{"id":9485,"date":"2010-12-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010"},"modified":"2016-04-19T00:44:50","modified_gmt":"2016-04-18T19:14:50","slug":"k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 26677 of 2008(A)\n\n\n1. K.GOPALAKRISHNAN,S\/O.CHINNAN NAIR\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT\n\n3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,\n\n4. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.RAMADAS\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON\n\n Dated :02\/12\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                      P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON J.\n                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                         W.P (C) No. 26677 Of 2008\n                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                 Dated, this the 2nd day of December, 2010\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>       The issue involved in this Writ Petition is, whether the property taken<\/p>\n<p>over by the Government as &#8216;bought in land&#8217; under Section 50 (2) of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, pursuant to the default made by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, is liable to be re-conveyed to him, admittedly when the liability to<\/p>\n<p>the revenue has been satisfied.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2. The sequence of events as narrated in the Writ Petition shows<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner, who was running a small scale industry, engaged in<\/p>\n<p>manufacturing and sale of wire cut bricks and hollow bricks, had availed a<\/p>\n<p>loan from the Kerala Financial Corporation, on the strength of the property<\/p>\n<p>concerned given as security. The petitioner, because of some unforeseen<\/p>\n<p>circumstances turned to be a defaulter, whereupon the KFC sought to<\/p>\n<p>attach the properties resorting to the remedy under the Kerala Revenue<\/p>\n<p>Recovery Act and the attachment was effected on 22.12.2000.             Later,<\/p>\n<p>observing that, there was some sales tax arrears to be cleared by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the property was sought to be proceeded against at the instance<\/p>\n<p>of the sales tax authorities and accordingly, the 4th respondent, invoking the<\/p>\n<p>provisions under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act proceeded against the<\/p>\n<p>properties of the petitioner in the year 2003. The liability in respect of the<\/p>\n<p>W.P. (C) No. 26677 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>assessment years 1991 &#8211; &#8217;92 to 1993 &#8211; &#8217;94, which was sought to be<\/p>\n<p>recovered from the petitioner was stated as ` 27,384\/-. The petitioner<\/p>\n<p>made an attempt to clear the liability by effecting some paltry payments,<\/p>\n<p>such as ` 2,000\/- on 09.02.2000 and ` 3,000\/- on 05.02.2001, as borne by<\/p>\n<p>Ext. P1 receipt. But, the repayments could not be effected thereafter,<\/p>\n<p>under which circumstances, the property having an extent of 6.500 cents<\/p>\n<p>was put to sale by way of public auction.    The steps taken in this regard<\/p>\n<p>turned to be futile, as there was no bidder to purchase the property, under<\/p>\n<p>which circumstance, the Government decided to bid the property, invoking<\/p>\n<p>the power and procedure as contemplated under Section 50 (2) of the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Revenue Recovery Act and accordingly, the property was bid by the<\/p>\n<p>Government for a notional amount of ` 1 as &#8216;bought in land&#8217;.      The said<\/p>\n<p>event was on 27.03.2003. Thereafter the sale was confirmed as per Ext.<\/p>\n<p>P3 proceedings dated 31.01.2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Nearly three years after the confirmation of the sale as aforesaid,<\/p>\n<p>the 4th respondent issued Ext. P4 communication dated 01.08.2007, giving<\/p>\n<p>an idea and impression to the petitioner that the property already taken<\/p>\n<p>over by the Government as &#8216;bought in land&#8217; could be re-conveyed to him, if<\/p>\n<p>the entire dues to the Government, as stated therein towards the principal<\/p>\n<p>amount, interest and cost was satisfied, however, making it clear that, an<\/p>\n<p>W.P. (C) No. 26677 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>application had to be submitted in this regard and that the authority to<\/p>\n<p>consider and pass appropriate orders was none other than the<\/p>\n<p>Government. Believing the words of the 4th respondent to be true, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner decided to clear the entire liability to the sales tax department,<\/p>\n<p>which was quantified in Ext. P4 as           ` 73,858\/ and accordingly, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner remitted a total sum of        ` 74,687\/-, due as on the date of<\/p>\n<p>clearance on 22.10.07, as borne by Ext. P5 receipt.         After satisfying the<\/p>\n<p>liability as above, the petitioner preferred Ext. P6 representation before the<\/p>\n<p>4th respondent for causing the property to be re-conveyed as assured in<\/p>\n<p>Ext. P4.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. It appears that the representation preferred by the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>admittedly forwarded by the 4th respondent for further steps to the higher<\/p>\n<p>authorities. Later, the petitioner was served with Ext. P8 communication<\/p>\n<p>dated 30.06.2008, informing that, though the petitioner had cleared the<\/p>\n<p>entire liability, the application preferred by the petitioner for re-conveyance<\/p>\n<p>could not be considered, as it was beyond the period of two years as<\/p>\n<p>stipulated in the existing rules\/guidelines. The petitioner has approached<\/p>\n<p>this Court challenging Ext. P3 confirmation of sale and Ext. P8<\/p>\n<p>communication turning down the request of the petitioner for causing the<\/p>\n<p>property to be re-conveyed.\n<\/p>\n<p>W.P. (C) No. 26677 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       5. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents as well.\n<\/p>\n<p>       6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the course and<\/p>\n<p>conduct pursued by the respondents is quite arbitrary and illegal. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was made to understand that the property would be re-conveyed<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner, once the entire liability to the State was cleared, which fact<\/p>\n<p>as stated in Ext. P4, is not disputed by filing any counter affidavit. It is also<\/p>\n<p>stated that the petitioner, based on the assurance given had cleared the<\/p>\n<p>remaining liability as well, which was to be paid to the Kerala Financial<\/p>\n<p>Corporation, who had attached the property much earlier in the year 2000,<\/p>\n<p>who in turn has issued Ext. P7 clearance certificate in this regard. This<\/p>\n<p>being the position, the stand taken by the respondents cannot, but be<\/p>\n<p>deprecated, which hence is liable to be intercepted by this Court, submits<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>       7. The learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondents<\/p>\n<p>submits that Ext. P8 communication has been issued, taking note of the<\/p>\n<p>contents of the guidelines issued by the Government in this regard,<\/p>\n<p>specifying a period &#8216;two years&#8217; so as to prefer an application, if at all any re-<\/p>\n<p>conveyance is desired.\n<\/p>\n<p>W.P. (C) No. 26677 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       8. The issue to be considered is whether any unlawful gain is<\/p>\n<p>intended to be extended to the Government, by virtue of the stipulation<\/p>\n<p>under Section 50 (2) of the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act or whether the<\/p>\n<p>said provision has been incorporated to protect the interest of revenue in<\/p>\n<p>respect of the &#8216;defaulted amount&#8217;. It is brought to the notice of this Court<\/p>\n<p>during the course of hearing that, the issue had been considered by a<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench of this Court earlier inn W.A. 1742 of 2009, observing that<\/p>\n<p>the property could be released to the owner\/defaulter in the manner<\/p>\n<p>specified therein. By virtue of the above binding precedent, this Court finds<\/p>\n<p>that the petitioner is also entitled to get similar relief.<\/p>\n<p>       9.  In the above circumstances, the impugned orders are set aside<\/p>\n<p>and the 3rd respondent \/ District Collector is directed to reconsider the<\/p>\n<p>application preferred by the petitioner in the light of the observations in the<\/p>\n<p>judgment dated 09.07.2010 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in<\/p>\n<p>W.A. 1742 of 2009 and pass appropriate orders, taking all consequential<\/p>\n<p>steps    to cause re-conveyance of the property to the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law.       This exercise shall be pursued and finalized, as<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within three months, from the date of<\/p>\n<p>receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of<\/p>\n<p>this judgment along with copy of the judgment in W.A. 1742 of 2009 before<\/p>\n<p>W.P. (C) No. 26677 of 2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the District Collector within two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of<\/p>\n<p>this judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The Writ Petition is disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>kmd<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 26677 of 2008(A) 1. K.GOPALAKRISHNAN,S\/O.CHINNAN NAIR &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA &#8230; Respondent 2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, 4. THE TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY For Petitioner :SRI.R.RAMADAS For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1143,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\",\"name\":\"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010"},"wordCount":1143,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010","name":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-18T19:14:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-gopalakrishnan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-2-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Gopalakrishnan vs State Of Kerala on 2 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9485\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}