{"id":94059,"date":"1996-02-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1996-02-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996"},"modified":"2018-03-30T09:44:40","modified_gmt":"2018-03-30T04:14:40","slug":"papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","title":{"rendered":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_citations\">Equivalent citations: AIR 1996 Kant 256, ILR 1996 KAR 1271, 1996 (2) KarLJ 74<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: P K Moorthy<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p> 1. I heard the learned counsel for the respondent also.\n<\/p>\n<p> 2.   This is a defendant&#8217;s revision against the order of the trial Court granting police protection to the plaintiff to enforce the order of temporary injunction passed by the trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p> 3. The suit was filed for a permanent injunction and along with the suit, plaintiff also filed an application for temporary injunction, which after contest, was granted by the trial Court on 3-7-1992. The defendant filed M.A. No. 95\/92 against the above order. It was also dismissed on 20-11-1993.\n<\/p>\n<p> 4. Thereafter, alleging that the defendant is taking law into his own hands and attempting to interfere with the possession of the plaintiff to the property, plaintiff lodged a complaint before the concerned police. But, the police failed to take any action against them and it is alleged that the defendant may dispossess the plaintiff at any time from the suit property. Accordingly, he filed an application under S. 151, C.P.C. for an order from the Court directing the police to give protection to the plaintiff.\n<\/p>\n<p> 5. The defendant filed objections, contending that the police help cannot be ordered to implement the orders of injunction and if there is any violation, the proper remedy of the plaintiff is to move the Court under O. 39, R. 2A and Court has no jurisdiction to order police protection. The defendant&#8217;s objection was overruled and the trial Court passed an order directing the P.S.I. Anekal to assist the plaintiff in implementing and enforcing the orders passed by that Court on I.A.I. application for temporary injunction. The defendant has challenged the same.\n<\/p>\n<p> 6. The counsel for the revision-petitioner contended that though there is an order of temporary injunction against him, in fact, he is in possession of the same and even if there is any violation of order of temporary injunction, the proper remedy of the plaintiff is to move the Court under Order 39, Rule 2A and that the Court has no jurisdiction to order police protection in such circumstances. I am not inclined to accept both the contentions.\n<\/p>\n<p> 7. It is to be noted that the order of<br \/>\ntemporary injunction was confirmed by, the<br \/>\ntrial Court after hearing the defendant and<br \/>\nconsidering his objections by its order dated<br \/>\n3-7-1992. Defendant, dissatisfied with the<br \/>\nabove order, filed an appeal before the Addl.\n<\/p>\n<p>Civil Judge, which was also dismissed on 20-\n<\/p>\n<p>11-1993 on a consideration of the entire<br \/>\nmatter. It does not lie in the mouth of the<br \/>\ndefendant to contend that he is still in<br \/>\npossession of the property and that the order<br \/>\nof injunction cannot be given effect to. When<br \/>\nthe Court has prima facie considered the<br \/>\nmatter and has granted a temporary injunction in favour of the plaintiff after hearing the<br \/>\ndefendant, the Court has to enforce the same<br \/>\nand the contention of the defendant that he is<br \/>\nin possession, cannot be accepted at this<br \/>\nstage.\n<\/p>\n<p> 8.   The second ground    raised by the counsel for the revision-petitioner is also equally untenable. The mere fact that there is provision under Order 39, Rule 2 A for taking action for disobedience    of an order of temporary injunction, does not prevent the Court from taking steps to see that its orders are implemented. If the Court had no power to implement its own orders, then there is no purpose  in  the  Courts  passing  orders in matters coming before them. The remedy under. Order 39, Rule 2A is not exhaustive and Court can pass appropriate orders to see that its orders are enforced. In necessary cases, even the police can be directed to enforce the orders of the Court. In this case that alone has been done by the trial Court and I do not find any error of jurisdiction warranting interference under Section 115 of C.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p> 9. Accordingly, I dismiss the civil revision petition, the trial Court may expedite the disposal of the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p> 10. Petition dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 Equivalent citations: AIR 1996 Kant 256, ILR 1996 KAR 1271, 1996 (2) KarLJ 74 Bench: P K Moorthy ORDER 1. I heard the learned counsel for the respondent also. 2. This is a defendant&#8217;s revision against the order of the trial Court granting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996\",\"datePublished\":\"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\"},\"wordCount\":678,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\",\"name\":\"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996","datePublished":"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996"},"wordCount":678,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996","name":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1996-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-30T04:14:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/papanna-vs-nagachari-and-others-on-20-february-1996#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Papanna vs Nagachari And Others on 20 February, 1996"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94059\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}