{"id":97065,"date":"2011-06-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-06-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011"},"modified":"2015-03-13T14:49:06","modified_gmt":"2015-03-13T09:19:06","slug":"sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH CQURT GE KARNATAE-(A AT ErEi:\u00a7;AE\u20ac\u00a7eR%E\"'  A'\n\nDATED THIS THE 9\" DAYQE,3UNEE;\"2'(}\"1::i:.  \"\nBEFORE    \n\nTHE H{}N'BLE MR. JUSTICE A,N.iF4EN:i.JG{3Pr5;L\ufb01 {Ef\u00a7'\u00a7)\\niE\u00a7;A.:7.:\n\nMisceftaneous First: AD0ea':'TV_!_\\ie:11{J29\u20acv ii\")!-? _2OV\u00a7A$.i._\"v\u20ac.PC}3\nBETWEEN:  A' '  V\n\nSri M.R.3ayaram,\n\nS\/0 late Ramaiah;\nAged about 57 years,\nResiding at Gokula... _  _  '  '\n\nBangalore ~     \"    ,.AppeHant\n\n(By sr:.K.sfaa.sh_i_\"'5:;.ra'r:  \nAND:  \"\"\"  ,    \nSriSida\"ppa,._ ' . _   \n\nSince deceased by L'Ps ,_  '\n\n1. Sm_t_,Venkatarnnj--a '\nW\/oefgateaasri Siciappa\n\n ~.Aged 'ab_out,74 years;\"\"'\n\nRfat P0omap u--ra Village,\n\n Ba ng'as!0:'rea :\\2m<:h"--jraIuk.\n\n  \nS\/0 "L;ate.fSr\u00a7v 'Sidappa,\n\n 'x__Aged a~bot;.2t 54 years,\n2  R\/are Poernapura Vitfagef\n"\u00ab.'E';ang'E.f.\u00a7ere Nerth Taiuk.\n\n   3.} Sri \\\/enkataraman\nT  -Erie Late Sn Sidapna,\n\n\n\n  \n\nAged about 53 years,\nR\/at Poomapura village,\nBangalore North Taluk.\n\nSml: Yeilamma\nSince deceased by LRs\n\nSrl Muthappa\nSince deceased by Ll'-is\n\n4. Smt Narasamma,\nW\/0 late Muthapba,\nAged about ~ major,\nR\/at Poornapura Village; \n\nBangalore North Taluk\u00a7   _ \n\n5. Sri Munlraju,   'V\n\nS\/0 late Mutha.p4p.a_,"~. g\nAged about ~grrj1aj\u00ab:.:\u00e9'r"',_. . "\n\nix)\n\nR\/ at P00 rn a:p"u ra. V\\\/'i-ll ag e,'--,3 ..  .\n\nBangalore Ne..rtl\u00e9. T:_a|uk.'_   \u00ab.  V'\n\n6. Sri r.aun:yAaplpg_._.__ \nS\/o Katbelepalya,'  \n\nAged about 65 yeaarsg'  \n\nR\/at Poornapura Vii-!_age, \nBangalore Nor:-hf_l"'aluk.'\n\n.   wereWW\n sjo \u00e9a.tge<lYlunl'ya'ppa;\n\n6(b)"\u00abSri .._fx;'en!AI\u00a7"ataramanappa,\n\n f_s\/o late Miuniyappaf\n _IVE.ajor. '\n\n a._\u00e9'\u20ac;(_V'_l\"a':_'{SLmdar Nagar)\n\u20ac'3.o'i<'1;\u00a7a;'vB3e:.:)ga'\u00a7'e:"e - 566054.\n\n6( ko)"-.S ri .;__i91'u-rz4:\u00a7'swa ma p pa.\n\n 'gs,\/0 fate Myniyappa.\n Ageocui 34~years.\n\n ..1%e;~,:\u00a3}-35 srmgvas.\n  " 3\/: late Muniyappa, \n waged 29 years.\n\n\n\n6(m} Sr: Siddiah,\ns\/0 iate Muniyappa.\nAged 34 years.\n\n601) Sri Muniamma,\nd\/Q Iate Muniyappa,\nMajor.\n\n6(0) Sri Ammaiah,\nd\/0 fate Muniyappa,\nMajor.\n\n6(9) Sri Siddamma,\nd\/0 {ate Muniyappa,\nMajor.\n\n(AH the above are_chiidre-n..._  'V\n\nof Late Muniya.p\u00abp.a and are \nr\/a 3"' Main, _P3Qor,ETapura. 1\nSundar Nagar, L3oku!'a.  x \nBangalore - 560.054) '   '\n\n7. Sri   \nAged ab'Qut\ufb0136 yea.r"s.,.  \nS\/0 late Si.ddappa~.  V'\n\n8. Sr; 'Mu_nira:]'a* ,  \n\n =  Ag biQ_ut..e_32 y\u00e9ara... *\n\n 9.\u00bb Sri eA\u00a5Via:r1js'_ma\u00a7tha\nt\ufb01ged ab'3\ufb01\u00abtV\u00bb_Z'3.'VV'3\u00a2\u00e9ars.\n\n10.  Mrgs' ra\u00e9dha.\n\n f_Aged a.b0r.:t 33 years.\n' _'The respondents No.7,.8,9 and<\/pre>\n
._ 2’10 are residing at
\n  i?\u00a7’F\u00a7e’or, C\/O Ayyappa Bakery
\n  Braiding, Gekuta,<\/p>\n
M.S.Ramaiah Road,<\/p>\n
Barigaiore \u00bb 560054. “”i5i’e.spofndVVen%tig K  <\/p>\n
{By Sri.i\\l.;i.Rar’nesn, Adv. for R6 (#.’\u00a5t\u00a7\ufb02F’,’I\u00ab}i’i5i\u00abND’EA?’?\u00ab:i_\u20ac}} <\/p>\n
This MFA is filed under orde:r.__4’3.V_iZuie.’\u00a7;_3ifAri}= c.r’eir>e,”~i,V
\nagainst the order dated -“‘~.{07I1i’52OQ8  pw.as.s_ed in . *<\/p>\n
MiSCtN0\u00a5357\/2001 on the file of,>'<$\\! Addl…City'_:Ci't{il Judge,
\nBangalore, CCH–2.8, dismissing'-the.._\u00bb petition fiied under
\norder 9 Rule 9 of CPC,t'o..V_set .a'side.._the=dismissai 'order, for
\ndefault passed in O.S.128.;1_98_2 r<j'ate'dVgj12.';Og2.2OO1.<\/p>\n
This appeal COming–.:.O:i1 for:a.gad.n1_is's'io";i' this day, the
\nCourt delivered the'-fol|t)wing'V:\u00abi  ~
\n  JUDGM_Elg]_"\n<\/p>\n
With :c.on*$_e;nt of’tiheifie_a”rried”;counsel on both sides,<\/p>\n
since Lt’.R is t-hVe”~a__pp_ealVVi’s heard for final disposal.
\n T-he Va_pp.e~l..lgan.t'”*fi_le’d__ O.S 128\/1982 against the<\/p>\n
respondentsshihri.thVe._City’  Court, Bangalore, for passing<\/p>\n
 a  of tie’:-lVa.r_atl0n of his title and for? mandatory<\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a7.,i’lljVLi”\u00a7”tCti”f,}_vfT~3516″Qthel’ reliefs in respect of plaint schedule<\/p>\n
 of the defendants having passed away,<\/p>\n
-V their”ieg”al representatives are brought on record. The suit<\/p>\n
H'”‘.’~u”‘V.i,.’irviasr..4det:reed on 13.11.1990. The defendants questioned<\/p>\n
.’  ii~;\u00a2:saia decree in RFA 400\/1992, which was ailowed on<\/p>\n
H9″-%:1G3\u00a7ig99 and the matter was remanded to the Triai<\/p>\n
x
\ncan
\n2*<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
Court. The appeiiant after receipt of court notice. <\/p>\n
Sri B.\\x’eerabhadrappa, advocate, who \ufb02ied  ”<\/p>\n
20.012000. Sri B.\\\/eerabhadrapp,a….d_ied on’2:3.;;oi’;’2.t0o1.._V<\/p>\n
The suit was dismissed for non~pro’:~:.ecs;\u00a7tion on 3U:.C3′.2E-‘–Q\u00a7.T1.’.:<\/p>\n
3. A Miscpetition wast4’…fi”ied  on
\n17.04.2001 under o.9,r\u00a7;9g_ CP{;’;”‘to’V…%;etjfosidetthe said order
\npassed in O.S.No.l28\/13382AVa’nvd’i’t:o  the suit. I.A.I
\nwas filed seeking’:-_  in filing the
\nMisc.Petition;” _fi”!’ed._;statement of objection
\nand con.t-es.t\u00a2ti~vthe’1i:;\u00a7etit\u00e9.on. EX’-power of attorney holder of
\nthe aptieilentV.dep0-sjedgasif”2P\\\/V-1. through whom E><s.P–1
\nA A 3  respondents, a power of<\/p>\n
attorney hordeivr of 3T5<\/p>\n
to P-3 viiere tgmarke-dA;–\n<\/p>\n
“respondent deposed as RW–1,<\/p>\n
“V”‘–.thr0.o’\u00a7;h:,.A–2\u00a7zruon1 E$$s;R’=’JZ’ to R-5 were marked. Considering<\/p>\n
_th’eT_rixza:i’~contegntigons, and noticing the judgment passed in<\/p>\n
R.F=A_.’34300\/\u00ab1\u00a79V2.t:;dated 04.03.1999, whereby, the Trial Court<\/p>\n
”.__had beer: directed to dispose off the suit by end of<\/p>\n
A ‘~.3f’Sneo3te_mber 1399,. the records of the case having been<\/p>\n
  reseived by it onfy on 31.03.2008 and there being defay in<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
*7
\n1<\/span><\/p>\n
service of court notice and the absence of PW”l for <:ross-<\/p>\n
examination on 12.e\u00ae2.:20\u00ael as weii as on <\/p>\n
was heid that! the petitioner is not diiigent in <\/p>\n
the suit and observing that, there isno bo_r:a'fi–d:es\u00bb"i'n:fi–iAing:u '= 'V<\/p>\n
the petition with deiay of about:=.two_-~irn:ont.h.s~,.'<\/p>\n
Petition for restoration oftii-the su,_it' wasv"'7divsrnissiedL <\/p>\n
Aggrieved, the plaintiff has fiiedthis appeal'.  H' V}<\/p>\n
4. Sri K.Shashi  counsel
\nappearing for  facts and after
\nreferring to’ contended that, the
\nCourt  approach to the
\nmattervland  fact that the appellants<\/p>\n
advocate Sari\u00bb.B.Veeraij~ha’d.~riappa had passed away and the<\/p>\n
 n’o”‘kn-owiedge of the adjourned dates, on<\/p>\n
a<:<t'oont"v..4ofrdentise of his advocate, his absence being<\/p>\n
bonaifidep\u00e9.'thj_e..'dismissal of the Misc.Petition filed for<\/p>\n
'i..restora~tior;_i of the suit is perverse and iiiegai. Learned<\/p>\n
A'~:i_:oVts;n's~e\u00a7 contends that; the Coorgbeiow has acted<\/p>\n
e
\n2%}
\nfa:\n<\/p>\n
\/
\n4<\/span>
\n.2″\n<\/p>\n
mechanically ln the matter and on any \\fi\u20acW of the’:rr*:a”t_te”‘l=.5<\/p>\n
the impugned order calls for interference.<\/p>\n
5. Sn l\\l.3.Ramesh, learned cdulnjjselgggappea’l*lrigton
\nthe respondents, on the other ‘han–<:l_. cont_en'ded <\/p>\n
appellant was negligent in proe.e'c~;lting"the'eu:it_:aVr;d""'in View ''<\/p>\n
of the judgment in i2_;fA 4gQ@–,fVi"#_39'2*\u00bb-.__dated=Cl4..vd3.1999,
\nwherein there was a   to decide the
\nsuit, PW~1 having notgmade 'h'infll5_el\u00abtV'_agtf'e2vi"iable for cross~
\nexaminationgdgw\ufb02    the Court below
\nwas  for default. According
\nto the  the petition filed seeking
\nrestorationL\u00e9beingaunten_a'b:l:e;the appellant having failed to<\/p>\n
makeeut suf.'-.ici'e'rlt cause for non–appearance of either<\/p>\n
?gW,1  19.02.2001, the Court below is<\/p>\n
  the impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
it   have perused the record.\n<\/p>\n
it  The suit was decreed in favour of the appellant<\/p>\n
 —   1311519905 The decree was set-‘aside in RFA\n<\/p>\n
 -\u00bbv4′{)\u20ac3,\/19392 on 04.031999; the matter was remitted to the<\/p>\n
9<\/span>
\nTrial Court to dispose off the Case within four mehths and<\/p>\n
the parties were directed to appear before the Tria.i’a\u20ac:i’oatgrt<\/p>\n
on 24.06.1999. The records having not been rejc’:eive_d’,: _<\/p>\n
matter was not taken up by the Trial Courtarz\u00bb  <\/p>\n
The record of the suit was received .0<\/p>\n
31.03.2000. The suit havingtieen taken up  the <\/p>\n
appellant entrusted the file  0.v’eei’VabhVadrappa,
\nadvocate. Indisputedl:-v;’-   was
\nhospitalised for,  away on
\n22-01-2001-_.  non–prosecution
\non   the’h’ah:se’nce of PW-1 and also
\ntakingiinto  tithe’ limit fixed for disposal of
\nthe Caseivlde  04.03.1999 passed in Ri-‘A<\/p>\n
400\/\u00a7L”39..2.\n<\/p>\n
‘  fact that Sri B.\\\/eerabhadrappa was engaged<\/p>\n
by the  hospitalisation of Sri Bveerabhadrappa<\/p>\n
lgufor cohsiderable time immediately prior to his death on<\/p>\n
A v~:lj”;>:2.0″?….2001, are not in dispute. The appellant having<\/p>\n
  some ta know of dismissal of the suit and having obtained<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n.\n<\/p>\n
ya<\/p>\n
10<\/span>
\ncertified copies has filed the E’\/i\u00a7sc.Petition seeking<\/p>\n
restoration of the suit. Except the 3″ respondent.’ o_thers<\/p>\n
did not file objections to the Misc. Petition. <\/p>\n
of PW\u00ab1 would show that, Sri B.\\ieerabhadrVaopa’~A–l.:ha_vihg” <\/p>\n
passed away and there being no \u00a7coh’}.m’Lijlhi\u00b0ceti.on.f’rom_Vt.h.ef<\/p>\n
office of Sri B.Veerabhadrap’pe___  sjitalole <\/p>\n
and hearing dates, PW–1 has hlvotepoeated
\nThe Court below has   delliat\/it of about
\ntwo months, the restor\u00e9.tioh’V._VVAo.eti’ti’o’h’l’:V\u00bb.’was filed. The
\naffidavit   ‘arid”:’th’e—iijevidence of PW-1
\nwould  ltiiotxvledge of dismissal of
\nthe  oh.’  after coming to know of
\nthe ordieeof  19.02.2001, certified copies<\/p>\n
wereeoplield’-\u00bbah’d’1olo”:ai.hed the Misc. Petition was filed<\/p>\n
 Evidence of PW-1 has not been<\/p>\n
 co-%_;’ectE\u00bb:.\u00e9”-\u00abexit: oteeiated.<\/p>\n
 V In my view. the approach of the Court below to<\/p>\n
A  the”‘metter is hyoer–technicai. Indlsputedly. the appellant<\/p>\n
 had engaged the services of Sri B.\\!eerabhadraooa,<\/p>\n
E2.\n<\/p>\n
ll
\nadvocate, who passed away on 22,01,200}. There being<\/p>\n
no communication from the office of Sri BlVeerabh’a.dV_ra_pp_a<\/p>\n
with regard to the stage and hearing date of  _<\/p>\n
appellant or power of attorney holder have”‘iio:t]_a:p’peared:it ‘* <\/p>\n
and the suit was dismissed for tdefa:-uitfi’<\/p>\n
When the factual assertionsrilmadelllin’the   <\/p>\n
deposed by Pl\/’V–1 are not in   the Court
\nshould have allowed tile:’p_ra’iirer;_>vA:inad’eAjiri._the restoration
\npetition and tal<en_the   the same.\n<\/p>\n
It is not    there was any
\ndeliberategggattgiialltiilg  in not appearing
\nbefore   allowing the suit to be
\ndismisseid\ufb01Llilaintitt\/app:.ei’lan’t’Jis not shown to have gained<\/p>\n
anything on  oflzhe dismissal of the suit for default.<\/p>\n
has not been correctly appreciated. The<\/p>\n
ap_pe_llant Tliais  out sufficient cause for condonation of<\/p>\n
 _ delay. and also to allow the restoration petition. The Trial<\/p>\n
:jCoi.irt hassfaiied to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it.<\/p>\n
._’T~h:e’–T’Ariai Court has preferred technicalities as against<\/p>\n
X.\n<\/p>\n
at<\/p>\n
E2<\/p>\n
substantial justice and as a resuit, has passed the<\/p>\n
impugned order, which is unsustainable.<\/p>\n
10. The deiay in filing Misc.Petition 3s?;5aoo:ii.:is”‘\u00e9ioiif <\/p>\n
deliberte. The appellant has not ga’ine’d’hy”a <\/p>\n
filing the restoration petition.’ The”.re1sponderi_–ts”ha~ve*:Tnot”~_<\/p>\n
established any malafides on   in
\nfiling the restoration pve\ufb02tion ciiie’ia.t_ejd’l\u00a7:.._AThe’cause shown
\nfor the delay constitutes  it is trite that,
\ntechnicalities   justice
\nshould be    compensating the
\notherside’wi-t’ij’:cos:t\u00a7\u00a7i”‘  has acted vice-versa.
\nUnder   the impugned order is<\/p>\n
unsustainable, ”\n<\/p>\n
  Fo”r:th:”e”iforegoing reasons, the appeai is allowed and<\/p>\n
Afhe’~ii_i_ni\u00a73’utj’n.edixcivrder is set–asidei LAJ filed in Misc.Petition<\/p>\n
 _ 357}”200.,i’eri’ the file of City Civil Court, Bangalore, is<\/p>\n
u””:'”v4.”‘*–;’ai.loivy*ed””‘and the delay in filing the Misc.Petition is<\/p>\n
_ercQndened.\n<\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
i
\n )’
\n‘\ufb02ax’<\/p>\n
E3
\nBeing satisfied with the cause shown for “non-<\/p>\n
appearance of the plaintiff eh 19.02.2001 <\/p>\n
128\/1E38Z was called an for hearing; the <\/p>\n
19.02.2001,, dismissing the suit for ho\u00bbh-prQ’s’eCu.ti_e.h”‘iisV’_’s.el:.,_ “‘<\/p>\n
aside and as a result, the suit Vstargdsi.:’rest_e’re\ufb01 tc,{f–..{ile;,i.:<\/p>\n
subject to the appellant\/;;i\u00a3Vla’i.h..tiffit”dep0sit’i’ri’gl~\u00bb.i\ufb02’cost:-5 of <\/p>\n
RsiL0OO\/~h1the Tnalcoun:p\u00a7hje\u00bb3o1\ufb01;2d11{\u00a7wnchis<\/p>\n
to be released in favouvrefl’del7en;;la,n’li’S–Vt[\u00a7\u00a3x”Tl5 -the LR’s.<\/p>\n
The parties,,_a_’re   before the Trial
\nCourt on  tu:,rt’her orders.\n<\/p>\n
The  \u00bbTt0._Tpvroce-ed with the suit from the
\nstage atiwhich it was as on 19.02.2011 and<\/p>\n
deciqe’ the suit’ eapveditiously and at any even’: within an<\/p>\n
 tjut.e_@xr lir_\ufb01ilt.o.f4l’4._Vmonths commencing frem 0237,2011.<\/p>\n
 .rRet_u.rhlithe LCR Trial Court forthwith,<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a3fe<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7{\u00a73<\/p>\n
saC*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH CQURT GE KARNATAE-(A AT ErEi:\u00a7;AE\u20ac\u00a7eR%E”‘ A’ DATED THIS THE 9″ DAYQE,3UNEE;”2′(}”1::i:. ” BEFORE THE H{}N’BLE MR. JUSTICE A,N.iF4EN:i.JG{3Pr5;L\ufb01 {Ef\u00a7’\u00a7)\\niE\u00a7;A.:7.: Misceftaneous First: AD0ea’:’TV_!_\\ie:11{J29\u20acv ii”)!-? _2OV\u00a7A$.i._”v\u20ac.PC}3 BETWEEN: A’ ‘ V Sri M.R.3ayaram, S\/0 late Ramaiah; Aged about […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97065","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1623,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011"},"wordCount":1623,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011","name":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-06-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-13T09:19:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-m-r-jayaram-vs-sri-sidappa-on-9-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri M R Jayaram vs Sri Sidappa on 9 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97065","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97065"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97065\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97065"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97065"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97065"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}