{"id":97898,"date":"2009-09-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-14T17:07:13","modified_gmt":"2017-05-14T11:37:13","slug":"labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n\n                             CHANDIGARH.\n\n\n\n\n                                        Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009\n\n                            DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 14, 2009\n\n\n\n\nLABHU RAM\n\n                                                       ....... PETITIONER(S)\n\n                                  VERSUS\n\nSTATE OF PUNJAB &amp; ORS.\n\n                                                       .... RESPONDENT(S)\n\n\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA\n\n\n\n\nPRESENT: Mr. MK Dogra, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).\n         Mr. BS Chahal, DAG, Punjab.\n\n\n\nAJAI LAMBA, J. (Oral)\n<\/pre>\n<p>            This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has<\/p>\n<p>been filed praying for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing<\/p>\n<p>order dated 28.4.2008 (Annexure P-5). Further prayer is for issuance of a<\/p>\n<p>writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to withdraw<\/p>\n<p>special increments which were granted to the petitioner prior to 13.3.1996.<\/p>\n<p>            It has been pleaded in the petition that the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>working on work-charge basis at Ranjit Sagar Dam Project under very<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009                             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>tough and hazardous conditions, including putting his life in danger.<\/p>\n<p>Almost 300 employees working on the project lost their lives in view of<\/p>\n<p>the nature of work.       Considering the tough working conditions, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was granted special increments for his dedicated service and<\/p>\n<p>extra efforts put in by the employees for early completion of the project.<\/p>\n<p>            It transpires that, subsequently, as per instructions issued by<\/p>\n<p>the respondent-State, it was ordered that the increments could not have<\/p>\n<p>been released while the persons were working on adhoc\/work-<\/p>\n<p>charge\/temporary basis.\n<\/p>\n<p>            It has been brought out that the matter is covered by the<\/p>\n<p>judgment of this Court in CWP 5568 of 2008 <a href=\"\/doc\/46565758\/\">(Charan Dass and others v.<\/p>\n<p>State of Punjab and others<\/a>) decided on 27.5.2009, relevant portion<\/p>\n<p>whereof reads as under:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   &#8220;It is admitted case of the parties that the work<br \/>\n            charge period is to be counted as qualifying period for the<br \/>\n            grant of pensionary benefits and thus the emoluments<br \/>\n            drawn by the employee as work charge employee had to<br \/>\n            be considered as also the period when the employee<br \/>\n            served in work charge capacity. It is admitted case of the<br \/>\n            parties that the benefit of retrenchment increments and<br \/>\n            special increments was granted to the employees during<br \/>\n            the period they were serving in work charge capacity<br \/>\n            without any misrepresentation or fraud on their part. The<br \/>\n            benefit allowed to the petitioners is, however, sought to be<br \/>\n            withdrawn after take over and regularisation by the State<br \/>\n            Government        with     effect   from     13.3.1996.     The<br \/>\n            retrenchment increments were allowed to bring their<br \/>\n            salary and emoluments at par with other employees in the<br \/>\n            revised pay scale, keeping in view their last drawn salary<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            as retrenchees. No reasons have been given in the reply as<br \/>\n            to how such benefit is impermissible or illegal. The State,<br \/>\n            however, has attempted to justify its action regarding<br \/>\n            withdrawal of special and retrenchment increments.<br \/>\n            Admittedly, special increments were granted from time to<br \/>\n            time to some of the employees\/petitioners for their alleged<br \/>\n            good work. There was no uniform policy and benefit of<br \/>\n            special increments was given on selective basis. In so far<br \/>\n            as the retrenchment increments are concerned, there<br \/>\n            cannot be any second opinion that the benefit was granted<br \/>\n            to bring their wages at par under the revised pay scale<br \/>\n            and that too before their take over by the State<br \/>\n            Government.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  As regards the grant of special increments is<br \/>\n            concerned, it was selectively granted from person to<br \/>\n            person and is not justified. However, one fact remains<br \/>\n            common in regard to grant of both the benefits i.e.<br \/>\n            retrenchment increments and special increments that the<br \/>\n            said benefits were conferred upon the petitioners without<br \/>\n            any misrepresentation or fraud on their part. The issue is<br \/>\n            squarely covered by the Full Bench judgment of this<br \/>\n            Court passed in CWP No.2799 of 2008 alongwith other<br \/>\n            connected matters <a href=\"\/doc\/1434376\/\">(Budh Ram and others vs. State of<br \/>\n            Haryana and others<\/a>) decided on 22.5.2009. The case of the<br \/>\n            petitioners falls in category ii) wherein following<br \/>\n            observations have been made:-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                  &#8220;It is in the light of the above pronouncement, no<br \/>\n                  longer open to the authorities granting the benefits,<br \/>\n                  no matter erroneously, to contend that even when<br \/>\n                  the employee concerned was not at fault and was<br \/>\n                  not in any way responsible for the mistake<br \/>\n                  committed by the authorities, they are entitled to<br \/>\n                  recover the benefit that has been received by the<br \/>\n                  employee on the basis of any such erroneous grant.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009                         4<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                  We say so primarily because if the employee is not<br \/>\n                  responsible for the erroneous grant of benefit to<br \/>\n                  him\/her, it would induce in him the belief that the<br \/>\n                  same was indeed due and payable. Acting on that<br \/>\n                  belief the employee would, as any other person<br \/>\n                  placed   in   his    position   arrange   his   affairs<br \/>\n                  accordingly which he may not have done if he had<br \/>\n                  known that the benefit being granted to him is likely<br \/>\n                  to be withdrawn at any subsequent point of time on<br \/>\n                  what may be then said to be the correct<br \/>\n                  interpretation and application of rules. Having<br \/>\n                  induced that belief in the employee and made him<br \/>\n                  change his position and arrange his affairs in a<br \/>\n                  manner that he would not otherwise have done, it<br \/>\n                  would be unfair, inequitable and harsh for the<br \/>\n                  Government to direct recovery of the excess amount<br \/>\n                  simply because on a true and correct interpretation<br \/>\n                  of the rules, such a benefit was not due&#8230;&#8230;<br \/>\n                  We have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that in<br \/>\n                  case the employees who are recipient of the benefits<br \/>\n                  extended to them on an erroneous interpretation or<br \/>\n                  application of any rule, regulation, circular and<br \/>\n                  instructions have not in any way contributed to such<br \/>\n                  erroneous interpretation nor have they committed<br \/>\n                  any fraud, misrepresentation, deception to obtain<br \/>\n                  the grant of such benefit, the benefit so extended<br \/>\n                  may be stopped for the future, but the amount<br \/>\n                  already paid to the employees cannot be recovered<br \/>\n                  from them&#8230;.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                  In view of the above, the respondents are not<br \/>\n            entitled to effect any recovery from the petitioners either<br \/>\n            on account of retrenchment increments or special<br \/>\n            increments allegedly erroneously given. However, the<br \/>\n            respondents are entitled to re-fix the emoluments by<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009                           5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            reducing the special increment only. Consequently the pay<br \/>\n            of the petitioners will be re-fixed and in case of those<br \/>\n            employees who have already retired from service, the<br \/>\n            retiral benefits shall be released within a period of two<br \/>\n            months. The petitioners shall also be entitled to interest on<br \/>\n            the delayed payment of pension\/retiral benefits at the<br \/>\n            statutory rate wherever admissible and at the rate of 6%<br \/>\n            on pension and other retiral benefits where statutory<br \/>\n            interest is not provided for. Any amount deducted from<br \/>\n            the retiral benefits or the salary of the petitioners shall be<br \/>\n            refunded within the aforesaid period.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   Ordered accordingly. Disposed of.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            Learned counsel for the respondent-State admits that the issue<\/p>\n<p>raised in this petition is covered by the judgment rendered in Charan<\/p>\n<p>Dass&#8217;s case (supra).\n<\/p>\n<p>            In view of the above, this petition is allowed in terms of and<\/p>\n<p>to the extent of the relief granted in Charan Dass&#8217;s case (supra), portion<\/p>\n<p>whereof has been extracted above.\n<\/p>\n<pre>September 14, 2009                                      ( AJAI LAMBA )\nKang                                                            JUDGE\n\n\n\n1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?\n<\/pre>\n<p>2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Civil Writ Petition No. 5712 of 2009 DATE OF DECISION : SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 LABHU RAM &#8230;&#8230;. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB &amp; ORS. &#8230;. RESPONDENT(S) CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97898","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1128,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009"},"wordCount":1128,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009","name":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-14T11:37:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/labhu-ram-vs-state-of-punjab-ors-on-14-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Labhu Ram vs State Of Punjab &amp; Ors on 14 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97898","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97898"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97898\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97898"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97898"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97898"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}