{"id":95876,"date":"2009-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009"},"modified":"2014-12-09T20:47:36","modified_gmt":"2014-12-09T15:17:36","slug":"b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
   \n\nIN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA A3: kk   \n\nDATED THIS THE 23\"\" 1;ya.Yc)I?\"3tJ1sIE%2{3o93%\n %   3 \nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUST1t(}i14jA-V'gA':r~1.4\u00a7;N\"'I)' B?Y$1ux12 EDDY\nREGULAR 1=I12_s_'1*  (PA_R\u00bb--SJ)\nBETWEEN:    \n1-  J     %\n\nSincg  'iiy his~-._ : e\u00e9a1&'l{*ep:e.2a;.e:2tatives:\ns\/u_;P.M.Easappg%k'k% %   \n\na)  \" \" 4' \nWf0.Latc.B.Sh\u00a7va:1na. -'\n4; about  years\n\nT vDfa._B...Shi_va;1na\n._   %Age{i_~vahug\u00a3i.'V27 years\n'  Vliesiding 'at Panchanahalli\n\" Sitzgalagcm Hubli,\n' Ka\u00e9\u00e9ur Taltxk,\nA' '  ._Chic:kmaga1ur District\n\n I  \n' :1'. V V.   S.\/o.P.M.Basapm\n\nMajor\nResiding at Panchanahalli,\nSingatagtmt Hobii, Kadur Taiuk,\n\n3\n\n\n\nChiukmagahxr District  \n\n(By M\/s.H.R.A11an1hakrishnamurlhy &  V  .\nAND: % % J\n\n1. Sri P.B.Maru1appa\n\nS\/o.P.M.Basappa\n\nMajor\n\nResiding at Panchanalabdli\n\nSingaiagcm Hobli, \" '\nKadurTa1uk, '- _  i \nChickmagalur   '  .' \n\n2.    \n\nResiding at Pancha33a11a\ufb02_i\" \" \u00e9 . =\"\n\nSingaiagcge VI-Iubii, V' \"\n\nKadnr T3Ill'i(,,_ w  '-\n\nChipkx\ufb01azgaiur   RESPQNDENTS\n\n Ad vacate for Rcspond::n1Nu.I)\n\n*  Thigx\u00e9aggaag First Appeal is \ufb01led tmdezr swim 96 of Code\nof Civil Prb:;edurc,}903, against the Judgement and Decree dated\n\n_ _  _  1;9.1 12003; passed in O.S.No.11S\/Q00] an the file uf the Civil\n\" \"   Judg\u00a2_.(Se':i'i0r Division) Kadnr, decreeing the suit for partition.\n\n This Appeal seaming on for hearing this day, the Court\n\n    the fallowing:\n\n3\n\n\n\nHeard the Counsel fer the     V'\n\n2. On 13.6.20{j9:,. .V:lA'l_;e  {he respondent had<\/pre>\n
remained abscg11\u00abai}c}    lu this day. When
\nthe case wa:=’\u00e9    lhc Counsel for the
\n   for the respondent had
\nH:-.mainr.V-#\u00a3i\u00ab {sbs\u00e9nt  the matter is called out in the<\/p>\n
pusl.;3uz.u_:h s\u00e9ssiotrg “1113”-Ctiunscl for the respondent cominues to<\/p>\n
     the Counsel for the appcllani is heard over<\/p>\n
   is disposed <31'.\n<\/p>\n
x ‘T   The \ufb01ascts as are relevant for consideration of this appeal<\/p>\n
{are as fulluws :-\n<\/p>\n
The appellants were the defendants I and 2 before the trial<\/p>\n
Court. The plaintiff had \ufb01led a suit fur partition \u00e9l\ufb02d scparait:<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
28 years prior in the suit and it was aileged <\/p>\n
defendants were joint famiiy rnetnbegizxrld  <\/p>\n
properties are jeint \ufb01imily properties  ti;~a_it’~itiI1eie:”waS1,i_i1e i<\/p>\n
division between the piaintitf   life<\/p>\n
time of Basappa, he was    the suit
\nproperties and after hisi   being the eldest
\nson of Basappzitv   It is in this
\nfashien    partition and separate
\n   to have the sale deed
\nin favoei’nt’ the  aside.\n<\/p>\n
:  siiit  ieentested by the appellants herein, the<\/p>\n
  issues as tu whether the plaintilt pruves that<\/p>\n
it    the joint family aiongwilh defendants I and<\/p>\n
V V . 2; ekhettiei  suit properties are the undivided family pregserties<\/p>\n
it it   tile.’ thiee; and whether there was a partition as on 1.11.1984 and<\/p>\n
‘   share ef the plainii\ufb02’ under a Pahzpatti was granted to him<\/p>\n
   that the piaintiif was residing separately; and whether the<\/p>\n
defendants prove that on 25.11.1990, a partition had taken place<\/p>\n
7><\/p>\n
6<\/span>
\nbetween themselves and they are in separate possession of their<\/p>\n
respective shares; whether defendants I and 2 pnwe..<\/p>\n
married sisters have also get their respective  as “eiifu1e1i’:3edV<\/p>\n
in the written statement; whether thep1si;;iitI’_*;\u00a7ii5iie:s’;vtt\u00a7\u00e9it (ac tales   _ <\/p>\n
made in favour of the third <\/p>\n
plaintiff was entitled to the retiet\u00a7S**~.sQug1″1iv__for;.VA  was<\/p>\n
having held in \ufb01tvuur of the p1.ai’m:i.t’;’ defeiitianisg are before<\/p>\n
this Court.\n<\/p>\n
4. its s;eete\u00a3i:5’\u00a7\u00a7ei:j}kzian\ufb021akrishna Murthy, on behalf<\/p>\n
of the appeliasls,   Cetert below has erred in answering issue<\/p>\n
 <    w}1et}\u00a7t<s"t\u00a51.e..(1;-zfendants land 2 prove that their married<\/p>\n
   got their respective shares as staieal in the written<\/p>\n
  counsel would seek to point out that the<\/p>\n
t3"\u00bb~'\u00ab.___V'~\u00bb.interpret:;tien placed by the Court below to hold that the sisters<\/p>\n
Vt   Pattamma and Laiithamma have been mazried prier te<\/p>\n
 and prior to the coming into force of the Kamalakn<\/p>\n
V Amendment to the Hindu Suceessien Act and that they would net<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
 " :1oV";}::dr1\u00a7\u00a3ion .. . '_<\/p>\n
be cntitlod to any share in the properties. The <\/p>\n
Court is improper admittedly they art: sislors   <\/p>\n
share under the Hindu Succession   <\/p>\n
was in error in holding that \ufb02lcrroopondonvi?     L.<\/p>\n
to \ufb01lo a suit for partition as ho   share and
\nrolinquishcd his right io   _V Tho Court below
\nwas in error i11_hQ:l'di._I'zg   not been divided
\ncqually and   would not arise. I1
\nis also     not 2: vaiid document as it
\nis   of the same: have not boon proved<\/p>\n
and l\u00e9ae: Couri  ihc\u00e9rcforodirx cltsar error in holding that there: was<\/p>\n
   hand, it was the: cotilonlion of the: appellants<\/p>\n
lhaI"–duririg' life lime: of their father, rcspondtznl no.1 lmd taken<\/p>\n
 iris. under Palupalii daied 1.11.1984 and evc:r~sim:o then,<\/p>\n
ioogondoni no.1 has been tmjoying his share: and has boon residizag<\/p>\n
2  a house bearing No.i36. And further, as between the<\/p>\n
defendants Lhcrnsclvos, they have e\ufb01wied a division and some<\/p>\n
Q<\/p>\n
pruperties have bcen given 10 {kc sisters lowarLl$'*V.}5;\u00a7ishina<\/p>\n
Kumkuma. The evidence: adduced has not   '_<\/p>\n
properly- It is pointed out that in lhcvciiuxw uf.er;as:};4::\\i;a1hiz\u00a7\u00a71liVi::;:, '<\/p>\n
the plaintiff has clearly admiticd lh;1i__ _  <\/p>\n
family, thuugh he does not  the Vgagaiar   'he:
\ncome: out of the family agidaat  .li1E!\u20ac,Vv1"\u00a7A6V;uVaS given 2
\naortas of land in survey  and 30 cucunui
\ntrees in survcy    110.240 and a house
\ncans-istigg Qf  has further dcpuscd to the c\ufb02izcl that<\/p>\n
he has rc\u00e9eivfsd  iand detailed at page 119.7 uf his rc-<\/p>\n
 cxatninf\u00e9g\ufb01wn w\ufb01ich :i;\u00a7___\u00a7x.hactcd in the body of the appeai memo.<\/p>\n
 'I:(\u00ab1 vicw–vgf\u00ab'admissiun as to 111:: plaintiff having separated from<\/p>\n
[fies  having received his share was ccm\ufb01nncd and<\/p>\n
 *,… 'V._supplem\u00a7\u00a7i:1cd by Ex.D-2 which is indcmd an unregistered<\/p>\n
   Hewcvtcr, in the lighi of Secticm 49 uf the Regisiraiiun<\/p>\n
   thc same can be received as evidence. of any transacliurn<\/p>\n
V' tsffeciing such property or cunfcrring sue-h puwur. Hence, the<\/p>\n
ulcar admission sf the plaintiff as to \ufb02nglain\ufb01\ufb01 having cums out<\/p>\n
of tht: family and having rcueivcd his share. of the <\/p>\n
disentitlc the plaintiff to claim.\n<\/p>\n
6 – Viewed from anuther angle, ethan ift!\u20ac\u00a3cr\u00e9\u00bb.w’a$”‘nQ”<\/p>\n
as suggested, it the property t3c.ttingingA”tt1__ <\/p>\n
ththcr was alive was abg:i.:t_12 aa:fi::V:s.t3.(‘ ‘Imtd, htz\u00e9tiuxtaitfy, the share
\n0f the ptainti\ufb01 would be4″tA!4\ufb01’  tsttvv\u00e9qttiiialent to 3 acres of<\/p>\n
land. While itiis’   uttattby%kme*tk ,\u00a7aa;nat1r admitting that<\/p>\n
he has rcce}1;cct_ atz’-fer:  he has been cultivating the<\/p>\n
same  the  >;:t:;3attttely and the land to the extent<\/p>\n
of ‘7 acrc\u00a7’–   subsequent to the separation of<\/p>\n
 ‘_ fjntainlitf, to that the share given to the plaintiil’ is<\/p>\n
‘  tttiisqttal wuuld nut be rcltwant. Merely on the ground<\/p>\n
.th\u00e9it\u00abt11cfc.V–V’vg:\u00a7\u00a7~3vi:o change of mutatiun in Eavuur of the plaintiff in<\/p>\n
respc’;:ttjnt’V 3 acres of land would not render the: entire extant uf<\/p>\n
  acquired as on the date of the suit to be constnmd as joint<\/p>\n
family pruptsrtics. The plaintiff is thcrcfurt: nut justi\ufb01cd in<\/p>\n
sctsking partitiuu at the prupcrty which has been acquired<\/p>\n
subsequent to cutting his sham, as admitted. Hence, that trial court<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
was in clear crrur in holding that the reliance coia–lLi–   ‘_<\/p>\n
on Ex.D-I in am face uf clear admisaiuiis.by~lliii_:ii;i:liii\u00a7i1il:i’i5i1IiS4;ll’iT.  <\/p>\n
as to the plainiill’ having reuciycd u;\u00a2\u00abi\u00a2gi,.;g;iu1* :;i;;dlam1:;g;:\u00a2a1
\nwhich would be: csqzzivalcnt la
\nentitled to at a partition,   of his
\nfalhcsr. Furthar, the llallwi  passed away,
\nthe plainiilf   [ha .l}illIt7!”S estate.
\nIn that view:   to I\/203′ share in the
\nsuit by  family during lhc: lifetime of<\/p>\n
his rm.  l .\n<\/p>\n
   is allowed in part while modifying<\/p>\n
  that the plaintiff would be 61}-iillfsil to truly<\/p>\n
I  If4″‘-\ufb01izargfv Vth\u00e9iestate of the thther and the properties which were<\/p>\n
” jbyihizii during his life time. The daughters who were not<\/p>\n
  (ht: suit in the \ufb01nal decree pruceezlings will have to be<\/p>\n
i ljilixxcliudcad since they alsu would get 3 share: in the l\u00e9ztlirsfs share.<\/p>\n
ii i The property given to the plaintiff earlier wuuld have {u be<\/p>\n
_\/5<\/p>\n
H<\/p>\n
excluded and the piafmiiff would be entitied to 1f20m Shaw  ‘A    .<\/p>\n
rust uf the {xupcrly hsld  the family dtrixtg L:h’::”ii\u00a7:..  4′<\/p>\n
falhcr. The decree shall be drawn up     <\/p>\n
above.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy IN THE HIGH comm’ OF KARNATAKA A3: kk DATED THIS THE 23″” 1;ya.Yc)I?”3tJ1sIE%2{3o93% % 3 THE HON’BLE MR. JUST1t(}i14jA-V’gA’:r~1.4\u00a7;N”‘I)’ B?Y$1ux12 EDDY REGULAR 1=I12_s_’1* (PA_R\u00bb–SJ) BETWEEN: 1- J % Sincg ‘iiy his~-._ : e\u00e9a1&’l{*ep:e.2a;.e:2tatives: s\/u_;P.M.Easappg%k’k% % a) ” ” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-95876","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1172,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\",\"name\":\"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009"},"wordCount":1172,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009","name":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-09T15:17:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-shivanna-dead-vs-p-b-marulappa-on-23-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B Shivanna (Dead) vs P B Marulappa on 23 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95876","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=95876"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/95876\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=95876"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=95876"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=95876"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}