{"id":96751,"date":"2010-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-27T06:03:21","modified_gmt":"2018-08-27T00:33:21","slug":"c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nAT BANGALORE\n\nDated this the Qt?' day Of September, 2010\nBEFORE:\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D V \nWrit Petition No. 47099 of 2004   A4 \n\nBETWEEN\nSR1 C K RAMAKRISBNA\n\nS\/O LATE C M KEMPEGOWDA\n\nAGED ABOUT 51 YEARS\n\nPRESENTLY R\/AT NO.711,\n\n\"rm FLOOR, 'B'--2 BLOCK\n\n\"TUNGABHADRA\", \n\nNATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE \n\nKORAMANGALA A   5 _ ~  \n\nBANGALORE -- 49. \" '  *   'L \"     PETITIONER\n\n _ xS1'i\u00ab.I\u00bbf&I\"'I..__SriC1hara Murthy, Adv.]\nANI)\":  '    ..\n\n1. THE KARNATAKASTATE TOURISM\n~ 1. DEV1::LOIJM'EN*'r CORPORATION LTO.\n\n'A REP. BY CHAIRMAN\n\n' ?-f\"NO\".49, 11 FLOOR, WEST SIDE\n_ KHANEJA BHAVAN\n\nO. \"v\u00abRACB_C'QURSE ROAD\n\n BANG-AEORE ~ 1.\n\nTHEQMANAGING DIRECTOR\n,. ~2.<.S.'1'.1i).C. LTD..\n\n-310.49, 11 FLOOR, WEST SIDE\nKHANIJA BHAVAN\nRACE COURSE ROAD\nBANGALORE -- 1.  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
{By Sri B L Sanjeev, Adv.]<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETlTIOl\\l IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
\n227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE
\nSAID IMPUGNED ORDERS VIDE ANNEXURE — R AND ‘1″ AS
\nARBITRARY, ILLEGAL, OPPOSED TO ARTICLES 14 AND 21 OF THE
\nCONSTITUTION OF INDIA AND ETC.,<\/p>\n
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS BAY, THE
\nCOURT MADE THE FOLLOW’Il\\lG:\n<\/p>\n
0 R I) E R
\nWrit petitioner was a person who had.
\nas a driver by the respondentcorpora\/tioniad   I
\nbut was conferred with the-..__stat{1s_ of V ov.}1ierof A
\nvehicle he was driving by  enterprising scheme<\/p>\n
brought in by the”.Lliiitorpoiftlationgf iljvvhere under, the<\/p>\n
corpoijationx the use of two buses in favour
\nof the petiltionler.Lthozighnhe could drive only one bus, in<\/p>\n
theynlaine of  tolioperate the buses from Bangalore to<\/p>\n
:Al*I9,spetl\u00a5lialnpi-T B Darn as sight seeing services, generate<\/p>\n
 to keep it with himself, to remit the<\/p>\n
9 so collected later to the corporation, as stipulated<\/p>\n
 int’-theylll letter of undertaking dated 6-9-1999 as per<\/p>\n
 uA\u00a7nnexure–B to the writ petition.<\/p>\n
.  .,,sut;ees\u00a3s’.=<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
2. Be that as it may, fact remains that the petitioner, it
\nappears, did not remit a single pie for two years during
\nwhich period, admittedly, two busses belonging to the
\nresporident–corporation were in the possession,’:cus_tody
\nand supervision of the petitioner,
\nbetween Bangalore–Hospet–Hainpi–T
\ncorporation, it appears, aiso
\ncommensurate follow up  except
\nbenign letters. However,VAy_.wiritirrggA of yyl\u00e9tters was<\/p>\n
fruitful to the extent ofi. lakh in favour<\/p>\n
of the:’lc’orp’ora.tion:’;Vlbutthat\u00e9nevertheless left a balance of
\nRs 9,6;r’,E’i89\/—  recovery of this amount, the<\/p>\n
c01’I3_”-1f,atiorj1″”had…’–\ufb01le.df'”a civil suit but without much<\/p>\n
 it may, on the employment side, the<\/p>\n
corpora_.tion.f~” if proceeded against the petitioner for<\/p>\n
 on his part in embezzling the funds of the<\/p>\n
  ‘corporation, held an enquiry and the inquiring authority<\/p>\n
  -recorded a finding holding the petitioner of the following<\/p>\n
if V it Charges: ”\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span><\/p>\n
“( 1) he, having been entrusted with the
\noperating KSTDC bus service between
\nBangalore & Hospet together with sight
\nseeing at Hospet–Hampi-T.i:”5′. Dam
\neffect from 109.99 on condition of
\nremittance of revenue to the Corpjora.tio.n 5 ;_.
\nas stipulated failed to generate  some
\nand committed misconduct in_–v-iol_a\ufb01on..:of _
\nrule 4.1 of the KS:’i”D’C”\u00ab-Ser:vic_e_ARuIes–,f?
\n1979 {the Rules) and showed’
\ndevotion to duty in’.__violaiion_-it of  ‘
\nprovision of clause (ii), ‘sub-reg}.;{l,l_VV of
\nReg.(3} of the  C&D. Regulations,
\n1982, {the Regulai_io’ns};–.._\u00bb ”  F<\/p>\n
(2) he failed to .remit  per stipulation the
\nmoneys earned in”theaabove\ufb02mentioned
\noperation  \u00ab [fcomrfn..ittei”l .i “an act of
\nrnisconduet in terr’ns”of~c_lause {b} of rule<\/p>\n
_ “‘1’.”‘;1″1’3EA:Q_jf_:J. the: rules -._’ ofgthe Regulations;<\/p>\n
(3) -he faiied_ to–.__retu–rn the materials supplied
\n to Vhiin ‘ivhile”_;~entrusting coaches bearing
\nu”8gr\u00a3;.NO. .KA”-901-9335 and KA–01-9271, &
\ncommitted, misconduct in terms of clause<\/p>\n
 {c} of rule 4.13 of the rules;\n<\/p>\n
‘  ” in.’ failing to perform his duties as per<\/p>\n
‘ ‘ –”.”gj—-stipulation in connection with operating<\/p>\n
~ _ the bus service, committed misconduct in
\nterms of clause (1’), rule 4.13 of the rules.”<\/p>\n
   basis of such \ufb01ndings of the inquiring authority<\/p>\n
  the discipiinary authority thought it \ufb01t to impose the<\/p>\n
punishment of dismissal on the petitioner in terms of<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nproceedings dated 13-5-2003 [copy at Annexure~\u00bbR to the<\/p>\n
s.\n<\/p>\n
writ petition}.\n<\/p>\n
4. Petitioner had pursued the matter by \ufb01plirigf
\nto the appellate authority, but the appeal.
\ndismissed as per the order  d’
\nAnnexure-T to the writ petition].\u00abdV.V_’hI’t is
\naction on the part of  in
\ndismissing the petitioner’ frorn  the present writ<\/p>\n
Petition.  V      ‘<\/p>\n
5.  it  petitioner, Sri Vijayakumar,
\nlearned several grounds such as the<\/p>\n
inquiry pro’ceVedings”i- are not fair or proper; that the<\/p>\n
.. \u00ab.  has not bestowed proper attention<\/p>\n
   the inquiring officer; that in terms of the<\/p>\n
 conduct on the part of the petitioner<\/p>\n
J’cou_1d.11–ot have been termed as ‘misconduct’ within the<\/p>\n
  ‘rrieaning of Rule 4 of the Conduct Rules; that neither the<\/p>\n
  “inquiring officer nor the disciplinary authority had an<\/p>\n
objective outlook towards the petitioner etc.<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
6. I have heard Sri Vijayakumar, learned counsel
\nappearing for the petitioner and Sr: 13 L Sanjeejvt.
\ncounsel for the second respondent.\n<\/p>\n
averments and the statement    Z'. \n\nrespondents.\n\n<\/pre>\n
7. In a matter of this  which  essfentially an
\nemployermernployee Vrel}”;ti’oi2sl.ii;l5,” ‘*–   ‘ ‘petition presented
\nunder Article 226\/ of India has
\nVery  for  it <\/p>\n
8.  followed the rules and<\/p>\n
procedures  terms of employment and the<\/p>\n
mere -fact  a-civil’-  for recovery of balance amount<\/p>\n
‘l V. \u00b0=0Ver  above  lakh did not succeed in itself is<\/p>\n
   mitigating factor to absolve the petitioner<\/p>\n
for”‘\u00abhaVing.tA\u00ab:indulged in the misconduct of misusing the<\/p>\n
V. \ufb01fll\ufb02ds of the corporation or even if not misuse in being<\/p>\n
_’  careless in not remitting the amount in time to the<\/p>\n
sa<\/p>\n
9. A person entrusted with a purse is in a position of a<\/p>\n
trustee on behalf of the corporation and it is .\u00abhis:h”-so1,emn<\/p>\n
duty to remit the amount promptly. If iiad\ufb02<\/p>\n
faiied in performing this onerousduty and\u00e9uwas remission\u00a7\u00ab <\/p>\n
performing the duty and if the :’co’rporatio1i.,AAvtras:
\nthe plight of \ufb01ling a suit of   frorn
\nthe petitioner, there’ iszxno  needecito hold the
\npetitioner guilty of   and if the
\ncorporation    of termination of
\nthe services  cannot be termed as<\/p>\n
dispro’p’ortionate: xiii —  ‘ ‘ \u00bb <\/p>\n
10. No”g_:_rotrnd to.’ interfere in exercise of Jurisdiction<\/p>\n
 undserVArtic1eV.’2\u00a3Z6[_2p27 of the Constitution of India. Writ<\/p>\n
 a petition ‘is’d_isn_1_issed.\n<\/p>\n
Sd\/~
\nIudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010 Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the Qt?’ day Of September, 2010 BEFORE: THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE D V Writ Petition No. 47099 of 2004 A4 BETWEEN SR1 C K RAMAKRISBNA S\/O […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96751","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nC K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":944,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\",\"name\":\"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010"},"wordCount":944,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010","name":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism ... on 9 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-27T00:33:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/c-k-ramakrishna-vs-the-karnataka-state-tourism-on-9-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"C K Ramakrishna vs The Karnataka State Tourism … on 9 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96751","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96751"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96751\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}