p>\n
E
\n5<\/span>
\ni
\nZ
\nI
\nE
\nL
\n3<\/span>
\n2<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\nJ
\nI:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\nE
\nE
\n5<\/span>
\nI
\nP
\nE
\n5<\/span>
\ni’f i ‘
\ng H
\n>
\n3<\/span>
\nE<\/p>\n
..}_5-\n<\/p>\n
16. While the first decision is relied eeiltend<\/p>\n
that even on the pleadings, no case.   .. <\/p>\n
contend that there was a disj2.ute_-Ainfivei\u00e9ietence”iwitjieiiiwasi-.A I<\/p>\n
required to be taken eitfierebefeifeii’ the
\ntribunal as the defendantiei  iizad not only
\nadmitted the right  of the plainti\ufb01’
\nbut also hadeinv’  in the Written
\nstatemeigt    in preventing the
\n   of easement over the
\nappiveachi  the defendants. In this regard,
\n   Jipetitioner —- first defendant has<\/p>\n
 tile ettentiozi of the court to parephwl 1 of the<\/p>\n
‘ ;V’V61’Ifitt\u00a3;4l’IiSg'{$’1’;t3II1eI1t which reads as under:<\/p>\n
“1-Ii; Re: Plaint para 10: This Dejkndant has
\n ,_vnez2e*ratanypointoftf:neobstr1\u00a2ctedtI1euseQf
\n,. ‘t_he\ufb01ghtofwayasaHeged.ThisDefendant\u00a3s
\n‘=puttingupagateattheEastemer:dofthe
\npassagvewhichliesfaczirxgthel-IasurR_oczdc:sa
\nmatterofprotectionofitspmpertyandto
\npreventthepassageway\ufb01ombeingusedasa
\nplaoetoparkvehicIes.1hepe1son.swhouse
\ntheAshurkhanaarefreetoenterthegateand
\nproceedtotheAsfu4rkhana. AR m
\ntheoentraryaredenieciThedec1’eeinO..S. No.
\n1I38of1987infactenurestothebene\ufb01tofthe
\nPlaint\ufb01’IHowever\u00a7”thePla1’nti_\ufb02”does notwant<\/p>\n
” “‘”‘” ‘ “”‘” ‘ “”””””l’A”‘,-  “”””‘”‘”””H*\\H “FUN I-UUKI Ur KARNA\u00a5AKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURV<\/p>\n
-19-<\/span><\/p>\n
passage and the pathway ABCD  suit<\/p>\n
schedule, the plaintiff will not be in a   en’3;oy,or<\/p>\n
make use of its own pmpertyend   <\/p>\n
the exercise of the right of \u00bbwm\u00a71d   ”<\/p>\n
denial of a property  the” ‘and;  such
\nit should be taken. ‘that _esllT1’sas’  a dispute<\/p>\n
relating to a wakf   matter is squarely<\/p>\n
I within the julgsdicedrl    oonstituted for<\/p>\n
the  ‘Act and the tribunal has
\n\u00ab:E%1?IteI”tam”  l 1ihe’ma”lter.\n<\/p>\n
20. ‘I12.    by learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondents in the suit that the object of the Act<\/p>\n
   a special tribunal to deal with all disputes<\/p>\n
 ~.  properties is not only to ensure that all<\/p>\n
siioh’–lidisgoutes involving 3 Walt!’ and wakf properties are<\/p>\n
l’ ” msoleed by a common specialized forum, but also for
\n  expedient disposal of the cases and resolution of<\/p>\n
 the disputes; that a jurisdiction of this nature conferred<\/p>\n
exclusively on the tribunal cannot be in any Way whittled<\/p>\n
down by giving a limited meaning to the word ‘wakf’ <\/p>\n
_g1_<\/p>\n
taken by the Iearned single Judge of the  High
\nCourt in ALI AKBAR’: case supra,  tile
\nsubmission made on behalf of__th.e_
\ntherefore urges for dismissal   it<\/p>\n
23. I have bestowed   to the
\nrival submissions . ._ the”  i j’   L’ A   perused the
\nrecords and the   relevant for the
\npurpose 0;’     extracted in the\n<\/p>\n
24.  state the Wakf Act, 1995 is a
\n created a special tribunal in<\/p>\n
tCE’331SA of   the Act for resokution of disputes<\/p>\n
.  ”   and management of the wakf<\/p>\n
I     The main object is to ensure that all<\/p>\n
Adisptttesi to wakf and Wakf properties are within<\/p>\n
 .. ?\ufb02_’1e.’domain of the tribunal and to that extent the<\/p>\n
‘ jurisdiction of the civil court is ousted under section 85 of<\/p>\n
 the Act.\n<\/p>\n
-uwuwaa Ir! In-IrIm.uva”su7″II\\l-I lll\ufb01\ufb02ll   l\\l1H.I’lQ3oP\\I\\l1 !1I\\$rI HUUKI K3.”           <\/p>\n
25. The ouster of jurisdiction under section 85 is with<\/p>\n
reference to the provisions of section 83 of the Act i.e., the 92\/,<\/p>\n
{……… V. nu-Ii\\IIr|Irl|\\r\\ a man \\.\\J1..n\\’:tA _\u00bb.ag_:– Tu-\\lS.lV.l-U!-\\I\\..H nus\ufb02 KJJUKI Ur IKAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HEGH COURT<\/p>\n
-33-<\/span><\/p>\n
jurisdiction of the civil court is ousted only in _.sa~~as the<\/p>\n
matters which are brought within the  <\/p>\n
tribunal and not a general ouster.’   <\/p>\n
subject matter is within’ the   .:Vl:’on(1)”” J<\/p>\n
or sub–section(2) of sectio1i:3’3\u00bbof    of l the
\nAct is not attI’aCtCd’.~_ In tfriethe question
\nthat is to be  V’i;l1vg%;~”(_1ispute relating to
\nviolation 9;    is sought to be
\n suit brought before the
\n    scope of section 83 of<\/p>\n
the  = V<\/p>\n
  As’  by learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
‘ V:V’pet1t.io13e1r;”‘the scope of the disputes with regard to the<\/p>\n
. ”  should be understood in the context of the<\/p>\n
 fitovisions, particularly, sections 6, 7, 32(3) and<\/p>\n
2 *  V5″-=l.(3)”of the Act. A reading’ of these provisions indicate
\n that the stress is always on the property belonging to the<\/p>\n
waktf as already noti\ufb01ed and contained in the list of Wald’<\/p>\n
properties or a wakf property which was asserted and<\/p>\n
used as a wakf property hitherto.<\/p>\n
ECOURT OF IKARNAIAIKA I-IIUI1 l…’UUKI Ur IKAKNHIHIKH ruun uuulu
\n  VI’ BMKIVHIHRH r’llu’l’I uvulu vr MNNEWMIHRM irlnan uwuns vr’nnn:1nunnn Mug”
\n.5  ‘rV’-“He<\/p>\n
-23..\n<\/p>\n
2’7. In the present case, the property in  “the<\/p>\n
main property is admittedly the  <\/p>\n
defendants and because of  esm,ssNgvaag; <\/p>\n
learned counsel for the Vxespondents   te’  ‘the
\ndispute Within the scope of  \ufb01ne
\nin aid the    also part of
\na pmperty right in ‘an?  and seeks to
\ndraw    of ‘immovable
\npropergyi’   3(26) of the General<\/p>\n
claizses    ‘<\/p>\n
 _ See’iio_i1   General Clauses Act, 1897 reads<\/p>\n
   *  <\/p>\n
v_.{.9.6)..– ‘ ‘immovabie property’ shall include land,<\/p>\n
 ‘ bene\ufb01tstoarise out afland, and things
\nattached to the earth, or pennanently
\nfastened to anything attached to the
\nearth,’<\/p>\n
 29. Even on an examination of section 3(26) of the<\/p>\n
General Clauses Act, 1897 , it does not necessarily indicate<\/p>\n
that a right of easement can be brought Within the<\/p>\n
E
\n5<\/span>
\ns
\ni<\/p>\n
N” ‘uvufi. “”\u00a7 “”””””””” “””” ‘*”‘-W W mmamm user: COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH comm<\/p>\n
-25-<\/span><\/p>\n
disputes relating to the ownership of the  _ as to<\/p>\n
whether it belongs to Wald’ or otherwise.  <\/p>\n
30. Though Sri. Navadgi,  the <\/p>\n
respondents — plaintiff would
\nprovision as it occurs in  —   83 of
\nthe Act would msisss A  qtiestion or other
\nInatters relating to  taken before the
\ntribunal? ,1    cannot be accepted
\nas    for the petitioner,
\nit  tn’ ejusdem genens in the context of
\nthe  6, 7, 32 and 54 of the Act. The<\/p>\n
  wakf property and as is sought to be<\/p>\n
e  in terms of sections 6, 7, 32 and 54 of the Act<\/p>\n
H ”   to understancl the scope of the words<\/p>\n
 to a Wald’ or Wakf property and the rig’ ht<\/p>\n
it ~  otia \ufb01utawalli or other interested person of a wakf or any
\n other person aggrieved by an order made under this Act to<\/p>\n
take such dispute relating to the wakf before the Tribunal,<\/p>\n
the present is not a situation involving any order passed<\/p>\n
by any person functioning under the authority of the W <\/p>\n
:3
\nD
\n9<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\nE
\n1:.\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
\nE5
\n‘1
\n2<\/span>
\nH
\nS
\nL.\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\n\u00a7
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n.4
\n1:\n<\/p>\n
Q
\n2<\/span>
\nE
\nE
\ni
\nz
\nI
\nE
\nI-\n<\/p>\n
D
\n2<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n5<\/span>
\nJ
\nI:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\nK
\nS
\n5<\/span>
\nit
\nI
\nE
\nE
\nL
\n3<\/span>
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n.1
\n:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\nI:\n<\/p>\n
E
\nS
\nx
\nE
\nI
\nE
\nis i v
\ns
\n3<\/span>
\nJ
\nL:\n<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
\n:\n<\/p>\n
i
\n5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
3.’,
\nZ
\nI
\nE
\nI-\n<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
\nE
\n:2\n<\/p>\n
2.<\/p>\n
-35-<\/span><\/p>\n
While, it is even dif\ufb01cult to say that the piaiI1tii’f  real<\/p>\n
cause of action to bring a suit before the trfbunjallhciior<\/p>\n
court in terms of the prayer soughtp fofi  <\/p>\n
appears the defendants had  J<\/p>\n
by the foilowers of the
\nnot be examined ill”  ep\ufb02etition’-Aasyil am of the
\nview that a dispute  of action as
\nwas pleaded  covered by section
\n33 of the  lacked jurisdiction<\/p>\n
to   the  brought before it.<\/p>\n
31. Section xS3.”‘ is a provision which seeks to<\/p>\n
out   the jurisdiction of the civil court and<\/p>\n
‘  jurisdiction in favour of the tribunal. While<\/p>\n
”  provision of this nature, there is no scope<\/p>\n
for enlarging the meaning and understanding of the words<\/p>\n
”   seeks to ouster the jurisdiction of the civil court as
\n any provision ousting the jurisdiction of the civil court<\/p>\n
should be strictly construed and cannot be unduly<\/p>\n
enlarged and unless the subject matter is squarely<\/p>\n
covered within the limited jurisdiction sought to be carved<\/p>\n
i\/<\/p>\n
IQURT OF KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT QITKAIKNATAISA HIGH Luulu Ur hnnlwnannn nzwn Mvu<\/p>\n
…27..\n<\/p>\n
out, it cannot be taken to be within the juI’isdic1r.:ioI_ 1 ~of the<\/p>\n
special tribunal either by the process of  or<\/p>\n
through a logical process.    A<\/p>\n
32. In the circumstanoee,
\nallowed. The impugned 2   on
\nIA No.5 in os   or one Presiding
\nOfficer, Kamanaka  i\ufb02ongaiore Division,
\nBangaxoge,     in os No.6 of 2005
\nitself   tthe Wald’ tribunal did not<\/p>\n
havethe ju\ufb01eyiio\ufb01ohovverxnertain the suit.<\/p>\n
33; \u00bb It  plaintiff —– respondents to work out<\/p>\n
   if  are a\ufb01ected, in terms of any other<\/p>\n
% ‘provision erlaw.\n<\/p>\n
Tudg\u00e9<\/p>\n
 -5%!’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar –…., …………….. nuan Wu.” VF mmmmm rm-an cmm or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or XARNATAKA man com’ my .1. nu ms area oomrr or x.mrurr.u\u00a2A AT DATED mxs ms 2!” DAY or ~ _ 1-rm Horn: ma. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9344","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSt Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"14 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2453,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\",\"name\":\"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"14 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008"},"wordCount":2453,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008","name":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-08T14:32:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/st-gregorious-orthodox-cathedral-vs-aga-ali-asgar-wakf-on-2-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"St Gregorious Orthodox Cathedral vs Aga Ali Asgar Wakf on 2 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9344","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9344"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9344\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9344"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9344"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9344"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}