{"id":9774,"date":"2009-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-10-25T11:33:55","modified_gmt":"2015-10-25T06:03:55","slug":"mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 24%; DAY OF AUGUST 2009. j\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR JUSTICE K N  3  A  \n\nR.s.A. No. 891 0:? 2009 A' \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1\n\n[BY SR1. M   \n\nMR PRAVEEN KUMAR JOSH}-A, .   \ns\/o LATE UMESH CHANDRAVJQSHI \"  E\nAGED ABOUT 70  -A    \nR\/AT TARA BAGH, ~ G0wRm{iL1T'1?_'sTRE,ET,\nMANGALORE TQ. (D.r:)      \n  A   ~   APPELLANT\n\nMR. SU1\\1IL'J.OSI*{I \" ._ _ .\n\ns\/0% LATE UiVI\u00abESHC.HAN.DRA JOSHI\nAGED_ABoUT 5\": \n\nC\/O. BALAKR;sH_NA~--'NAYAK\n}'{'ADRANGI,.YEDAPADAVU,\n\n~ _ v.':DP:Q\u00bb,YEDAPADA'v\"J#574 267,\n~. 1. lVLAN{;\u00a7AI;QRE TQ. (D.K)\n\nD 'A-T'.:3R;1$iI':2A\u00a7i;;s;N U JOSHI\nA V s\/0 _LAT_E'UMESHCH_ANDRA JOSHI\n\"A,GE:D ABOUT 68 YEARS,\n\nR\/*'~AT;. B~43\/ 172, SUNDERNAGAR,\n\n A. VADVIDYANAGARI MARC},\n\nKALINA, SEANTHCRUZ [EAST],\n\nV'  EVIUMBAI\n\nW\n\n\n\n3 MRHYDER ALLK\nS\/O 1\\\/1R.ABOOBAKKAR.K\nPROP. M\/ S. RESIDENCY BUILDERS\nAND SHAMA RESIDENCY, VAS LANE.\nMANGALORE675 O02, {D.K}\n\n(BY SR1. PADMANABHA MAHALE, :1StI\u00a7.t::CO,U\"IsISEL:,': '--    _ \nFOR C\/R)     '2. - -\n\nRSA FILED II\/S. 10U._.\"'QF CIPC I AGAIESIE. \n\nJUDGEMENT &amp; DEGREE DATEDjt'09.04\".200':3' PASSED IN\nR.A.NO.156\/2008 ON THE FILE II--ADD'L. CIVIL\nJUDGE, (SR. DN.)   ALLOWING THE\nAPPEAL AND SETIING *ASID_Eg~.  JUDGEMENT AND\nDEOREE DATED: 18. 1 1.2003 PASSED. IN.I'V_*QS.NO.354\/2008\nON THE FILE OF_'THE  &lt;:fIVIL&#039;.JIJbGE (JR. DN.},&amp;\nJMFC,MANGAI;D13;Ef.&#039;  i   A &#039; \n\nTHIS  FOR&#039; ADMISSION THIS\nDAY, THE ICQU_R&quot;T&#039;1D5ELIVERED-- FOLLOWING:\n\nI V  T; N *1&#039;\n\nThe  &quot;1:I:1:aintiff in 08. 354\/2008 on the\n\n.--\ufb01le Of-ttl\ufb01iet&#039; II&quot; A(IditiQn_a1 Civil Judge [Sr.Dn.), Mangalore,\n\n is bef0Iet&quot;th._iS Court in this appeal questiening the\n\n   1egSlity&#039;aDd&#039;eiOIIfectneSS of the judgement and decree dated\n\n 09.04.2009 passed by the by the II Additional Civil Judge\n\n   Mangalore, D.K. in RA. No.156\/2008, whereby\n\n ..__&quot;V&#039;t&#039;he&#039;j%LOwer Appellate Court in reversal of the judgment and\n\n&amp;\/\n\n\n\ndecree of the trial Court has dismissed the suit by setting\n\naside the judgement of the trial Court.\n\n2] The appellant\/ plaintiff filed ~.. \n\nthe respondents\/ defendants forI__ <\/pre>\n<p>restraining defendant No.1.&#8217; from tal&#8217;i&#8217;enati.n;g;  <\/p>\n<p>schedule property and further4i&#8217;to::1&#8217;estrain..Vde&#8217;fendants &#8211;1<br \/>\nto 3 from C16V\u20aclOpiI1gV&#8217;A]3&#8217;IOfVle.i;f3,:_V:xiiii&#8221;\u00a3}lOut taking the<\/p>\n<p>written consent from the.ep&#8211;1ain.tiff._&#8221;\u00bb__ it <\/p>\n<p>3) mi  fhes&#8217;j&#8217;.-pi&#8217;a;:ri;:ifi5_ in brief was that, the<br \/>\nsuit selieduleiiivjyviiivlth other properties<br \/>\no1iginail3i&#8221;belonged&#8217;:to~Vone:E3rn~t. Anandi Bai, who executed<\/p>\n<p>a Willdated&#8217;-V1V_&#8217;1.03:.l985&#8243;\u00b0bequeathing all her properties<\/p>\n<p> heirs. As&#8221;&#8216;per the terms of the said Will, the<\/p>\n<p>si_i__i&#8217;t VS(El1e:di_i1e \u00e9vproperties were bequeathed in favour of the<\/p>\n<p>I81  &#8220;l&#8217;he said Will further contains a condition<\/p>\n<p>*ijv\u00bb-v&#8217;\u00ab._fCll.a&#8217;E the.,V__A&#8217;lSt defendant should not alienate the suit<\/p>\n<p>   properties bequeathed to him for a period of 10<\/p>\n<p>1\u00a7.J.\\:1+e.4;ea\u00a5 5 {*0 $.-\n<\/p>\n<p>  and thereafter, if he isxulhriguthe sell the same, he<\/p>\n<p>~&amp;\/<\/p>\n<p>should give first option to the plaintiff and if it is only in<br \/>\nthe event of plaintiff declining to purchase the property,<\/p>\n<p>defendant No.1 could sell the property to others<\/p>\n<p>Written consent of the plaintiff. The said    <\/p>\n<p>during May 1987. The plaintiff 3filed&#8221;the&#8221;&#8211;\u00absuit<br \/>\n2008, alleging that the 1st defendant\ufb01has entered<br \/>\nagreement with defendants  to<br \/>\ninto a multi residential.   oifvthe \ufb02ats<br \/>\nconstructed thereon   the terms of<\/p>\n<p>the Will mthot;~t&#8217;g=\u00a7\u00a75ing g\ufb01stipoptionjto&#8217; as such, the 1st<\/p>\n<p>defendantillllsliotildl\ufb01fije  from alienating the<\/p>\n<p>property zandalso  the same.\n<\/p>\n<p> it &#8216;The  &#8216;d.e:fend,ants resisted the suit. They<\/p>\n<p>AV&#8217;Vcontended&#8217;\u00abth\u00abat&#8217;the suit is not maintainable, as there was<\/p>\n<p>no &#8217;cause ofaetion, since no alienation has taken place.<\/p>\n<p> A. .5) Z :The trial Court on assessment of the oral and<\/p>\n<p> rdocumentary evidence decreed the suit and granted<\/p>\n<p> p-e.r-nianent injunction restraining the 13% defendant<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><br \/>\npermanently from alienating the schedule property in<br \/>\nviolation of the terms of the Wi1I&#8211;Ex.P1 without the written<br \/>\nconsent of the plaintiff. Further defendants &#8212; 1 to 3&#8242;;&#8217;were<\/p>\n<p>permanently restrained from putting&#8211;up any  poi;<\/p>\n<p>building in the suit property without ,<\/p>\n<p>complying with the pre&#8211;emptiori&#8217;  if<\/p>\n<p>Ex.PI.\n<\/p>\n<p>6} On appeal __by  Lower<br \/>\nAppellate Court held that ithels\ufb01lfit  the plaintiff was<br \/>\nnot maintainablein as\ufb01iuch  no cause of<\/p>\n<p>action for the ,p1&#8217;a.:n_tif\u00a3 ltod\ufb01le&#8217; the suit in View of the fact<\/p>\n<p>that there was no&#8221; made. The Lower Appeliate<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;V.Court\u00ab.\u00a7didi&#8217;~not  the judgment of the trial Court,<\/p>\n<p>A&#8221;:and&#8221;hVeid:_thatfthe clause Contained in the Will is Vague.<\/p>\n<p>Thefefore;  Appellate Court set aside the judgement of<\/p>\n<p> g [the trial  and dismissed the suit by allowing the<\/p>\n<p>   It is against the judgment of the Lower Appeliate<\/p>\n<p>b<\/p>\n<p>Court, the unsuccessful plaintiff is before this Court in<br \/>\nthis appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>7) I have heardkthe Ieamed counselappveaifing  -i, <\/p>\n<p>the appellant and also Sri. Padmanabhajv <\/p>\n<p>Senior Counsel appearing for._the&#8221;responcieiitt\ufb01I _ha&#8217;Ve_\u00b0.<\/p>\n<p>\nperused the judgement of the   <\/p>\n<p>8) The only question  considered by<br \/>\nthis Court is    to file the suit<br \/>\nfor permanent  of the pre&#8211;~emptiVe<br \/>\nright Ci&#8217;eate&#8217;dx.:  of the Will~Ex.P1.<\/p>\n<p>Aciniittedly,&#8217; \u00abthe VVVl&#8221;~&#8221;:t:ljV*defendant succeeded to the suit<\/p>\n<p>schedule property&#8217;   of the Wil1&#8211;Ex.P1. It is not the<\/p>\n<p>I-&#8216;:&#8217;rca.se the plaintinfyfwthat the 15&#8217; defendant has sold the<\/p>\n<p> of the defendants &#8212; 2 8: 3. According to<\/p>\n<p>  the A &#8216;&#8211;defe_ndant; he entered into an agreement for<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8220;&#8221;&#8211;._deVeVIopinvg:the suit schedule property. The question as to<\/p>\n<p>  a pre&#8211;emptor has a right to seek equitable relief of<\/p>\n<p> niginjunctien at the hands of the Court has been considered<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><br \/>\nby the Apex Court in several decisions. In Kumar<\/p>\n<p>gonsusab 82. others vs. Mohammad Miyan Urf Baban\n<\/p>\n<p>82. others [ (2008) 10 SCC 153] , it has been clearly held<br \/>\nthat unless title to the suit property has<br \/>\naccordance with the provisions of the T.P. Act.,&#8211;<br \/>\nenforce pre&#8211;emption arises. As; per&#8217;  A&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>reported decision, there was an agree\u00e9inentldtbetvgfeenfthree<\/p>\n<p>appellants for sale of the&#8221;fVpi&#8217;=operty-.  Thef&#8217;d.:re&#8217;spend;ents&#8221;at<\/p>\n<p>therein in exercise of the of &#8216;pre&#8211;e.rnpti.on,,:\u00a7filed the<\/p>\n<p>suit. The Apex Court ulltifnatelfhield&#8217;  suit for pre-<\/p>\n<p>emptionv&#8217;tVbrVoueghtv &#8216;Vthe&#8221;\u00bbb&#8217;asis tof\ufb02such an agreement was<br \/>\nwithout any ac&#8217;ti_o&#8217;n,V~&#8217;as there was no right of pre-<\/p>\n<p>emption, in the respondents, which could be enforced<\/p>\n<p> = law. As observed by the Apex Court in the said<\/p>\n<p>decis;ion,.tltterefare no equities in favour of the pre-emptor.<\/p>\n<p>  TheAA.pex_fCoi1rt has further observed that &#8220;it would be<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;pre&#8211;emptee to defeat the law of the pre~\u00bbeInption<\/p>\n<p> aby*V_Vanj;&#8217;legitimate means, which is not fraud on the part of<\/p>\n<p>A  &#8216;either the vendor or the vendee and a person is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>a\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">8<\/span><br \/>\nsteer clear of the law of preemption by all lawful means&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>It is further observed that &#8220;the right of prewemption is a<br \/>\nWeak right and is not looked upon with favour by Courts<\/p>\n<p>and therefore, the Courts cannot go out of their&#8221;&#8216;v}ay&#8221;&#8216;to<\/p>\n<p>help the pre&#8211;ernptor&#8221;. In the case on hand a1so:&#8221;th,ere.i:&#8217;is  <\/p>\n<p>transfer of property in accordance&#8221;&#8216;w&#8211;ith  of<\/p>\n<p>Property Act. The 1st defendant  A&#8217;exectf.te&#8217;d. <\/p>\n<p>deed in favour of DefendantVs&#8217;~\u00a7r2p and   the&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff cannot enforce&#8217; at ysithisfvfistage th&#8217;e&#8221;&#8216;pr*\u00e9\u00a7emptive<br \/>\nright, if any. In other   wait till the<\/p>\n<p>transfer: piaciew accordance with the<\/p>\n<p>provisions. of .i?*roperty Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>.. it &#8220;In the&#8221; the law laid down by the Hon&#8217;b1e<\/p>\n<p>in the aforesaid decision, I do not find any<\/p>\n<p>illegality committed by the Lower Appeilate<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216;Courtin idisrriissing the suit as the plaintiff had no cause<\/p>\n<p>   \u00e9l\u00e9tion to fiie the suit. In this View of the matte <\/p>\n<p>appeal lacks merit. The appeal does not invo1V_e__ any<\/p>\n<p>question of law muchless substantial question of <\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, the appea} is dismissed._.   &#8216;  \u00ab<br \/>\n \/7&#8217;)  <\/p>\n<p>KGrR*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 24%; DAY OF AUGUST 2009. j BEFORE THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE K N 3 A R.s.A. No. 891 0:? 2009 A&#8217; BETWEEN: 1 [BY SR1. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9774","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":979,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009"},"wordCount":979,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009","name":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late ... on 24 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-25T06:03:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-praveen-kumar-joshi-vs-mr-suniljoshi-so-late-on-24-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr Praveen Kumar Joshi vs Mr Suniljoshi S\/O Late &#8230; on 24 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9774","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9774"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9774\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9774"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9774"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9774"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}