{"id":93591,"date":"2007-05-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-05-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007"},"modified":"2016-06-29T15:23:51","modified_gmt":"2016-06-29T09:53:51","slug":"suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","title":{"rendered":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl MC No. 594 of 2007()\n\n\n1. SURESH, S\/O. SIVADASAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :23\/05\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                                 R.BASANT, J.\n\n                              ----------------------\n\n                          Crl.M.C.No.594 of 2007\n\n                        ----------------------------------------\n\n                    Dated this the 23rd day of May 2007\n\n\n\n\n                                   O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
      The  petitioner  is  the  third  accused in a prosecution  under<\/p>\n
the provisions of the Kerala Abkari Act.   In the F.I.R registered,<\/p>\n
only   one   accused   was   shown.     In   the   course   of   investigation,<\/p>\n
accused   2   and   3   were   also   arrayed   as   accused.     Initially,   the<\/p>\n
allegation was that accused 1 had committed the offence.  In the<\/p>\n
course of investigation, it is revealed that another person (A2) by<\/p>\n
name   Ponnappan   and   his   nephew   (A3)   by   name   Suresh<\/p>\n
S\/o.Sivadasan   were   also   guilty.                 In   the   course   of   the<\/p>\n
investigation,   report   was   filed   to   array   additional   second   and<\/p>\n
third   accused.     They   were   thus   arrayed   as   accused.     After<\/p>\n
investigation,   final   report   was   filed   against   three   accused<\/p>\n
persons (A1 to 3).   The third accused, Suresh was described as<\/p>\n
“Suresh S\/o.Sivadasan, Puthenkandathil house, aged 25, residing<\/p>\n
at   Kizhakkekkara   thekkummuri   of   Thrikkunnappuzha   village.<\/p>\n
Accused   2   and   3   were   shown   as   absconding.     After   taking<\/p>\n
cognizance,   attempts   were   made   by   the   learned   Magistrate   to<\/p>\n
get the service effected on the third accused.   Summons issued<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.594\/07                       2<\/span><\/p>\n
to   the   third   accused   was   returned   with   the   endorsement   that<\/p>\n
such   a   person   could   not   be   traced.     The   learned   Magistrate<\/p>\n
called   for   explanation   of   the   police   officer   concerned.     At   that<\/p>\n
stage, it was reported to the learned Magistrate that there was a<\/p>\n
mis description in the address of the third accused.  It was really<\/p>\n
Suresh S\/o.Sivadasan of Kochuveettil Puthuval of Mahadevikadu<\/p>\n
Muri   of   Karthikappalli   village.     The   process   issued   in   that<\/p>\n
address   was   served   on   the   petitioner.     The   petitioner   has<\/p>\n
thereupon come to this court complaining that he is not the real<\/p>\n
third   accused   and   that   he   has   now   been   arrayed   as   the   third<\/p>\n
accused belatedly by the officials without any justification.<\/p>\n
      2.     The   counsel   points   out   that   initially   there   were   no<\/p>\n
allegations   raised   against   the   petitioner.     The   petitioner   is   not<\/p>\n
the person arrayed as third accused.   When the court called for<\/p>\n
explanation, conveniently the petitioner has been arrayed as the<\/p>\n
third accused.   This is incorrect.   This is unjust.   Powers under<\/p>\n
Section 482 Cr.P.C may be invoked to prematurely terminate the<\/p>\n
proceedings against the petitioner.  This, in short, is the plea.<\/p>\n
      3.     The   learned   Public   Prosecutor   was   directed   to   take<\/p>\n
instructions.  The learned Public Prosecutor has got a statement<\/p>\n
filed   by   the   Sub   Inspector   of   Police,   Thrikkunnappuzha   police<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.594\/07                       3<\/span><\/p>\n
station.  It is submitted that there is no incongruity or confusion<\/p>\n
about   the   identity   of   the   third   accused.     The   third   accused   is<\/p>\n
Suresh S\/o.Sivadasan, the petitioner herein.  It is true that there<\/p>\n
is   confusion   about   the   address   of   the   third   accused.   The<\/p>\n
confession   statement   of   the   first   accused   revealed   that   a<\/p>\n
neighbour   Ponnappan   and   his   nephew   Suresh   S\/o   Sivadasan<\/p>\n
were accused 2 and 3.   What is crucial according to the learned<\/p>\n
Public Prosecutor is the fact that the third accused is described<\/p>\n
to be the nephew of the second accused.   There is no confusion<\/p>\n
regarding the identity at all though there is a mis description of<\/p>\n
the address of the third accused.  A mountain is attempted to be<\/p>\n
made out of such a mole hill of inaccuracy of address shown of<\/p>\n
the  third   accused.      Identity   of  the   person   is   without   any  basic<\/p>\n
dispute.  The third accused is the nephew of the second accused<\/p>\n
who is a neighbour.  In these circumstances, notwithstanding the<\/p>\n
error in not describing the address of the third accused correctly<\/p>\n
in   the   initial   documents   and   notwithstanding   the   return   of   the<\/p>\n
summons   issued   to   the   third   accused   in   the   original   incorrect<\/p>\n
address with the endorsement that such a person does not exist,<\/p>\n
powers   under   Section   482   Cr.P.C   may   not   be   invoked,   submits<\/p>\n
the learned Public Prosecutor.\n<\/p>\n
\nCrl.M.C.No.594\/07                         4<\/span><\/p>\n
       4.     I   have   considered   all   the   circumstances.     I   must<\/p>\n
alertly   remind   myself   that   I   am   called   upon   to   exercise   the<\/p>\n
extraordinary   inherent   jurisdiction   under   Section   482   Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
Such   jurisdiction   is   to   be   invoked   sparingly   and   in   exceptional<\/p>\n
cases   and   that   too   only   in   aid   of   justice.     Crucial   question   is<\/p>\n
whether   there   has   been   failure   of   justice.     The   case   diary   has<\/p>\n
been   perused   by   me.     Though   the   existence   of   the   second   and<\/p>\n
third   accused   is   not   mentioned   in   the   F.I.R   and   in   the   seizure<\/p>\n
mahazer,   it   is   evident   that   from   the   confession   of   the   first<\/p>\n
accused,   the   culpable   involvement   of   the   second   and   third<\/p>\n
accused was ascertained and the third accused was described to<\/p>\n
be   the   nephew   of   the   second   accused,   a   neighbour.     The<\/p>\n
witnesses   had   identified   the   petitioner,   third   accused   with<\/p>\n
reference to his name and address only.   In the name given, he<\/p>\n
was   shown   as   Suresh   S\/o.Sivadasan   which   is   correct.     But   of<\/p>\n
course,   there   is   an   incongruity   in   the   address   shown.     This<\/p>\n
incongruity, by itself, according to me, cannot clinch the issue at<\/p>\n
this stage.  Of course, at the stage of trial, it will be open to the<\/p>\n
petitioner to raise his contention that he is not the person who is<\/p>\n
shown as the third accused.  But, at any rate, that contention will<\/p>\n
have to be considered and decided in the course of the trial.<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.594\/07                         5<\/span><\/p>\n
       5.     I do not intend to express any opinion on merits about<\/p>\n
the culpability of the petitioner, third accused.  But I am satisfied<\/p>\n
that   the   mere   incongruity   in   the   address   shown   of   the   third<\/p>\n
accused in the final report and later in the report submitted by<\/p>\n
the   Sub   Inspector   of   Police   after   the   summons   was   returned<\/p>\n
unserved   (to   issue   process   in   the   correct   address)   cannot   by<\/p>\n
itself persuade this court to invoke the powers under Section 482<\/p>\n
Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       6.     The learned counsel for the petitioner finally submits<\/p>\n
that   in   view   of   the   confusion   about   the   address,   the   petitioner<\/p>\n
has not so far surrendered before the  learned  Magistrate.   The<\/p>\n
petitioner apprehends that when he appears, his application for<\/p>\n
bail may not be considered by the learned Magistrate on merits,<\/p>\n
in   accordance   with   law   and   expeditiously.     It   is,   in   these<\/p>\n
circumstances, prayed that appropriate directions may be issued<\/p>\n
in the matter by this court.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       7.     I am of the opinion that no specific directions need be<\/p>\n
issued.  The petitioner can appear before the learned Magistrate<\/p>\n
and  apply  for   bail.       I  find  absolutely  no reason   to  assume that<\/p>\n
the   learned   Magistrate   would   not   consider   the   application   for<\/p>\n
bail   to   be   filed   by   the   petitioner   on   merits,   in   accordance   with<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.594\/07                     6<\/span><\/p>\n
law and expeditiously. Every court must do the same. No special<\/p>\n
or specific directions appear to be necessary. Sufficient general<\/p>\n
directions   have   been   issued   in         Alice   George   vs.Deputy<\/p>\n
Superintendent of Police [2003(1)KLT 339].\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       8.    In   the   result,   this   Criminal   Miscellaneous   Case     is<\/p>\n
dismissed but with the specific observation that if the petitioner<\/p>\n
surrenders   before   the   learned   Magistrate   and   applies   for   bail,<\/p>\n
after giving sufficient prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of<\/p>\n
the   case,   the   learned   Magistrate   must   proceed   to   pass<\/p>\n
appropriate   orders   on   merits,   in   accordance   with   law   and<\/p>\n
expeditiously – on the date of surrender itself.     I may hasten to<\/p>\n
observe  that no observation  in  this  judgment  shall be reckoned<\/p>\n
as indicative of the culpability of the petitioner or that he is the<\/p>\n
person   described  in   the  initial  documents  as  the   third   accused.<\/p>\n
Those   contentions   must   be   considered   in   the   light   of   the<\/p>\n
materials   to   be   placed   before   the   learned   Magistrate   in   the<\/p>\n
course of trial.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n\n\n                                                   (R.BASANT, JUDGE)\n\n\njsr\n\n\n                                \/\/ True Copy\/\/          PA to Judge\n\n\nCrl.M.C.No.594\/07    7<\/span>\n\n\nCrl.M.C.No.594\/07    8<\/span>\n\n\n         R.BASANT, J.\n\n\n\n\n\n           CRL.M.CNo.\n\n\n\n\n\n               ORDER\n\n\n\n\n\n21ST DAY OF APRIL 2007\n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl MC No. 594 of 2007() 1. SURESH, S\/O. SIVADASAN, … Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR For Respondent : No Appearance The Hon’ble MR. Justice R.BASANT Dated :23\/05\/2007 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93591","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSuresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1216,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\",\"name\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007","datePublished":"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007"},"wordCount":1216,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007","name":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-05-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-29T09:53:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-may-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 23 May, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93591","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93591"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93591\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93591"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93591"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93591"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}