{"id":95040,"date":"2011-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-01T08:16:07","modified_gmt":"2017-08-01T02:46:07","slug":"ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                   File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000982\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing     :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision:\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Smt.\u00a0Vimal\u00a0Issar,\n           H.NO.\u00a0D\u00ad8,\u00a0Defence\u00a0colony,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110024\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n\n\n           Prasar\u00a0Bharti,\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(A)\n           Doordarshan\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Coppernicus\u00a0Marg,\n           New\u00a0Delhi.\n\n           Represented\u00a0by: \u00adMs.\u00a0E.S\u00a0Isaac,\u00a0Dy,\u00a0D.G.\u00a0&\u00a0PIO,\n                                    \u00ad\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Harpal\u00a0Singh,\u00a0SO\u00a0(RTI)\n\n                   Information\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                               at\n                                                      New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000982\n\n\n                                                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
    1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.\u00a022\u00ad12\u00ad2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharti,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0stating\u00a0<\/p>\n
        that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0submitted\u00a0a\u00a0representation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0DG\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0on\u00a020\u00ad05\u00ad2010\u00a0containing\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        facts\u00a0which\u00a0favor\u00a0telecast\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0program\u00a0‘Disabilities\u00a0leaping\u00a0forward’\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0requested\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the\u00a0\u00a0DG\u00a0to\u00a0review\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0matter,\u00a0for\u00a0which\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0verbal\u00a0assurance.\u00a0<\/p>\n
        She\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.\u00a009\u00ad07\u00ad2010\u00a0from\u00a0DG\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0informing\u00a0her\u00a0that\u00a0her\u00a0<\/p>\n
        case\u00a0stands\u00a0closed\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02007.\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0connection\u00a0she\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0ensure\u00a0that\u00a0her\u00a0<\/p>\n
        representation\u00a0dt.\u00a020\u00ad05\u00ad2010\u00a0is\u00a0resumed\u00a0and\u00a0reviewed\u00a0and\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0favoring\u00a0the\u00a0telecast\u00a0<\/p>\n
        of\u00a0her\u00a0program.\u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0notings\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0vide\u00a0which\u00a0her\u00a0representation\u00a0<\/p>\n
        was\u00a0handled.\u00a0\u00a0On\u00a0not\u00a0receiving\u00a0any\u00a0response\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0stipulated\u00a0period\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
        filed \u00a0 her \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 on \u00a0 3.2.11. \u00a0 This \u00a0 was \u00a0 replied \u00a0 to \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 on \u00a0 \u00a0 09\u00ad02\u00ad2011 \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that\u00a0<\/p>\n
        photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0relevant\u00a0portion\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0notings\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0sent\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0for\u00a0her\u00a0<\/p>\n
        ready\u00a0reference\u00a0while\u00a0enclosing\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0acknowledgement\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Applicant. \u00a0 \u00a0 He \u00a0 further \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 letter \u00a0 dt.09\u00ad07\u00ad2010 \u00a0 was \u00a0 in \u00a0 reply \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 Applicant’s\u00a0<\/p>\n
        representation,\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0has\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0reviewed\u00a0<\/p>\n
        and\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0decided\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0claim\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0justified.\u00a0Thereafter\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0\u00a0closed\u00a0since\u00a0<\/p>\n
        the \u00a0 year \u00a0 2007. \u00a0 Being \u00a0 aggrieved \u00a0 with \u00a0 this \u00a0 reply, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 filed \u00a0 her \u00a0 2nd\u00a0 appeal \u00a0 before \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n
        Commission\u00a0on\u00a016\u00ad03\u00ad2011.\n<\/p>\n
\nDecision<\/p>\n
    2. During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0some\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0till\u00a0January\u00a02010\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
        provided\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO.\u00a0However,\u00a0she\u00a0still\u00a0requires\u00a0file\u00a0notings\u00a0and\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0with\u00a0respect\u00a0<\/p>\n
        to \u00a0 the \u00a0 closure \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 matter \u00a0 starting \u00a0 from \u00a0 Jan \u00a0 2010 \u00a0 till \u00a0 the \u00a0 time \u00a0 the \u00a0 matter \u00a0 was \u00a0 closed. \u00a0 The\u00a0
\n            Respondent\u00a0produced\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0the\u00a0two\u00a0files\u00a0within\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0available.\u00a0<\/p>\n
           The\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 accordingly\u00a0 directed\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0allow\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0files\u00a0and\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
           provided \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 from\u00a0 Jan\u00a0 2010 \u00a0 onwards \u00a0 till \u00a0 the\u00a0 matter \u00a0 is \u00a0 closed, \u00a0 although, \u00a0 this\u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n
           additional\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0sought\u00a0initially\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application.\u00a0This\u00a0decision\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           additional\u00a0information\u00a0 \u00a0was\u00a0taken\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0carrying\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           relevant\u00a0files\u00a0with\u00a0them\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0which\u00a0would\u00a0make\u00a0it\u00a0easy\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0identify\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
           documents\u00a0required\u00a0by\u00a0her\u00a0immediately\u00a0without\u00a0having\u00a0to\u00a0wait\u00a0for\u00a0more\u00a0days\u00a0for\u00a0them.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n
           also\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0her\u00a0(Appellant)\u00a0within\u00a0<\/p>\n
           one\u00a0week\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0inspection.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      3.   The\u00a0case\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                              (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                                     Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.\u00a0        Smt.\u00a0Vimal\u00a0Issar,\n           H.NO.\u00a0D\u00ad8,\u00a0Defence\u00a0colony,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0-\u00a0110024\n\n\n\n2.         The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           Prasar\u00a0Bharti,\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(Admn)\n           Doordarshan\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Coppernicus\u00a0Marg,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n\n\n3.         The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\n           Prasar\u00a0Bharti,\n           O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(Admn)\n           Doordarshan\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Coppernicus\u00a0Marg,\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n 4.   Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000982 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a030,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision:\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a030,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Smt.\u00a0Vimal\u00a0Issar, H.NO.\u00a0D\u00ad8,\u00a0Defence\u00a0colony, New\u00a0Delhi\u00a0–\u00a0110024 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Prasar\u00a0Bharti, O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Deputy\u00a0Director\u00a0(A) Doordarshan\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Coppernicus\u00a0Marg, New\u00a0Delhi. Represented\u00a0by: \u00adMs.\u00a0E.S\u00a0Isaac,\u00a0Dy,\u00a0D.G.\u00a0&\u00a0PIO, \u00ad\u00a0Mr.\u00a0Harpal\u00a0Singh,\u00a0SO\u00a0(RTI) Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000982 ORDER Background \u00a0 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.\u00a022\u00ad12\u00ad2010\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Prasar\u00a0Bharti,\u00a0New\u00a0Delhi,\u00a0stating\u00a0 that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0submitted\u00a0a\u00a0representation\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0DG\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0on\u00a020\u00ad05\u00ad2010\u00a0containing\u00a0all\u00a0the\u00a0 facts\u00a0which\u00a0favor\u00a0telecast\u00a0of\u00a0her\u00a0program\u00a0‘Disabilities\u00a0leaping\u00a0forward’\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0requested\u00a0 the\u00a0\u00a0DG\u00a0to\u00a0review\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0a\u00a0\u00a0decision\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0matter,\u00a0for\u00a0which\u00a0she\u00a0was\u00a0given\u00a0verbal\u00a0assurance.\u00a0 She\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0she\u00a0had\u00a0received\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.\u00a009\u00ad07\u00ad2010\u00a0from\u00a0DG\u00a0Doordarshan\u00a0informing\u00a0her\u00a0that\u00a0her\u00a0 case\u00a0stands\u00a0closed\u00a0since\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02007.\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0connection\u00a0she\u00a0requested\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0ensure\u00a0that\u00a0her\u00a0 representation\u00a0dt.\u00a020\u00ad05\u00ad2010\u00a0is\u00a0resumed\u00a0and\u00a0reviewed\u00a0and\u00a0a\u00a0decision\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0favoring\u00a0the\u00a0telecast\u00a0 of\u00a0her\u00a0program.\u00a0She\u00a0also\u00a0sought\u00a0the\u00a0photocopies\u00a0of\u00a0notings\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0vide\u00a0which\u00a0her\u00a0representation\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95040","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMs.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":484,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011"},"wordCount":484,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011","name":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And ... on 30 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-01T02:46:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vimal-issar-vs-ministry-of-information-and-on-30-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ms.Vimal Issar vs Ministry Of Information And … on 30 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95040","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95040"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95040\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95040"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95040"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95040"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}