{"id":97987,"date":"2010-09-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-11T05:24:17","modified_gmt":"2019-01-10T23:54:17","slug":"m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCRP.No. 465 of 2010()\n\n\n1. M.P.SAINABA, AGED 58 YEARS\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. M.P.MARIYUMMA, D\/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. M.P.KUNHIMUHAMMED HAJI,\n\n3. M.P.HASHIM, S\/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI\n\n4. M.P.RASEENA, D\/O.KALENDAN, RESIDING\n\n5. M.P.SAKEENA, D\/O.KALANDAN, NAFEESA\n\n6. M.P.KADEEJA, D\/O.KALANDAN, KADEEJAS\n\n7. M.P.SHAMEER, S\/O.KALANDAN TRADER\n\n8. M.P.NASNEE, D\/O.KALANDAN DO..DO..\n\n9. SHAKEER M.P, S\/O.KALANDAN\n\n10. P.C.P.AYISHA ,W\/O.ABDULLA\n\n11. P.C.P.JAFAIS, D\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n12. P.C.P.JUNAID, S\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n13. P.C.P.JURAID,S\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n14. P.C.P.JUBAIRIYA, S\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n15. P.C.P.JUSHAD,  S\/O.ABDULLA,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.KHALID\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :20\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                          --------------------------------------\n                             C.R.P.No.465 of 2010\n                          --------------------------------------\n                  Dated this the 20th day of September, 2010.\n\n                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>       Plaintiff in O.S.No.64 of 2007 of the court of learned Additional Sub<\/p>\n<p>Judge, Thalassery is the petitioner before me challenging the order dated June<\/p>\n<p>10, 2010 on I.A.Nos.3962 of 2008 and 3963 of 2008               condoning the delay of<\/p>\n<p>316 days and allowing the application to set aside exparte decree, filed by<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1. O.S.No.64 of 2007 is a suit for partition of 1.17.75 acres and<\/p>\n<p>building thereon. Respondents filed written statement. There was an exparte<\/p>\n<p>preliminary decree for partition passed on 20.11.2007.                After 316 days<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 filed I.A.Nos.3962 of 2008 and 3963 of 2008 as aforesaid. Still,<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.2 onwards remained exparte. Respondent No.1 gave evidence<\/p>\n<p>as PW1 and proved Exts.A1 to A3. Learned Sub Judge allowed the applications<\/p>\n<p>and set aside the exparte decree as against all the respondents which is under<\/p>\n<p>challenge. It is contended by learned counsel that on the facts and evidence on<\/p>\n<p>record learned Sub Judge ought not to have condoned the delay. It is also<\/p>\n<p>contended that at any rate, in so far as there was no application by respondents<\/p>\n<p>No.2 onwards      learned Munsiff ought not to have set aside the exparte<\/p>\n<p>preliminary decree as against those respondents.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.     The case set up by respondent No.1 to condone the delay and to<\/p>\n<p>set aside the exparte preliminary decree is that she had entrusted the matter to<\/p>\n<p>her brother, Hashim to contest the case but he did not do so. In the meantime,<\/p>\n<p>CRP No.465\/2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>she had gone to Pune to stay with her son working there for treatment there.<\/p>\n<p>She could     not give instruction to her counsel to file written statement.<\/p>\n<p>Respondent No.1      produced Exts.A1 to A3 to show that she was suffering<\/p>\n<p>various illness and underwent treatment for the same. Respondent No.1 gave<\/p>\n<p>evidence to that effect as PW1. Learned Munsiff was impressed by the reason<\/p>\n<p>stated by respondent No.1 but found that there was some latches on the part of<\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 which could be corrected by the common curative of cost.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly the application was allowed on payment of cost of Rs.1,000\/-.<\/p>\n<p>       3.    Brooding spirit of justice requires that every party must be given<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to be heard unless there is contumacious negligence or laches on<\/p>\n<p>the part of such party. In the present case learned Munsiff was inclined to find<\/p>\n<p>that circumstances justify absence of respondent No.1 in court on the relevant<\/p>\n<p>day and that she must be given an opportunity to contest the case. I must bear<\/p>\n<p>in mind that this is a suit for partition. Having regard to these aspects and on<\/p>\n<p>the evidence on record coupled with the fact that petitioner did not adduce contra<\/p>\n<p>evidence to controvert what respondent No.1 has stated and proved through her<\/p>\n<p>evidence as PW1 and Exts.A1 to A3, I do not find any infirmity in the learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff taking the view that delay is required to be condoned and exparte decree<\/p>\n<p>against respondent No.1 be set aside.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       4.    Then the next question is whether in the absence of respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2 onwards the exparte decree against them should have been set aside.<\/p>\n<p>Proviso to Rule 13 of Order IX of the Code of Civil Procedure says that where<\/p>\n<p>CRP No.465\/2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the    decree is of such a nature that it cannot be set aside as against the<\/p>\n<p>defendant seeking to set aside the exparte decree only, it may be set aside as<\/p>\n<p>against all or any of the other defendants also. Therefore, if the decree is of<\/p>\n<p>such a nature that it cannot be set aside against one of the respondents alone,<\/p>\n<p>mere fact that respondent No.2 onwards did not apply to set aside the decree<\/p>\n<p>does not prevent the court from setting aside the decree as against all the<\/p>\n<p>respondents. The suit is one for partition. Respondents, it is not disputed have<\/p>\n<p>a joint right in the property. If there happens to be a preliminary decree for<\/p>\n<p>partition against respondent No.2 onwards and respondent No.1 is able to<\/p>\n<p>sustain her claim there is a possibility of divergent decisions being entered on<\/p>\n<p>the same issue. Though not stated by learned Munsiff in so many words that<\/p>\n<p>could be the reason why the exparte decree was set aside against all the<\/p>\n<p>respondents which I find on the facts and circumstances is not illegal or irregular.<\/p>\n<p>As such no interference is required with the order under challenge.<\/p>\n<p>       Revision Petition is dismissed. But learned Munsiff is directed to expedite<\/p>\n<p>trial and disposal of the suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>       I.A.No.2186 of 2010 will stand dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               THOMAS P.JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                       Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM CRP.No. 465 of 2010() 1. M.P.SAINABA, AGED 58 YEARS &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. M.P.MARIYUMMA, D\/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI &#8230; Respondent 2. M.P.KUNHIMUHAMMED HAJI, 3. M.P.HASHIM, S\/O.AHAMMEDKUTTY HAJI 4. M.P.RASEENA, D\/O.KALENDAN, RESIDING 5. M.P.SAKEENA, D\/O.KALANDAN, NAFEESA 6. M.P.KADEEJA, D\/O.KALANDAN, KADEEJAS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-97987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":767,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\",\"name\":\"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010"},"wordCount":767,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010","name":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-10T23:54:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-p-sainaba-vs-m-p-mariyumma-on-20-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.P.Sainaba vs M.P.Mariyumma on 20 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=97987"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/97987\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=97987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=97987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=97987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}