{"id":94394,"date":"2008-11-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-12T09:53:09","modified_gmt":"2018-10-12T04:23:09","slug":"tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                          W.P. (C) No. 332 of 2008\n            Tulsidas Patel &amp; others     ...      ...                    Petitioners\n                                 Versus\n            Md. Shafique &amp; Another... ...        ...               Respondents\n                                ------\n            CORAM:         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. Y. EQBAL\n                                ------\n            For the Petitioner:        M\/s. V.Shivnath,A.N.Gupta, S.Topno\n            For the Respondents:       Mr. Rajesh Kumar,M.K.Sinha ,D.kr.\n                                ------\n      Reserved on: 12.11.2008          Pronounced on: 20th November, 2008\n\nM. Y. Eqbal, J.    In the instant application filed under Article 227 of the\n\n            Constitution of India the sole question that falls for consideration is\n            as to whether the executing Court was justified in rejecting the\n            objection filed by the petitioner-judgment debtor under Section 47\n            of the Code of Civil Procedure holding that execution case is not\n            barred by limitation.\n            2.     The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff-respondent filed\n\n            Title (Eviction) Suit No.58\/85 and obtained ex parte decree on\n            5.12.1987<\/pre>\n<p>. The contesting defendant after having come to know<br \/>\n            about the ex parte decree filed application under Order IX, Rule 13<br \/>\n            Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for setting aside ex parte decree<br \/>\n            which was registered as Misc.Case No.6\/88. During the pendency<br \/>\n            of the miscellaneous case, since there was no stay of the execution<br \/>\n            of the decree, respondent-decree holder filed Execution Case<br \/>\n            No.10\/89 for obtaining delivery of possession. Since the decree<br \/>\n            holder did not take any step in the said execution proceeding, the<br \/>\n            same was dismissed on 26.9.1991 for default. The decree holder<br \/>\n            however, did not take any step for restoration of aforementioned<br \/>\n            Execution Case No.10\/89. After the expiry of 12 years from the date<br \/>\n            of decree and also from the date of dismissal of the earlier<br \/>\n            execution case filed a fresh execution case in January,2005 which<br \/>\n            was registered as Execution Case No.2\/2005. In the meantime the<br \/>\n            judgment debtor died and on service of notice to the heirs of the<br \/>\n            judgment debtors namely, petitioners, they appeared and filed<br \/>\n            objection under Section 47 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for<br \/>\n            dismissal of the execution case as it is barred by limitation. The<br \/>\n            respondent-decree holder filed rejoinder stating, inter alia, that<br \/>\n            after the miscellaneous case for setting aside ex parte decree was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             2                        W.P. (C) No.332 of 2008<\/span><\/p>\n<p>rejected, a fresh execution case was filed, which is not barred by<br \/>\nlimitation. Learned Munsif ,after hearing the parties, rejected the<br \/>\nobjection filed by the petitioner-judgment debtor under Section 47<br \/>\nof the Act and held that the execution case is not barred by<br \/>\nlimitation.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.     I have heard Mr. V. Shivnath, learned senior counsel<\/p>\n<p>appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned<br \/>\ncounsel appearing for the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.     Mr. V. Shivnath, in course of argument, relied upon the<br \/>\ndecision of this Court in the case of <a href=\"\/doc\/118869\/\">Bharat Ram Mahato and others<br \/>\nvs. Ramesh Chandra Sharma and others<\/a> (2007)1 JLJR 245, where<br \/>\nthe decisions of the Supreme Court have been followed. Mr. Rajesh<br \/>\nKumar, on the other hand, submitted that since the miscellaneous<br \/>\ncase filed under Order IX Rule 13 was pending, the decree holder<br \/>\ndid not proceed with the earlier execution case which resulted in<br \/>\ndismissal for default. According to the learned counsel after the<br \/>\nmiscellaneous case for setting aside ex parte decree was finally<br \/>\nrejected, the fresh execution case was filed, which is not barred by<br \/>\nlimitation. I am unable to accept the submission made by Mr.<br \/>\nRajesh Kumar. In the case of Bharat Ram Mahato (supra) a Bench<br \/>\nof this Court, after following the principles laid down by Supreme<br \/>\nCourt in the case of <a href=\"\/doc\/272195\/\">W.B. Essential Commodities Supply<br \/>\nCorporation vs. Swadesh Agro Farming and Storage Pvt. Ltd. and<\/a><br \/>\nanother (1998)8 SCC 315 and held :\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;As noticed above, in the instant case, judgment and decree<br \/>\n              passed by the trial Court on 11.3.1977 was finally<br \/>\n              confirmed by the High Court on 3.4.1989 in Second Appeal<br \/>\n              no.245 of 1979. The original decree holder filed Execution<br \/>\n              Case being Execution Case No.23 of 1993 within 12 years<br \/>\n              from the date of the decree. The said execution case was<br \/>\n              ultimately dismissed for non-prosecution on 22.9.2000.<br \/>\n              Thereafter, the legal representatives of the decree holder<br \/>\n              filed a fresh execution petition on 17.4.2003, which was<br \/>\n              registered as Execution Case No. 5 of 2003. Admittedly,<br \/>\n              the second Execution Case No. 5 of 2003 filed by the legal<br \/>\n              representatives of the decree holder was beyond the period<br \/>\n              of 12 years from 3.4.1989 when the judgment and decree<br \/>\n              attained its finality. After the Execution Case was<br \/>\n              dismissed for non- prosecution, the remedy available to the<br \/>\n              decree holder or his representatives was to file an<br \/>\n              application for restoration of the Execution Case as<br \/>\n              provided under Order 21, Rule 106 of the Code of Civil<br \/>\n              Procedure. The period of limitation for filing an application<br \/>\n              for restoration of Execution Case is 30 days from the date<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3                        W.P. (C) No.332 of 2008<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                         when the Execution Case is dismissed for default.<br \/>\n                         Admittedly the second Execution Case was filed beyond the<br \/>\n                         period of 12 years from the date of the decree and no<br \/>\n                         application for restoration of the earlier execution case was<br \/>\n                         filed within 30 days from the date of dismissal as<br \/>\n                         contemplated under Rule 106 of Order 21 of the Code of<br \/>\n                         Civil Procedure.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           5.            In the instant case, as noticed above, the respondent-<br \/>\n           decree holder obtained an ex parte decree of eviction in 1987 and<br \/>\n           Execution Case No.10 of 1989 was levied, which was eventually<br \/>\n           dismissed on 26.9.1991 for non-prosecution.          Neither the decree<br \/>\n           holder filed restoration application for restoration of earlier<br \/>\n           Execution Case No.10 of 1989 nor even filed fresh execution,<br \/>\n           although not maintainable, within 12 years from the date of<br \/>\n           dismissal of the earlier execution case. In that view of the matter,<br \/>\n           fresh execution case filed by the Decree-Holder in 2005 was not at<br \/>\n           all maintainable as the same was barred by limitation. Learned<br \/>\n           Munsif , therefore, rightly passed the impugned order, which needs<br \/>\n           no interference at all by this Court.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>           6.            For the reasons aforesaid, this writ application is<br \/>\n           dismissed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>                                                                    (M. Y. Eqbal, J)<br \/>\nRaman\/ A.F.R.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 332 of 2008 Tulsidas Patel &amp; others &#8230; &#8230; Petitioners Versus Md. Shafique &amp; Another&#8230; &#8230; &#8230; Respondents &#8212;&#8212; CORAM: THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE M. Y. EQBAL &#8212;&#8212; For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-94394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":823,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008"},"wordCount":823,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008","name":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-12T04:23:09+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/tulsidas-patel-ors-vs-md-shafique-anr-on-20-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Tulsidas Patel &amp; Ors. vs Md.Shafique &amp; Anr. on 20 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=94394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/94394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=94394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=94394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=94394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}