{"id":97505,"date":"2010-08-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-08-15T05:31:00","modified_gmt":"2017-08-15T00:01:00","slug":"kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.M.Thaker,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/911\/1995\t 3\/ 5\tORDER \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 911 of 1995\n \n\n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nKAUSHAR\nENTERPRISES - PARTNER OF SAIYEDALI HASANALI &amp; 2 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nCHANCHALBEN\nBABUBHAI PATEL &amp; 7 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \n(MR\nPV NANAVATI) for\nPetitioner(s) : 1,None for Petitioner(s) : None for Petitioner\nNo(s).: for Petitioner(s) : 2 - 3. \nMR CB KAUSHAL for Respondent(s)\n: 1 - 4. \nNone for Respondent(s) : 5 -\n8. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 12\/04\/2010 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>\tPresent<br \/>\napplication accompanies the main appeal being First Appeal No.435 of<br \/>\n1995 which arises out of the award dated 30\/7\/1994 passed by the<br \/>\nMotor Accident Claims Tribunal (Main), Ahmedabad (Rural) at Mirzapur,<br \/>\nAhmedabad in MACP No.439 of 1987.  The appellant insurance company<br \/>\nhas challenged the directions passed by the learned Tribunal in the<br \/>\naforesaid award.  By the award impugned in the appeal, learned<br \/>\nTribunal has awarded compensation to the tune of Rs.4,30,800\/- with<br \/>\ninterest at the rate of 15% in favour of claim petitioner and<br \/>\nrespondent no.4 and 5.  The learned Tribunal has directed that<br \/>\nrespondent nos.2, 3 and 7 (in claim petition No.439 of 1987) shall be<br \/>\njointly and severally responsible to pay sum of Rs.4,30,800\/-.<br \/>\nAggrieved by the award, the appellants preferred the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\nappellants applicants also preferred, along with the First Appeal,<br \/>\npresent application praying for stay of the said award.  After<br \/>\nhearing the appellants applicants the Court passed below mentioned<br \/>\norder on 10\/12\/1995.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t Rule.\n<\/p>\n<p> Ad interim relief in terms of para 4(A) on condition that the<br \/>\npetitioners deposit on amount of Rs.3,30,000\/- (Rupees three lacs and<br \/>\nthirty thousand only) together with proportionate interest and cost<br \/>\nwith the Tribunal.  On deposit of the amount, the Tribunal will pass<br \/>\norder as regards disbursement and investment of the amount deposited.<br \/>\n If the petitioners have deposited any amount in excess of the<br \/>\naforesaid amount, the petitioners will be at liberty to withdraw the<br \/>\nsame.  The petitioners may retain the rest of the amount with them on<br \/>\ncondition that in case they lose in appeal and are required to pay<br \/>\nthe balance amount or any part thereof, the petitioners will pay the<br \/>\nsame with interest as may be directed by the Court.  Order that may<br \/>\nbe passed by the Tribunal as regards investment and disbursement of<br \/>\nthe amount shall be reported to this Court immediately.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\ncan be seen that the Court directed the applicants appellants to<br \/>\ndeposit Rs.3,30,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate Mr. Thomas for learned advocate Mr.Nanavati appearing for<br \/>\nthe applicants submitted that the amount of Rs.3,30,000\/- with cost<br \/>\nhas been deposited.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\norder dated 10\/2\/1995 appears to have continued until now without any<br \/>\nmodification.  After the order was passed, the application does not<br \/>\nappear to have been prosecuted and\/or heard further.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tToday,<br \/>\nwhen the application is taken up, applicants&#8217; advocate is not<br \/>\npresent.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThere<br \/>\nis nothing on record which would clarify the position obtaining as on<br \/>\ntoday particularly on the point as to whether the learned Tribunal<br \/>\nhas carried out the order with regard to the disbursement and<br \/>\ninvestment or not.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIn<br \/>\nthe facts and circumstances, following order is passed:\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tRegistry shall call for the report from the officer of the Nazir of<br \/>\n\tlearned Tribunal with regard to compliance of order dated 10\/2\/1995<br \/>\n\tpassed in captioned Civil Application.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tclaimant shall deposit the balance i.e. difference between the<br \/>\n\tamount directed by order dated 10\/2\/1995 and the amount required to<br \/>\n\tbe paid as per the award impugned in the appeal.  The said<br \/>\n\tbalance\/difference amount shall be deposited with the Tribunal on or<br \/>\n\tbefore 30\/4\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>After<br \/>\n\tthe amount is deposited, the learned Tribunal shall immediately<br \/>\n\tinvest the said amount in fixed deposit in a nationalised bank in<br \/>\n\tthe name of Nazir of the Tribunal. The amount towards proportionate<br \/>\n\tcost and interest, not deposited by the appellant shall also be<br \/>\n\tdeposited on or before 30\/4\/2010 and such amount shall also be<br \/>\n\tinvested in fixed deposit along with the aforesaid amount.  The<br \/>\n\tinterest shall be accumulated and will not be disbursed\/paid until<br \/>\n\tfurther order by the Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tfixed deposit shall be initially taken out for a period of three<br \/>\n\tyears and thereafter it will be renewed without further orders until<br \/>\n\tfinal decision in the appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>Since<br \/>\n\tthe appeal is pending since 1995, the Registry is directed to list<br \/>\n\tthe appeal for final hearing in the week beginning from 21\/6\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>Fresh<br \/>\n\tnotice intimating the date of final hearing of the appeal shall be<br \/>\n\tissued forthwith.\n<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\n\tapplicants appellants shall confirm with the Registry that the<br \/>\n\taddress of the opponents mentioned in the cause title are accurate<br \/>\n\tand continue to be the same as of now.  If there is any change the<br \/>\n\tsame shall be informed to the office on or before 15\/4\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tWith<br \/>\nthe aforesaid direction and clarification, the ad interim relief<br \/>\ngranted earlier is confirmed with the aforesaid modification.  It is<br \/>\ndirected that the amount deposited earlier shall continue to abide by<br \/>\nthe terms and conditions mentioned in the order dated 10\/2\/1995 but<br \/>\nwith aforesaid modification and further clarification and direction<br \/>\nthat the amount deposited earlier and the amount which may now be<br \/>\ndeposited after this order shall remain invested (after the<br \/>\ndisbursement as mentioned in the order dated 10\/2\/1995) and the<br \/>\nTribunal and\/or the Bank shall not permit the respondents to create<br \/>\nany charge and\/or raise any loan against the fixed deposit amount.<br \/>\nThe respondents also will not create any charge and\/or raise any loan<br \/>\nagainst the fixed deposit.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\ncivil application stands disposed of with aforesaid clarification,<br \/>\nmodification and directions.\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.M.THAKER,<br \/>\nJ.) <\/p>\n<p>(ila)<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 Author: K.M.Thaker,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print CA\/911\/1995 3\/ 5 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 911 of 1995 ========================================================= KAUSHAR ENTERPRISES &#8211; PARTNER OF SAIYEDALI HASANALI &amp; 2 &#8211; Petitioner(s) Versus CHANCHALBEN BABUBHAI PATEL &amp; 7 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97505","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":850,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010"},"wordCount":850,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010","name":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-15T00:01:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kaushar-vs-chanchalben-on-23-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kaushar vs Chanchalben on 23 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97505","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97505"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97505\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97505"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97505"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97505"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}