{"id":97580,"date":"2008-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-28T16:58:25","modified_gmt":"2017-10-28T11:28:25","slug":"t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1478 of 2008()\n\n\n1. T.K. KUMARI KAMALAM,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. A. SAMIKUTTY, S\/O.IMBICHIKUTTY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE\n\n3. CHIEF TOWN PLANNER,\n\n4. THE SECRETARY,\n\n5. THE TRIBUNAL FOR LOCL SELF GOVERNMENT\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.G.BHASKAR\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\n\n Dated :13\/08\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                    H.L.DATTU, C.J. &amp; A.K.BASHEER, J.\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                                 W.A.No.1478 OF 2008\n                  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                       Dated this the 13th day of August 2008\n\n                                       JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>A.K.BASHEER, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The genesis of the dispute in this writ appeal has essentially stemmed from<\/p>\n<p>the clamour between the appellant and respondent no.1 over the title and<\/p>\n<p>possession of the property situated in Survey No.50\/2B of Pantheerankavu Village<\/p>\n<p>in Kozhikode District.         Appellant and respondent no.1 are stated to be<\/p>\n<p>neighbouring property owners.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2. It is on record that the appellant had started construction of a multi<\/p>\n<p>storied building for a Nursing College in the said property after obtaining a<\/p>\n<p>building permit from Olavanna Grama Panchayat.                         Respondent no.1 raised<\/p>\n<p>objection against the construction before the Panchayat. After considering the<\/p>\n<p>objections and hearing the parties, the Panchayat found that there was some merit<\/p>\n<p>in the contention raised by respondent No.1 that the appellant was infact making<\/p>\n<p>the construction in his property. Therefore, a stop memo was issued by the<\/p>\n<p>Panchayat directing the appellant not to proceed with further construction. After<\/p>\n<p>issuance of the stop memo also the Panchayat had heard the parties yet again, and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter an order was passed directing the appellant to get the property measured<\/p>\n<p>by the Taluk Surveyor.        It was further directed that the construction of the<\/p>\n<p>W.A.No.1478 OF 2008<br \/>\n                                        :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>building be stopped till the survey was completed.\n<\/p>\n<p>        3. The above order was challenged by the appellant before the Tribunal for<\/p>\n<p>Local Self Government Institutions. The Tribunal allowed the appeal and set<\/p>\n<p>aside the order issued by the Panchayat holding that the Panchayat had no<\/p>\n<p>authority to issue a stop memo, since the dispute was essentially touching upon the<\/p>\n<p>title to the property. However, the Tribunal also held that the appellant was not<\/p>\n<p>entitled to make any construction in R.S.No.50\/2B since the building permit<\/p>\n<p>obtained by him was only in respect of R.S.50\/2A2\/2B. It was further held that<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 will have to seek his remedy before the civil court, if according to<\/p>\n<p>him, the appellant had committed trespass.\n<\/p>\n<p>        4. The above order passed by the Tribunal was challenged by respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.1 before this court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India contending,<\/p>\n<p>inter alia, that the appellant would not be entitled to continue with the construction<\/p>\n<p>of the building in terms of the permit issued by the Panchayat, especially, since<\/p>\n<p>the permit was obtained by her misleading the Panchayat and also since the dispute<\/p>\n<p>with regard to the title to the property had not been decided as yet.<\/p>\n<p>        5. The learned Single Judge took the view that a solution to the vexed issue<\/p>\n<p>can be found only by identifying the property covered under the building permit,<\/p>\n<p>after getting the property measured with the help of Surveyor. Learned Judge also<\/p>\n<p>noticed that the parties had no objection to the above course of action. It was<\/p>\n<p>W.A.No.1478 OF 2008<br \/>\n                                       :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>therefore directed that the plot covered under the permit issued by the Panchayat to<\/p>\n<p>be identified after measurement of the disputed property. It was further held that<\/p>\n<p>the appellant shall not be entitled to make any construction in R.S.50\/2B.<\/p>\n<p>       6. The said judgment is impugned in this writ appeal contending inter alia<\/p>\n<p>that the interdiction contained in the judgment from making any construction in<\/p>\n<p>Survey No.50\/2B will result in irreparable hardship to the appellant. It is pointed<\/p>\n<p>out by the learned counsel for the appellant that the learned Single Judge was not<\/p>\n<p>justified in restraining the appellant from continuing with the construction since<\/p>\n<p>the Panchayat had issued the permit after scrutiny of the relevant records and also<\/p>\n<p>after making local inspection in compliance of the statutory formalities.<\/p>\n<p>       7. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 submits that the writ appeal has in<\/p>\n<p>fact become infructuous in as much as the directions contained in the judgment<\/p>\n<p>had already been implemented. The Taluk Surveyor had measured the property in<\/p>\n<p>the presence of the parties and prepared a sketch. He further points out that<\/p>\n<p>immediately after the pronouncement of the judgment in the writ petition, the<\/p>\n<p>appellant had rushed to the civil court and obtained an order of injunction.<\/p>\n<p>       8. We do not propose to deal with the issue any further at this stage since<\/p>\n<p>admittedly a dispute does exist between the appellant and respondent No.1 as<\/p>\n<p>regards the above property. Learned counsel on either side would agree that a<\/p>\n<p>final solution to the vexed issue relating to the title to the property, has to be<\/p>\n<p>W.A.No.1478 OF 2008<br \/>\n                                        :: 4 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>ultimately resolved by a competent civil court.\n<\/p>\n<p>       9. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the<\/p>\n<p>materials available on record, we have no hesitation to hold that the imbroglio can<\/p>\n<p>be sorted out only by a competent civil court. The only apprehension of the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is that the interdiction in the judgment restraining her from making any<\/p>\n<p>construction in Survey No.50\/2B may act as a fetter when the issue relating to title<\/p>\n<p>is considered by the civil court at a later stage. We do not find any reason why the<\/p>\n<p>observation made by the learned Judge in this regard shall trammel the civil court<\/p>\n<p>from deciding the issue of title, if and when such a suit is filed by either of the<\/p>\n<p>parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Therefore, we dispose of this writ appeal making it clear that the ultimate<\/p>\n<p>decision on the question of title in respect of the property in which the alleged<\/p>\n<p>construction has been made, shall be taken by a competent civil court. Status quo<\/p>\n<p>as on today shall be maintained by the parties and neither of them shall make any<\/p>\n<p>construction without the permission of the civil court.<\/p>\n<p>                                                             (H.L.DATTU)<br \/>\n                                                         CHIEF JUSTICE<\/p>\n<p>                                                         (A.K.BASHEER)<br \/>\n                                                                 JUDGE<br \/>\njes<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1478 of 2008() 1. T.K. KUMARI KAMALAM, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. A. SAMIKUTTY, S\/O.IMBICHIKUTTY, &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE 3. CHIEF TOWN PLANNER, 4. THE SECRETARY, 5. THE TRIBUNAL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":945,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\",\"name\":\"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008"},"wordCount":945,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008","name":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-28T11:28:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-k-kumari-kamalam-vs-a-samikutty-on-13-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.K. Kumari Kamalam vs A. Samikutty on 13 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97580"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97580\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}