{"id":97028,"date":"2007-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007"},"modified":"2014-12-01T05:55:42","modified_gmt":"2014-12-01T00:25:42","slug":"k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","title":{"rendered":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS\n\nDATED: 16.04.2007\n\nCORAM:\n\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN\n\nCrl. RC. No.1440 of 2003\n\n\n\nK.Sarojini\t\t\t\t\t.. Petitioner\n\n\n\tVs\n\n\n1.  The State   \n    by the Sub Inspector of Police\n    B5~Singanallur Police Station\n    Coimbatore\n  \n    [ Amended as per the order of this \n      Court in Crl. M.P. No.13005\/2003 \n      dated 30.12.2002 ]\n\n2. S.Ethiraj\n\n3. S.Visalakshi\t\t\t\t\t.. Respondents \n\t\t\n\n\n\n\tThis Revision is filed against the Judgment in S.C.No.388 of 2001 on the file of the Court of the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dated 26.3.2002.\n\n\n\tFor petitioner    :  Mr.K.Kalyanasundaram\n\n\tFor respondents   : Mr.V.R.Balasubramaniam, Addl. Public Prosecutor~R1.\n\t\t\t    Mr.R.Ravichandran~R2 and R3.\n\n\nO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>\tThis revision has been preferred against the Judgment in S.C.No.388 of 2001 on the file of the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t2.A1 and A2 have been charged under Sections 498A, and 302 IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t3. Before the trial Court, P.Ws 1 to 14 were examined and Exs P1 to P17 were exhibited and M.Os 1 to 8 were marked. On the side of the accused Exs D1 to D4 were marked.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t4. After going through the evidence both oral and documentary, the learned Sessions Judge has held that the charges against A1  under Section 498 A and 302 IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and the charges against A2  under Section 498A and 304 ((b)  IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act have not been proved and accordingly the learned Sessions Judge has acquitted both A1 and A2 under Section 235 (1) Cr.P.C. The State  has not preferred any appeal over the findings of the learned sessions Judge.  P.W.1 the mother of the deceased has preferrred this revision.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t5. In this revision against acquittal, the main point to  be gone into is , is there any manifest error of law or procedure incurred in the judgment of the trial Court or whether the findings of the trial Court is perverse in nature to warrant any interference in its Judgement by this Court?\n<\/p>\n<p>\t6.Heard  Mr.K.Kalyasundaram, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner,  Mr.V.R.Balasubramaniam, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for State-R1 and Mr.R.Ravichandran, learned counsel appearing for R2 and R3 and considered their rival submissiions.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t7. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State would focus the attention of this Court to Exs P1 and P5 and contended that there is no irregularity or infirmity in the findings of the learned Sessions Judge and it is not perverse in nature on the availiability of both oral and documentary evidence.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t7a.  Ex P1 is the complaint given by the deceased on 16.10.2000 before the Inspector of Police, while she was taking treatment at the Government Hospital after the occurrence. A reading of Ex P1 complaint will go to show that the victim was a Science Graduate and the marriage between her and A1 took place some three years before the date of occurrence. In her complaint, she would state that on 14.10.2000 evening, she along with her husband and child went to Saibaba Temple and after staying at  her sister&#8217;s house, returned to her house on 15.10.2000 at about 10.00p.m., While her husband was sleeping in the bed room , she went to the kitchen for the purpose of preparing hot water, she opened the gas and ignited with a match stick without putting out the match stick, she dropped the same by the side of her, inadvertently, failing to  notice that the five litre kerosene cane was spilled over  on the floor which resulted in the immediate engulf of fire which caught in her nylex nighty, she raised distress call which made her husband to come to her rescue with a pot of water. In the mean time, she had sustained burn injuries all over her body and in the process of putting out the fire, her husband also sustained burn injuries on his hand and with the help of her brother Sankar and Rajagopal, her husband took her to the Government  Hospital in an ambulance and admitted her for treatment.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t 7b. Ex P5 is the dying declaration recorded by the  Judicial Magistrate on 16.10.2000 at about 2.20 a.m. Even in Ex P5, the deceased has not made any allegation of dowry or cruelty against the accused. She has stated that only due to the accident, the fire engulf all over her body.  The dying declaration is a  mere replica of what she had narrated in Ex P1. Only basing his reliance on Ex P1 and Ex P5, the learned Sessions Judge has come to a correct conclusion that the charge levelled against A1  under Section 498 A  and 302 IPC and under  Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act  and offence under Section 498 A, 304(B) IPC and under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against A2 has not been proved by the prosecution and accordingly acquitted both the accused under Section 235(1) of  Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t8.Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to interfere with the reasoning given by the learned trial Judge for having come to a conclusion that the charge levelled against the accused are not proved beyond any reasonable doubt for an acquittal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t9. In fine, the revision is dismissed confirming the Judgment in S.C.No.388 of 2001 on the file of the Court of Second Additional Sessions Judge, Coimbatore dated 26.03.2002.\n<\/p>\n<p>sg<\/p>\n<p>To<\/p>\n<p>1. \tThe Second Additional Sessions Judge,<br \/>\n\tCoimbatore<\/p>\n<p>2.  \tThe Inspector of Police,<br \/>\n\tB5, Singanallur Police Station,<br \/>\n\tCoimbatore.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. \tThe Public Prosecutor,<br \/>\n\tHigh Court,<br \/>\n\tMadras<\/p>\n<p>[PRV\/10242]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 16.04.2007 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.C.ARUMUGAPERUMAL ADITYAN Crl. RC. No.1440 of 2003 K.Sarojini .. Petitioner Vs 1. The State by the Sub Inspector of Police B5~Singanallur Police Station Coimbatore [ Amended as per the order [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\"},\"wordCount\":821,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\",\"name\":\"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007","datePublished":"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007"},"wordCount":821,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007","name":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-01T00:25:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-sarojini-vs-the-state-on-16-april-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.Sarojini vs The State on 16 April, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97028"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97028\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}