{"id":93635,"date":"2010-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010"},"modified":"2014-11-29T10:36:31","modified_gmt":"2014-11-29T05:06:31","slug":"smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 23\"? DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA   \n\nWRIT PETITION NOS.4777--4779\/2010    H\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSmt. Puttabasamma\nW\/o.veerabhadrappa\nAged about 43 years\nR\/at Chikkahosur Village\nHarnahalii Hobli \nPeriyapatna Taluk .. _ --_  ;\nMysore District -- 571 107.. V  \"\n\nRepresented' by her A \nGenerai' A'Po-vvyer of ?1}%.'tto'rn,e\\; HoFd'er\"\nSn' B.B.Basava.ih...V_   '\nS\/o.Ba\"3_avaia'h_ A    \nAged about 62 years . \n\nGiruguru V\"i~!..|age '_ A\n\nHarg1a\"haE|i Hobli \n\n Pe._rjyap.atn..a Ta|uk~-- ----- \nV' Mysore' Lgis\u00e9trigzt -- 571 107\n\n._    PETITIONER\n(B:(__Sri'A.,_Lo.u'rdu Mariyappa, Adv.)\n\n Ai\\|D:\" \n\n  Ananda\n\n:3\/o}DLingegowda\nAged about 63 years\n\n  R\/at Chikkahosur Village\n\n\n\nHarnahalli Hobli\nPeriyapatna Taluk\nMysore District -~ 571 107.\n:RESPOI_\\3_DE|\\iT\n\n(By Smt. Nirmala, Adv. for IVE\/s.My|araiah Associa-tes.)f\"p:4._:\"._\n\nThese writ petitions are fiied under 4_\n227 of the Constitution of India, praying-.?0__\"'caii--.Vfo.r the, \"\n\nrecords in Exec.No.54\/2007 onv.th'e-file5_of_pHioI.ri'b'|e--.iCiW\nJudge (Jr. Divn) Periyapatna, Mysore.c[\u00a7ist_rict;'-quash the\nimpugned order sheet dated '05.1_2\".2009_V% pas.sed'\u00ab._on.\n\nE.A.No.6 to 8 filed by.*,_the \"'pe'titioner-therein \n\nExec.No.S4\/2007 at Annexure.,..,\"~\"B.\n\nThese petitions comings-on.\"for\"p_re|imiiina-ryhearing in\n'B' group this day, the..Court-'_madVe*'t_ihe_ following:\n\n 0 00\nRespon_der}t\u00bbi'.i_nst:i'tuted'x 0j.'S.jvNVo';1--6i\/1996 against the\npetitioner for't'ii:e.._:re.|i_ef.\u00bb_ofv--.permanent injunction in respect\nof the Asu.i_tiisched'\u00a3i.iAe.--'property. The suit was decreed.\n\nDepcteesi.ho|de'.'A.._V_fiIedViexecution petition and prayed for\n\n attVach_Vn:.AentA'a._nd sale of movable & immovable properties of\n\n3'_u'dgpm\"e.nu'L_~v_..V__de:;b\"tor and arrest & detention of judgment\n\nde\"b'torv--..'in 'c\"ivi| prison. LA No.1 was filed to extend police\n\n\"he|__p for due implementation of the decree put in\n\n7e>'<'e'cution. Said appiication was allowed on 01.04.2009.\n\n0' " "The petitioner, represented by the special power of\n\nI\/.\n\nr\n\n\n\nattorney holder Sri Basavaiah, filed I.As No. 6, 7 & 8. I.A\n\nNo.6 was for directing the decree holder to put the\n\njudgment debtor in possession of the landsgV.i'iie'g.aliy\n\nencroached, pursuant to the order dated 01_.;U4.'2.G-i)_97%_\n\nthe executing court. LA No.7 was for app~o--i.nth1_e'nt of the\u00bb. \n\nAssistant Director of Agriculture\ufb01to \n\ncrop caused by the dec_r'ee__ hold.e_r'.   \n\nappiication to appoint the'V'Vi4i'E:.).Vepi,iVty of Land\nRecords--cum--Technicail._._"':'-   Deputy\nCommissioner, to inyegstigatteiith\u00e9eugfence&'i':Vi'E.le'gaily put by the\ndecree holder the   "po'Eice i.e., to find out\nwhether  beionging to the Judgment\ndebtor ii\u00e9nv\ufb01uryeyi  26\/2, 26\/3 of Giraguru\n\nViiiafge e-and  the reports. In the affidavit in\n\nsu.piportVA.of_i't--he said application, it was stated that, the\n\n decree"h'o_vlde~r"'b.y causing notice to the wrong address got\n\nthe" ju'dgm'ent debtor exparte, obtained poiice help\n\n pursuant to the order passed on I.A No.3. on 01.04.2009\n\n'Vand"i\u00a7taking the police heip, the decree holder aiong with\n\nV' "henchman rushed to the spot, which though protested, got\n\nK"\n\n4:\n\n\n\n4\n\nsurveyed the land with the heip of a surveyor by name\nSrinivasa and with the support of the police, destroyed the\n\nbarbed wire fence, which existed around the ianvdpfvgthe\n\njudgment debtor with the help of }CB and \n\nfencing in a haphazard manner covering more, .acres, \n\nof land beionging to the judgrnents,dfebtor,_'a--n'd*\u00bb.inthe\n\nprocess, the standing crops-,_worth,V_a'bout,\u00bbFi-sV.A4,_VdO,t)O'O;'--:'s.\n\nwere destroyed on account  of   further\naiieged that, decree   loss and\ndamages to the._judgm,ent_  'if\/m\ufb01bbjections filed,\nthe averments in the affidavit in\nsupport of" ,a'p\u00bb_p:|'ivc.ations were denied and it was\ncontencie'd,:_'_'that,"  \u00bb\u00aba:p'pV'|4i4cations are not tenable. The\n\nexecution co'ur.t:: upon hearing the applications and\n\n.A co.n:sid_ering:the written arguments has passed the orders\n\n appiications. Aggrieved, the judgment\n\ndeb'tor"----has fiied these writ petitions.\n\n   Learned counsei appearing for the petitioner\n\n Zwouiid contend that, I.A.No.6 to 8 have not been\n\n\/7.\n\n\n\nconsidered in the correct perspective and the impugned\norder is irrational and iilegai. Learned counsel contended\n\nthat, there is non~appiication of mind to theVV.rei_e'vant\n\naspects and the order is not a considered a_n'd"\u00abr.eesio7n_ed.e\n\norder.\n\n3. On the other hand, ie:arne-d,afidvoca.te-appearing\n\nfor the respondent would submit th"at_,"'I.As  g8v_.an_ji;1 <\/pre>\n
objections filed thereto hiia’-we _VVbeen~,_VV:c’dnsi’dered in
\naccordance with iaw—-._._a;nd 7_V_th\u20ac;7\u00a7 infirmity in the<\/p>\n
impugned order, in vie.w..,of\u00bb.whi,c.h no ivntderference is calied<\/p>\n
for. !,’.Vea’Vrn’edf’.cou’:i?is’e3:”‘r’nV,ade s_’uVb’missions in support of the
\nfindings. and theAjco_nc.i_u’s.i.o..r1 arrived at in the impugned
\norder,<\/p>\n
  zAt the~”ti’me the writ petition was fiied, the<\/p>\n
  produced, which contained the operative<\/p>\n
p’o_rtdionv_r’eoi’atii:ng to the consideration and disposai of the<\/p>\n
 I.As”\u20aciA’:.to 8. Along with Misc.W No.6833\/2010, the<\/p>\n
 petitioner has produced the fuil text of the common order<\/p>\n
  passed on LA Nos.6, 7 & 8. E
\n..  \/..\n<\/p>\n
V n<\/p>\n
5. Indisputedly, LA No.1 filed by the decree<\/p>\n
holder was allowed and the Station House Officer. of<\/p>\n
Esylakuppe Police Station was directed to extend-tlheupoiicei<\/p>\n
help to the decree holder for due impi_e’_rifeVnta:tioril’<\/p>\n
permanent injunction decree passedgin  <\/p>\n
The decree is in respect of;lands\u00e9’buearing Svijrueyz <\/p>\n
and 22\/2. The allegations maVd’e._V’gby_theV”j.u.d”gl<nent\u00a7debtor is
\nin respect of lands   Nostz\ufb02\u00e9\/1, 26\/1,
\n26\/2, 26\/3 of Cg\ufb01giraguru\ufb02 gxjecution court has
\nobserved   I.As are not the<\/p>\n
subject  a'ijd"decree, which is being<\/p>\n
executed -_a'ndV'hehc:ei hasiiheld that, the allegations made in
\nthe appli'ca_tlons" and  relief sought against judgment<\/p>\n
de,b.tor,tr.beingwbeyonicl the purview and scope of the<\/p>\n
 pe.titio_n,wAiha$"*di_smissed the application.<\/p>\n
 6.. .”i:\u20ac–.j\u00bb”ii:hether in the guise of implementation of the<\/p>\n
 judgment and decree in respect of the suit property, there<\/p>\n
V”–i_AAwas’A”g_’any damage caused to the adjoining properties of<\/p>\n
 judgment debtor as alleged in the applkcbations, have not<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nbeen considered. The impugned order does not indicate
\nthe court having considered the record, which came into
\nexistence after the order on I.A.No.1 was passed.  6<\/p>\n
to 8 have not been considered with referen.c’fe:V:to4ffthe<\/p>\n
proceedings that took place after passing of7o:rde_r.: <\/p>\n
No.1 in the execution petition. Thie”appi’i\u00abcatio.ris’\u00abouvghit <\/p>\n
have been considered with refereri\u00bbce”to the:v_r\u00a2ecor::j<\/p>\n
execution petition after Passingjof the ordieron  tiiiw<\/p>\n
I.As 6 to 8 were filed,'”w_hich_.~iw’ouV\u00a3.d hvaye eniabiedhthe court
\nto find out whether there.’Ais’avri1y’Vtr:.i_ti*i.x.’i’n’ii_the ailegation of<\/p>\n
encroachment’a\u00abnLd–  to the adjoining<\/p>\n
properties debtor (other than the decreed
\npropertsi\/’}~\u00bb.’_’ Since :8 have not been considered in<\/p>\n
the._\u00a7i’i’ght of t’ii-e_VVo’bse:i’vations made supra and hence the<\/p>\n
  orders have to be held as irrational.\n<\/p>\n
 ._  I’i1:”‘t~h.er;es’uit, the writ petitions stand ailowed and the<\/p>\n
imp”:igiviVe.d’orders stand quashed. K<\/p>\n
or<\/p>\n
The execution court is directed to reconsider I.As 6
\nto 8 in the light of the observations made supra and in<\/p>\n
accordance with iaw.\n<\/p>\n
In the circumstances of the case, the;p–a’rtie__sEgret<\/p>\n
directed to bear their respective costs.<\/p>\n
Ks}\/–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 23″? DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA WRIT PETITION NOS.4777–4779\/2010 H BETWEEN: Smt. Puttabasamma W\/o.veerabhadrappa Aged about 43 years R\/at Chikkahosur […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-93635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\\\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":545,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Smt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\\\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\\\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010"},"wordCount":545,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010","name":"Smt Puttabasamma ... vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-29T05:06:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-puttabasamma-vs-sri-l-ananda-so-lingegowda-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Puttabasamma … vs Sri L Ananda S\/O.Lingegowda on 23 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93635\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}