{"id":97659,"date":"2010-12-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-21T12:00:20","modified_gmt":"2017-10-21T06:30:20","slug":"sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE: HIGH COURT GP' KARNATAKA AT }3ANGA__LORE-\nDATED \"IRIS THE 13*\" DAY OF DECEMBER' \n\nBEFO RE\n\n'TPII\u00a3 HON'}3L.EZ MRJUSTIC \u00a75,:\u00a7\u00a7.sA':YAN\u00a7i;f2A&*;Ar\u20ac'_A  \" \"\n\nR.S.A..NO_ 1794\/2005 c \/x};: Rs-A._..\u00a7':=o'.'TT1.\u00a796g20\u00a7;f5..\u00ab \nR.s,A.No. W94\/2005 V' '\nBETWEEN;\n\nSMT.SARASAi\\\/EMA '\n\nW\/O MUNIRAJU __ :\n\nAGED ABOUT42 YEAI\u00a7'.S --. 3  ; \nR\/T FARM HOUSE m SY.NQ.73~..\"_--.._ ' \nBALIGANAI[i\u00a3ALi:;$j     \" \n\nMAILUR   563 '  -- '\n\n  ' _   ...APPELLANT\n{SRI JwALAKUMAR'ANiD_N.G.RAvI1<:UMAR, ADVS.)\nmtg; n x    \n\n 'A . If .jAV?A1LzxKsr1A1@MMA\n\n" .. ,wA\n13\/ Q M'UN{SHAMAPPA\nAG-<E'I) ABOUT 60 YEARS\n\n~.. " ._R\/T KADADANAI-IALL1\n= ._ LAKKUR HOI:3\u00a3..I\n\nMALUR TALUK M 553130.\n\n" 3. .M.VENKA"i'ESHAPPA\n\nS\/O MUNI'SVVAMAI3PA\nAGEZI} ABOUT 55 '{E*3\u00a3--lF.S\nKASEPU 179L!--\\.\u20ac I'3ANC}ARI3E1T 'fA3C,{\u00a7 K.\n\n\n\n4. M..RAMACHANDRAI:'PA\nS\/' O l\\\/EUNISHAMj\u00bb\\.PPA\nAGED ABOUT 48 YEZARS\nBAN GARPET TALUK\n\n5. R.RAMAMUm'HY\nS\/0 RAMAPPA   \nAGED ABOUT 35 YEARS : '\nBANGARPET TALUK\n\n6. DAKSHNAMURTHY\nS \/0 RAMAPPA 'V \nAGED ABOUT 30 YEARS  \nBANGARPET TAL-UK \n\n7. RAMAPPA  \nS\/O vE:NKATAPPA.~~  _ \n\n    \n\nRELSPONDENTFS  5;..6' SI '2 ARE\nRES.I_DiNG AT   _ " * '\nCHALA_GANAI\u00e9fAL,LI'~..'\n; MALUR 1-'.A_1;U K.\n * . ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
 ‘ ; ‘(‘SRi -VIGPE.NES}{WARA S. SHAS”1’RI,ADV. FOR R1
\n‘ .;-R1 f<7jARS SERVED)<\/p>\n
 '.7;-:iS'TRSA FILEED 13\/8 100 OF cpc AGAINST THE
\nJUQGMENT AND DEGREE DTD.16.05.05 PASSED IN
\nR.A.:\\3Q'.312\/98 ON THE FILE OF 'I'H.E2 PRLCIVIL JUDGE<\/p>\n
 AA ii?-R.DN.) AND CJM, KOLAR, ALLOVVING THE APPEAL AND<\/p>\n
'  'vSE\u00a7'TING ASIDE TIMER JUIDGEMENT AND DEGREE
\n DTD.21.} 1.98 PASSED IN OS.NO.243\/93 ON THE FILE) UP'
\nTHE CIVIL JUDGE URDN.) AND JMFC, MALUR.\n<\/p>\n
ISETWEIENJ<\/p>\n
1. JAYA’LAKSHI\\\u00a3LAMMA
\nW\/O RAMAPPA
\nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS  .\n<\/p>\n
R\/AT CI-MIAGANAHALLI, LAKKUR H033-LI ._
\nMALUR TALUKW 563 130.\n<\/p>\n
\n(SR1 VIGHNESHWARA S. S}1ASTR’.I, ADV.) ” .  <\/p>\n
AND :\n<\/p>\n
1. SRIEMUNISWAMAPPA _ _ .\n<\/p>\n
SINCE DECEASEDBY LRS _  ~<\/p>\n
Ha} RAMAKRISI\u00bb;NAPP;;  ‘  1
\nS\/O LATE MUI\\}ISWAM_P}’A_ f
\nAGED ABOUT 50 ‘ .1.\n<\/p>\n
R\/AT cH,ALA,\u00a7:ANi;iAL:,i’~’  A ‘  u <\/p>\n
LAI<;r{LIj\u00a7\u00a7"H0'i%:L:–, "\n<\/p>\n
l\\11ALUR’1’Al,I.jK\u00ab.+ 553.13o.S’<\/p>\n
1(b] SR1,v1\u00a7NIgpA”\n<\/p>\n
S\/e_’LATE NHENLSWAMAPPA\n<\/p>\n
– -. AGE!)-AB’OU”_F?15 YEARS
\n ILASH\u00a3PURA__’_\\[ILLAGE
\n‘ 5\u00bb-KASABA HOBLI
\n_ 1-ZANSGARPET TALUK – 563 1 14.\n<\/p>\n
‘ . 1:9; SR\u00a3_’M.RAMACHANDRAPPA
\n‘ , S\/0—LATE MUNISWAMPPA
\n\u00ab =.AG’::”1> ABOUT 40 YEARS
\n~~ V R.\/AT CHAMXGANHALLI, L-AKKUR HOBLI
\n‘E\\\/IALUR TALUK — 563 :30.\n<\/p>\n
‘  SMT.SARASAMMA<\/p>\n
VV\/O MUNIRAJU
\nAGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
\nR\/AT C}-IALAGANI’~IAI.;LI\u00a7 LAKKUR HOBLE
\nMALLER TALUK –\u00bb 563 130,
\n., wRI3S1?’OND ESNTS<\/p>\n
.4-\n<\/p>\n
{SR1 JWALAKUMAR. ADV. FOR R2
\nSR1 HKVRAJARAM, ADV. FOR R3 (3.)
\nRMB), R1{C) are served)<\/p>\n
THIS RSA FILED 13\/8 100 OF’ c:Jc;AGAI:s’s\u00a2%@4111:<\/p>\n
JUDGMENT AND DEGREE D’m.;e.oe._o5., PASSED’-\u00abIAN<\/p>\n
R.A.NO.52\/98 ON THE FILE QR me ;’P12L.\u00abC:;1v1LVJUin_.13:AL AND <\/p>\n
CONFIRMING THE JUDGEME;’;NT”\n<\/p>\n
DTD.23.1..98 PASSED IN QS.NO.’1._5-4-[90  THE E4′-{LE OF’
\nTHE CIVIL JUDGE {JR.DN’.’)_AN__.D JMFC,    ‘<\/p>\n
THESE APPEALS C0Mi’:~J:\u00a7:; ON 1%*o\u00abRT_  HEA:R1NG THIS
\nDAY, THE COURT DF;3L.IVEF;ED”TEI13″PTQLLOWING:<\/p>\n
  ‘\u00e9.’pp”ea1:~3& \ufb01led by piaintiffs in
\n0s.No. 1’5};\/ 3A:9’~.\u00a7\u00a73.. ‘,1 r1eE44V_LV25+\u00a7e{3:j’tedV by her father Murliswamppa in her favom’ for sake<\/p>\n
”  A’ 0f._.&agrVf;eu1tL:ra1 land bearing Sy.N0.73,measuring 2 acres 31<\/p>\n
 gL\ufb011\u00a7,as si’i.L:a”\u00a3ed 211; E3a1igz:11ah.aIIi village” The one and the<\/p>\n
” {ml}; praye1* sought, in the aI”er<;z<3aid suit.  for a direction 1.0<\/p>\n
W and 23"' dei'et1d;m1:s i,herein 3:10 exeeu\u00e9e the ssa\u00e9e deed 0!"<\/p>\n
*1
\nV ~\\<\/p>\n
4'?\n<\/p>\n
-5\u00bb<\/p>\n
suit schedule preperty in favour of _ plaintiff<\/p>\n
Sm.t.JayaIakshmammz:: pursuant to agreement r3i”‘e~e\ufb01-e.’t:i\u00a2ated<\/p>\n
1.4.8.1984. In the said suit Muniswa.mappa_.\u00a7S-~  ‘IVS?<\/p>\n
defendant because the pr0perty_,is.. 3_tjated beloiigixtg {O . <\/p>\n
him. So far as 2!” de’fenc:ia11t S\u00e9.raSe;r11’e1a
\nplaint averment is that SEi>i;C v’SC..}:%l\u20acCi;.i3’\u20ac. eeriief
\nbeionging to Munisufamappa\u00a3_L:Vi:$vusaiei  been gifted in
\nher favour under 3. \u00a7:*e;f%_StmerAe&d deeefdeated 31.3.1986. The<\/p>\n
said gift deedahas eeme .i:1:’1tO’~exisiei1ee”‘ if: eoliusion between<\/p>\n
2nd v~c1e1en,:i;\u00ab:,nt defe’f1dai 1t. to defeat the legitimate<\/p>\n
Claire ef ” a\u00a7.:fe33}{shmamma.\n<\/p>\n
2-, \u00bb See-Grid’ s\ufb01it ‘in OS.No.24.~3\/1993 is fiied by<\/p>\n
sggraserathaxn\ufb01ga’ 2r\u00a5<'=* defendant in os.No.154\/1.990. This<\/p>\n
   jmfilevd bjyewher against Jayaiakshmamma as 151
\n  is ineidentaiiy plaintiff in OS.N0.i54\/1990.<\/p>\n
A5.r'.i4'?'~'3 c\u00a7efe!rAi'dA3.nt in this suit is Mu111'sw3_mappa, father 0f
\n AA Qayreieiishmamma and Sarasamma, defendants 3 to 5 are\n<\/p>\n
 –bfethers of piaintiiff am\ufb01. 131 defendant and sons of defendant<\/p>\n
 N02? defendants 6 and 7 are gene ef Jayalakshmamma and<\/p>\n
m,:”‘}’\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘x,<\/p>\n
.5’-\n<\/p>\n
de{‘en::iani. No.8 is husband of Jayalezksliniaifzfna. 15’<\/p>\n
defendant in this suit. This suit is filed by S*a;*3.sa__I__r’1i::i;i for<\/p>\n
the relief of decrlai-aiion in 1*espe<:.E; of  prdpezity<\/p>\n
which is the suit schedule propei9i,yVih'O.S1NG3.'A1_ <\/p>\n
3, The common facts in bo\u00b0'ih Suiis are   *
\nThe parties in both Vsu_ivf'\u00a7s.V_a1*e ri1e_mbers:df–:\u00e9\u00e9i111e family
\nI.e..Mu.r1iswam21ppa and hisi…<:h:i'}rife~n i_e. 'hivs..t.Wb sons and<\/p>\n
two daughters, 11usb'\u00e9i;;<\\d..ai2e\u00a7i_V0'ne daughter i.e.,<\/p>\n
Jaya1e;}{shi\u00a7Ia111i\u00a7\ufb01}.3'.' T'he"'caseubfgiayalakshmaiiima is that in
\nAugiist '' 35.986?  A\/Iuriiswamppa was in need of
\nmoney. Heh was -inA'.seai*eh of a buyer for the suit schedule<\/p>\n
p15=':)pe_rA1yV to i*aise____funds required. On coming to know,<\/p>\n
' V;"J21ya1aksi1.f\ufb01an1ma Called for panehayath of elders in the<\/p>\n
. '–   her father Muniswamappa advised by them to<\/p>\n
eeiiai\/*e'yjV Suit schedule preperty in her favour for vaiuable<\/p>\n
' eansideraatien of a SLIE11 of Rs.25,0(}0\/~\u00ab, which was agreed by
\n Miznisx an}-appa, P'1,11*Suar11, to such zirrangemeni:<\/p>\n
' Jayaiakshmamma irnihec\u00e9iaiely gfewe 2; sum of Rs.2C!,0GO\/\u00bb\u00bb<\/p>\n
on the sartrxe day  an .E4,8.1984= when 21g1'ee;12ent, ef saie<\/p>\n
,7-\n<\/p>\n
was entered mte between herself and her__ faiher
\nMu1’1.i.shaInappa. It is her case that S1,11T)SEfC}L\u00a3\u20acI’1′{,l:}{‘})\u00a7h}’_}K1’\u20acZiv her<\/p>\n
back. elemdestineiy her faizher and her s;is_tee._r S’a.fa-s:\u00e91i:3.1na<\/p>\n
created :3: douement purp01-ting >10 be””’21’–.::’_deed “of <\/p>\n
beqL’1eai:hi11g suit schedule pr0pe1:1:y \ufb01n .fave.ur-.oxf S’arfa.32i1;:1;r1a .<\/p>\n
under a registered gift deeddVd’3:.ted  1 E3861′    _\n<\/p>\n
4. h\ufb01tially suit in “”Q_zS.TF\\I0154′,l xikas filed by<\/p>\n
Jaya1aks.h.rnamma s.eek_ing  of agfeefnent of sale<\/p>\n
dated”  executed by her father in
\nher f\u00e91_\\&rdu_r.’  guilt in OS.No.243\/ 199315 filed by
\nSarasaI1V;1r:1\u00e91’v5seei:irA1’gb’ declaration that she is the sole and<\/p>\n
5i14:a:E3031,1’te __ow11ei’ in..p.e’ssessi0n and enjoyment of said property<\/p>\n
‘  Vi\u00a5f4’Lvii\u20aci’;”0:f’17\u20acigiSi\u20ac1.’\u20acd gift deed said to have been executed<\/p>\n
” ‘he?idtheidMunishamappex in her favour on 31.31986.<\/p>\n
 -, :11 the original suit. 154\/1990 M.ur1ishama’ppa and<\/p>\n
 AA $are1s3.i11m21, defendams E and 2 respeeiLiveiy entered<\/p>\n
 V’2:;a;3ear21n(te$ filed 1.}r1ei.r detaiieci wr1’t\u00a3’.en aatdemezzt. En the<\/p>\n
wr1’it:er1 e;ia?;em,e1’1t. filed hr E\\.\u00abiI’maiewame::>3a.  adm1’\u00e9;s
\nI<\/p>\n
V kg’<\/p>\n
execution ofagreemeni of sate in favour oi\ufb02ayaialiehnianirzia
\nand receipt of a eurri of Rs.20,0()O\/\u00bb as adV’3;3\ufb01ee sale<\/p>\n
consideration.\n<\/p>\n
6. Whereas in the suiii; ifiiedv  ”<\/p>\n
Sarasamrna fiied detailed _w1″itteriu. s’ii.–atemen.’i{Aivhereinfvishei<\/p>\n
denied each and every aver\ufb011\u00abeh’i. of i:h.e._p\u00a3air:1L.  denied
\nthat her father Munis*~.i(ania,}Jfia’iiifgasneg;)nier1’ii5iafi’r1g the sale<\/p>\n
of suit scheduie ih  1984, alleged<\/p>\n
pane}:’i’ayaih:iwherein h’e’VVag;i’ee.d”i0’V’se11 suit scheduie property
\nin faxreiir hf  and Jayaiakshmamma paying
\nthe aforesaid  a._iIic.u:r1’i– of Rs.20,000\/~ to her father.<\/p>\n
A_.ee0r;i__i’i1g_ 1:0 hieix…,layaiakshma.mma who was married to a<\/p>\n
‘ differerii village was not getting weil with her<\/p>\n
“hi3’sbe.ricE;7j’hence she came back to the viliage where her<\/p>\n
f3iherV””~a;as staying, she S’L\u00a31Fi,\u20acd to reside in the said village<\/p>\n
Aiziiieng with her ehildrezi, since she was not having any means<\/p>\n
 father had provideci. a house and arise C{;?}”‘f\u00a31iI’1. extent of<\/p>\n
1H1E1.1’1(\u00a7 for the maintenance Qf Jayalakshmamnia and her<\/p>\n
childreii. SimLi1.i.g:i:ieoi.1.:-sly he had ales e.>.:e.<:'i,ii:eci gift cieeii<\/p>\n
v"1,="'–<i3i<\/p>\n
.. 9 _
\nsettling the suit schedule property in her favour. Sp far as<\/p>\n
his sons are ecmeemech there was partition h.e1;v\u00e9ee\u00a7:.Vthe<\/p>\n
father and sons and the rema1':r3ing property  <\/p>\n
share of ehiidren. The pr0\u00a7)eriy\u00bbA}yhiehJis""b.eq1ieatE1edx.vhy'.<\/p>\n
Muniswamappa both in f'avour',of:_J:1\u00a7*a}.\u00e9:ksh1h?1ii:f5s2.a'and<\/p>\n
Sarasamma is independent'. ':)fQp\u20ac1't$T' QfV'PJI.unjs{v\u00e9g;11_e;Vpp;:.<\/p>\n
7. It is aiso neeessa’f”y_.i’e piaee~.ei1e*fee’eg~d that 15?
\ndefenciant Muniswanfappa ._\u00a7i.1hede.w1’itteh statement in<\/p>\n
the s’i1itTIi1ec\u00a7._byS\u00e9xrasag\ufb01ma he-h has neither Chosen to lead
\neviderrze \u00abnor  to Cr0ss~exam1’ne any of the<\/p>\n
Wiinessesef p1ai:i~tifi”vo15dhefendants\u00e9 With these rivai<\/p>\n
   suits the court beiew framed the<\/p>\n
  in OS.No.154–\/1990, In the said suit based<\/p>\n
  the court below framed the foiiowing issues:<\/p>\n
…….  ,..-2: .._2 =  –7 …..n 9\u00bb  . 1 .4 .. ‘\n<\/p>\n
1. we-\u00a3:*::?:3 we  2:3-*3 \u00a2.:c;m..,”*-:,,::,=ri 3i.{J3.8(3 001.45 e\ufb01ma\ufb01<\/p>\n
 -.-2′ +4 y1\u00ab’–+ ~= =  45.. –I–\u00ab ,9-3 A –M mewws
\n‘geese 9&3; 39.’: jib-Em ‘::Ce;C13 c>.e~Q\u00a7\\JC;.3’E ‘i”3F\u00a5U\u00a7aq  Eie\/CK2:’L3
\n. \u00ab.4\/’<\/p>\n
c  ‘ ;\u00b0'”~”.r\\% . m~  ~\u00ab.  . –  -~–‘ ~-:-*’.3\\:>x\u00a7\u00bb.\u00ab\u00ab'<2\u00ab\\.,'<in.\u00bb.:.':r<.3 :\\.z@i~'x\u00bb'\u00bb.\/\u00ab.v'\\\/3 .<\/p>\n
mg}-\n<\/p>\n
Venkataswamy as IDWSQ to 4 arid produced and ixmrked in<\/p>\n
ail 25 de::euments as P:xS.D1 120 I325. _ ._\n<\/p>\n
9. C)ut of the five witnesses exam_i11e__d”‘0a1’jbe11\u00a3:_1__”‘Qf<\/p>\n
Jayaiakshmamma PW.1 is herself, sh.e..V_A4_fe\u00a7f\u20ac:{3ied  \u20ache <\/p>\n
contentions raised in the plaim as hegj’ ex\/i\u00e9\u00a7eri%:AeV:i.:1:i’ :~;u\u00a7pk;;rtfof ”<\/p>\n
her case. The persons whogxre examiiaed as.\u00a33x1IS”.2. :05<\/p>\n
supported her case as und’e:j.”* PW.2~.j\u00e9’w3f:1 i3f1depe’r1dent<\/p>\n
witness who is suppd’sad  to  which is<\/p>\n
ag.reerr1e1:t=A :’tj’gf  }ieV’*-ha\u00e9””given evidence regarding the
\ninteIi”ti0\ufb024’o1′  \u00a30 sell the property and holding
\nof panefieayaih,’whe_1’eiai3:7a decision being taken for sale of<\/p>\n
euii s_e’h-eduieh”property in favour 0fJay’aIaksh1″namI11a and<\/p>\n
‘ : ag;:ee.nient.Mbejng prepared and executed on the same day.<\/p>\n
‘– P’WL3 21:1″.’inCiepe11d.e.1’11 w’i’t11ess, is an ag:’ict:1l.t;u1’ist of the said<\/p>\n
v’1I1ag\u00e9,_xA?rio ES ales 21 signa%;'{>;”y ta EX.P\u00a34~ and he feiteraiee<\/p>\n
 “the eiridenee that is deposed by PW2. PWC4 is a<\/p>\n
 bi1’Si1’1essrn2:11.q he aiso eiaimss to be a signatory to Ex.P14. He<\/p>\n
” also euppcarts the ctase of plainf\ufb01f and oiher two witnesses.<\/p>\n
:.,1_u\/.x\/2<\/p>\n
~12-\n<\/p>\n
PW5 is the scribe of\u00a3Cx.P14 and he ease supports i:he,__es.se of<\/p>\n
plaiiltiff.\n<\/p>\n
10. As against this the witnesses who <\/p>\n
on behalf of de.ier1dar1ts are, DW.1, who is”2W?:'{f:<\u00a7f\u20acnt?]:a11f\u00a3 in <\/p>\n
OS.N0.I5-4\/1990 and also siste\ufb01of  vV:.;;S11e '<\/p>\n
reiterates the statements made in \ufb01e:'written"sVtsf;eme\u00a7r1t and:<\/p>\n
tried to assert the property  beqiieafgheei  her un\u00e9er
\nregistered gift deed;:,4_."'~xvhi.eh is in the said<\/p>\n
proceed'ings"_j;. 1i\ufb01f:.;s-11pp,e'rt  case she examined DW.2
\nMan\ufb01gef 'of'  'Where she has taken loan on the
\nstrength'*-._ 0f ' deic,-1,.1:n'1ei7it.s executed by her father<\/p>\n
1\\'I'i'3\u00a7:E1i,Siivarnapf\u00a7'\u00a21\u00ab-iI1..her favour for deveiopment of said<\/p>\n
' Upropevfty.\u00a5,\ufb01'sV,3 is the scribe who is said to have prepared<\/p>\n
. '~   31.3.1986 and assisted the execuiant and<\/p>\n
bei:e\u00a3'i'ciaiy of we said doucnieni, {:0 get the same registered<\/p>\n
2 is " ijiireizgh him. He supports the case of defenciani Sarasamma<\/p>\n
 the effect that said douemeni. was executed by<\/p>\n
" Muniswaziiiiia durilig his 3;ifei;ime, DWA\u00bb is Si;:i.pe:1c1ia.:y of<\/p>\n
G3'\u00abE11'I}.E1p&1I'1\u20acfh\u20acij,FE1U], he said he we.s:\u00bb preserit at: the time {if<\/p>\n
i\/'\u00a7J;&<\/p>\n
'\\
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
execution and 1’egistr21tE.o11 of IE;,x_.D1 the gift deed exeemed by<\/p>\n
Muniswaraiappa in her favotzr.\n<\/p>\n
11., The court, below on appreeia.tio1’i_ oftl}e”a{o;’eseid <\/p>\n
evidence avziilable on record ans’vVered’i$5s7uess’ l_e1\u00a3’1d_4llilr1 the ‘<\/p>\n
negative and 2 and 3 in the positive. l:z3nseq1i\u20ac:nt.ly ‘the:-eueitloi”L<\/p>\n
Jayalakshmamme. for the reli.ef’–of specific=.p_e1’fo.ijmanee was
\nrejected and 3 positivv\u00b0e,I11idiiig*’ W213 given so far ‘sis execution<\/p>\n
of gift deed dated  ‘l.*1fA._aye’V_?3een executed by<\/p>\n
Muniswaaieippalliii-:1’ fl\u00e9wotzr ol”.””Sarasan1ma and also gave a
\neat.egoric3a.1 ‘i’indii1g’i~.1;htatl _the agreement. of sale dated
\n1-4.8.l984–._V e:\u00ab<eeute'd,  Muniswamappa in favour of<\/p>\n
Jdjzalaliet;marii'rna….i_s' a fictitious and concocted doucrnent.<\/p>\n
';'l"1"'1':…e –pl3tz:1tiil1' .._in the said suit OS.No.154\/ 1990 namely<\/p>\n
'\u00abJ.d3r\u00e91l21ksl?1jme=mina being aggrieved by the firiding of the trial<\/p>\n
Codrt ion the issues framed against her has taken up said<\/p>\n
 j\u00e9gdgiiient. and decree in RA.No.52\/1998 on the file of<\/p>\n
l'~:Pli9iiiAt:ip2;1l Civil Judge' Sr.Dr3., Kolar.<\/p>\n
4\/V-"\\J_\u00a7<\/p>\n
-1.4-\n<\/p>\n
12. In the said proceedings the IS’ appellate court on
\nperusal of the grounds of appeal and also the  the<\/p>\n
trial Court on the pleadings and evidence _C.jE1″‘1ieCo_itl:_.he,s<\/p>\n
framed the following points loz’ CGI1Si(Zl\u20acIf2?iiQ:f’i.xlfl-.::.fh\u20ac Said <\/p>\n
appeak<\/p>\n
1) Whether the appell\u00e9ni:VlV:.has est\u00e9tblilshed  she had
\npaid Rs.20,0QO\/- toEvin-:,’\u00a7j\u00a7s{x;*:a7ma,p}5a”and he in tum
\nexecuted agree.i’n_er1~t  1.4.8.1984 as per<\/p>\n
EXPI4?\n<\/p>\n
l’t._’2} : and decree of the trial Court
\nll  .i1le’gal’_.’~ based upon the material. on
\n2:’leco:rdv?. A l<\/p>\n
1′.\n<\/p>\n
  order’?\n<\/p>\n
  l*1e.l:1rir1g the counsel for parties 15>’ appellate<\/p>\n
Court v_ 3.12s3li;?2’ered point l\\?os.}o and 2 in the negative and 3 as<\/p>\n
 per a linal order diemissing {he appeal Filed by<\/p>\n
”  ‘Jayj\u00e9alaksh.m2m1n1a. Said Jayalakshmamma being aggr1’eved<\/p>\n
 the eonem”rer1t. finding has Come up in RSAJ996\/2005<\/p>\n
alleging t:h.at there is pen-‘e.1’sf.:.y in app’recia1,ion of evidence<\/p>\n
awailable on reeorci. ‘.l’l1ai. the CUU.E’l’.S below have gleliberately<\/p>\n
e;\\_,5′}<\/p>\n
-13 .\n<\/p>\n
igzncred the adm.1’ssio:e.s of Evi{u11i.swar:aappa rega:’di11g<\/p>\n
execution of agreement of sale in her favour. ‘Fhat t-hte.t.O’t.her<\/p>\n
evidence which are stzpporting her case haverjet been ieeked’ <\/p>\n
into. The courts below have c:0m:n’t’tt’ed ef_1’o1j.i\ufb01..3p;jre\u00e9:ia1t.\u00a7.gg’ j<\/p>\n
the evidence available on recofd  the” appvreci’a:tiQfi”Qf<\/p>\n
evidence is perverse and epjge\u00e9ed to the_ legal’-prixjeipies.<\/p>\n
13. New coming to the-.V1_i1,igat’.io.\ufb01 \u00ab-witth reference to
\nOS.N0.243\/1993 fi1.ed..};’y_  __is seen that in the<\/p>\n
said vsiii’t  Mtu.1iiswatiiapf>a entered appearance filed
\nhis v\ufb01rittc\u00e9n _.V’t’i-$\u20ace’\\5,*eve1′, he takes neutral stand. In
\nthe WI’itVt\u20ac*’1′ sf.aten1Ae.n:t”~.EiVe neither admits execution of gift<\/p>\n
deed  favettr bfvSH211*asarnma nor denied the same. Whereas<\/p>\n
 i.e.. OS.N0.1.5\u00bbi1\/1990 he categorically<\/p>\n
“ac\u00a3:epi;edV–“ej*– entering into agreement. of sale with<\/p>\n
Jajraialgshamxxaa, piatxitiff in the said st:.it.. in this suit: except<\/p>\n
AAJa;{ale1kshma:n11aa1 and her father who are respeetiveiy<\/p>\n
h”:ciet;endan1,s 1 and 2 nobody else filed vwiiteta statement.<\/p>\n
H However. def’endar.1t,s 6 to 8 who are none other than<\/p>\n
husband and children of 1?” defehdartt. ted, Jayz1Ia.}:shmamr:1a<\/p>\n
t,\u00ab\\..”3″)1,:\n<\/p>\n
.15.,<\/p>\n
l”1’c1\\.-*6 filed memo adopting the written statement, filed by<\/p>\n
Jayalakslimamma. The trial Court aftei” cor:1pi.et.io.r1 of<\/p>\n
pleadings proceeded to frame the following iss_tie’s:\u00ab  .. 5 ;_. <\/p>\n
1)<\/p>\n
c\ufb01 .\n<\/p>\n
t__,, ..\n<\/p>\n
Whether plaintiff proves that lal3Sol1.1ti.elo.wrie1* l’<\/p>\n
of suit ro ertv b r virtije 55 ‘rift deed’
\nP P –  .. E.\u00bb  s 3<\/p>\n
defendaiit No.2? ll<\/p>\n
Whether pi.ai~o_tiff  she”  in lawful<\/p>\n
possession oflstiit _orolpertyl?’-.  ” —<\/p>\n
W’it’otlieriLplaifitiff proxies that defendants tried to<\/p>\n
‘ interfere”in”i1er=possession of suit property?<\/p>\n
Whether: deferidant No.1 proves that she is in<\/p>\n
possessio\ufb01’ of suit propeity’?\n<\/p>\n
 defendarit. No.1 proves that defendant No.2<\/p>\n
‘  agreed to sell the suit property and executed an<\/p>\n
 agreeriient. of sale’? (deleted as per order cit.<\/p>\n
27.8.98]?\n<\/p>\n
What. o1*de:~:r or ciectree’?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
– .17 ~<\/p>\n
1-4. In ‘this p1″0ce\u20acdiIags Sarasa1z11.ra’1a, ‘V “f3,L’;1\u00a3’I1\ufb01ff<\/p>\n
examined herself as PW.1 and produced _…:\u00bb.1r.j1d ‘o’V;j’:11V*’i::cf;3d<\/p>\n
dOC’L1\ufb021\u20acI1iS EXs.P1 to P22 and her evidenm-i”‘-is   <\/p>\n
repetition of statements made b3.”H\u00e9f’ii1 s_t1~1e p’1a_i:r”1i.,_ ‘I’ar ?as i<\/p>\n
isr doi\u00e9ndaxat in this suit,VJayal\u00e9aks’hmanmfzaAis ‘~co11c’6rried<\/p>\n
she examined herself as   ‘rV11arkocVi
\ndocuments Exs.D1 to”D_.lO 21;-‘1(:’i  of h\u20ac:1″‘oase she got
\nexamined as many   s.2 to 6 who have
\ngiven eVid:’:r1.oe ;is.   2<\/p>\n
  ‘J’ai3}s’I\u00e9i1{\u00a7sh111ar11ma is nothing but
\nrepev1’\u00a7ii_;&io’r1’_oi”  she has made in the written
\nstai:emeu%1\u00a3–;_VAA  is concerned, he is brother of<\/p>\n
R’1EiiI”15Eff Eind AF-\u00abvde.f-cnciant and 5″‘ defendant in said suit.<\/p>\n
 ‘this proceedings supports the case of<\/p>\n
“Jay’a}.ak.sIE;m}m1n1a and tried to assert that suit. scheduie<\/p>\n
p1’op6i”ty is joint. family p:’0p\u20acrty, which his faiiher ha\u00e9 no<\/p>\n
AA r”1g};1.  sell. According to him, he also has a share in the<\/p>\n
Ajsaid property. So far as DW3 is concerxaedg he is one<\/p>\n
“Ran1a1::”ish11appa who knows Jzzyzziezkshnazimmax and<\/p>\n
Sa:*::\u00bb:sz1mmas. His ri”.E-“Ed\u20ac:’;’fI\u20ac.’,f3 is not of U1LI{Ih 13-556′. to 316 case of<\/p>\n
~\u00ab.I8\u00bb\u00ab<\/p>\n
JayaIaI;<;ehma;11ma. DW4 is one Balappa, an agrieulmrist
\nwho has given evidemte to the effect': that s~3L1:ii. 7s_5eheciL1Ie<\/p>\n
ro ert is "aim femliiv m erty, which is in \u00ab(ISS\u20acSSi"()f:._3\ufb02d
\nI3 J -1 P P ,     _<\/p>\n
enjoymerlt. of 211} the ehiidren of Munisxm*ama_p}A5a.Va11:\u00a7i i_.h.c:bsa:;e1 <\/p>\n
property continues to be in p\u00a3:ssessio:1 "\u00aban1d'enjgy.,;1ie13_t jof '<\/p>\n
Jayalakshmamnlaw DW6 Nachafamhma alsdf. .Yieiiera9\u00a7;e\u00bb\u00a7'~i:hee.<\/p>\n
evidence adduced by  :.'ifez.i1:<a{:.eshappa
\nwho is the b1'O'\u00a3hE:15OEi.V_plai.1*1'"fi'ff:  de.f'ef1<:f2i11t and 59'<\/p>\n
defendant he supportshthe  n5\u00a3'\u00a2.Jgiy"\u00a71\u00a7akehm.amma stating<\/p>\n
that   of  schedule properties and
\nhe arid' his bro{h.e1=.5"v*. _:i:Ie\u00a3e1;dan.t have executed release deed
\nin f21vou1x* 'of themfather?"nMur1iswar11appa during his Iifetjme<\/p>\n
 do uf1o:……have any right over the suit schedule<\/p>\n
'  these witnesses again have supported the<\/p>\n
"ease ef c\u00a7'e3fe}5ada1nt based on the docr1.1.mer1ts available with<\/p>\n
t.he'm..   h h<\/p>\n
1.5. The trial. eeurt, after recording evidence and also<\/p>\n
'Hon appreeiaieion of the pieadirlge and era}. zmd \u00a31oez,m"2e.m:ary'<\/p>\n
evidence 2;wai\u00a3abEe C211 reeerd proceeded 1,0 zmewez"  '1 '\u00a30<\/p>\n
,19..\n<\/p>\n
3 in the pasitive’ 5; in the nega\ufb01ve and 5 was deleted by
\norder dated 27\/’.1OA1988 and thereaftier” based on s1.;eh44″\u00a7’L.x;1.ding<\/p>\n
decreed the suit of plaintiff Sa1*e1szu:11n1\u20ace  “by<\/p>\n
the said judgment  defendant  <\/p>\n
Jayalakshmamma \ufb01led appea} 1,11  ”\n<\/p>\n
to set aside the jt1dg.111er1fg and deri_r’e’e   t’1\u00a7;e’ 1rijziie.<\/p>\n
Court declaring that plaintgfff..V\u00a2Sarasa.\ufb01i1ne\u00a3’Tie the sole and
\nabsoiute Owner of  [sefieelule in both
\nsuits). In the appeai AV_’tl7_ a&  IS’ defe.ndar1t<\/p>\n
Jayai2ii{S11:1j:1.mfii:\u00e9?x;V’ 1 ~**eV’appeiI:ii’eVV court after securing the
\nentirerecortisVet1;id.MO13._jg\u00a7ay\ufb01i:g through the grounds of appeal
\nand as evelwl\u00e9  the terial court; proceeded to frame<\/p>\n
t:_F1e.:.fQ1_ie*.ar::.ng 150;-;::t..s_._.f0r consideration.
\n  W”t1ether the piain\u00e9iff\/1″eepe.11.demi No.3 has
\n the registered gift deed at EXP}. as
\n by deceased M’u11.iswamappa and
\n i:’:i.e1’efbre she had aequzreei t\ufb01itie and<\/p>\n
. p0s3ess1’01:1 ever the suit. property’?<\/p>\n
‘Q21,\/’–=”4\u00a7<\/p>\n
\u00bb-20\u00bb<\/p>\n
2} Whether the said Sarae.amm.a fL1rther prove
\nlmvful possession over the suit property at\ufb01tct-_<\/p>\n
interference by contesting defendallts?   ” <\/p>\n
3) Vvhether the judgment and d\u20ac3(?I’\u20ac_\u20ac’..  <\/p>\n
Court is legat, valid e;i1E} ‘t33$e:j upQha_the’*<\/p>\n
material on record’?\n<\/p>\n
4) Wh at order?\n<\/p>\n
16. After heaxttig :t:E’:e”15.:1:’ties lt’-*1 appellate<\/p>\n
court.p;fo_eeette\u20aci*::tn’ p’ev;:1t”\u00a7N0s.I to 3 in the negative
\nand  as ‘perv  “In effect the 15* appellate eeurt
\nby ansxi>e;’it1g f:o1:E1::.s” .t:’_”_.’tt;o 3 in the negative reversed the<\/p>\n
fin\u00a3f:I’it:1g~oi’ the  court on all the issues, consequently held<\/p>\n
. *t3,1a’:, _Sa.tfae9a’n1Ir121 has not proved that; she is the 5016: and<\/p>\n
 ._\u00e9ibeeliji\u00abe”_*-.<;w:je:' of suit seheduie prepe\ufb02y by virtue of gift<\/p>\n
deed s.\u00e9u'd*te have been executed in her favour for the reason<\/p>\n
V uthfat She has not examined the scribe and as wet} as the<\/p>\n
K_\u00e9it.te'St.e:'5; to the d.0ue.me.nt, L1I1d.<.-31' WE1iet1 she 1':-3 said to have<\/p>\n
~7.t'eeeived title to the propertiy tn questiorl. Plaintiff in<\/p>\n
OS.,243\/ 19913; "hm-\ufb01rtg suctczeeded in the trial emu': and having<\/p>\n
sL1.fl"er\u20ac-cf ills reversal of the judgment. in .1" appellaio court<\/p>\n
has come up in the second appeal in RSANQ. l 794\/<\/p>\n
1.7. in. both. the aforesaid second apo\u00e9als' :i\u00a7fh\u00a2:'; izhsty
\ncame up for admission this <\/p>\n
grounds awed in the said appeals.ad–miti.ecll..i;h\u00a73"appeals for'<\/p>\n
consideratior1. based on th\u00e9vi,si1hsi;a11t.ial "C}1i'\u20acS1Ti\u00a7')11S of law
\nwhich were frarI1ed }3y~e.\u00a2_}1e at; the i:iii1\u00e9Vof filing the<\/p>\n
suit. Subsequently, io{:la._Vhw'h:3Vi;1:i:h{:sle.iZwo'_appea}.s are taken<\/p>\n
up i'o1*\ufb01"r1al  "the counsel for plaintiffs in
\nOS.N:o,&1 .1993 this Court felt that the
\nsubsiianiliialolques'i.ioi*is: law as stated by counsel in both<\/p>\n
ap}f;eal_L'momosV"ars….n'oI. substantial questions of law which<\/p>\n
' i'or:'aoonsicieratio11 in both the appeals. Hence this<\/p>\n
'C..oulrt.  in both the exppoails substantial question of<\/p>\n
ml? i.s:'r\u00a7:qVu.i:'ed to be i'1"am<=:d before disposal of the appeals.<\/p>\n
2 xA'(:'c:o1"di.r1gIy, in both the appeals the following substantial<\/p>\n
A\ufb01quesii on of law 1' s f:'an1e(:1 ; —\n<\/p>\n
ix: pi<\/p>\n
,g;g_<\/p>\n
RSA. 199652005<\/p>\n
Whether “there is per\\rersity.V__o;f_’T’
\navaiiable on record by ‘oo:th”A”t.he. ec}g,1rE;;$
\nin Concurrent error’ and tI;I(\u00a7F\u20ac:\u00a7\u00a7y’~\u00e9f1iSf13.i$Si;li. ~:1V’i_E1eF7–A
\nsuit, of piaintiff seekiiag’ spe’t:i\ufb01E: per.fo’fr:;a;n_ee _:of VA<\/p>\n
agreement: dated I-4,8. i’e\u00ab9uV8\u00ab?\u00bb?\n<\/p>\n
RSA.179-452005 .– –\n<\/p>\n
 the vfkopeiiate Court was<\/p>\n
 \u00a31 “””*\u00a2’;\u00a3\u00a3:v:1t the plaintiff in<\/p>\n
   proved execution of Gift<\/p>\n
A’o\u00a2ed% an  her father on 31. 3 .1988<\/p>\n
u1iei’er”iEx,\u00a3?1A’3.rid’ ‘:hereby justified in reversing<\/p>\n
. V the V’j\u00e9,tdg.1_1qent and decree passed in
\n \/ 1993?\n<\/p>\n
1  .;H”2\u00a2\u00e91″eai”ie1*, both the counsel appearing tor the<\/p>\n
pa.r{ie__r3 ‘we.;9e called upon to address th.e1’r argLunents. Heard<\/p>\n
  t}1e . W=(s\u00a70Lt}’}S\u20acI for Jayamkshrllamzria plaintiff in
\n\u00ab’-.e ‘\u20acDS:=No.154\/I990 which was filed for specific performance<\/p>\n
fa-u1d Sar21s2s.1mna pIai1″a\u00a5,i.I”i” in OS’No,243\/1993 \ufb01feci for relief of<\/p>\n
dee121ra1Lior1.\n<\/p>\n
mfk;\n<\/p>\n
On going thrciugh the mam:-.rial available on ifeeord Le,<\/p>\n
the g’r0ur1d of appeal and the findings of <\/p>\n
below in their judgment resulting in eorieinfrenvii-fi.hd’i11g’of<\/p>\n
dismissing the suit. sf pEaintii’f1.V99G <\/p>\n
divergent finding of the eourisliiibeleiw<\/p>\n
filed by Sarasamma, wherein hef ._sui.i; ‘-:fof~.:Wp’e1’:hanen1<\/p>\n
injurietion is decreed and the  filed’agai.n’st the said
\norder is aliowed by s’e’i;f’ing”-ssiid\u00e9a  gi1<\u00a7_ign1enI. and decree<\/p>\n
passed in OSN0.243\/.1'998{'a\ufb01d..\u00a7i}_so .ethei*"rx1ater_ia} on record<\/p>\n
this Cbi1i*f:i.ei:;isWe\ufb01r"ih'e'~sf0resegiCi" substantial question of law<\/p>\n
in both iiih\u00e9e appe~a1's.as.1.Q1iI;gie.r:<\/p>\n
 SuBsta.r1.i:iaI question of law in RSA1996\/2005<\/p>\n
' stud RSA.:NeI'1..794\/2005 are held in the negaiiive for the<\/p>\n
'L: –:  R<\/p>\n
REASONS<\/p>\n
Relsiionship between the pai\ufb01es 140 boih suits are not<\/p>\n
 .. _..;'\u00a7n dispugte, It is aiso not in dispuie t:h::1t. piaintiff in<\/p>\n
OSNO. .1. 54\/ 1990 JayalzikshIz1amI:<1.a. had left, her n1.ai'.ri;:110n\u00a3aI<\/p>\n
.h:.1se arid was si’zzyi1″ig in the village 0i’\u00a7?.1er* father \u00a31232″ \u00a3a}\u00ab;.iI1g<\/p>\n
,2.:-1,-\n<\/p>\n
Care of her chilciyen with the support.  V5’\u00a3’q.*a4′.he1’*<\/p>\n
Muniswamappa. 15* defendant in the sui_E..E7i1_ed._E>y.;’he1′. ‘I’h–a1: <\/p>\n
in the suit while Iiling wri’.-jien _,.S{.’;’V1{uL”._II}.:\u20ac.”?_’l”l\u00a7-_ 4’h..evr__ ifather ”<\/p>\n
Muniswamappa has taken” a  2
\ni1ran.saeiion as s\u00e9ated to h21\u00a5*e'”h\u00a3een’take:1V_   I984:L
\nwherein it is   entered into
\nagreement with his  for sale of
\nsuit schedtglekgftapeitey. though
\nMunisurarn.2hppex;””‘ 3. party, he entered
\nap;3\u00a2.ara:;-g;\u00a7’;-#18′:  eiaternent he has not taken
\n21  he executed ihe gift deed in
\nfavour   plaintiff in OS.No.243\/1993 or<\/p>\n
  .  …..\n<\/p>\n
20.\u00a7V’e:—- fzks eouid be seen from the recordss said<\/p>\n
Mni,$\\$}’arne.ppa deee not deny execution of gift deed though<\/p>\n
2 , A’ he._zsu;V3sport$ the case 0fJaya.1akshma.rnIna in stating that he<\/p>\n
“je’ni.ered i11t.e agreement ef Sale with his daughter for sale cf<\/p>\n
H suit schedule property far x-Hltzable censide1’at,1’en. ef<\/p>\n
Rs.25,\u00a3)C}G,!~ \ufb02iid zygfeepted ;::2″:;n’;1e:2i: af par”: sale<\/p>\n
r:or1side1’atior1 arnotmting to a sum of Rs’20,Gf{JU’;’–{;_’ \\.?\\}’f1:,.r’ee,s<\/p>\n
the reeita} in said dOL1C’:1″\u00a31\u20acI’T[., which is a\u00e9.EE3x..”F?l-4i<–..i:t is seen <\/p>\n
that said agreement is errtered izntoqfrr the r1"1o'm'f1"oiZ_Aug:,ist<\/p>\n
1.984, In the said ag1'eemen_t there  a refe\u00e9eliee that<\/p>\n
sale price is Rs.25,OOO\/A."vO::1t1' of '.VRs:23\u00a7O,t)00\/~ is
\nalreaciy paid and \u00a3\ufb02\u00a3)1".}\ufb01.'_\u00bb';;~_\u00a7:"_II1\u20ac]_':}t!'eV't_;{'TA — which is
\na paltry sum eomparetcit   Consideration, the
\npurchaser    daugh1;er of 15'
\ndefendant years time to pay the
\n sale deed registered in her
\nfavour' '' L111'  of sale there is also recital
\nregardirrgputvtiogvtrertrriaossessioll of the property. There is<\/p>\n
 or: reoo'1'dv.Whi'ch is produced by her to estabiish that<\/p>\n
'  is"ir1';'\u00ab,riossessior1 of the property pursuant" to the<\/p>\n
. 'ag:*e:e:1.ie1';iVf'eL: dated }4.8. 1984.<\/p>\n
231. In the said suit, the person who has supported<\/p>\n
hher\ufb02ease is none other than one of her brother who in the<\/p>\n
wt “”meanw’h1’1e tried to set up a separate tjtie to himself to an<\/p>\n
e;x:t;e1″1t. of 3} gzrarztzas in the said property wiziier t.:*y1’r3.g to<\/p>\n
‘.4, \/”via<\/p>\n
-37.\n<\/p>\n
executed by her figxi\u00e9fier in fav0L1i\u00b0 {if her sister is eiei\ufb02asside.<\/p>\n
W’i'{.h0ut a$ki:t1g for such EL praryel’ Said Jayalakreih2:.1’13\u00a7ii’1i.1’r1\u00e9i..is<\/p>\n
trying to substantiaige that gift. deed <\/p>\n
come into place in ctollusioii bf? 1″l\u20acZ'{“‘4\u00a7’iii.'[i’}\u20acI’i’\u00a31I1d*’1′}.\u00a7\u00a7I:’LE3iSi”E?]’ *<\/p>\n
Sarasamma. Though such 211Eega.1iO’n is .ri12;de’.’ ‘*;he=, e’m:1’1′–\u20ac::<\/p>\n
pleadings” the evidence eivaiiehie. on .1feec.irde1e\u00e9ir1yVeiisciosee
\nthat it is Miiiaisxvanjappa whd  to ei1?3Siant.iate the
\ncase of plaintiff even th$0;_1′,1ghi–thei-e__iS—\u00e9g..i9egisi.ered document<\/p>\n
which is at    Isehedule property is<\/p>\n
bequea’ti’1eg;,1:fbyiiii:fZ3’i-n3′–.Vii1- fadft)’i:3i”V:of his anotlier daughter
\nSaraear\ufb01hia  deed which is registered in
\nthe 01’fiee_ o.f Vjuii-iediiciiibbnal sub–registrar on 31.3.1986.<\/p>\n
Jafyzalveikshinari*1ma_”sibrother given evidence in support of her<\/p>\n
\u00bb ucaeee .,iA1n\u00ab.bo,{1’:i:he suits ie, as DW.3 in <:)s.No.2zi3\/1993 and<\/p>\n
r aiseii\ufb01w; the said suit.\n<\/p>\n
 “‘I’h()ug11 these txwi witnesses ha.,ve tried to<\/p>\n
su\u00a73ssija[i:;iia1i.e ihai, there was an agI’\u20ac\u20ac3I}’1\u20ac}”i{ of sake by their<\/p>\n
ia\ufb01her in iavoul” of Jayaiakshmaiiiziia and J’\u20ac\u00a3y\u20ac1i&1kShI1].8,Hi}fI1E}.<\/p>\n
iiS in pGSSI3SSiOi”i of suit. s:.<:1f1.edu1e \u00a7)r<3peri.y and Sarasanirna<\/p>\n
Le ..s:\\,<\/p>\n
.33"\n<\/p>\n
1.Ir1ough corltenci that. 1*egisi.ered ciormtmem, is eXee.uie_d in<\/p>\n
fawour of S21r21$a.1111″na’1 she is not in possession.f'[Iie:,3_’Eitaveriot<\/p>\n
been Successful in establislling that po\u00a3;3e:ss3io*rir of Vs’i:”i1;.b <\/p>\n
schedule property CO}’}{,l’I1L1\u20aciS::_ u}ri..\u00a3;h} ‘J\u00e9;y;1Iak8hzr1a;r:$1.a<\/p>\n
pursuam. to agreement ofsalek ‘I””n_e”tlocu::e’:erj1.fi:s wh.1feh  are;<\/p>\n
produced by Sarasamma eleeirly’ est21.b’fieh 1irie1i as on 1986
\nSun; schedule 13roperry’Was .’rnL’V1_E;21″te\u00a7iV,ivr:*–.favour of Sarasamma
\npurs’uar1t: to reg;iste1″ed gii’t.dee_e1 exet::u1:e\u00e9\u00a7i:b31r her father in her<\/p>\n
favour and  1’eVer1r;1evrecords”‘are\ufb02iatanding in her name<\/p>\n
and ir1V’t:o~E:,1r3-rn  “if” refers ‘:o'”fi1e”pe1-so’11 in possession of the
\nproperty’ ‘ as Vei;1’\u00a71;ive,1_or.,. ‘es Sarasarnma. With ‘these
\noverwhelming cioeumeiiie supporting the ease of Sarasamma<\/p>\n
3_s’3’Sh:e being iopossession of the property 13*’ appellate court<\/p>\n
 RAL’No,3’1:2_\/.1998 has not properiy appreciated the<\/p>\n
” ewe.-2}eneeV.”ave1i1e1b1e on record. It has proceeded to hold that<\/p>\n
S3\u00e93s\u00a71.g’1mai has not proved execution of gift deed in her<\/p>\n
“f2:vou1′ by exzxmining independem witnesses regarding<\/p>\n
“je:>’-:e<:ui.iora 2111:} .1'eg'is;irai,ic)z1 of the same,<\/p>\n
L\/'K,\/39%<\/p>\n
24. incidentally W s.ppe.1.l-ate Court has 11e–t__ leaked<\/p>\n
into the fact that in OS.N0.i5\u00bb4\u00ab,=’199O wheiieiinh:”L:’s\ufb01eciefiC<\/p>\n
defence is taken by Sarasarnma to establish’lthel\ufb01etjtzeslt cljfa<\/p>\n
suit S(‘.l1\u20acdL1l{i’ property in her favatiziby liter  Of j<\/p>\n
gift she has examined the sc1″ibe\u00abAar:ell to
\nthe said douement as witriesises in’ the anti
\nso far as the evidenee of  has taken
\nCertified copy of the said eviclemre<\/p>\n
and pleadings in:.='(‘}S doucment in<\/p>\n
OS.N0;’2’43:\/ii}  li1~_e’f1″eet has established execution
\nand 1″‘ regist1’altiei1,: deed in her favour in
\nOS.N0.2″\u00a3l\u00a73..\/ iv993._ speci\ufb01c issue was framed by the<\/p>\n
 e6u:j'{, calAli’i’;g….t.1p’0:1 her te substantiate the legitimacy of<\/p>\n
‘  sa’i’r:E tlvoiienaent having established the same in the said<\/p>\n
”  has also produced the certified copy ef the<\/p>\n
er1t3’3″e”, Cleposition in the said pmcteedings into<\/p>\n
  AA 0–S.Nd’;243\/199%.; ‘ a suit: filed by her seekiiiig c:ie<:1a1'at.i0n of
\n title to the suit schedule _p:mpert:y p{1I'SL1\u00e91f1E tn the gift<\/p>\n
 deed.\n<\/p>\n
LV;,=\u00a7<\/p>\n
~ 30 –\n<\/p>\n
325. ‘I’heref01fe. the approaeh of 15*” appeE1atefC0t1rt in<\/p>\n
RA312\/1998 in not appreciating the evicienee…_evet:iI;9t};’1e” Q13<\/p>\n
record and thereby holding piaintiff in  <\/p>\n
Sarasamma has not proved \u20acX;L5Cttt:iOE’7’_ or gift: “deed'”i’s hot T<\/p>\n
correct. Therefore, this Court white:eQnsi.de;ji:1g~s’t1bst.\u00e95u:1tiatl<\/p>\n
question. of Eaw framed inVt:E1e:s’ebtwc.)”   tight ef
\nthe \ufb01nding of both .the COIJFI:-L*:.’V._:L”E#’V1Vt51?Sf’ anaazhih’i:1″1e”‘vg:roL1:1ds of
\nappeals answer the  of Law in the
\nnegative for   u  ” 2 h<\/p>\n
  in RSA1996\/2005 wherein
\nJaya1aksh_1ria.rhh’:a’Vplairgiiff in OS.154~\/1990 is Challenging<\/p>\n
 coheu1″reh’t*–\u00a7”iht1t;1.gs of both the courts below is dismissed<\/p>\n
\u00bbA :’a.a;c1 }\u00a7SA.;R\ufb01IVd\u00ab..1_794\/2005 \ufb02ied by Sarasmma plaintiff in OS<\/p>\n
  there is divergent finding given by 15′<\/p>\n
atgzipeli’-:\u00a7p:e”eourt4 in setting aside the judgrnent and decree<\/p>\n
 AA passed in her favour in OS.2<f,L8\/ 1993 is set aside and the<\/p>\n
Vapg\ufb01eal is ailowed helding that Sarasaxllma is the absolme<\/p>\n
"oW1f1er in possession and engoymerlt: of suit seheduie pmperty<\/p>\n
;mrst1a:r1t' to gift cieed dated 31  E95-36 e:x:ee::'ted by her fat:h.e2"<\/p>\n
sf,\/L <\/p>\n
W:\n<\/p>\n
Munigwanappa in her favour and permanem. injun(:\u00a7:”\u00a76’I2\u00ab.}1s.. :  ;_. <\/p>\n
prayed for is grzmied.\n<\/p>\n
27. In the resu\ufb01\u00e9, appeaf;  .i.1.1  \u00abis  3<\/p>\n
disniissed and RSA.N0,}794\/2005 “ViV;<\u00a7.V:fiii0xx,1ec3" \/,Vif1:f5ut. \u00a71ny<\/p>\n
order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
Nd\/\u00ab<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE: HIGH COURT GP’ KARNATAKA AT }3ANGA__LORE- DATED “IRIS THE 13*” DAY OF DECEMBER’ BEFO RE ‘TPII\u00a3 HON’}3L.EZ MRJUSTIC \u00a75,:\u00a7\u00a7.sA’:YAN\u00a7i;f2A&*;Ar\u20ac’_A ” ” R.S.A..NO_ 1794\/2005 c \/x};: Rs-A._..\u00a7’:=o’.’TT1.\u00a796g20\u00a7;f5..\u00ab R.s,A.No. W94\/2005 V’ ‘ BETWEEN; SMT.SARASAi\\\/EMA ‘ W\/O MUNIRAJU __ : AGED ABOUT42 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"28 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sarasamma W\\\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":5423,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sarasamma W\\\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sarasamma W\\\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"28 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010"},"wordCount":5423,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010","name":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-21T06:30:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sarasamma-wo-muniraju-vs-jayalakshamamma-on-13-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sarasamma W\/O Muniraju vs Jayalakshamamma on 13 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97659"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97659\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}