{"id":98427,"date":"2009-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-28T13:35:59","modified_gmt":"2017-01-28T08:05:59","slug":"sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
1:\u00bb: THE HIGH Comm' 9;: ;<ARNM'A1<A A'\u00a7f__B;A:I\u20ac\u00a3"\u00a5g3:I;.(\u00a7R;'\u00a7 M'  \n\nDATES THIS TE-IE ama ;3g\u00a7g*j"c3:\u00ab"~M::::~:g' , \nTHE HOWBLE MR. JUsT1\u00e9\u00a7j;a:A.si. P;&CI\u00bb::aA\ufb01 t\u00a7:\u00a7E\nCRL. REVISIOI*:\u20aca'~PETE'f\u00a7E{) :\u00a7\u00a7~1 088}-\u00e9o\u00e9\u00e9\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri. Fa}\/HZ,  \u00e9      \nS\/9. Moha:r;m:\u00a7d_SIai.:\u00a21, 32:3\u00a7\u00e9a,1fs,=." \n\nHamali, Danscmnam;    &  \nG-hikmaga11_1rACi.ty{*<:;;,     PETITIONER\n\nA  ~:3abu, (3. Adv.)\n\nAND:\n\n   fifzze sate Fb;z%Tox;r;:kPo1ice\n %V c:1u:;::uagai+z_:r"* Qity. . . RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
    4%%{By%i%sm B. Balamshna, HCGP.)<\/p>\n
 T\u00a71iS*  is, filed 11\/ 8.89′? (31:98. praying ta sat,
\n‘asizi\ufb01 the” arder of cmnviction dt.3 1.3.2686 passed by the<\/p>\n
i:’ “–F’E’C-II, Chickrnagalur in Cr1.A. No.75,\/2804 and order<\/p>\n
 ‘ :;Iat\u00a7c:\u20ac{“43\u00a39.8.2GO4 and Omar datc\u00e9 19.8.2004 passsd by flhtfi<\/p>\n
A::”2d7i.–. ..CJ (JR. DN.) \ufb01s JMFC, Chiignagalur 2: cc<\/p>\n
 “No.i3’? 11$\/\u00a32001 and the pctitionsr be acqzlittcd of the
\n‘  Gffeiice for which he stands convicted.<\/p>\n
This Cri. RP czctxzrzing on for hearing this day, the court
\nznacie the follcxwmgz<\/p>\n
The petiticmner has chaI\u00a3\u00a2r1g:\u00a7dn f;   \u00a7:\u00e93I\u00a7x2’i{f:!”_3’__o;a*; _ an\u20aci=_ I<\/p>\n
sentence for the Off\ufb01\ufb02c\ufb01 undgr S\u00e9cti\u00e9n 32’\u20ac>”V’V’Qf.’\u00a7;ij:;e  clfia
\nTrial held by the JMFC, cm\u00a2k:\u00a7aga1uf’\u00a7en@:3:med in the<\/p>\n
appeal by Fast ‘I’rack  <\/p>\n
 ‘\u00a3’1’1c:.Vi’a\u00a7:i:-:3  f\u20ac)_IA’ \ufb02 :f;\u00a3?:u  of this revision<\/p>\n
are as 1;\ufb02Ci\u00e97ri”,\\”._V  \u00bb <\/p>\n
.\u00a7fi”S’0f\u00a7T23IS}I2{){j’}.Jiihaig  Haseena, the sissier of tha ?<\/p>\n
accus\u00e9d’ is. the’\u00ab.f3ctii;\u00e9qfxs::f\ufb01..~herei11 filed a compiajnt to th\u00e9<\/p>\n
police: at \u00e9fbsut 5,;3dpm’; She is the resident of 4th cross in<\/p>\n
  Urciu Sahara} and she was residing<\/p>\n
   an\u00e9 three children and on the date of the<\/p>\n
ir.ici_fieI2t_;a.tV\u00e9.b:(;)ut 12.30 1100:}, she had come it) the house of<\/p>\n
 ._t11e a<3i":1iS\u20acd, 1:0 tak\ufb01 bask the galden ornaments and mizsney<\/p>\n
   she had kept wh\ufb02e she was with $115': accused, a<\/p>\n
. K  m\u00e9anth eariier and when she: requested '\u00a30 retum the<\/p>\n
 ornamants and 1110116}? to the accused, ska came ta know<\/p>\n
{hat the accused had pledged them and when she further<\/p>\n
254<\/span><\/p>\n
asked far the armaments, the accusad at T’<\/p>\n
chopper and siaxied assaulting\ufb01ii’ \u00abheir   <\/p>\n
ether parts of the bedy     1 ~i*:g\u00b0s ‘V;:gjiidV’V$he
\nsustained injuries on the; \u00e9zgfs, left  w\u00e9s
\nzaxnpmzation ofthe maze\ufb01nggr\u00a2f%ghg r:g1a:15535;’ At the time
\nof the assault, PW2   presem. She
\nfell ur1co13scig3u:;::.\u00a3V;\u20ac1f\u00a3*1d  Vtaken to her house
\nat about E4    mother–;in\u00abIaw tack
\nPW1    ‘for the }31iI’P0Se Gf
\n ~  under treatment, the poiice<\/p>\n
appf\u00a77&.Che\ufb01””‘h\u00a7r’~aI1ci\u00b0-r\u00e9iiordsd her complaint. On these<\/p>\n
 fact?’ ‘iiii\ufb01 CQ:nig}aifif”}i2x.P1 came 1:0 be regstered and the<\/p>\n
 \u00a7’E\u00a3\u00a7f_’.\u00a3v\u00e9.%.:’\u00a7f\u00e9\u00a2I\u00a7Vtjn\u00a7_}the Magstrate. The ixzvastigaiing Of\ufb01cer,<\/p>\n
went__Vt0  and in the prasenos of PW5 an\u00e9 another<\/p>\n
‘he}d  at: E\u00a7x.P5 and ssized MOI Chopper. He<\/p>\n
  i*\u00e9ca\u00a57r:’1u;i3d CUE’: statement of other Witnesses includmg PW2<\/p>\n
    PW3 and {2OH\u20acC’\u00a5:\u20ac\u20aci injury certi\ufb01cate EXP4 fnom PW4.<\/p>\n
 ” ~’ After completien :11′ the investigation he fiie\u00e9 charge sheet<\/p>\n
against the accused. Duri\ufb02g the trial, the prosecruiion<\/p>\n
by the Trial Cceurt and con\ufb01rmag 13;. as<\/p>\n
illegal?   –\n<\/p>\n
(2) What Order?\n<\/p>\n
4. It is the c0r1ter1ti01ui\u00b0<3;fV"'t.1_;\u00a7i:  cavimsel for the
\npetitioner that excepi{__.1?1H If; tIi;:% 'i11I;ei'\u00e9':3t\u00a7:d WitI1f3S$, 110 other
\nwi1::1eSses have' suppQ.r\u00a3\u00e9_<i–..{ii\u00a7 irga\u00e9\u00e9l \u00a7;\u00a71\\\\t1\/ji\u00e9 prosecution and
\ntherefore, he."  'h\u20ac:: \u00a2xrid'\u00e91iC\u00e9: has to be discarded
\n50 .9130 if is   the prosecuticsrz has not
\nexamiij\u00e9dv CW2, _\u00a7<fa\u00a31di\u00a7:bo are the eye-witnesses and that
\nthere am '–rIi\u00a3;.tt:\u00a3*i.\ufb01v;j\u00a3v.[:Cc';\ufb01t:*.:idictioI1 and omissions in the<\/p>\n
evid';'='"1Ce of 'further states that she di\u00e9 118?: see<\/p>\n
  \u20ac;')v3:'*\u00e9::01'";e…_svi10V%\u00e9;ssaL2}te\u00e9 her as she later became<\/p>\n
 __u;t;c:i:*:s,f\u00a7::i;\u00a7u:\u00a7 _:\u00a7;mi it is aiso his contentien that the<\/p>\n
p:"{;$4\u00a7\u00a7c1ztiz\u00a71:rii'..~ fias mat \u00e9sxamined the Inv\u20ac:st3lgati31g Qf\ufb01aer<\/p>\n
 –  ‘-which ‘iS_.I;i fatal {:0 the case of the proseautien. So aiso, it is<\/p>\n
   “‘}V9;i>;;.,;:j\u00a7i\u00a7nteI1tioI1 that thcrugh the injured has $tai:t:<:I that her<\/p>\n
 c\ufb01lp\u00e9tiies were biood stained, the same have not been seized<\/p>\n
'4 by the investigating agency, 0:1 ail these grounds, he has<\/p>\n
sought for setting aside the j1.idg}a1e:z;V1'1':""'-.{\u00a7;t1(if_.'~. K<\/p>\n
conviction.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
5. Per contra, the 1c\u00e9.\u00a7;1n\u00a7\u00a7d
\nPleader submits that   ganeraliy
\nan irzjured does notv  and does not
\nleave the persQ;:~x\u00a7?h0    and that her
\ncvidance \ufb01\u00a7}\ufb01a;te\ufb01a1 particulars by
\nthe evi\u00a715:I1{:\u00a7”‘  i\u00e9ho has issued the injulry
\nCer\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9.3te–_  “PVV1 has sustained incised<\/p>\n
WOilI}{iS, A  ”  \u00e9he iittle \ufb01nger and as the<\/p>\n
 amp\ufb01t\ufb01tien of “}if11p f:nger is 8. gievous injury and the<\/p>\n
 weapo13._us$\u00a3iVA’i\ufb01_ Causing the injury i3 a dangerous weapon,<\/p>\n
 the offence under Secticn 326 IPC is<\/p>\n
V . j:_1stii7ieci;~.’:A I\u00bb1\u00e9Vsu\ufb01mits that the petitioner has not made gut<\/p>\n
V’ ”  g1″0i_inc:i to Waxtrant iI’i1Z6I’f\u20acI’f3I1{Z\u20ac \u00a311 \u00a3116: cenczurrerat<\/p>\n
 of the courts bslow.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. E have scru\u00a3:ir1i3\u20acd the evidence led by the<\/p>\n
presecution and also the documents grodnced in 316 case.<\/p>\n
54..\n<\/p>\n
corroborate her version about the assault  “L-‘beet; <\/p>\n
caused by a sharp edged weapon.   <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
7. it is true that PW2 :=e*i_1_e  a
\naccused has turned hostile    PW3
\nindependent wimeeses   ihe firesecutien
\nbut the mere \ufb01aet fgiiat   support the
\nversion itself    evidence of an
\ninjured wimes;~;.__ ef  evicience which has
\n:0 be 1oo;\u00a3 <e\u00a7i   'em: quaI1t.it:y. Theugh the<\/p>\n
preseeutio1i";i_i{i  4 and 5 and when it<\/p>\n
fef ot1iei:eha1*ge sheeteci witnesses is not a
\n   evidence of the injuxeci. :1; is Wei}
\n ieetab\ufb01eh-ed  of Law, that an injure\u00e9 generally does
\n.  an irmoeent and does not ieave the person
\n   caused the harm. The evidence of PW\u00bb-1 reveals
\n relationehip between PW}. and the accused was<\/p>\n
i""\u00ab.etif'd1ai, and as far as the incident is Ceneemed, the<\/p>\n
54<\/span><\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
relaticmship were stra1’11ed at the time of   efxly<\/p>\n
,Wh\u20acI1 she demand for the cf1’1i’am.\u20ac;”13;    AV
\nrefused to return and it is in    A
\nof assauit has taken place.-..ii1_1;1″1eA.eiret1mVSte\ufb01ee\u00e9; \u00a3116 I\ufb01erre
\nfact that the reiationehip  3 A’ “accused were
\ncerdia} before the e.:. CiJ_’Cuu1stance which<\/p>\n
eeuid support  ac\u00a7:iieed:;\n<\/p>\n
8.    of the spot manager
\nsickle has been seized. PW5 has
\ns1:ppor1fed:_ I:l*}e’ ‘ eke prosecution and seizuze of
\n PW5; ii;  who treated PW\u00bb-71 in the hospital<\/p>\n
  ieeeed the iIlj\u00a5_1I’}? certi\ufb01cate Ex.P4 and it reveals
\nA 2 85 4 are incised Wotmds suffered by PW–<\/p>\n
V VV .V E   No.3 is 21 contusion over the head measuring
\n“;:;e_.g,VVie};1ereas injury No.4 is amputation over the right
\n   ‘finger. The Beater is of the epinion that ixzjmy No.1<\/p>\n
T i::: 4 are simple in nature and injmrjy No.5 is gieveus in<\/p>\n
Imture. She was admitted in the hespital 01:: 23.5.20!) 1 and<\/p>\n
5\/\\<\/p>\n
I3<\/p>\n
10. It is nessssary that when once a f.’ii’1:\u00bbi2_7<fi:<.i'," <\/p>\n
there must be reasonable $<:n"i;<:noe.7_4   iixto 7. V<\/p>\n
consideration these Circtlmstance\u00e9gl  of tixe opinio\ufb01 ~~tf1':.\u00ab2t<\/p>\n
the petitioner has not made  g::.:'('}:_.2,:T'1_"<i1s*;&V"f\u00a7'
\ninterferance. Hance, I ;;\u00a7nsw.e1*"   i'I*1"t1i\u00e9 Negative<\/p>\n
and proceed to pass the'4f\u00e9l1G'as%i-nig <\/p>\n
The Revia\u00a7ior\u00a7iP\u20ac:1i:i0n1 is d:smiss\u00a2\u00e9;%%% The Trial Court is
\ndirected to' –.se{r2jg:\u00a7\u00a2 Elia: of the accused to<\/p>\n
commm\ufb01icatr\u00e9  V  ., __ — '
\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 1:\u00bb: THE HIGH Comm’ 9;: ;<ARNM'A1<A A'\u00a7f__B;A:I\u20ac\u00a3"\u00a5g3:I;.(\u00a7R;'\u00a7 M' DATES THIS TE-IE ama ;3g\u00a7g*j"c3:\u00ab"~M::::~:g' , THE HOWBLE MR. JUsT1\u00e9\u00a7j;a:A.si. P;&CI\u00bb::aA\ufb01 t\u00a7:\u00a7E CRL. REVISIOI*:\u20aca'~PETE'f\u00a7E{) :\u00a7\u00a7~1 088}-\u00e9o\u00e9\u00e9 BETWEEN: Sri. Fa}\/HZ, \u00e9 S\/9. Moha:r;m:\u00a7d_SIai.:\u00a21, 32:3\u00a7\u00e9a,1fs,=." Hamali, Danscmnam; & […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Fayaz S\\\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1254,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Fayaz S\\\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Fayaz S\\\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009"},"wordCount":1254,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009","name":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police ... on 30 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-28T08:05:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-fayaz-so-mohammed-sab-vs-the-state-by-town-police-on-30-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Fayaz S\/O Mohammed Sab vs The State By Town Police … on 30 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}