{"id":94048,"date":"2008-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008"},"modified":"2015-11-20T06:16:35","modified_gmt":"2015-11-20T00:46:35","slug":"s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
 \n\nAGED ABOUT 47 YEARS\nPEON    \ns L N COLLEGE 05 ARTS & COMMERCE *  \nFORT BANGALORE-560002   L E\n\n[By M,\/s. ASHQK HARANAHALLE A\u20ac\u00a5$CrQIATES;'- ADkiOC.'ATES.]\"'  \n\nAND\n\n1 JOINT DIRECTOR or= C0t;L.E'I5IATE;ED\"UCATTIQN\nOFFICE or THE COMMISSIONER-OF'CQLLBEIATE\nEDUCATION      \nPALACE ROAD     \nBANGALORE--56--Q0(:2 '.    \n\n2 THE COMMIESIGETER EG'R.TCT.\u00a7'Li\u00a7EGIATET EDUCATION\nPALACE   \nBANGALiDRE--56'G\ufb02;Q3_ E 'L\n\n3 THE STATE' .VO'FEKARN#J'ATKA._  \"\nREP BY ITS PRINVCIPALESECRETARY\nDEPT.GFv EDUCATION \"\n\n . MULTI~?*.sTQRIED BUILEIPJG\nL T rm AEQBEDKART VEEDHI\n'V.BAN'GAL0._RE--'\u00a7T;6@O01\n\"  [B'&'--\u00absE.1 B. MANOHAR, AGA FOR R3]\n\n 'THISEWRITT. P\u00e9nnou IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 225 AND\n* '223'?'''f_)F\u00bb THE cor:s'rrru11o:~a or INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE\n\nIMPU\u20ac5NEE')E*-..ORDERS DT. 13.10.2007 AND 31.10.2007 VIDE\n\n.ANNEX.A;.._AND A1 AND DECLARE THAT RULE 15(1)(f) OF THE\n \"~i(ARNATI-'LKA EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (COLLEGIATE\n EDU'L\"ATI\u20ac3N) RULES, 2003 AS ULTRA VIRES AND\n\njTjlJ.NC0_NSTI'FU1'I0NAL; DIRECT THE RESFONDENTS TO RELEASE\n\n  'SALARY GRANT' PAYABLE TO THE PETITIONERS; GRANT\n\nVSTAY THE OPERATION OF THE ORDERS ET. 13.10.2007' AND\n\n31.101200? VIDE ANNEXA. MD A]. AND CONSEQUENTLY TO\nDIRECT THE RESPONDEHTS TO RELEASE THE SALARY GRANT\n\nL..:.FE!:'fTI\u20ac)NERLS'L 'T\n\n\n\nTO THE PETITIONERS AND ISSUE SUCH OTHER %oRoEesiioei \nomecnon AS oeemeo rrr IN THE CIRCU.M;_STAi'~lCE'S--.e'.C>F\"TlfiE  i\n\nCASE; AND ETC. \n\nIn this petition arguments being neerd, reserved \n\norders, coming on for pronouncemeiit\ufb02tiis clay,' the Coulrjtpme\ufb01e\nthe following:      _\n\nThe challenge in this petitionllsl  orders\ndated 13\"' October, zaosranoslrsejtoceoer,zoos (Annexure-A\nand A1  of salary grant. The\npetitioners have l\u00e9lsolsgol\ufb01liti ai%e\u00a7elaratiohVi that Rule 15(1)(f) of\nthe Karnatakaiz'--EtlecotioVrle'li:V~Institlitions (Collegiate Education)\nRules, 2003'. _(hereina_ti:e.r'.*-- oolletilll i(.\u00a3.I.(C.E) Rules, 2083 be\n\nciec;'l'e\"re\u20ac.l neon stitutiormi \"\nX2.'   Tl'_:e..il:3'rief  of the case are that the first petitioner\n\n:i':\"is___a_reeiste'red  Trust, which runs the second petitioner\n\n4' .\u00a2'ol'lege.  joetihtiloners No.3 to 16 are the members of the\n\n teeo_hin_'gxe'nd._Anon-teaching staff of the second petitioner College.\n\n   oetitloner College was receiving the salary grant.\n\n ~ University Grants Commission of India established\n\nNetional Assessment and Accreditation Council ['N.A.A.C.' for\n\nRBI-1\n\n\n\nshort] to assess and accredit institutions of hiqher.Vsoocati_oo\"    \n\nthe Country. The grading system was as ff'o|to'ws:.V \n\nThe Grading System\n\nGrade Iostita\ufb01onalt\ufb01wsk\u00e9 : V;\n  (uppertifmifoexclusive) \n\nA++  ' , - *  tt'sV\u00a7)5\u00a5:oooV:'  V\nA*  o V9Q@95V'..~,.:\".\n\nA    =\n\n4. ThuAs,.__t\"t1e accr\u00e9&jit;o'd..:imi-ititutions were graded on a\nnine-point scaisf V'Enstitti'tio:ns, which did not obtain 55%\n\nscore '9ver.s'tfouE\u00e9'ci riot'_.quam'isd for accreditation.\n\n5;_ s*ctcowi:t3\u00a7It\"ofre\u00a7\u00a7;from 1* Apra, 2oo7, N.A.A.C. introduced\n\n metho\ufb01otogy  assessment and accreditation. What can be\n\n ~ab__out\"\"tshe new methodology is the introduction of\n\n gtade point average. It is as fouows:\n\n* , : ''Cg(r\u00a7uIative\n\nb 3.0.: - -4.00 A (Accredited) accomplishment as cxpected of\n\nLetter Performance\nGrade Descriptor\n\nVery Good\n\nInterpretation of Desciiptor\n\nfiigh level of academic\n\nan institution\n\n33+!\n\n\n\niastitaiien '\n\nSatisfactory\nan -institution'\n\n.  er'    \nU\"5at'5m\u00b0t\u00b0'V   tho\n5 1-50 '3' 4\"\"\"' mfn!mum\"'!eve! expactee of an\n\n6. As is evident from14'the'ai3ove  tebie, the\ninstitutions which were  \".i%te?e'j?ii>t found \ufb01t T0?'\n\naccreditation. _ 'V    _  \n7. Government i_(arn'a.ta!<'a,.__in exercise of its powers\n\nconferred by  Karnataka Education Act,\n1933 ['the said ms irarfianded K.E.I.(C.E) Rules, 2oo3,f\nDeaiieg withitvhe generaiiiggririitions of grant-in-aid, Rule 9 of\n\n _F\u00a7ui.:e_*.-r,  states that seeking of grant-in-aid is\n\n';a5pejecti"' tot-ci'ue' i\ufb01iifiiiiniient of the infrastructure, etc, as per\n\nvjfapipvendix II' \ufb01g".\/(:i;.h.vE".V'KeE.L(C.E.:) Ruies, 2003 or production of\n\n  "B'_Grade status accreditation certi\ufb01cate. Further, Rule\n\n,\/  K.E.I.(C.E) Rules, 2003 gives the power to the\n\nxi"'rjfvstatef\u00e9overnment to withhold, withdraw or reduce the annual\n\nHRH.\n\nT Level of __ *  T'? "V  A ~\n2 01 _ 3 00 B Good accompfishment  the  K \n' ' (Accredited) minimum fave! ex.o'e::'te_d area  '\n\nMinimum   \n1.<\/pre>\n
51 — 2.90 C.’ (Agcredfted) accompiisbtrrent  woof ‘<\/p>\n
grants if the institutions fail to provide infrestructur”e.:i’fe\u00e9’ititVi’es ht  <\/p>\n
speci\ufb01ed In Appendix II to the said Ruleseor tat! f1’te’tsp.fo’dut\u00e9VIiiheah<\/p>\n
minimum ‘B’ Grade certi\ufb01cate issue\u00e9V_b;r_V..N..tt.A.’C. V 1.)(f) vh<\/p>\n
of the K.E.I.(C .E.) Rula, 2003_states the  efisaiary
\ngrant is subject to every colle9e…\u00e9ibta\u00a7_ni;:;\u00bbg:vt’.’\u00a5\u00a3s’.’L\u00a32tf’ed\u00bbe certi\ufb01cate :3?
\nassessment and accreditation  the peried<\/p>\n
speci\ufb01ed by the   _     <\/p>\n
8. In Wfit –\u00a5;e’tttieh\u00a7s”\u00abM6t.3’tvS?\u00a7\u00a7’8?”hf 1997, this Ceurt by
\nits interim or<v\u00a31'e;:","  .2004 directed the State
\nGetremment ts s'p*ei\u00a2\u00a7fy wtthin which the private
\nedee:et\u00a79na.\u00a7':_j';\u00a5nstttvt\u00a7oh's',""cteiming or receiving grants, should<\/p>\n
prcdttce.138'-V.TGtede\u00abttie–rt\u00a7\ufb01cete; the Government was further<\/p>\n
:{"di__\u00a7e\u00a2ted"te""'exe?r\u00a7V\u00a7ne.'e1'end pass appropriate orders regarding<\/p>\n
_  withthewing or reducing the grant to such of the<\/p>\n
 I*n_stitt:ti'ons;'\u00ab–.whe fail to ccmpty with the requirements of Rule<\/p>\n
nthe K.E,I.(C.E.} Rules, 2003. Pursuant to the said<\/p>\n
'VVVsfL'inte'\ufb01:'nVV'erder, the State Gevernment issued the Netifieetien,<\/p>\n
hhdeted 16"' June, 2004 requiring the coiieges situated in urban<\/p>\n
areas to obtain 'a' Grade certi\ufb01cate from &A!A\u00a2\ufb0159 en or befere<\/p>\n
R834.\n<\/p>\n
30″‘ Aprii, 2005. Theree\ufb01er a show cause netice,__’\u00a72_eteciA_.:’i\u00ab;8′”T’ <\/p>\n
August, 2006 was issued canine open <\/p>\n
Cellege end some other Celiegee toehow tteoee asTte_.$oi1y <\/p>\n
eatery grant some net be withorexo’r:e\u00bb.:VV:ee perV”Rr_ute:.V-1.?tnIetVVVthe
\nKrE.I.(C,,E,) Rules, 2oo3′ ‘fee eetneo%%fmatqoeer rconee
\nsubmitted its repiy on 6″‘  vAA–‘.i’V_~g[1fs~ereafter the
\nGovernment vide its    (Annexurew
\nA) ordered the  obtains ‘B’ Grade
\ncerti\ufb01cate or  is earlier. This is in
\nrespect of ee\\tierei–  the second petitioner
\nCollege. E-!oAwexrer, ‘th_e Govererrient reconsidered the issue end<\/p>\n
greeted. oo”e.’\u00a7re.er’s”t–ti’rne’foreoteinlng ‘E’ Grade certi\ufb01cate. This<\/p>\n
. mod\u00e9\ufb01’ceter.'{er\u00a2ier e\u00e9eevipassed on 30″‘ Gctober, 2006 (Annexure<\/p>\n
t  ..  Srieishok Herenahelli, the tearned counsel appearing<\/p>\n
  tee petititonere urged the feliowieg contentions:<\/p>\n
  The very grading system by N.A.A.C. has undergone
\nu a change. ‘B’ Grade in the otd regime does not<\/p>\n
correspond itself to any grade in the new system.<\/p>\n
HRH.\n<\/p>\n
(19)<\/span><\/p>\n
(c)<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
As the secend petitioner Coiiege the
\ninfrastructural facilities, as per Ai:4i;ren’dix’:e_IE—-h: <\/p>\n
said Rules, the insistence for the’product’iee:4_Vef  .<\/p>\n
Grade certi\ufb01cate is not  iii:.:ie:’;9 and
\n12(1)(1) of the  ahe of the
\ntwo conditions be_me_tV._  Eeeiiegf\ufb01-rnent is not
\njustified iii iiieeistiriiigi’  with both the<\/p>\n
conditid.ri5..::_””‘..V _    ‘
\nSri_,.e.Asi1’oi:e_’H’e;renah’e.l_ii’ ‘aieoVV_.\u00bbtompiains af hostiie<\/p>\n
ds\u00a7c.nmina\u00a3idr-i;;riii[jiHerifsubinwsts that there are 349<\/p>\n
Goverrmient teiieijeeii\ufb01e\u00e9tiie State. out ef these, 257<\/p>\n
Qielivleges h\u00e9veiiet even appiiw for accreditation from<\/p>\n
  92 Colleges have obtained<\/p>\n
 . “.ecr:i*ei\u00a7_ivtetii~\u00a7)’:i'”by N.A.A.C. Out ef them, 45 coueges<\/p>\n
“‘have:A.been given ‘C’ Grade. In support of these<\/p>\n
 * ieeeubrhiseions, the petitioners have produced the<\/p>\n
   ‘”e>:(tract from N.A.A.C. manuei at Annexure-J.<\/p>\n
In View of the change In the rnethedoiogy of grading,<\/p>\n
the State Government itself vide its letter, dated 21”
\n68!!<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
only in compliance with the directions issued by this    it  .,  <\/p>\n
order, dated 27%\u00bb: March, 2004 in writ peijietsons’i%i\u00a2t\ufb0231is:\u00bb$5;.g7V _t\u00a7f%A\ufb01%”rt<\/p>\n
1997. He submitted that the Governmentis dutyfiooviznd  <\/p>\n
ensure that the aided institutionsiivifeeinteine’
\ninfrastructure and further kee\u00a7”‘~upgred.i’nij\u00ab._Vttiv\u00e9ir infrvaustrvucture.
\nNo aided institution has anyv\ufb02eyestegjiebi’i;oii.,’r:Jemand the
\ncontinuation of grant’+ir:f;ia:td  a_ If the
\nGovernment forrnsigftstitution has vioiated
\nany condition   breach of statutory
\nprovision, it is etvgiays “th:e”4t5overnment to withdraw the<\/p>\n
grant. A . L  .\n<\/p>\n
“’13,.  ;>_t!ianioharV’fu\ufb01–he’r eubmits that there is no privity<\/p>\n
of coiitraz:_’Vt..\u00a7E-overnment and the petitioners No.3 to<\/p>\n
 Therefore itiannot maintain this petition. It is his<\/p>\n
…ernp4het’ic sebrniesivon that by invoking Rule 1S(1)(f) of the<\/p>\n
  2003, the Government can always stop the<\/p>\n
A V  <\/p>\n
 The submissions of the learned counsei have<\/p>\n
 my anxious consideration. The legal submissions of Sri<\/p>\n
FEE!-I.\n<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
16. Further, this Court in writ petitions i’io.315i’?’\u20ac;’-\u00a73′;’::.’..joVf _<\/p>\n
1997 has already taken the View that the consequenee’~of’A~~non–it”  <\/p>\n
production of ‘B’ Grade certi\ufb01cate inciiidefs to’<\/p>\n
withdrawal or reduction of grants _oay_ab|e”‘to”‘the  .<\/p>\n
Judicial discipline requires that the  stated” ther’ein:’fhas to
\nbe foilowed. If the petitionersejrgy  thewsaid writ
\npetitions, it is always open to  to   of the same
\nby impieading  th:eyse_id\ufb01 chaiienging it<\/p>\n
before the Division ea;-ma V  4. A ”\n<\/p>\n
17. Thevreia a\ufb01other.yreason”‘as’Vto why I am negating<\/p>\n
the challenge some vaiioitty1d5(1)(n of the said Ruies.
\nAdmittediy, none VVof.VtheVVoetit\u00a7.one’rs have filed any objections to
\nthe.\u00ab-‘Dra_ft  said “R’uies..\u00abFor all the aforesaid reasons, I<\/p>\n
negaitiyertheictiailenoe’ to the validity of Rule 15(1)(f) of the said<\/p>\n
?:”R._t_iies.\n<\/p>\n
 yTh.av…A:other contentions raised on behalf of the<\/p>\n
;oetitionei’s,_n\u00a7erit serious consideration. I notice with concern<\/p>\n
  349 Government Coiieges, 257 Colleges did not even<\/p>\n
.qi’\u00bbaVpp-iyifor accreditation from N.A.A.C. The Government’s counter<\/p>\n
HRH<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
is silent on this aspect of the matter. Further out of**9–:\u00a7\u00a7fCo’i*ieg\u00abes ”  <\/p>\n
which have obtained the accreditation, 45 <\/p>\n
given ‘C’ Grade. when these are.\u00bbthe admitted  .<\/p>\n
considerable force in the submissionsv’vl’ot”:’Sri _i-\u00ab’!:araf:rIahaill
\nthat there cannot be double stantiarc\u00a5V: in; of utilisation
\nof State funds in the \ufb01eld of eduicaitioni  been done<\/p>\n
amounts to violation_d_i’  to”tVh_e_”Censtit*ution of India.\n<\/p>\n
19. Rule 1(3) Qf’VtF;E:”~KfE-|:V$:’J.(C’L$3) Rules, 2003 states that<\/p>\n
the said Rules”the.V\u00a73~overnreeVnt, local authority and
\nprivate aided ai’\ufb01’liatedv  ‘Government Colleges and
\nprivate aided’insttitutionstihavelt diitfferent status, does not mean
\nthait-‘theA_Ge${ern\u00bbti}ent sheuld…not be concerned with the quality of<\/p>\n
education.V”in._i’ts’~r(t’:-ttiivemment) colleges and upgradation of<\/p>\n
Zidinfrastructurei th’e%ein’;’vVbut at the same time insist for the<\/p>\n
_  ofilthightiicla\u00e9ss infrastructure in private aided institutions.<\/p>\n
_ .j2’heV””transitlonal problem is aiso required to be<\/p>\n
 i\\i.A.A.C. has switched over from the nine point scale<\/p>\n
(.l:ii:?’\u00b0’*”””i (ii) A”: (iii) A, (iv) 3″, (V) 8*. (vi) rs, (vii) C”, (vim<\/p>\n
 (ix) C to the new cumulative grade point average system<\/p>\n
\ufb01Bl1<\/p>\n
18<\/span><\/p>\n
of (3) A, (ii) 3, (iii) c and (iv), the equisgaience df”the’_’;v:>id: “re? 4  V<\/p>\n
Grade is yet to be worked out. The rigcrst-of r$ne’*i.1′<\/p>\n
methodology to the other methodeiogy are to  vh<\/p>\n
N.A.A.C. itself has ciarified that ‘Cf_tmC-rad_e  **reeerg;|f;ed as
\naccredited. This is evident  the relevant<\/p>\n
portions of which are extracted:ri’i’ereiijebe\u00a7,\u00a7;   it ” it\n<\/p>\n
21. Nobody can  the st’ete’rnent~ of Sri Meneher<\/p>\n
that the  the grant, if the
\ninstitution vleietes   or contravenes any
\nprovisions cf stetn:t’e.V Bi.;i:’.VA$bi’hiie:.:_}e:r’e’rcising its power, the State
\nGovernment jhaspto into accoiint an the reievant factors. No<\/p>\n
expvianetightfg fhirthicomingivvttasivto why insistence for obtaining of<\/p>\n
 ‘B’  not being made in respect of 257<\/p>\n
 v<:3o\\rernmen–t__V It cannot be the case of the Government<\/p>\n
" 'th–et"\u00ab\u00abth'e qualityvcef education in Government Coiieges can be low<\/p>\n
"\u00abthe'que–iity of education has got to be high in aided<\/p>\n
 in'r;titet_i_er*is. The impugned orders were passed one year three<\/p>\n
 prior to the ciarificatory communication issued by<\/p>\n
sN'."A.A.C. at Annexure-L. In the wake of this subsequent<\/p>\n
3:354.\n<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
development, the petitioners’ cases certainly’    <\/p>\n
reconsidered.\n<\/p>\n
22. In the result, I a\ufb02ow this_petitian’*i_n’part  V.<\/p>\n
the impugned Government orders (An’ne:t:urefA erid’A_}\u00a7:(–) infise far
\nas they pertain to the second  the
\npetitiener No.2 has faiiedto  fairness
\ndemands that the   the second
\npetitioner coI!ege’s\u20ac.eVesv\u00a7  eppropriate orders’
\nThis Court,  March, 2004 in writ
\npetitions No.31zS7\u00a7-37′  said the same, which is
\nas fotiows:  V ‘ A V’ <\/p>\n
 ” _ V”s”l}p\u00e9;-n faHt_::e ovfw\u00e9ny one of the institutions to<\/p>\n
V’cdn:;i(yV  an requimments of Rule 15(2)(r), me
\n Gdven2mentV”shaif;;’examine and pass appropriate orders
\nV  mgardfng vwitht\u00e9dciding, withdrawal or reduction of grants
\n ._’t:r such institutions.”\n<\/p>\n
   nonwebtaining ef ‘B’ Grade certi\ufb01cate can net<\/p>\n
  the mechanica! withdrawat of aid. The Gevernment has<\/p>\n
-.__ “:t:\u00a7’ett\u00e9mine how much time has to be given for obtaining the<\/p>\n
REM.\n<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
necessary Grade certi\ufb01cate from N.A.A.C. Ithas to.a–isoffcon.siderf  ”  f <\/p>\n
the position prevaiiing in other colleges.<\/p>\n
23. It is made clear that thewquashind-_of <\/p>\n
Government orders should not’:’rn_al<e.'rthe'.noetitionersf '!\\i'o.:i"v:and 2
\ncomplacent in the matter of fcreatifnqifthe:'.:_:ivi1ifrastructure, nor
\nshould the petitioners an-cl   are entitled
\nto grant, whether?  necessary Grade
\ncerti\ufb01cate. It is    fff\u00e9overnment to satisfv itself
\nthat the petitioners' Vi-grovide the infrastructural
\nfacilities speci\ufb01edKiri~aAVppenoi\u00a7;–or:=of the K.E-.I.(C.E-.) Rules, 2oo3,
\nanclj' it \u00abis tivi':ei'i~rig.ht and ifoertens duty too of the Government to<\/p>\n
insist7et_hetT_th.e"–v.n'ecessary Grade certi\ufb01cate from N.A.A.C. be<\/p>\n
:i:ol1tavined..r,_."i"liev_i5o\u00e9iernment shall also take into consideration<\/p>\n
_ _iillih$tl:i&'r there  any relaxation in the matter of ful\ufb01llment of<\/p>\n
 i'n'fra_structureA extended to other institutions. The Government<\/p>\n
  \u00abZ:'"eha_l_l"'ens"ure uniformity while continuing the grant-in-aid. It is<\/p>\n
V'Vf}'e–is9""ooen to the Government to specify the period within which<\/p>\n
 petitioners No.1 and 2 shall remove the de\ufb01ciencies and<\/p>\n
create the requisite infrastructural facilities.<\/p>\n
\u00a33}!<\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
24\u00bb. The Government is directed to: (i) _e’5ce’rteih::t\u00abh_e ”  <\/p>\n
minimum grade In the new methodology of\ufb01ndieng the4Ain’sti’totitoh=.;eh<\/p>\n
fit for accreditation by N.A.A.C.; and (4.i_i) re\u00e9:o._ns:der:theAj vta_Vse_Tlofv%<\/p>\n
the second petitioner Co\ufb02ege keepingvjhhhyvf\/Eetfv t’h’e..t:_a:vses:vVf\u00a7of the
\nsimitariy placed institutions.   A    > A H<\/p>\n
25. The Government  N.AA.C. to
\nho!d special inspectitotilhe\u00a7tdhe tse\u00a2ono  couege for the
\npurpose of finding   be awarded the
\ngrade for bei   \u00ab  \u00a7 v  <\/p>\n
26. On Ahreconsidehdheo’\u00bbtti’erV””eecond \ufb01etitionefe case as
\ndeteiied he;\u00a7eit1e.E3o\\re, atttagts open to the Government to<\/p>\n
pas::._Vfteeh’horde?3:.-ittsqrawinhowthe orent–in-aid.
\n‘Z1’Until\u00ab..;su’\u00a3:h_”time that the Government pass% the<\/p>\n
:\ufb01fres.h ordesfon vre\ufb02\u00e9gzslideration of the second petitioner’s case,<\/p>\n
~ Ghovernmentshaii keeo reieasing the saiary grant, etc. to the<\/p>\n
 f,.’\u00a2ftitioeersj3’;3d further to reiease the arrears of salary grants,<\/p>\n
 2″‘ November, 2007, within an outer fimit of three<\/p>\n
V” . _ ‘V  eh  from today.\n<\/p>\n
AQBK<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS PEON s L N COLLEGE 05 ARTS & COMMERCE * FORT BANGALORE-560002 L E [By M,\/s. ASHQK HARANAHALLE A\u20ac\u00a5$CrQIATES;’- ADkiOC.’ATES.]”‘ AND 1 JOINT DIRECTOR or= C0t;L.E’I5IATE;ED”UCATTIQN OFFICE or THE COMMISSIONER-OF’CQLLBEIATE EDUCATION […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94048","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nS L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1857,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\",\"name\":\"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008"},"wordCount":1857,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008","name":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate ... on 17 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-20T00:46:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-l-n-charities-vs-joint-director-of-collegiate-on-17-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S L N Charities vs Joint Director Of Collegiate … on 17 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94048","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94048"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94048\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94048"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94048"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94048"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}