{"id":9391,"date":"2010-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010"},"modified":"2015-05-08T05:51:19","modified_gmt":"2015-05-08T00:21:19","slug":"shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 2339 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010,\n\n: PRESENT :\n\nTHE HODFBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATTT; ~    .<\/pre>\n<p>AND<\/p>\n<p>THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE I:I&#8217;.&#8217;S.jKEMPANNA.:&#8221;T <\/p>\n<p>M.F.A.NO. 91\u00a7;;QF 2005<br \/>\nBetween:\n<\/p>\n<p>Shashikala Mary<br \/>\nI) \/0. Michael.\n<\/p>\n<p>Aged about_28 years, ,<br \/>\nR\/0. Vidya,.&#8217;nag_ar,&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Tumkur. V  V .\n<\/p>\n<p>Presently&#8221;&#8216;R\u00a2s&#8217;:?;din\u00a7f:.at &#8221; _ .<br \/>\nNo.13,2, St, At1\u00e9l:hQn&#8217;3f&#8217;s S.,t1&#8243;&#8216;eg:t,_ _&#8217;<br \/>\nKullap&#8217;pa\u00b0C&#8217;1&#8217;r(:le_,&#8217;  &#8216;T  &#8221;<br \/>\nKammanahalli, <\/p>\n<p>Ba11galor\u00e9.&gt;&#8211;._ .\n<\/p>\n<p> Appellant<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; l &#8216;A {By&#8212; :&lt;a1e\u00a2mu_11a&#039;h&#039;Sharia&#039;, Advocate]<\/p>\n<p>1A.\u00bb._$yed.\n<\/p>\n<p>S\/0&#8242;: Syed Ismail,<br \/>\nMaj of-,<\/p>\n<p> n o.&#8221;&#8216;V1&#8217;n0ba Nagar,<br \/>\n Tjumkur.\n<\/p>\n<p>ll {Owner of Autoriksha<br \/>\nN0. KA.O6&#8211;7086].\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;WV\/_\/,,,.\n<\/p>\n<p>.5&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>ix}<\/p>\n<p>2. The New India Assurance ($0.. Ltd..<\/p>\n<p>Branch Of\ufb01ce,<\/p>\n<p>By its Manager,<\/p>\n<p>Turnkur Shopping Complex.\n<\/p>\n<p>BB. Road,<\/p>\n<p>Turnkur.\n<\/p>\n<p>[By Sri. RB. Raju, Advocate for  i     =<br \/>\nR} w Notice dispensed with V\/O dateci-.12\/04&#8242;,;&#8217;200V7). ~  <\/p>\n<p>This MFA is filed U\/S,-1\u00ab?3{&#8211;l)&#8221;*~of Mvaet against the<br \/>\nJudgment and Awarti\u00e9iatecl: 1.30\/0.6,\/V2005 passed in MVC<br \/>\nNo.&#8221;\/95\/2000 on the file&#8217; of t?&#8217;i\u00e9:1l:&#8217;1&#8217;l..&#8217;C;iVi1*:JL1dg\u20ac {Sr.Dvn) 8.:<br \/>\nAclcll. MACT, Tumkur, partly allowing th1je__claiIn petition for<br \/>\ncompensation and seeliinglienliiancenienii of compensation<br \/>\nwith interestgat 12% Pli_A.::  &#8221; &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>This i\\.{iP&#8217;A &#8220;t~omi:ijg &#8216;ore &#8220;for Hearing, this day,<br \/>\nN.K. PAIIL;J;&#8217;, &#8216;cEe_liveredi_ the folplowingc<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ag;gQGMENT<br \/>\n appeal :tlreV&#8221;claimant is directed against the<\/p>\n<p>inipiigned  and award dated 13&#8243;? June 2005,<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;passed:.in4&#8243;M.V.C.No.795\/2000, by the Principal Civil<\/p>\n<p>   &amp; Additional Motor Accident Claims<\/p>\n<p>Tribu1&#8217;ial,&#8221;&#8221;:Tumkur, (for short, &#8216;Tribunal&#8217; ) for<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;cn.ijiancernent of compensation on the ground that, the<\/p>\n<p>in&#8217;-cornpensation of ?93,731\/&#8211; awarded in her favour as<\/p>\n<p>0&#8242; &#8220;against her claim for 05.001akhs, is inadequate.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;W__M__MM__,,,_&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>_- &#8221;   V.\n<\/p>\n<p>It is also the case of the appellant that the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>erred in not awarding any compensation towardsiioss of<\/p>\n<p>one academic year and towards loss :ria_;~riag\u00a2<\/p>\n<p>prospects and therefore, reasonable cojnipe&#8217;r1-sfvatitcn xrnayi<\/p>\n<p>be awarded under the said an <\/p>\n<p>enhancement may be madeunder other hevadsf  <\/p>\n<p>4. In View of vii.:s&#8217;u,stained in the<br \/>\naccident,  petition under<br \/>\nSection  Act, before the<br \/>\n&#8216;I&#8217;ribu;nal;  of a sum of ? 05.00<br \/>\nlakhsvxaglainwsti  The said claim petition<\/p>\n<p>had come&#8221;~up for consideration before the Tribunal on<\/p>\n<p>  .,iu_ne,. &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; &#8220;The Tribunal, after considering the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;r1e.1eva:nt_dmateiiial available on file and after appreciation<\/p>\n<p>ofthe  documentary evidence, allowed the claim<\/p>\n<p> npetitio\ufb02n&#8217; in part, awarding a sum of 393,731 \/~ with<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;interest at 8% per annum from the date of petition till<\/p>\n<p>_..the entire amount is paid. Being dissatisfied with the<\/p>\n<p>__MM__MM_,,_,..\n<\/p>\n<p>quantum of compen n awarded by the Tribunal, the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is in appeal before this Court, seeking<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of compensation under Various h_ead&#8217;-stand<\/p>\n<p>award of compensation towards loss of one  <\/p>\n<p>year and also towards loss of marriage p&#8217;rospee;ts.l&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>5. We have heard learned<\/p>\n<p>and learned counsel fo1*.,_Vp4l&#8221;i.nsurance c.priip&#8221;;:my&#8217; for&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>considerable length of  <\/p>\n<p>6. After hearinlgllllearnddi&#8217;  the parties<br \/>\nand after of   award passed by<br \/>\nTribunal  placed before us.\n<\/p>\n<p>we arelof  of accident and<br \/>\nthe resultant  by appellant are not in<\/p>\n<p>dispute.  t V.i&#8217;s.a1.s(3~-\u00a2_nlotl in dispute that she was aged<\/p>\n<p>  :22 3&#8242;(:arSlll&amp;i&#8217;C&#8221;&#8221;tifie time of accident and pursuing her<\/p>\n<p>   course. After going through the<\/p>\n<p> awarded by Tribunal. we are of the View<\/p>\n<p> that it v.the compensation awarded by Tribunal at<\/p>\n<p>it A &#8216;  \u20ac&#8217; 31 \/ &#8211;\u00bb towards medical expenses, &#8216;&lt;&#039;3(),00O\/ ~<\/p>\n<p> V\u00bb .._..towards loss of amenities, discornforts and unhappiness<\/p>\n<p>\/\/was<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and ?&#8217;25,000\/&#8211; towards future medical expenses is just<\/p>\n<p>and reasonable and does not call for interferenceg<\/p>\n<p>7. However, the compensation __a\u00a7warfdeofd&#8211;.  <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal towards other heads_;app&#8217;ears.llto&#8221;the<\/p>\n<p>lower side and needs enhance&#8221;men:t.&#8221;&#8216;l <\/p>\n<p>appellant has undergone ltrelatmenlt  of 25&#8243;?<\/p>\n<p>days, during which period&#8217;,i-shiepshouldlhave undergone<br \/>\nunsaid pain and    also spent<br \/>\nreasonable    nourishing food<br \/>\nand  from other incidental<br \/>\nexpenses.&#8221;   the injuries sustained<br \/>\nand theshe would have missed one<\/p>\n<p>acadernie\u00b0yea1&#8242;.. _HaAV_ing&#8221;regard to the disability assessed<\/p>\n<p>  b3{:l)o,etor&#8211;,p. as stated above, there appears to be loss of<\/p>\n<p>  h_1.arri.age -p1=os_pects also to some extent. The Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>has slippjed into an error in not awarding any<\/p>\n<p> Acompensation under these two heads. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;1at\u00a7ing regard to all these aspects, we award a sum of<\/p>\n<p> .. _.%25,00G\/- towards pain and sufferings as against<\/p>\n<p>315,000\/&#8211;; ?&#8217; I 5, 000 \/ M owards conveyance, nourishing<br \/>\nWMWM<\/p>\n<p>food and attendant charges as against ?&#8221;5,._O0O\/-<\/p>\n<p>awarded by Tribunal and; ?50,000\/- towards 1oss.e:o1\u00b0i_ione<\/p>\n<p>academic year and ?30,000\/&#8211; towards iosshf <\/p>\n<p>prospects.   e<\/p>\n<p>8. In the light of the facts _<\/p>\n<p>the case, as stated above,V\u00bbthie~~.appAe&#8217;a1__tiiedv-.b\u00a7\ufb01&#8217;appei1ant&#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>is aliowed in part.  im&#8217;p-ug,tned&#8221;}n.dgnie1:t  award<br \/>\ndated 1391 June  \/2000,<br \/>\nby the    additional Motor<br \/>\nAccident  is hereby modified,<br \/>\nawarding&#8217; of as against \u20ac93,731\/\u00bb~<br \/>\nawarded lbiy  at 6% per annum on<\/p>\n<p>the Venhanced&#8217; sunl\ufb02rorn the date of petition til} the date<\/p>\n<p>  of&#8221;rea12i;:\u00bb:ation. n&#8217;The&#8221;&#8216;E5reak-up is as foiiows:<\/p>\n<p>   sufferings ? 25,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Towards of amenities 8: ? 30,000\/&#8211;<br \/>\nemoymen\ufb02nlife<\/p>\n<p>Toviiards Medical Expenses ? 18,731\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>__  Towards&#8221; conveyance, nourishing food<br \/>\n.. f  aruiattendant charges<br \/>\n&#8216; Towfards Loss of one academic years<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217;R<\/p>\n<p>15,000\/~<\/p>\n<p>50,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>h    Towards future medical expenses<\/p>\n<p>25,000\/&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Towards Ioss of marriage prospects 30,000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;-H\/\\l\u00a3&#8221;4-IN?\n<\/p>\n<p>Totai I,93,&#8217;73l\/~<\/p>\n<p>La<\/p>\n<p>The Insurance Company is directed to deposit the<\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation of 31,00,000\/~, <\/p>\n<p>thereon at 6% per annum, Within two weeks frozn  &#8220;aa&#8221;te.;5\u00a3 V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>receipt of copy of the judgment an;dlaWarr;_l.&#8217;l&#8211;\u00aby .y  l\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>On such deposit by the lnsuraonce oultulofu<\/p>\n<p>enhanced compensation of <\/p>\n<p>proportionate interest. &#8220;shall  in\u00abl&#8217;Fi:S\u00e9:ed&#8217;lVl)eposit in<br \/>\nany Nationalised or  \ufb01ne name of the<br \/>\nappellant, for  V&#8217;re;:\u00a7;\u00e9{vab1e for another<br \/>\nfive years,;   hy_er._:toV_withdraw the periodical<br \/>\nintereystpypv  :2 . .\n<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9lof &#8216;l?25,000\/&#8211; with proportionate<br \/>\ninterest u&#8221;s._Ifia1.1 llbelltlreieiase\u00e9d in favour of the appellant,<br \/>\nirsriiediat\u00a21v~         -4<\/p>\n<p>.y:Office&#8217;to__draw award, accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>salt<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>sdl-\n<\/p>\n<p>Iudga<\/p>\n<p>BMV*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 Author: N.K.Patil And H.S.Kempanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2339 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010, : PRESENT : THE HODFBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATTT; ~ . AND THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE I:I&#8217;.&#8217;S.jKEMPANNA.:&#8221;T M.F.A.NO. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9391","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shashikala Mary D\\\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\\\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1001,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Shashikala Mary D\\\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\\\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shashikala Mary D\\\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\\\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010"},"wordCount":1001,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010","name":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-08T00:21:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shashikala-mary-do-michael-vs-syed-saheen-so-syed-ismail-on-23-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shashikala Mary D\/O Michael vs Syed Saheen S\/O Syed Ismail on 23 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9391","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9391"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9391\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9391"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9391"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9391"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}