{"id":9667,"date":"2010-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-16T02:54:46","modified_gmt":"2016-06-15T21:24:46","slug":"basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                               CWJC No.1379 of 2010\n                 1. BABU LAL SAH S\/O YADU NANDAN SAH POSTED AS\n                 LABOUR (FIELD WORKER CLASS-IV) IN THE OFFICE OF\n                 INCHARGE DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER, BETTIAH\n                 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAGARWA,\n                 P.S.MANJHOLIA,DISTT-WEST CHAMPARAN\n                                   Versus\n                 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE DIRECTOR-IN-\n                 CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES BIHAR,PATNA\n                 2. THE CHIEF MALARIA OFFICER BIHAR,PATNA\n                 3. THE INCHAGE , DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER BETTIAH,\n                 EAST CHAMPARAN\n                                    with\n                               CWJC No.1438 of 2010\n                 1. BASUDEO SAH S\/O LATE RAM NARAYAN SAH POSTED AS\n                 LABOUR (FIEND WORKER CLASSIV) IN THE OFFICE OF\n                 INCHARGE DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER,BETTIAH\n                 RESIDENT OF VILLAGE BHAGARWA, P.S.MANJHLIA, DISTT-\n                 WEST CHAMPARAN\n                                   Versus\n                 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR , THROUGH THE DIRECTOR-IN-\n                 CHIEF, HEALTH SERVICES BIHAR, PATNA\n                 2. CHIEF MALARIA OFFICER BIHAR,PATNA\n                 3. THE INCHARGE , DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER\n                 BETTIAH, EAST CHAMPARAN\n                                 -----------\n<\/pre>\n<p>8   9.11.2010              Petitioners are the persons, whose services were dispensed<\/p>\n<p>                with on the ground of irregularity in appointment. They along with<\/p>\n<p>                several hundred approached this Court. The matter then traveled to the<\/p>\n<p>                Division Bench. While the matter was pending before the Division<\/p>\n<p>                Bench in LPA, the Division Bench directed the State to scrutinize the<\/p>\n<p>                cases of all individuals, who were affected by the order of termination<\/p>\n<p>                of their services and categorize them basically in two categories i.e.<\/p>\n<p>                irregular appointment and illegal appointment .A High Powered<\/p>\n<p>                Committee headed by the Director-in Chief, Health Services, was<\/p>\n<p>                formed. It submitted its report to the Court on affidavit. In the said<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>report, the Committee categorized the petitioners as irregular<\/p>\n<p>appointees. By virtue of the said placement, the petitioners became<\/p>\n<p>entitled to be regularized. Ultimately, all L.P.As were disposed of,<\/p>\n<p>which judgment is since reported as State of Bihar -v- Purendra Sulan<\/p>\n<p>Kit, 2006(3) PLJR 386.By then the judgment of Constitution Bench of<\/p>\n<p>Apex Court in the case of Secretary, State of Karnataka-v- Uma Devi<\/p>\n<p>since reported in 2006(2)PLJR (SC) 363 was at hand. This Court<\/p>\n<p>disposed of LPAs as per the judgment, as referred to above, and directed<\/p>\n<p>the State to set up a Committee and scrutinize the individual cases. In so<\/p>\n<p>far as persons, who are found to be irregular appointees, they should be<\/p>\n<p>regularized and the rests would be deemed to be dismissed being illegal<\/p>\n<p>appointees. This time when the Committee remained under               a new<\/p>\n<p>Director-in Chief, Health Services, it found the petitioners to be illegal<\/p>\n<p>appointees as against irregular in the earlier report. It is this brought the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners to this Court seeking the reliefs as this adversely affects the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners. At first, a counter affidavit was sought to be filed by the<\/p>\n<p>State taking the very existence of the first report but on being shown<\/p>\n<p>that it was a part of the record of LPA proceeding and filed under<\/p>\n<p>affidavit duly sworn by Director-in-Chief, Health Services,the said<\/p>\n<p>affidavit was withdrawn..\n<\/p>\n<p>             A second counter affidavit was then filed. It was then<\/p>\n<p>submitted that as the first report did not bear the signature of all the<\/p>\n<p>members of the Committee though it was filed under affidavit of the<\/p>\n<p>Director-in-Chief, Health Services,it was not acted upon and as such<\/p>\n<p>after retirement of the Director-in-Chief, Health Services under the new<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Director-in Chief, Health Services, a fresh Committee was formed. This<\/p>\n<p>submission is again not correct. The sound reason for the second<\/p>\n<p>Committee is that the first Committee was formed pursuant to interim<\/p>\n<p>order in LPA proceeding. That report was not finally affirmed or acted<\/p>\n<p>upon by this Court.While disposing of LPAs, this Court passed a fresh<\/p>\n<p>direction to constitute a fresh Committee to examine the matter and that<\/p>\n<p>is how the second Committee came into being after disposal of LPAs.<\/p>\n<p>However, question remains as to why irregular appointees suddenly<\/p>\n<p>became illegal appointees.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Here, I may notice that the petitioners were engaged purely<\/p>\n<p>as daily wagers by the Incharge District Malaria Officer . They have<\/p>\n<p>been working continuously for four years               and applied for<\/p>\n<p>regularization. The District Malaria Officer forwarded their applications<\/p>\n<p>to the Chief Malaria Officer, Bihar, Patna . The Chief Malaria Officer,<\/p>\n<p>Bihar, Patna then passed an order approving their regularization and<\/p>\n<p>directed the District Malaria Officer to follow up the formality. It is<\/p>\n<p>pursuant to that the petitioners were then regularized way back in the<\/p>\n<p>year 1988 itself. It is now said in the counter affidavit that initial<\/p>\n<p>appointment being by an officer, who was not competent, being illegal.<\/p>\n<p>The petitioners are now categorized as illegal though in the first report<\/p>\n<p>they were shown as irregular because of the categorization that was<\/p>\n<p>followed was that an appointee by           incompetent person having<\/p>\n<p>qualification on vacant sanctioned post was to be treated irregular. This<\/p>\n<p>difference changed the situation. From the facts, it would be clear that it<\/p>\n<p>is not in dispute that the petitioners were engaged on daily wage on<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sanctioned vacant posts, who were qualified for permanent appointment<\/p>\n<p>to that post. It was mere in charge on daily wages not an appointment<\/p>\n<p>to the post. On State&#8217;s own showing the persons, who could make these<\/p>\n<p>appointments was the Chief Medical Officer, Bihar, Patna. From the<\/p>\n<p>facts, noted above, it would be seen that being daily wagers for over<\/p>\n<p>four years their cases were referred to the Chief Medical Officer, who<\/p>\n<p>granted approval for their regularization. Thus appointments were to be<\/p>\n<p>made upon regularization by the Chief Medical Officer, Bihar, Patna<\/p>\n<p>who on State&#8217;s own      stand was the competent officer. Thus, on the<\/p>\n<p>facts, it is not in dispute that these appointments \/regularizations were<\/p>\n<p>made by the Chief Medical Officer, Bihar, Patna , who was the<\/p>\n<p>competent person to appoint on duly sanctioned post, which was vacant<\/p>\n<p>and for which the petitioners had requisite qualification. That, in my<\/p>\n<p>view, would make it only irregular appointment and cannot be termed as<\/p>\n<p>illegal appointment. To that extent, Five Men Committee report cannot<\/p>\n<p>be sustained. Here, I may notice another aspect from the very judgment<\/p>\n<p>of the Constitution Bench, which is the basis of the judgment of this<\/p>\n<p>Court in LPA cases, where their Lordships in LPA cases have noticed<\/p>\n<p>para 44 of Uma Devi case. In that para itself their Lordships have noted<\/p>\n<p>as under-\n<\/p>\n<p>            &#8220;We also clarify that regularization, if any already made, but<\/p>\n<p>not subjudice, need not be reopened based on this judgment&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>            In the present case, petitioners&#8217; appointments were duly<\/p>\n<p>regularized pursuant to order passed by the competent authority on<\/p>\n<p>sectioned vacant posts. It is not the case of the State that the Chief<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>        Medical Officer, Bihar, Patna was not the competent to order<\/p>\n<p>        regularization. Thus, in my view, petitioners have been wrongly<\/p>\n<p>        categorized as illegal appointees. They were rightly shown as irregular<\/p>\n<p>        appointees in the first report, as submitted to the Court, the consequence<\/p>\n<p>        whereof would be that being irregular appointees, in view of the<\/p>\n<p>        judgment of this Court in which petitioners were also parties, they<\/p>\n<p>        would be required to be regularized and\/or not interfered with and<\/p>\n<p>        having been dismissed , would be liable to be taken back as others have<\/p>\n<p>        been.\n<\/p>\n<p>                    With the aforesaid observations and directions, the writ<\/p>\n<p>        petitions stand disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<pre>singh                     (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.1379 of 2010 1. BABU LAL SAH S\/O YADU NANDAN SAH POSTED AS LABOUR (FIELD WORKER CLASS-IV) IN THE OFFICE OF INCHARGE DISTRICT MALARIA OFFICER, BETTIAH RESIDENT OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1068,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010"},"wordCount":1068,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010","name":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-15T21:24:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/basudeo-sah-vs-the-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Basudeo Sah vs The State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors on 9 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}