{"id":9392,"date":"2010-12-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"modified":"2014-08-13T14:32:14","modified_gmt":"2014-08-13T09:02:14","slug":"sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA1JQ\u00a71\u00ab:.\nDATED THIS THE 141m DAY OF  \" \nBEFORE _  \"   \"\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE \nWRIT PETITION NOS. 39058~1() 6() F.j\u00e9OO\u00a7 (\u00a7;.M:PP)n  \n\nBETWEEN\n\nAged About 56 Years  _ 1 V .\nDevastanadalliruva Badigetia;*a'V   \nKssemabhrudhi Sanghgi[Registe;re'd).  L = \"\nBy Its Presid::r1t_.Sri H L Na.rayAari'--..' ' \"\nS\/O Sr1'H:M E;:ingeg(Ewda{J _V   \nR\/O      '\nMandya:Tq.;;5z'_Disf\" '  A'  V'\n\n1. Sri Lakshmi Jallardhana  u\n\n_l\\)\n\nSri. VG0p\u00e91i\"M_V < _\n\nAged : 53 Ye\u00e911*\u00e9" .. _ ' ,  '-\nS\/O ManjunathRao;'*~.__ " \nR\/O HC\u00bb-*.\u00a2IMMMad'hu 'D}'1a1\ufb01u'a\u00abV P3asha\"'~\u00ab.V\nS\/'O Na'neV-Jho1f1,.._ M A V' \nAged' About 4.5 'E-'-ears\"  \nR\/O N'er_41ne.VJho'n';_ \"  \"\nSub New \":3La1' Auto 'Works\n\n2 ' \/O Ko'i\u00ab1_eVKutty.\nA .__Aged.Ab'o,ui 49 Years\n\nGood Luok Footwear\nD  Bank Opp\n\n \" .=B'L1sVSia11d Road,\n. _ Malldya.\n\n\n\n\n\n9.\n\nl. U.\n\n11.\n\n2))\n\nSri. '35. Puttaswamy\n\nS \/ O Thirnmaiah,\n\nAged About 55 Years\n\nR\/O 1st Cross.\n\nSihineeru Kola\n\nMandya\n\nSri. Shreedhar\n\nS \/ O Venkatachalaiah.\nAged About 33 Years V\nR\/O New Anil Hair Style  \nOld M C Road, ''\nHolalu Circle\n\nMandya\n\nSri. Arujun I-I Patil ._ .\n\nS\/O Hirji Deevs Pate1.,.._ _  '\n\nAged Abou_t.:3Q \u00a5ea1\ufb01s V     :\nR\/O S H Ffateii\ufb02ardwafed   A' \nNear       '\nMandya T__  3 '\n\nsnz. D    \nS\/Q Man}: R'P.\u00e9rtel.=.v  \nAged'Ab'out 5.2. Years\"  \nR\/ O Sag_ar Emu-_:-rprises_.,'*\nBus Staf1\"d_RoaC;' ' \n\nNear?' Gayath\ufb01. Hotel,\n'=Ma1'11jd_Va\"~ A. H\n\n\" '}4o1\u00a7es;fi(':'handra Gupta\n.  S,\/O'B'abu.La1 Guptha.\n\n' . Aged A'::~oL1*.r:' 61 Years\n'R\/O.vGeei'ha Drug House\n\nOpupdd\ufb02 C C Bank.\nBusv\ufb01tand Road\n\n  .. A ' Mandya\n\n\n\nI6.\n\nE7.\n\nSri Ashok\n\nS\/O Dondoji R210.\n\nAged About 48 Years\n\nR\/O Modern Tylors\n\nOpp D C C Bank.\n\nBus Stand Road\n\nManclya  _\n\nSmt Asha\n\nW\/O Sri Ashok,\n\nAged About 48 Years\nR\/O Pallavi Buity Parlor\nR\/O Ist Cross,\nSihineeru Kola\n\nMandya\n\nSri. U J Rajendra Pra.e~9.,d\"V. V\n\nS\/O U RJz;1},:'--sg Ram; V   ~. _  .\nAged About 5{\u00a7}YearsA  V   \" \nR\/O Diyjxesh\u00bbTextiles,'-._V*--\u00ab.__    '\nOpp D C..CB::_nk ' '  \n\nBus Sta r1d*'eR0\u00e9it3;A., \n\nMazndya 1 \" ' \" \"\n\nSri. VKFuzzi._U11a< \n\nS\/O Abdul Shakkvr; \n\nAgevd Ab0'L1\u20ac:_. 40' Yeafs\n\nP;\/O Sami Bro\u00a5.hvers\u00ab}-Ia1'dware\n\n"Sihi\ufb01eeer'LI._K0la. Z\ufb01d Cross\n\ne     Mand;ra  \n\n:3.\n\n \n' O Ma1*a_.da Muttu.\n\nAged--Abo\u00e9uf. 45 Years\nR\/ Q Raghavendra Electricals\n\n * x 1,91 Ci'0ss, Sihineeru Kola\n, _M':g.ndya\n\nW'"l\n\n\n\n19.\n\nTU\n\nI'-.3\nTU\n\nSri. Abdul Klmdar\n\nS\/O P T Hassan,\n\nAged About 42 Years\n\nR\/O Maddeen Tea Stall\nSihineeru Kola, .1 st Cross\nMandya\n\nSn'. Zakir Shariff\n\nS\/O Been Makbul Shareeff,\nAged About 32 Years\n\nR\/O Au to Work Shop\n\nlst Cross, Sihineeru Kola A\nMandya\n\nSri. Firoz A ~ A\n\ns\/o Firoz Khan @ Kmde;;e;;11ano,:   \n\nAged About 35 Years,  _ *\nMandya Furniture \\\u00a7\u00a7x'or}\u00a7s_f\nIst Cross, :51h1;m;=.e;~-:4 'Koia\nMandy-91:'  AA A A A 4. -. \n\nSri  M-u!_<Asi'1_ KuAii1a1* \n\nS\/0 Ba12iChE_1nd,AAV.V  \n\nAged About 3A9.AYea\u00a3s  \n\nR\/O s:11'inee'm KOEa,AA'1-.st"{";'foss\nMandyA\u00e9x.__' A A '  \n\n52:1. Sohan Raj,\n\n"S\/O3.-Kisiian Lal,AAA AAAAA AAA\n\n.A  * Aged Abop1i~.6G Years\n'A V AR\/O AC1o'i'rA1 =l\\_\/Ie.rchar1t\n\nA'B_us St\u00e91_n_dA'Road,\nA .i__\\4\/farldya A'  '\n\nSri." N\u00e9mendra Kumar\n\n'A .5.\/osohan Raj\n\n\u00abAA  , _NAa;vajyoth.i 'I'ex1.1'1es\n Bus Stand Road.\n\n\n\n(w\n\nOpp Dec Bank\nMandya\n\nS11'. Ghevar Ram\n\nS\/O Nena Ram.\n\nAged About 35 Years\nR\/O Rathod Garmems\nBus Stand Road,\n\nOpp DCC Bank\nMandya\n\nSri. Ahmmed Kutty\nS\/O Abdul Khadar,\nAged About 72 Years~._\nR\/O Preethi Stores,  \nOpp D C C Bank\n\nBus Stand Road    dd\n\nMan dya\n\nAbdul Khader:~.\u00bb-  'V\n\ns\/0 Ah:n.m;\u00e9pd;\u00bb'.Kutty.<_\u00b07~7."_A .1  "\n\nAged Ab.Qu't. 48' 5:fear;~3_. \n\nR\/QJa112i"priya 'I3'radefS,V_ _ '\n\nOpp;D'C (3 Bank, M _ \nBus Stparzd Road  v "---\nMandy\u00e9t M 7 "\n\n Gevendegowdap.\n\n' "S \/ O?-{S-a1'1n_e Gowd\u00e9;\n* Aged Ab0u"t-- .42 Years\n\n  \n_ 'I{enchaiva.hV'Bu\u00a3Iding\n\nA fist Cvrossg Sihineera Kola\n\nI\\"\/Iar1.dya" 4'\n\n.31-i. Ram Raji Urs\n. _S}'_C) Davarji Urs,\n\nMK':\n\n\n\n30.\n\n31.\n\n..i\\;\u00a7Ea11Ctya\n\nAged About 48 Years\n\nR\/O Subramauya Canteen\nKenchaiah Building, 1st Cross\nSihineera Kola.\n\nMandya\n\nSri. Ghouse Peer\nS\/O AssiffAIi,\n\nAged About 51 Years\nR\/O G P Auto Works J  _\nKenchaiah Building, Est Cross\nSihineera Kola, \n\nMandya\n\nSri. L Putta Swamy\n\nS\/O Lingachar,\n\nAged About 54 Yea,rS~._ i "  ' \nR\/O M\/S Manj'ushre_e:rWo'o_d ]??'\u00a2 i\ufb01i\ufb01g  _\nFurniture Works,  A   .   A\nNear Rai1way,'I'ack Road  A\n\nMandya ' f V' \n\nSri, V DeV\u00e9.ip.utr\u00e9.V 'V\nS\/(JVeda;nurth.y,A  A' _.\nAged'Ab"out E59 's<\u00a2ar's'~_..__  \nR\/O Hlanoka E}.ectriCa}S\nSi-hineeru K1o'Ea;' lst Cross\n\n * --. Sri, Puttai'aju\n" _ "Pu t!".asw_an1iah,\n. "Aged '\/\\_.\u00a5;;0u't 55 Years\nA ._R\/Olktshpia Air Dresses\n\nKen\u00e9ha\ufb01th Building,\nIsi, Ci\u00e9oss\n\nA * .rASihiiiee1*u Koia.\n\nA A . _ Mjandya\n\n\n\n34.\n\n35.\n\nSri. Shabbir Khan\n\nS\/O Anwar Khan,\n\nAged About 24 Years\nR\/O S L V Stores,\n\nDr Thammanna Building\nSihineeru Kola Road.\nMandya\n\nSrj. Mohammad Asgar Pasha\n\nS\/O Mohammad Inayathulla,   \nAged About 35 Years I A\nR \/ 0 Star Enterprises\n\nSihineeru Kola,\n\nMandya\n\nSri. Shaf\ufb01 Ulla _\nS\/O Abdul Shakku1",'~._\nAged About 45 Years.  _ A\n\nR\/O Samy Brothers \n\nOpp D C C Bank,  A\nBus Stand. E?,o_a"_d V\n\nMav.:1*d*ya,A  '  "C C A\n\nSri}:Pr'ashVanth:'~ A  A'\nS\/O'Na'ryan'a.V_Ra.o',-- A \nAged About 35 Yea,_r's\u00bb__ \nNaresha Ta,i1ors", ls-t Cross\n\n\u00bb Siiihi\ufb01ceru Ko1a.Vv_ ,\n"lMa1d'dya' \n\n" V A.    lSu;1'u_(j-.sha\n\nC" 'S\/O Gange Gowda,\nA ._Aged. About 33 Years\n\nR\/O Av B" Bakery & Sweets\nOpp D C C Bank.\n\n " :a.I4_3us"Sta'nd Road\nx _ Nlatldya\n\nK,'\/\/ti\/Z'\n\n\n\n39.\n\n40.\n\n41.\n\n..1.a5t Cross,\n"Maridya"' \n\n9\n\nSri. G V Venkoba Rao\n\nS\/O Govinda Rao,\n\nAged About 60 Years\n\nIsl Cross.\n\nSihineeru Kola\n\nMandya\n\nSri. A M Mohammad Ismail B'u1\u00a5{kl1a'1.*i' ._ \nS\/OAMAbdu1Ajeej,  \nAged About 54 Years\n\nR\/O Zen Zow Footwear\n\nBus Stand Road,\n\nMandya\n\nSri. S Arland\n\nS\/O Srinivasa. \nAged About 44 Years...  _ \nR\/O Om Sh-akthi Bi;ildm:g _ _\nNear Sil1i13i_eer}i:~Ko1a'o    A' \nMandya  A A A' 4. --.    ' \u00bb\n\nS1'i,.Rewa.s11a\ufb01Ra.r . .\nS \/ O Poof1'afe Chand.hji~,.V\nAged About 51. Roars "   "\nR\/O 'CV\/o oanesh Ma1,%  \nSomanai_;ha.,Chemi::a13_...'\nSjhineerli Kola  '\n\nA _   She\ufb01ty\n_ ' V,' O 'I?.afg11'i:, Ram Shetty,\n' ,AgedAbo--\u00a7;"t 46 Years\n\nS] O<.Sri' Dhurga Restaurant:\nOld MIC Road,\n\n AA ; Manddya\n\n".\/:;--'1'\n\n\n\n44.\n\n45.\n\n46.\n\n47'.\n\nS11. S O Sajadh\n\nS\/O Late Syed Umer.\n\nAged About 55 Years\n\nR\/O Baba Emporium,\n\nOpp D C C Bank\n\nBus Stand Road,\n\nMandya   _\n\nSri. Sundar\n\nS\/O Ram Rao, _\nAged About 35 Years " _V\nR\/O Sunder T ailors, 1st Floor"\nKenehaiah Building, \nSihineeru Kola \n\nMandya\n\nSri. C R Saroja Swamy-.. _  A\nW\/ 0 TA SW'an'1\u00a77_, } _, \nAged About  1\nCha11da.'riVSVa.rfies;V_ _ V\nTammar;na:..B\u00a3\u00abdg A A  \n1st,dvF}o0r,V"j.  -  \nOpp D C ?Ba.nk\u00ab.  \nMaVn,dy':-1 "   V'\n\nSri. K  ..So1fitlda._ AV\/A{A.d?_11"in.f'.J",~:L1\nS.\/O Malihgu,' ~ * V-\n\n.Agedd'Aobout  .Yeor.s\n" vChet.r1da12 .. Beauthy Parlor\n\n. :'\u00ab--.Si11ineeruko1_a lst Cross\n" . A.O'p:?_"D._ <3 C*~B.%.?'~\ufb01k=\n\n'Bus Sfand'TRaod\n' ._Ma11d,ya"  '\n\nSrlf; Vsdiddappaji\n\nAA ; S\/O"Venkata11nga Char,\n\nAged About 35 Years\n\nA "Sun Stitch Tailor Building\n\n'vs.\/""'i\n\n\n\nKenchaiah Building\nMandya\n\n49. Sri. MakbhooIA11aInad\nS \/ O Huiam M'usthaffa.\nAged About 58 Years\nJ J Traders, ls': Cross\nSihineerukoia\n\nMandya ... Pet.i1_,i'e'11ers:.A_A."~ \n\n(By Sri.M.R. Rajagopal. Adv.)\nAND\n\nI. The State Of Karnataka  .\nDept Of Mujarai 8: EI1C1OVVII1\u00a7_3_IV"l{L,_ \n\nVikasa Soudha,   \nBangalore  " ' \n\nEx.)\n\nThe State Of AKarnata1:--d._  '\n\nBy Its Secretary ' '   .,  A\nDepartment Oi\u00a2i:.-Revenue\nVidhana A861-,1dha,V  \nBangaiore " V"  AV\n\n3. The C(Srn1nissione'r_F'mj..'e'\n\nReligious" 8: CheL'1*itab1e\n.\u00bb Bind dwmems " -in Karnataka\nA & " 'eM.al\u00a7ed 'AM\u20aci\u00a31eshWaf\u00e91' Building\nV " -. Fort, 'ctxanzaraj apet,\n" _ . BVaI1_ga_10re\u00bb._ \n\n4. A   Comrnissioner\nMandya' District\nMandya\n\n     Tahas1'Idar\n\n"Mandya Taluk\n\n'L\ufb01\/*.\u00ab*"\\,\/1\n\n\n\n6.\n\nA 5.1"; \n\n..  andya\n\nMandya\n\nSri Lakshmy Janardhana Swamy Tempie\nMandya Taluk\n\nReps Muzaroi Officer & Deputy\nCommissioner, Mandya Dist\n\nMandya  _\n\nDr '1' S Sudharshan\n\nS\/O Late Dr D Thammarana,\nAged About 40 Years 'T \nR\/O N0 1237, Amma Nilaya, \nK R Road, Ashoka Nagara, \nMandya  ~ \n\nSri. Kenchaiah ._ \n\nS\/O Rangaiah,  V\nAgedAb0'u_t.8\u00abO'Yea1\u00a7js ,    ~\nR\/O 7th Cr0s\u00a75e;s' _ _   _  " \n      '\nMandya   ' '\n\nSri, C Nafas-irnh:a: Sw.\u00e91"my _ _'\nS\/Q Late Chaluyaehaz, \nAged About 40 me rs"   v \nR\/O I3'.\u00a33}d.779,_ " \n\nOld M C Read\u00bb \n\n- .. MK. 'Ram\u00e9linge Gowda\n" s_S',lQ;=L,a\u00a3e'Kernpegowda\n._  AgeVC'I"  years,\n\n' __R\/o Istcrjoss,\n\nSubhash J Nagar,\nMandya\n\nV  S~:;i.. M.D.Ramesh Raju\n\n3\u00bb\/a\u00a2"gJ1\n\n\n\n""15.\n\nS\/() Late Devaiah\nAged About 60 Years,\nR\/O 2084\/ 1.\n\n2nd Cross,\n\nSubhash Nagar,\nMandya\n\nSri. M.G.Shreeka1'1tu\n\nS\/0 M.B.Gangadharaiah\n\nAged About 65 Years,   ._\nR\/0 no. 829, I\nKallahalli Layout,\n\nShankarapuram,\n\nMandya\n\nSri. M.N.Kumar   \nS\/0. C.Narasimha Ma,.:V_rthy."V "  j\u00e9\nAged About 35 Years,  _ Y  ' V\nR\/O Old Town, \n\nMandya    .  v\n\nSri, S';KurI1ar  ii; \nS\/o.San\ufb01appa'\u00bb . R1'\nAged About 35:";l'ears;"eVd.__  _\n\nR\/ 0 T P'uttasv_vamy P'e.f_t_'t"y Shop\nIn Fro\ufb01E._4Of,Sihi.1'1ee_r'uIs;C)la\nMandya A    V-\n\n"  C ;"\u00a3)&eVegd\\Xfd'\u00e9{ A\n' 2  Laue Chikkahidegowda\n\nA " e_Ag.ed'\u00abAbvdmj:_ Years,\n\n_  O"T\u00e9_1jdagg1Wadi Village\n' _Sr1ra1_'1gagatr1a T aluk\n\nIV.Ean'dyav Dist\n\n_Sr1. VMs.V.Narayana Swamy\n\nS730 Venkatagiriyappa\n\nVA '\u00bb1".ged Aboui 50 Years.\n\n\n\nR\/O 4th Cross Gandhi Nagara\nMandya Dist  Respondents\n\n[By Sri. RB. Satyanarayana Singh, I-ICGP for R}~6....._l' \u00bb  9  \n\nSri. M.V. Seshachala, Adv. for R-7. 8. 9. 10, ll &*l2  j" \n\nSri. T.P. Vivekananda. Adv. for R15\nR9 & R14 are served)\n\nThese Writ Petitions are filed i\ufb01;ndere\u00a7~irtic\u00bbles~ \nof the Constitution Of India praying; to_I'_;quas'h Wthe ' 0\nproceedings of the Respondent "no. \u00e9ltltdi I0;9.0..:9"'"as"'per "\n\nAn.nex--R and also comrnunicati0n..ol"the respondentWn0.3 dtd\n91109 as per Annexure M S a-ndeto 'direct. the-.re.s-lpondent\nnos} 8: 4 to implernent.__the decision*..o\u00a3_th.e government dtd\nl.l2.05 as per AI1I'1\u20acX~PJ _i'by'r..rr:gularizing" the sub~lease\nexisting in favour of the_.pet1ti.oners*.by*--lconsidering the\nrepresentations of "the pet,itj;oI1ers"_ji-as. per Annex~Q dtd\n1.09.09. ' ' "\n\nThese'   for preliminary hearing\nin '13' Grnup this '{:'u3\u00aby_V. "the"Cou_r't' made the following:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
  V””Fhe Tpetitioners herein are sub–lessees of commercial<\/p>\n
 to 6th respondent. The admitted facts are<\/p>\n
9  that ‘6__”‘* respofndent is a Mujarai temple having vast vacant<\/p>\n
0.9″‘-__Vlandj a1’ou.:td the temple. The said vacant land was initially<\/p>\n
9  hl’C_tV’Q.EJfti.”by respondent n03 herein to 25 persons under an<\/p>\n
5.: {JR<\/p>\n
order of lease granted in their favour in the year 1995_…___ The<\/p>\n
petitioners herein are the sub~lessees of the premises”,V<\/p>\n
are constructed on the property belonging to  ‘<\/p>\n
~ Mujarai temple.   _<\/p>\n
2. The brief facts leading to thesellwrit Petigtiiohs areas <\/p>\n
under:\n<\/p>\n
6t” respondent —   Temple
\nof Mandya Taluk has  the center of
\nMandya town,:,  to 25 persons
\nunder a 1ease”:g1,.,  01.04.1995 which.
\nwas renew’ed.,lrorn ai’i’dVV-the said lease came to an
\nend  lease period, the original<\/p>\n
lessees haVle>1.et~\u00bbout thle._slai.d” portion of the property that was<\/p>\n
 }eased.3~’:.t0x’l.l1\u20ac1’I1 “t–o._j_r_arious persons as subwlessees. The<\/p>\n
 petit-ioners\u00abhe1jein_ are the sub~lessees under respondent nos.<\/p>\n
7′.   lessees under respondent nos.3 to 6. So<\/p>\n
afar   leasehold right of respondent nos.7 to 16, the<\/p>\n
same.. terminated by the 3”? respondent by order dated<\/p>\n
E,\/*.’\\\/E<\/p>\n
16<\/span>
\n10.09.2009, as per Arinexure ~w R, which is impugned in
\nthese proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
3. Challenging the said order several Writ Petitions<\/p>\n
were filed by the original lessees in W.P. <\/p>\n
705\/2009, 30410415\/2009, 30416\/2009 and”20.2v10,\/’2009..’0 1* ” <\/p>\n
ciassified as {GiVI–R\/C}. The said:v’Jpetition’s_ c:arti_e’–_a.p”‘VforV”\u00ab<\/p>\n
consideration before this court and ‘by ar1\ufb01_1:1fder’* <\/p>\n
29.01.2010, this court diSpOS\u20ac\u20ac’\u00a7%0.f”1f.h6  the
\nfollowing order: 0 it 0 0
\n“(ad Ail the petitions.0_a1’e   <\/p>\n
(10) _v  the Deputy<\/p>\n
 _ * _;A.D:DVS(2}:57:2009~10,
\n0*-_Mandya'”‘ J 10.09.2009 stands
\nejuavshed insoiar as the petitioners are<\/p>\n
vvconceined; ”\n<\/p>\n
V V’  it  “matter stands remitted to the Deputy
\nA –.v7\u00a7io’\u00a7nmissioner for fresh disposal insofar<\/p>\n
0 -as the petitioners are concerned.\n<\/p>\n
“‘”‘”\\<\/p>\n
{d} The petitioners shall take these_..___
\nproceedings as notice to them and
\nappear before the Deputy Commiss:.i0n.efr:’__’__’if’
\non 17.02.2010 on which date  theblllld<\/p>\n
petitioners shall appear.__aiid*’mpi*odiic’\u00e9’ <\/p>\n
documents, if they  <\/p>\n
Deputy Commissioner shall–._giVe  ‘a<\/p>\n
personal hearing.  3<\/p>\n
(e) The entire  concluded
\nWithin a period (of  vi\/e_6.l:<_Ids– tiiereafter.<\/p>\n
(i)     to the<\/p>\n
i’peti:ti’onVers  4(1) of the Act<\/p>\n
 ~~~~   lin””r”aioeyanCe till the<\/p>\n
V , ..of “l the petitioners are<\/p>\n
  C0nsid_ered-  be regulated by the<\/p>\n
ordei’._’;.toA’=_  passed by Deputy<\/p>\n
COIDi’iii\u00abS\u00a7_1’Q1″i\u20acr.”\n<\/p>\n
V   “V-..ineideri’tally, the said petitions were filed by the<\/p>\n
origiiilal less’ee_s..9 So far as the present petitioners are the<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘.concerned’,\u00ab:_ they are the sub–lessees under respondent nos.’7<\/p>\n
 I  ii\u00a7lE$I<–.Tl1e case of the petitioners herein is that the original<\/p>\n
""""\\<\/p>\n
lessees under respondent nos. 7 to 16 have no right tolouild<\/p>\n
perrnanent stnlcttire on the land leased to them a11cl_'to_.s\u00abi.V1.'f3;<\/p>\n
lease the same to the petitioners herein. It is al:_-:o*\u00abtheilrv:.case"' '<\/p>\n
that the original lessees are collecti_ng..h_nge   <\/p>\n
and paying a very nominal aI1"lO1,t{1t 'lrent  <\/p>\n
respondent — temple.\n<\/p>\n
5. Therefore, the lffilpl\ufb01 ht,1ge’~arri\u00a7ount of
\nlinancial losses. “Therefore, the petitioners
\nis for a direction toilthe  proceedings
\nof a meetingi.   lo_nlHtl1.12.2005, which<\/p>\n
was presided  I ejspovndenii .h.e’rei r1.<\/p>\n
6. The case’ of”tl3ie_lipeti’tioi’1ers herein is that as per the<\/p>\n
resolution irihrthve vsaid”v.meeting, the submlessees may be<\/p>\n
ll’recognisedt.Aasvi. lesseeshf the property in their occupation on<\/p>\n
“fated Trent “t  the pan by then}.\n<\/p>\n
 v\u00ab._V.’I.’he”i’t,1rther case of the petitioners is that under<\/p>\n
it in”Ar1.11e>rureF~..R, respondent nos.3 and 6 are trying to initiate<\/p>\n
it iproceedings for eviction of original lessees from the property,<\/p>\n
W}<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
which is leased to then} and which are now su’o–1et. to the<\/p>\n
petitioners and others siinilarly placed. If the proceedinig”s_Vl’oif<\/p>\n
eviction of unauthorised occupation is initiated’ ‘<\/p>\n
proceeded, only against original le_s_s.ees, the ex:\/ietf;ion”ordei’._V<\/p>\n
passed therein would affect. their:”:.rightslV Th_er*eIlorel, <\/p>\n
should also be heard with th\u00e9lleozriginal”less<3\u00a2S'V.lli't'\u00a2lV'tlnat-lithe r L'<\/p>\n
respondents to be directed to  notieehlandpphear them
\nbefore taking steps to     direction that
\nthe resolution passed  its meeting on
\n01- 12-2005    consider their<\/p>\n
representation vvihiaoh is at..A'nf11eX\ufb01I'e  Q.<\/p>\n
8. :”–Hea:rd’  for the petitioners and<\/p>\n
the counsellor responG.ents~’l’nos.7 to 16, the original lessees<\/p>\n
 and  learned.___Qovernrnent Pleader appearing for<\/p>\n
“g_respondeni.nos;’l to 6.\n<\/p>\n
A  l\ufb02oidotibt by an order dated 29.01.2010 this court<\/p>\n
 in ea1*lierVV__Wi’it Petitions has passed an order directing the<\/p>\n
   lrAr3spondeI’1t to hold an enquiry against the original<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
lessees by issuing notice under Section ~ 4(1) of__ the<\/p>\n
Karnataka. Public Premises {Eviction of Una1;1_tho_i*i.sed<\/p>\n
Occupants) Act, 19374 by giving sufficient opportu–1iit,yT’to” V’<\/p>\n
original Iessees. Admittedly. n1ajority…of_  it<\/p>\n
are not in possession and occupation  the ttiand..’leas~eid..to–:<\/p>\n
them in the year 01.04.1995 andreiievved frorri..vtAin}Ve*v–to time * it<\/p>\n
up to 31.10.2004. Admittedly, lease that .iysHgpijanted in
\ntheir favour has also    date. Therefore, the
\nsaid original lessees aiidaiso. the  on par with<\/p>\n
each other and eacki ,o’ne’of 1’\u00a3hE;’fI}’ are in unauthorised<\/p>\n
occupation  property.   6″‘ respondent.<\/p>\n
1OE._ It   that the Government in its<\/p>\n
proceedingsttvdpaitedtt  has taken a decision to<\/p>\n
 considfei” reneWal””o\u00a3’___thev lease of the persons who are in<\/p>\n
V”._Voecpupatio_n*.yof_ respective portions of the property<\/p>\n
beioprigingdtof\ufb01i’tf\ufb01zrespondent, whether as lessees or as sub-<\/p>\n
iessees to_co’nside1’ the renewal in their respective names<\/p>\n
‘bascd..’_on their possession to their said portion and the said<\/p>\n
“”1<\/p>\n
renewal is also sought to be made subject to payment o.l’__rent<\/p>\n
and good will as resolved in the said meeting.<\/p>\n
11. On going through the resolut_i_oin’:iA.of _ the”  <\/p>\n
Government: dated 01.12.2005 itizvis <\/p>\n
resolution is more beneficial to. 6″” respondentgeitepnjple.ltifuit <\/p>\n
is implemented. it will fetch higher. rents”for’th*e benefit of<\/p>\n
the temple. In any way, ‘ii:..V_wil1;not”at1″ect:-the rightselof either<\/p>\n
the original lessees or the sub–‘iessee.s.5 ‘fo1:t1fie reason that<\/p>\n
the original lease granted inthe yeareijisllor a period of 5
\nyears. to time till 31.10.2004,<\/p>\n
on which davteggthe lease intheir favoar has expired.<\/p>\n
12. lTh_ei’efore_,l\ufb02slublsequeilt to 31.10.2004, the<\/p>\n
 occup’antslA’oi’ the “p*rope_rties belonging to 6″‘ respondent are<\/p>\n
“sin :’po_sse_ssi.oi2,_ the same as unauthorised occupants.<\/p>\n
Theretore,v’tJ”1e. possession of the original lessees and the<\/p>\n
\u00abpetitiolners\u00e9 herein being one and the same. the 4″‘<\/p>\n
lllrespontdent — Estate Officer i.e., the Deputy Commissioner of<\/p>\n
 is directed t.o issue notice under Section — 4(1) of the<\/p>\n
‘rt<\/p>\n
Karnataka Public Premises [Eviction of Unauthorised<\/p>\n
Occupants} Act, 1974 to each one of the petitioners ..aniti’\u00ab.a1’so<\/p>\n
other persons who are similarly placed, to avoid’ ~<\/p>\n
of proceedings and thereafter shall hear allwof along’ <\/p>\n
with the original lessees and shallgpassl azpprolpriatiel’ord&e’1t1s_’l<\/p>\n
keeping in mind the recommend-actions’ ‘passed in”t.ljie_rnee,\u00a7tinlg <\/p>\n
held on 01.12.2005, which is nioiebbepneficialttof the interest<\/p>\n
of 631 respondent.\n<\/p>\n
13. The said.__ exe-rcilse’~lsl1all.l:’be conipleted by the 41″
\nrespondent  sixijnlonths from the date of<\/p>\n
issue of ofyeviction under Section 4(1) of the
\nKarnataka ‘   [Eviction of Unauthorised<\/p>\n
Occupants)  is  ‘\u00ab.._i:~ssued to all the occupants.<\/p>\n
 , ‘The1_’eafte_r’, the proceieclirzgs shall be held and each one of the<\/p>\n
 petit\u00e9oners\u00ab.and”‘others similarly placed i.e., persons who are<\/p>\n
i\ufb01-\u00a7osse?ss’:V\u00a2i’:;. the premises built on the property belonging<\/p>\n
–V to  .\u00a33’5*V1.a respondent either as direct lessee or sub–lessee<\/p>\n
00 served with notice and each one shall be heard and<\/p>\n
‘question of evicting them from the said premises or<\/p>\n
“*1<\/p>\n
23<\/span>
\nrenewing their license in their favour subject. to resolution
\ndated 01.12.2005 shall be taken in the said proceedings
\nafter giving opportunity to each of them. With these
\ndirections, the Writ; Petitions are disposed oi’.<\/p>\n
14. It is further observed that, in the  the _<\/p>\n
-.\n<\/p>\n
fourth respondent is directed to receive “direct’E’u<\/p>\n
from each of the tenants who are the at the .0<\/p>\n
property of 61” respondent either asV”sub–iessees.Vor lessee <\/p>\n
before issuing notice under  4(1) of~!;hAe’vi\u00b0ict:;\u00a7 thereby<\/p>\n
recognizing their occupatfion   the Mportions of<\/p>\n
property  “SW” “e1″1t’.j
\nIudgg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA1JQ\u00a71\u00ab:. DATED THIS THE 141m DAY OF ” BEFORE _ ” ” THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE WRIT PETITION NOS. 39058~1() 6() F.j\u00e9OO\u00a7 (\u00a7;.M:PP)n BETWEEN Aged About 56 Years _ 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1398,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"},"wordCount":1398,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010","name":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-08-13T09:02:14+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-lakshmi-janardhana-swamy-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-14-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Swamy vs The State Of Karnataka on 14 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9392"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9392\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}