{"id":97900,"date":"2009-11-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009"},"modified":"2016-05-27T06:16:23","modified_gmt":"2016-05-27T00:46:23","slug":"bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN '1'I~II5 HIG11 (.T()UR'I' 1'\u00ab' mRNA'1:\u00bbx1<A AT I-SANGAJ ,(._}R.I\u00a3\nI)A"II'.E\u00a3Ijf) "11-11$ '11--11: 1.9m DAY or :\\'r.:m'a:.z\\\/11-s1\u00ab:1< ;z<)Q9.\nPRESENT T T\nTI--1 E H0N'1:31.,1:: MR. P. 1:). I..)INA.KARAN. (3:11 1121-' Z1j:r~1\u00ab:f I   .\nA.I\\"I.")  .' V V.\n\n'I'I--i.I.?, IT1oRAj:'1(:m \nCENTRAI,.OI?I?1\u00ab<\u00e91;:.';'. ._ .\nK.H.ROAD. _E3AN(;--\u00a3\\;I,OR.E2,  \nBY ITS CIHIEF_1TRAFT{1(i? r\u00bb\/\u00a7.;x_N2a.c31:::\u00a72."v.V .\n\nREP BY I'I'S_(1fi1IIE:}.I}' LAW 4(,')T1::\u20ac'[1c.:1-\u00ab:'1\u00ab_:(.% :} '\n\nAN D:\n\n:3?'  AS1---1VI{A1a'15 \u00ab  ..... .. \u00ab\n\n. - \/'.. A'_1;3(_}I..{\nA  ' N().4% _I._2'.-11 \"MAT_E\\'\u00a7...\n\n \n\nV54 Y1\u00ab:A1'$5;..__ TANNY R(Zf)AD.\n\nP'I_LLANE_\\EA {'3:;\":RIDE3N'.\nIII \":s'1'A\u00a3; 12,- E'3AN(Z}A],()RIE.\n~.  ..RI%3SP(T)NI.')}E3N'3'\n\nVv'RI'I' AI-'I-'IEI,A.I, IS I~'11,I*-I-If) (2\/8 -41 C)?\" TI-II-i K\u00a3\\Ri'\\fx'YI'AKA ITTIIGE--'1\n\n ;f,T()[II\"{'l' ACT I.\"Rz'\\Yl\u00a7\\?(.} 'I\"{) 81171' .-'\\\u00a731I)IEZ-- TIIIC ()RI)I-CR I-\"AS81313 IN\n\"'WRI'I' PI* l'I'\u00a7'I.'I(..').7\\' N().4\u00e9%{i5i5\/2('}()FTJ \u00a7f)A'II\"[.\u00a3II') 5\/I5\/2(.)(')E}.\n\n\n\nMISCW. IS I<'II.I<)I") 1.5\/3 5 or' '1'm\u00ab:. L11'\\\/\u00a7I'I'A'I'I\u20ac)N AC1'\nPRAYING~'1'() CONIDONPJ '1';--11; DELAY or 22 DAYS IN E~'II,I___NG '1'?-I113\nAPPEAL. ' "\n\nWRIT AI-)1--"KAI, 65: MIS{f.'..\\7V. <:oM1N<; o:\\; 14-'':'z;:1;I.:\\21_I\u00e9\\s_g\u00a7R\\f\n\nHEARING THIS DAY. SABHAHIT J., Ii>1+:\":;._1V:\\rEj\u00a7 T'*1--'\u00a7-11<:" \n\nFOI.LOWEI.\\I(}:--   \u00e9 . H\nJUDGM\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7g'\n\nThis appeal     \n\nWLPIw14463\/2009 benggaggnevga:g\u00ab:5\u00a2(nucr(kuea\n5.3.2009<\/pre>\n
 wherein t}v_\/1″c:–  of this Court<\/p>\n
has allowed 11.1152 wrif”pt:ti’L,ic)’11._”i.11 ;;>21r t; 2i11d set aside the<\/p>\n
ordeixf of  C1.is.r.1_iissz.:1 ‘.<_J\u00a7'. _{1'lt3 writ. laetiitiioncr cleu\u00e9d<\/p>\n
13.12.2003 'c11'1dCii\u00a5,T\u20ac?"(i1\u00a3\u00e9('1 E';he C<_.)1'pora1,i011 10 1'ei1'1st.a1@<\/p>\n
t11gf:  "p!;'.t'.i1'.i()m:1_'"}3aC'ii 11:10 se1'vi<.'.e with ('%o1'11:i1'11.1if;y of<\/p>\n
. '~&'\u00bb,,e1'vi_(ic':, _H~0wever. ii; is held 1"ha1i" the pet.i1'.i0ner is not<\/p>\n
" ~.\u00e9r1i.it.I\u00e9\u00ab:\u00a7fgt,Q'b\u00e9zckwages and C0211SCq11E?1'1i'ii21l be-me'fii:s and<\/p>\n
will not be enmled for three i1'":.(:remc-:111:s with cumulative<\/p>\n
'a"a&af<\/p>\n
2 The 1'e-spn(icm. 1’:e.:’c.*i11 was xv1*}<i1"1gg  2:<\/p>\n
(1r1've.1' in the z~1pp<:-,%IEa:1\u00a3 ~(.',01'pora1ion as 2: pc;:1'ma1'1\u20ac:n1"<\/p>\n
.\\\\\u00e9Z<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\nThe L-‘=nqui1″y <_){'i'i<__'c1' \u00a3:'a'1iIe(1 to m:1si<h_~1' tI"1<-*, e*xp!a11atio11
\ngivc1"1 by tI'1<-;* pc-%1.1'tium~r zmcil 21 $c1r(:()1':('.I Show can:$–<%._1'1′[.i(“e<\/p>\n
was iSSLiOd to 111m pctit.i011er on 11.7′.200:3”._\u00a7:1–1.<jVI'1g\u00e9j~T.vv=ift.h<\/p>\n
copy of \u00a31116': I"i1'1(1i1'1gs of t'1'1,1’1c;u:’1″_\\_: ()fI’1′(_.’.Vt:;f1; ‘E}1’1C’i[ }\u00a7)y r)1\\<1Tc=jA1"<<\/p>\n
dated 13.12.2003. 1110 pct'::i.1_:'(:f.1;"1\u00bb\u20ac:;V1"b: \\&r2;}$:_
\ns<\u00bb3n\/ice. A ' A<\/p>\n
-4}. The pet,it.i():-1&1?  a  {If
\nLabour Court: at. Np. 2×003 under
\nSect,i0n 10{4 fA) .f_ 1″)is})1.1t:e&3 Am;\n<\/p>\n
(Ke11\ufb02r1\u00e9iii\u00e91kaiiAn1’\u20ac%iid1\ufb01ej’11, Ar:’f.’}””‘If977]. The-=. Labour Court’,<\/p>\n
lieafiii t’;1i1ci-. 3′-1.v:”V”‘g*:{I-1.}t*;’1i\u00e9w,gj:’:.. me1’its. I’1ci(1 1:}’12:=n. {I19 dmesf’,ic:
\ne11qL1iry.V_\\7wi’1s ‘faii*”:.\u00a7.1’1’1:_f:1’—;\u00a7’21:\u00a7.sc%ci zm awalxi (‘lair-,c;1 8.7.2008
\nrejQc_t.i1’1g f}1\u00a2  cEis;–)uAt’.\u20acs. “‘ }}3ei11g aggricr\\rc:(‘i by the-: said 0’rd\u00ab;>r
\nof’5’i;11\u00a2_ EM.g}b<_)1.1h1*"C.QL;.:'t. Wm" I-'<==::1:1'tim'1 NL1r1., P32-;’a1″1g21l(.)z’c in l.I).N0. .124\/2003<\/p>\n
cia.1r:c1V__v’E%..7:}”Q;()O8 (?(_)1:1(‘*:1(“]E12;.;’ Ilmt t”‘I’1<=-:* e-..1'z<;:,1i:*_\\,,T\u00bb-' I"1a('1 not<\/p>\n
 becri .(_r_<:_\u00a7r1ch.1ct<2d in 21\u00a2(.:()1"da1'1(%(' w1't"'}_"1 lemx. the 1″1<\/p>\n
.s1ibn1i11.<=;%d lay t.h<2 ;3<:*t.jt.im~.1* I’1E:i.(f1 mm }.)e<:1"1 'lake-:?1'1 int:<\/p>\n
x\ufb01,<\/p>\n
5. The Eear11ed Si1’1;\u00a7k-: J1.1(.i,c_\u00a7<'._ 2.1ft'e:1* l'1<':re;u*i11g the<\/p>\n
lee.-11'ne.c1 eo1,.msel a1p13ea-11'i11gg for the w1*ii' pe14i1.io1i'1_erd. and<\/p>\n
the lezmled c?om'1svl ap1.)ca1'1'1'1_;g %"o:' t.i";.e 1'es;p'oz'1'de_1"1\u20ac,__by<\/p>\n
order dated 5.3.2009. held that one of tolae.\n<\/p>\n
deposed before the e11qui1″y {=)_f’ficir=_:1j}’h’ai’.jf”-the’–..m:}to1′<\/p>\n
Cyclist would 1″1z’-we {e1.k11.\u00bbi.ii..1:le 1)1;c:e”2iL1fic):1,”‘tin:_ae_eidem::><\/p>\n
would not have occurred ‘”e;1j1ci, reriy}’1ag_ on} the said
\nstat,emer1i. the ct1’1(11oi.\u00abi1\u00a7y’_gi’)17\ufb01ce1j 17i<;%i.dA"'t';E.}a.1': ihe charge is<\/p>\n
partly proved. 'I'11g'As"v\u00bbp}gtr11.'-\u20ac1e('?ct13teci by the<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
C11'S(fipiiI1'c"1lT_\\\/"'–..&i\u00a7{f_T1()iv'if(f;Z..*_i'\u00a3 __\u00bbE1tj_':-1.ci ,1',"i"V1V-at' the eha.rge of<\/p>\n
negligeiiees. 1.)1"'o\\3'(*(oid"~2'\u00a7ge1i1'1s_f.'The pet'it[ioner and passed
\nthe O'1'"\u00abd.\u20ac'\u00a3\u00ab'. of  Ex._1\\\/1.10 shows that the<\/p>\n
a_ceVid_em:  v1'1ot oz'1_Al'y due to the neglig_ge.r1e.e. of the<\/p>\n
 pe1:ii:ione,1"; ..1')u1: ei\u00a7sod1:_cr to the ;'1cg;lig;c21"1('7<? of the. cyclist'.<\/p>\n
   ridetf of the cryele was afso <~_~\u00e9qua!ly responsibie.\n<\/p>\n
I,(;-{)_l<;iI_1g21Aii'~\u00bb'EX.M.}i3, the leamed Sir'1\u00a7_{le Judge ()13se1'Vc2c1<\/p>\n
 nthat: the motor Cyclist had taken 1*ig;'l1i4 t_z,1r1'1 211116 almost<\/p>\n
"ore:-1:;:'}1ed the ('?\u00a71'(".fL':'. and in .the ci1'c1..1msiamees. w.i1';}1()L.:t.<\/p>\n
V.–there being any evider1(j'e as 1'c==:gge.:1'roi to t:mff'1'c_r signal and<\/p>\n
also as regarcl to who was at 1241,1111. in 1"1'1o\\-'i31g tihe vehicrle<\/p>\n
\\j\u20ac~<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\n:fi1*s1… it (:e.1.z’111m. be sa;1i(.i H1211. the pctiE..i0z”:&=:1′ 310119 is<\/p>\n
rc5}’)()1″1si1)I.c1 fox’ i:1’1(‘*. z:1(t(ri(k-mi. ‘i”h:_.~ po\u20ac.i:i1″:(-1:1’ (..'()L.1i~:_i }’1e.w@<\/p>\n
taken reasonable (“me to zwcaici the Ei(‘IZ(Iid(.’I}I , biIf ‘\u00a3P\\.’hE?\u00a57<\/p>\n
the signal  given, 1’1()rmaily VE-‘.hi(‘_’.1\ufb01’.’ st.-d1-ts’mmzmg a1’1dTif7<\/p>\n
the person c.:ome=. in bet.w:\u00e9c,1T1, “may ~:’F:~g=f’\u00ab._in “‘s1.zVbh<\/p>\n
CirCur11sta11(teS, the 21(_:c.:icie.,nt’, (:()t,rE.ci”1;>e 1.)()ssj:+i’r\u00a7\u00a3tz”21:Td ‘i,hat}<\/p>\n
by itself may 1″1o1T wa1*1’a1:11 “\u00a3)&1’t:ic?1’ (‘)f'” ~V;<;A-z1'n_11'1,.if:. 1,0’A1″c:inste1te the p(‘i.i\u00a5.i()I’IC1’ ‘::)2.1(‘.k into .s.se,1’vi(.:e 2’3mc.%<\/p>\n
1  gr211f1t\u00e9\u00a7ci_\u00ab t:<).V1'1I,Vi_'1~~n.1i1Ty of St.'i'\\-"i('.'E'T. I–I(mrc\\\u00bb'c,1'. Iee;u_*11<=ar(1 sixxggle<\/p>\n
J\ufb01cigc. .c)'rc\u00a7e1'cr(E 141'1at, t:he pt’,ii:.i01’1e1′ is not em.it.Eed for<\/p>\n
bz1(?l\u00a7;Wag\u00e9s and (t()nsr:>(]uemial be1″1cfiE;s 21116}. wili not be<\/p>\n
AA6:x1tTii:\u00a3\u20ac\u00bb\u00e9’d for three ’11’1c:_r’ernem.5 with <.:1,.:m1..tIa.t:ive c3f:feCt':.<\/p>\n
"  'B_ei:'1g ag___{gr1'c:vc'(:i by t'11'1c: 1-said (_)1*<:E.er of thc ltzanfxeci SE1"1gIe<\/p>\n
\\j%.\n<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\nJL,1cigc?. t’E’_1e 1’CS]J\u20acI.).1’1(‘ftII”1f. –CZm’p01’z\u00bb1t”i11 11.2125 131’c:fe1’1’e(:1 this<\/p>\n
appeal. There  21 dciay of 22 days in filing ‘the ap’p_e’c:13.<\/p>\n
6. We have 1’1.ea1rd \u00a3:I’1cF 1ez11*11e<:}~ "–Vr\u00a7f0Li"I1Sei<\/p>\n
appearing for the appeliallti.\n<\/p>\n
‘7. The lea1’.ncd c()L.z1’1:3e] for ‘a:ppelE;:1″m..\n<\/p>\n
submitted that. \\2vhen the (:h211’\u00a7_.._fQ of-1i1Tc:_\u00a7giigei1,CE%- iii” V(.’:21’L1’\u00a3’3i1ig<\/p>\n
the accident. has be->91′; }:*1*oyed.  r.)1’d;\u00bbr1f”‘\u00a7;ff_Vg1is1\u00a7niss3J \u00bb<\/p>\n
cannot be said to be dispr0p(51itiu–1:1ate G1*..sh0c:1\u00e9:ing to the<\/p>\n
ConsCi\u00e9”f1e\u00a3: })i’ tli%:”C<5t:;*t, a11d"f.h'\u00e91'efc)re the learned Single\n<\/p>\n
-Judg\u00e9:,WaSV I1()1. ‘}1:s%’i1j_\ufb01ed J1′; m0d1′[“yi:1g “U19 pL111ish1’n\u20ac1’11’.
\nimposed D3: the’;a}jpcl’i\u00e9i111 anti T110 Iear:1e(i Single Judge<\/p>\n
to A.have'”‘(‘i’c>1V’1firn1c:ci the award passed by {he<\/p>\n
“L-;%iVb0\u00a7:;ii_Cd’t:.1’f_j..:m(:I cIis.sm_issec.i the Wm. pet:i1.i0n.<\/p>\n
 We have given Lteirefui c0nsidera1ii01_1 to the<\/p>\n
 “en1\ufb02.ent.i()r1 of the 1(?El\u00a3’1’1Cd (totmsel for the appeilam. and<\/p>\n
. S(tI’1.1{‘,i1’1iSEEd the 111at..erial on 1’G(‘,()I’d.<\/p>\n
‘\\\\,…’>-=5<\/p>\n
10<\/span>
\n\u00a31(3C()}’dil’1\u00a7___\u00a7 1.0 ii.}’1c i’i}”1(.ii1’1g 0i'”1}’1c Cl’1(}EIiI”y ()i”f’i(te1′, (‘I”1211’g.;e is
\npartiy proved. U1’i(i(%1’ tile (‘iI'(?1..11’11&-S’:i:1.I’1(“E?S. ii  ci{‘:”‘.\u00bbi.1_1′ that.<\/p>\n
the orcier of ciisii1i$se=1.I is (iirs.;;)mpr)r’1″i_01’1aE’e-* i’:.c3.._’i:h\u00a2\u00a7’giztoveci<\/p>\n
charges. The 1C2=i1*11eci Single Jiidge has 1’i\u00a7\u00a7;1._1ui’,i’\ufb02~,?ff;.-,=t;?i’i. :33.\u00bb-ids: 7<\/p>\n
the order of ciis.~:_;1:1’1i_ssal ciath\ufb01l 2<72C)O3*.\u00a7:EI\ufb01iCi' }"i\u00a71S<\/p>\n
ordered 1'ei1'1sL:;n'.e1"nenii (Jfihe p\u00e9:'$.itic.\u00bbi"1e1' V\\4't'–'\u00a7'.{.}7.."(E'OI'}"iiiii'L!iT:y'i<\/p>\n
of service. but wit.i1’t1\u00a2_ any “~._bV\u00e9:n.e1f<\/p>\n
would not be e1’11\ufb01iV_tVl_{\u00e9.d._ ibif 1~h~reL.t~~V.fjV ~1i’1(?1’\u20acl}1\u20acI1tS with<\/p>\n
cumuiativei}:  *1.’<\/p>\n
 ‘}{2NVi1’2i4i2;i ‘j.If\u00a7\u00a5gz_}iVi”(i. fo i’_I%’1c-* abox-‘ .’32,-lid facts and<\/p>\n
(%irc\u00e9un1sigsgums Of’A’i.hfi’*…{\u00a7tiSC?. it is (.?i\u20aciE1I.’ i’.11a=1.i. the 1ctai’11ed<\/p>\n
S’if*HI:: ‘ L,Iv1J1d-i(?fV”V\\:k?’:;1.-99;’, ‘L.:st.i\ufb01e(:I in. r1mciiE*vii”1f ilh\ufb01.’ ‘\u20acl’1\u00a3:1]E}V<\/p>\n
V =wiiIipAO’s:~e’Ci ptfm the writ peii1;i(>ner arid. the finding ()fi.i1e<\/p>\n
is;ar.11’ed”‘Si:1*c.iir1gl}z1 we hold that 1.h_er.’pca.} :~1m”i p2:s=s:_s ‘i’.1’1c-? i'()Ei(.)\\MiI’1g:<\/p>\n
\\\\,f’:\u00bb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN ‘1’I~II5 HIG11 (.T()UR’I’ 1’\u00ab’ mRNA’1:\u00bbx1<A AT I-SANGAJ ,(._}R.I\u00a3 I)A"II'.E\u00a3Ijf) "11-11$ '11–11: 1.9m DAY or :\\'r.:m'a:.z\\\/11-s1\u00ab:1< ;z<)Q9. PRESENT T T TI–1 E H0N'1:31.,1:: MR. P. 1:). I..)INA.KARAN. (3:11 1121-' Z1j:r~1\u00ab:f I . A.I\\"I.") .' V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\\\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1525,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\\\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\\\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009"},"wordCount":1525,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009","name":"Bangalore Metropolitan ... vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-27T00:46:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bangalore-metropolitan-vs-syed-ashraff-so-syed-bashasaheb-on-19-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bangalore Metropolitan … vs Syed Ashraff S\/O Syed Bashasaheb on 19 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}