{"id":96729,"date":"2009-02-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009"},"modified":"2015-05-30T15:33:53","modified_gmt":"2015-05-30T10:03:53","slug":"nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH mum or KARNATAKf:*~'C: %[    _\n\ncmcuzr BENCH AT DHA\ufb01WA. DW ;u\u00ab\"  %     A\n\nDATE!) was THE 20*\" may oF+=%Eai2uA$2\u00bb' \n\nBEFOI3'2'E'  %\n\nHON'BLE MRJUSTICE\":\u00a7\u00a7OH}\u00a7M:.'S'HAVl$:?L'?ANA6OUDAR\n\nwarr QM-rags)\n\nBetween :\n\nNAGESH  \"\"\"    \ns\/0 APPAYYA SAN:-\u00a7EVAi&'!A   . '\nAGED A130:.1T':4 'KEAIQS-.,   \"\n000 s'I'U1:3E'm\"* % '  \n\nSINCE MENORREP I3?' _ *.\n\nH18 NATURAL GU.:\\RDIA\u00a7--&I *\n\nVFATHEKAPPAYYA \" - V\n SJO N.kGA}?\u00a7?A sawxgvxama\n',AG'g::>4 ABOUT' <:;mrEAz2s\n\nO.CCV.SE~RVE<3E~  A ' \nR19 M-AN9.wAR  \n\n _ TQ 85 ADIST DHA'}?.WAi). .. pmrwxonm\n\n V {By sri\ufb02" su\u00e9\ufb01sii P HUDEDAGA\u00a3)DE,ADV(}CA'1'E}\n\n............_--.----um-\n\n"  EJNIQN OFINDIA\n\n" ~ VRE? BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY\nDEPTOF' SCHOOL\nEDUCATION 85 L.i'I'ERACY\nM1NIS'I'}?Y OF' HUMAN\n\n\n\n 'Cquxt  folluwmg .\n\n-2-\n\nRESOURCE DEVELOPMENT\nNEW DELHI\n\n2. 'THE DEPUTY COMMESSIONER\nNAVOBAYA VEDYALAYA SAMITHI    .\nHYDERABAD REGION  \nSARABAR PATEL ROAD\nSECUNMERABAD {AP}\n\n3. THE PRINCIPAL  \nJAWAHAR NAVODAYA VIDYA YVA, \nKYARAKOPPA ROAD   --  "\nDHARWAD~580007.   p  RESPONDENTS\n\n{Ey Sri. S.N.RAJENDRA, ADVQCNEE Edi? R\u00a5'1.\u00e9;'\u00e9.e2"\nAND SR: AMARESHLAW A.ssoc:AmfEAs.,%\u00bbguvomwms\n\nThis' 'A lrE.tVP't:ti_1V_:Vi\u00a3)V\u00a3z cgxmmg on for hearing this day, the\n\n-v .\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
‘me gsfi’eva?:ce of the petitioner is that the raspondenE–<\/p>\n
”  \u00e9r\u00e9 net making cerrec\ufb01on in the school recards of the<\/p>\n
  peti\ufb01oner dapite of the judgment and decree passed in<\/p>\n
  A  %      ;fs;No.13\u00bb5\/2003.\n<\/p>\n
V”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-3 –\n<\/p>\n
2. The recerds disclose \ufb01iat \ufb01re pe\ufb01tioner \ufb01led<\/p>\n
O.S.No.136\/2003 before the learned Civil Budge (Jr.Dn.), <\/p>\n
fer dedara\ufb01on that die caste of the plaintiff as <\/p>\n
and not ‘Hindu Madar’. The said suit came tq  _ <\/p>\n
27″‘ October 2003 declaring that uieipigiimwsicaeetist<\/p>\n
Bhangi’ and not ‘Hindu Madar\ufb02; Censeeeen\ufb02y, <\/p>\n
in the suit were directed te _V  in the
\nschool recerde ef the petit\u00a7ener–‘:V:  s;:>_ite””cif the decree, the<\/p>\n
correc\ufb01on is net .:nade.VA…–v–itnote that the<\/p>\n
defendants in thesi;i:iiis.e.i;hie me had \ufb01led R.A.No.1s\/zms<\/p>\n
before the Civ%l_vCoiift._fSf.Qn’;;)’ Gokak, which alse came to be<\/p>\n
~  V26″; J’uEy._2C)0S as is dear from Annexure-‘ 3’ to the<\/p>\n
  the petiticmer made repraentatiore.<\/p>\n
   of Pubiic Instructions, Chikodi, has also<\/p>\n
 _ di3″ecte:i  sense! to correct the relevant entries in the scheei<\/p>\n
4   reeere\u00a7”A_pursuant to the judgment of the Civil Court. In spite of<\/p>\n
‘  …”‘V’fnfe_”i’same, ewe 3″‘ respondent has not czompiied with the decree<\/p>\n
we<\/p>\n
-4…\n<\/p>\n
passed by the Civil Court on the gmund that the <\/p>\n
is not a party to the civil seit.\n<\/p>\n
3. It is no doubt true that the 3?’? i-emnaeerisaea<\/p>\n
party to the civil seit. The  Kernateke. vv\ufb01eputy’<\/p>\n
Director of Public Inwuctions ands’-l\u00a7itick”‘Educationl.Ofticer were
\nparties to die suit. They   the State.\n<\/p>\n
They have ever;  en  order of the trial
\nCourt and have   the decree of
\nthe Civil  consequently, the 3″‘
\nrespondeht.  should not be constrained to<\/p>\n
\ufb01le onemorel against  3″‘ respondent. At the time of<\/p>\n
I-‘i’:v”\ufb01l–ingsziit,A_ the olaintiff was not studying in 3″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
  in Kadasiddahwara Kannada Medium<\/p>\n
  _Scheoi._._ Kc;fnnti:%’;’ Under such circurrastances, the 3′” respondent<\/p>\n
 not made party to the civil suit. In View 3′ the same,<\/p>\n
 direction has to be issued to we respondents to<\/p>\n
‘T lljzzomizly w\u00e9th the direetioes issued in the civil suit. Accordingly,<\/p>\n
  the following order is made :\n<\/p>\n
The 3″‘ rapondent — Principe}, Jawahaf  <\/p>\n
vidyaiaya, Dharwad, is directed in make  ivrfv\ufb01ie V<\/p>\n
column of caste of the petitioner as ‘  B1’!3l’\\}’gfd_?.,J’A.Ai’l’I\u00bb.t\u00a7.’l&n <\/p>\n
of ‘ Hindu Madar’, as expedi\ufb01oz:siy–\u00a7s~possibie,_’bLi\u00a3f’:1c$i::.i\u00e9i:\u00e9”V’ti1an <\/p>\n
axe outer iimit of one mgsnigh fram’    of this<\/p>\n
order.\n<\/p>\n
Writ  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar IN THE HIGH mum or KARNATAKf:*~’C: %[ _ cmcuzr BENCH AT DHA\ufb01WA. DW ;u\u00ab” % A DATE!) was THE 20*” may oF+=%Eai2uA$2\u00bb’ BEFOI3’2’E’ % HON’BLE MRJUSTICE”:\u00a7\u00a7OH}\u00a7M:.’S’HAVl$:?L’?ANA6OUDAR warr QM-rags) Between : NAGESH “”” s\/0 APPAYYA SAN:-\u00a7EVAi&’!A . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":441,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009"},"wordCount":441,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009","name":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-30T10:03:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nagesh-aged-about-14-years-vs-union-of-india-on-20-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nagesh Aged About 14 Years vs Union Of India on 20 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96729"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96729\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}