{"id":96679,"date":"2009-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009"},"modified":"2018-02-04T11:45:20","modified_gmt":"2018-02-04T06:15:20","slug":"rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 16\"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2999\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE  4\n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL, 151.0'. 88 .Oi$'72\u00e9:)5V\"{s15__}_ \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nRangaswamy,\n\nS \/ 0 Revappa,\nAged 5'7 Years,\nKodikerre Road, . . V\nBANGARPET TAL'LT.K'%- 543\n\n:3:J!l3i#OH\ufb01.H\n\nRamad'e'iraH\u00bb_@ Raiagappa  V'  ' '\n8\/ 0 Drivcrv \u00bb.M'Vg1Vniswamappa,'A\n   \n\nReddyh_aEIiXVfi]A1_age, K\u00e9saba Hobli,\n\nBANGARPE1 ~T[ALU1_.{H-.~__\"ti_J63 1 14.\n[By s1~a.4P;EsV.Manjuina\ufb01h; Adv.)\n\n.. APPELLANTS.\n\nAND: g \"\n\n  \" Naga;a\ufb01i11a';: \n %ea..z;e3 Years\u00bb, \n\nW\/$('yPapa_\u20ac'ah;' \"  \nReddyhalli \u00abV;3.1age',\n\nKasai)\n\nV .BANGARPE'I\"I'ALUK - 563 114.\n\na Hobli;  '\n\n(By'Sr:.13.Veerappa, Adv.)\n\n*_*_*_*_*w*w*\n\n. . RESPONDENT.<\/pre>\n
property purchased by him under Sale Deed dated 27.05.1987
\nwhich is produced and marked as Ex.P–l are totally different. it is
\nalso his Case that the plaintiff has not sought any relief. the
\nsecond defendant, therefore the suit as   Joe<\/p>\n
dismissed. I  _<\/p>\n
6. With these rival content1ons,:=\u00bb._th\u20ac_’A’*i\u00a7%iai’=.Col1irt'”ffa.;I1’e:\u20ac1i the”: 5<\/p>\n
following issues:\n<\/p>\n
1. Whether the plaintiff -proves  15′
\ndefendant exe_o’uted’lAtheVA agreernent of sake dt.<\/p>\n
27.5.87 withlV.resp’ee11;:-‘ ,”_s;uit:__ schedule<\/p>\n
property? ‘V _ ”\n<\/p>\n
2. if .._W’hetherl   proves that she is ready
\na4n’dV_iWi1,l.ir1g to perform her part of the contract<\/p>\n
V ‘ under”th.e___agreernent?\n<\/p>\n
 the plaintiff proves that she is in<\/p>\n
so”\n<\/p>\n
if  possession and enjoyment of the suit<\/p>\n
 . property?\n<\/p>\n
”   Whether the plaintiff proves the interference
\n‘ by defendants?\n<\/p>\n
vi<\/p>\n
and held issue Nos.1 to 4   infthe
\naffirmative in favour of the sepcondfvcdefendantf tandtclismissed the
\nsuit of the plaintiff,  Preferred an appeal
\nin R.A.No.104\/2C)Q1..’on;gthe’_:f7i1e.::gof.f”_{3i3(il “pf-.*f1’idge [Sr.Dn.], K.G.F.,<\/p>\n
wherein the \u20acFi19st__ framed the following points<\/p>\n
Whether the 2″” defendant proves that he is’–a<\/p>\n
bonafide purchaser as contended in his W’S’:?~.._ <\/p>\n
To what relief the parties are entitled”-to?’   d<\/p>\n
What order or decree? I<\/p>\n
for cons:ideratior1,’_–.\n<\/p>\n
1.<\/p>\n
\u00ab ‘*–WhevthVer_  Trialfcourt erred in believing the
\n* -V _ experttopxinion?\n<\/p>\n
 Whether  Triai Court erred in not giving
\nW,_’the.r_re_asons for not accepting the evidence of<\/p>\n
“‘  to 4?\n<\/p>\n
  Whether the judgment and decree of the Trial<\/p>\n
V ‘ Court calls for any modification at the hands<\/p>\n
of this Court? WT<\/p>\n
What order’?\n<\/p>\n
and held point Nos.1 to 3 in the affirmative in favour of the<\/p>\n
plaintiff, based on the Commissioners report and”  to<\/p>\n
reverse the finding of the Trial Court so far as   <\/p>\n
sale is concerned and held that tlie” ‘plaintiff  <\/p>\n
execution of agreement of sale dated    ‘A<\/p>\n
defendant, who is the first appellant before   and held
\nthat the plaintiff is entitledto spe-cific per-fto1’znancve,.of suit schedule
\nproperty in his favour.  nbieing aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
same, have come up ?0eforeflthisf::Cour:t- in this appeal.<\/p>\n
7.  of  thisfffCfourt framed the following two
\nsubstantial epuestions admitted the appeal:<\/p>\n
 ~ _ Whether  flower Appellate Court is
\nV’   justified’ i’1rreversing the judgment and decree
\nrn():f.”lL’}l\u20ac’ Trial Court dismissing the suit of the
\n TA'”_redspdorident\/plaintiff for specific performance
\n agreement of sale without taking into
\n consideration the report of the hand writing<\/p>\n
“*1<\/p>\n
expert?\n<\/p>\n
number. Admittedly the said survey number is measuring “13 acres.<\/p>\n
out of which an extent of 2 1\/2 acres is covered under..E1\u00a7;_D:’fi’;V;~ of<\/p>\n
the said extent, in the land belonging to first defendant <\/p>\n
formed more than l5–20 sites and hejhas”agre.ed  lone: oxfithef’ <\/p>\n
sites to the plaintiff, the second defendarltl
\nthe 15-20 sites formed by firstV::d.efend’an_t
\nnumber. Except for the reasons ‘there are tioyvindveipendent site
\nnumber given to the Site’s’;-..v’4:’;e.4′! in favour of second
\ndefendant and site given   {nothing to show that
\nthe said two  On\u00e9   Therefore, the First
\nAppellate   uldvecreeing the suit as against
\nsecond  to execute Sale Deed of the
\nsite purchased V   of plaintiff along with first<\/p>\n
appellant in the o’rigin.alAAsi1it.-as if the said site is suit schedule site.<\/p>\n
“To  eitterit. thew-Judgment and Decree passed by the First<\/p>\n
l’VAppVellate–v_Cou.rt”\u00bbis required to be modi\ufb01ed. Regarding third<\/p>\n
sub-sta.Iitial’alquestion of law, as already discussed above, the<\/p>\n
V .identificat’ion’vof suit schedule property and the property sold in<\/p>\n
,,”_”‘—favoizr of second defendant under EX..I3\u00bb~l are totally different by<\/p>\n
 i.th’e_fdes’cription of the boundaries provided in the plaint schedule<\/p>\n
%  witseif. Further there is no relief claimed by the plaintiff as against<\/p>\n
We<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16″‘ DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2999 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE 4 REGULAR SECOND APPEAL, 151.0’. 88 .Oi$’72\u00e9:)5V”{s15__}_ BETWEEN: 1. Rangaswamy, S \/ 0 Revappa, Aged 5’7 Years, Kodikerre Road, . . V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96679","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":643,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009"},"wordCount":643,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009","name":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-04T06:15:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rangaswamy-vs-nagamma-on-16-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rangaswamy vs Nagamma on 16 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96679","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96679"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96679\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96679"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96679"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96679"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}