{"id":96911,"date":"2010-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010"},"modified":"2014-05-15T01:03:02","modified_gmt":"2014-05-14T19:33:02","slug":"retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 18911 of 2008(B)\n\n\n1. RETNAMMA, VILAYILVEEDU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE HOME\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,\n\n3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :27\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n\n            ---------------------------------------------\n             W.P.C.NO.18911 OF 2008\n            ---------------------------------------------\n            Dated         27th    October, 2010\n\n\n                           O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           Petitioner, the mother of Shaji,<\/p>\n<p>whose body was found hanging on the upstair of<\/p>\n<p>the  house,   being          constructed                 by him,  on<\/p>\n<p>6\/7\/2006, filed this petition under Article<\/p>\n<p>226 of Constitution of India, for a direction<\/p>\n<p>to respondents 1 and 2 to appoint a Senior<\/p>\n<p>Police   Officer             to          investigate           Crime<\/p>\n<p>No.411\/2006    of          Varkala              Police       Station<\/p>\n<p>registered under the caption &#8220;man missing&#8221; and<\/p>\n<p>subsequently converted under Section 174 of<\/p>\n<p>Code of Criminal Procedure. Deceased Shaji was<\/p>\n<p>working in Gulf. He married Lyna and was<\/p>\n<p>staying with her and the father-in-law                          and<\/p>\n<p>mother-in-law and           their children, since his<\/p>\n<p>return from Gulf 1=             years prior to the date<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of his missing. Sunil, bother-in-law of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased     Shaji   came to   the  house  of  the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner on 3\/7\/2006 and informed that Shaji<\/p>\n<p>was    missing   five  days  earlier to  3\/7\/2006.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner went to Varkala Police Station and<\/p>\n<p>furnished the information of missing of Shaji<\/p>\n<p>based on which Crime No.411\/2006 was registered<\/p>\n<p>under     the  caption  man  missing. On  6\/7\/2006<\/p>\n<p>body was found hanging in decomposed stage in<\/p>\n<p>the upstair portion of the       building,   which<\/p>\n<p>was being constructed by Shaji. Petition is<\/p>\n<p>filed      alleging  that  there  was   no  proper<\/p>\n<p>investigation      and  though  father-in-law  and<\/p>\n<p>brother-in-law of Shaji had sustained injuries,<\/p>\n<p>suspected to be caused in the incident which<\/p>\n<p>led     to   the   death  of   Shaji,  no   proper<\/p>\n<p>investigation     was  conducted.  It  was    also<\/p>\n<p>contended     that   wife  of  Shaji  had  illicit<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>relationship with one    Sathishan, while Shaji<\/p>\n<p>was in Gulf and on his return, on getting<\/p>\n<p>information which was not originally believed<\/p>\n<p>by Shaji, he used to     quarrel with the wife.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioner would contend that it was disclosed<\/p>\n<p>to    her that some times prior to the date of<\/p>\n<p>missing there was quarrel between father-in-law<\/p>\n<p>and the wife of Shaji with him and something<\/p>\n<p>occurred and Matador Tempo Van owned by Shaji<\/p>\n<p>was taken by Sathishan and it is suspected that<\/p>\n<p>body was shifted. It is also contended that<\/p>\n<p>postmortem certificate shows the contusion of<\/p>\n<p>8x4x0.3 c.m on the right of front of chest 7 cm<\/p>\n<p>to the right of midline and 4 c.m above costal<\/p>\n<p>margin, which shows that death was not due to<\/p>\n<p>hanging.     It is also  contended  that  close<\/p>\n<p>relatives      of the  wife  of  Shaji      are<\/p>\n<p>influential    and closed  to  leaders  of  the<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>community and it is in such circumstances, no<\/p>\n<p>proper investigation is being conducted. It is<\/p>\n<p>therefore contended that, a direction    is to be<\/p>\n<p>issued to conduct proper investigation by a<\/p>\n<p>Senior Police Officer.\n<\/p>\n<p>           2. Though there was a direction to file<\/p>\n<p>a statement, two years back no statement was<\/p>\n<p>filed by the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>           3. Learned  Government   Pleader   made<\/p>\n<p>available the case diary. On going through the<\/p>\n<p>case diary, I find that proper investigation<\/p>\n<p>was not conducted. There are several suspicious<\/p>\n<p>circumstances,     which    warrants   a    proper<\/p>\n<p>investigation. Though      Shaji was living along<\/p>\n<p>with the wife and in-laws and it was alleged<\/p>\n<p>that Shaji was missing       five days prior to<\/p>\n<p>3\/7\/2006,     factum of missing was not reported<\/p>\n<p>to the police, either by the       wife   or  the<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in-laws. The fact was not even informed to the<\/p>\n<p>mother      or other relatives  of  Shaji.  First<\/p>\n<p>statement recorded from the wife and father-in-<\/p>\n<p>law    and brother-in-law  show that as stated by<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner, petitioner was informed aboubt<\/p>\n<p>the missing only on 3\/7\/2006 by Sunil, brother-<\/p>\n<p>in-law of Shaji. Statement recorded shows that<\/p>\n<p>according     to the wife  and  in-laws,  on  the<\/p>\n<p>previous night of date of missing, there was an<\/p>\n<p>attempt by Shaji to hang himself, after getting<\/p>\n<p>the    wife hanged and as wife was not willing to<\/p>\n<p>join the husband, the fact was informed to the<\/p>\n<p>father-in-law.     Statement   shows  that    the<\/p>\n<p>deceased had allegedly     tied rope,  which was<\/p>\n<p>being used for the well on a fan. It was there,<\/p>\n<p>even in the morning. If that be the case, in<\/p>\n<p>the normal human conduct, if the husband is<\/p>\n<p>missing from the morning of the very next day,<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the wife and in-laws would definitely doubt<\/p>\n<p>whether he committed suicide as there was an<\/p>\n<p>attempt     earlier. In  that   case,  one  would<\/p>\n<p>expect them to inform the relatives of the<\/p>\n<p>husband of Shaji or to make a thorough search<\/p>\n<p>or at least inform the police. But that was not<\/p>\n<p>done, what was admittedly done.\n<\/p>\n<p>           4. Though  due to decomposed stage of<\/p>\n<p>the body, external injuries could not be found<\/p>\n<p>out    by   Dr.Rema who  conducted  the  autopsy,<\/p>\n<p>postmortem certificate reveals that there was a<\/p>\n<p>contusion     of 8x4x0.3 c.m on the right side of<\/p>\n<p>front of chest 7 c.m to right of midline and 4<\/p>\n<p>cm above costal margin. How this injury was<\/p>\n<p>sustained and whether it is possible, in the<\/p>\n<p>case of a suicide by hanging, was not properly<\/p>\n<p>considered by the Investigating Officer. It is<\/p>\n<p>also seen from the case diary that by the time<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>body    of   Shaji was  found  in  the decomposed<\/p>\n<p>stage, there were injuries on the body of both<\/p>\n<p>the father-in-law      and brother-in-law. Though<\/p>\n<p>explanation was offered by the brother-in-law,<\/p>\n<p>that he had fallen while sitting on a stool<\/p>\n<p>and sustained injury and treatment record was<\/p>\n<p>also procured, it is clear that       considering<\/p>\n<p>the nature of the incident and conduct of the<\/p>\n<p>relatives, a proper investigation should have<\/p>\n<p>been carried out. In such circumstances, it is<\/p>\n<p>absolutely     necessary   to  direct  a   proper<\/p>\n<p>investigation,     irrespective  of  the  finding<\/p>\n<p>arrived at by the Investigating Officer, based<\/p>\n<p>on the registration of the case under Section<\/p>\n<p>174 of Code of Criminal Procedure.<\/p>\n<p>             Writ  petition  is  allowed. Second<\/p>\n<p>respondent      Director   General   of   Police,<\/p>\n<p>Thiruvananthapuram     is  directed   to  entrust<\/p>\n<p>Wpc 18911\/08<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                         8<\/span><\/p>\n<p>investigation     of Crime   No.411  of  2006   of<\/p>\n<p>Varakala Police Station to the CBCID with a<\/p>\n<p>direction      that   it   shall    be   properly<\/p>\n<p>investigated by a superior police officer not<\/p>\n<p>below     the  rank of  Deputy  Superintendent  of<\/p>\n<p>Police. All efforts should be made to find out<\/p>\n<p>the     truth   and complete   the  investigation<\/p>\n<p>expeditiously and file a final report before<\/p>\n<p>the       concerned   Magistrate.    Investigating<\/p>\n<p>Officer is directed to file report before Sub<\/p>\n<p>Divisional Magistrate to     send the records to<\/p>\n<p>the concerned Magistrate including the FIR.<\/p>\n<p>                             M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,<br \/>\n                                        JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>uj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 18911 of 2008(B) 1. RETNAMMA, VILAYILVEEDU, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE HOME &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, 3. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, For Petitioner :SRI.RAJESH VIJAYAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1008,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010"},"wordCount":1008,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010","name":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-05-14T19:33:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/retnamma-vs-state-of-kerala-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Retnamma vs State Of Kerala on 27 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}