{"id":96226,"date":"2008-11-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2"},"modified":"2018-04-03T16:07:37","modified_gmt":"2018-04-03T10:37:37","slug":"hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","title":{"rendered":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 111 of 2004()\n\n\n1. HASHIM, SON OF MUHAMMED HANEEFA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SARASWATHY, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. BABY, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN,\n\n3. INDIRA, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN,\n\n4. SAKUNTHALA, DAUGHTER OF GOPI,\n\n5. RAJU, SON OF GOPI,\n\n6. SANTHOSHKUMAR, SON OF NADESAN,\n\n7. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.M.PREM\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.B.JAYASURYA\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :21\/11\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                            M.N.KRISHNAN, J\n                        =====================\n                          MACA No.111 OF 2004\n                        =====================\n\n                Dated this the 21st day of November 2008\n\n                               JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>      This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor Accidents<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal, Attingal in O.P.(MV)No.1247 of 1998. Claimants are the<\/p>\n<p>legal representatives of deceased     Sarasamma, who succumbed to the<\/p>\n<p>injuries sustained in a road accident on 27.3.1997. The Tribunal found that<\/p>\n<p>she has contributed 30% to the accident and the rider of the bike 70% and<\/p>\n<p>held respondents 1 and 2 jointly and severally liable for the claim. It<\/p>\n<p>awarded a sum of Rs.71,750\/- with 9% interest. It is against that decision,<\/p>\n<p>the 2nd respondent has come up in appeal before this Court challenging the<\/p>\n<p>question of negligence as well as the quantum.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. Admittedly the deceased was a passenger in a bus. She got down<\/p>\n<p>from the bus and through front side of the bus. While she was crossing the<\/p>\n<p>road and at that time the accident took place. It is seen from the scene<\/p>\n<p>mahazar that the accident had taken place 88 cms. east of the western tar<\/p>\n<p>end in a road which is having a width of 5.40 metres and straight vision of<\/p>\n<p>250 metres to the south and 300m metres to the north. Learned counsel<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 111\/2004                         -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>would contend that the deceased was a blind lady and she did not take care<\/p>\n<p>at all and it was on account of her negligence the accident took place. It has<\/p>\n<p>to be stated that the rider of the bike was coming behind the bus and when<\/p>\n<p>the bus stopped for alighting passengers he attempted to overtake the bus<\/p>\n<p>and in that process he met with the accident. It is not known how the<\/p>\n<p>accident had taken place on the other extremity of the road which is<\/p>\n<p>indicative of one factor that the deceased had almost crossed the road.<\/p>\n<p>There was a duty cast upon the deceased as well to wait and see whether any<\/p>\n<p>vehicles are coming from the two directions before crossing the road. So<\/p>\n<p>also a rider of a vehicle especially when a vehicle like a bus is parked for<\/p>\n<p>alighting passengers should be very cautious and must slow down the<\/p>\n<p>vehicle so that these type of unfortunate incident does not take place. But<\/p>\n<p>unfortunately the    rider did not take that much care which he is expected<\/p>\n<p>and therefore that has resulted in the accident. The duty of a rider is more<\/p>\n<p>towards pedestrians especially under the above mentioned circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore I do not propose to disturb the negligence apportioned as 70%<\/p>\n<p>and 30% respectively.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Now turning to the quantum of compensation. The Tribunal itself had<\/p>\n<p>opined that the deceased was only a pensioner having a monthly pension of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.75 to Rs.100\/-. Though it is stated that she was a blind person no<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 111\/2004                        -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>evidence has been produced to prove the same. The Tribunal should have<\/p>\n<p>taken a nominal income of Rs.1000\/- at least. Similarly the Tribunal need<\/p>\n<p>not have awarded Rs.15,000\/- as compensation for pain and suffering and<\/p>\n<p>Rs.15,000\/- towards loss of estate. When dependency is allowed again<\/p>\n<p>adding loss of estate as a huge amount will be a duplication and a nominal<\/p>\n<p>amount need be awarded in such cases. The claimant had a head injury. She<\/p>\n<p>did not survive long after the accident. Towards love and affection the same<\/p>\n<p>compensation can be      retained. The award passed by the Tribunal is<\/p>\n<p>modified as follows. Towards loss of dependency I award Rs.40,000\/-,<\/p>\n<p>transport expenses Rs.2,000\/-,      damage to clothing Rs.500\/-, funeral<\/p>\n<p>expenses Rs.5,000\/-, pain and suffering Rs.5,000\/-, loss of estate Rs.2,000\/-,<\/p>\n<p>loss of love and affection Rs.15,000\/- making a total of Rs.69,500\/- of<\/p>\n<p>which the claimants are entitled to 70% of the amount which would come<\/p>\n<p>to Rs.45,650\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In the result, MACA is partly allowed and a revised award is passed<\/p>\n<p>whereby claimants 1 to 4 are entitled to realise a sum of Rs.45,650\/- with<\/p>\n<p>9% interest from 5.10.1998 till realisation from respondents 1 and 2. They<\/p>\n<p>shall take the amount in equal shares. If any amount is deposited that shall<\/p>\n<p>be given credit to and disbursed to them. Respondents 1 and 2 are directed<\/p>\n<p>to deposit the amount within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA 111\/2004               -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>a copy of this judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                   M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>Cdp\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 111 of 2004() 1. HASHIM, SON OF MUHAMMED HANEEFA, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. SARASWATHY, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN, &#8230; Respondent 2. BABY, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN, 3. INDIRA, DAUGHTER OF SREEDHARAN, 4. SAKUNTHALA, DAUGHTER OF GOPI, 5. RAJU, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\"},\"wordCount\":709,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\",\"name\":\"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2"},"wordCount":709,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2","name":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-03T10:37:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hashim-vs-saraswathy-on-21-november-2008-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hashim vs Saraswathy on 21 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96226"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96226\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}