{"id":98458,"date":"2009-12-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-10T14:39:01","modified_gmt":"2015-09-10T09:09:01","slug":"sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre> ,......m wwwnr m..n- nnwmmamn\ufb02 mam?! wwum Ur KARMAT?-\\%A ME\u00a33\u00a7~E COURT 0? \u00a7\u20ac\ufb01:\ufb01N\ufb013\ufb01%{a\ufb01 H\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 CQW\n\n3: THE mmicoum 01-' I\u00ab:.AmA'rAKA, BAHGALbR:\u00ab:kkk%*Ffj if  \nmama T;-m'rHE 17% my G1?' DE(.TE_MBER    \"  'V\n\nBEF@E\n\nTHE smmx MR. JUs'r;\u00a7:g_.,g;.s;B{\u00a7E.a1\u00a7r:g\u00e9   \n\nWRIT mmg 11 Q %.   ' \u00abE1 \nEN:  _    \n\nSR1S{IDHALEA'*E\u00a7_EBE&amp;1iR'*..\"A   ;  \n510 mm    x \nAGED  -     V\ncm: AGiRIC_U\"I.~.TUE'E  *  --\n\n PEQTHGHER\n\n{BY am  ,r\u00a7r'1\u20ac, ai:*sv.',;\n\n-.2-----n.n..... ~\n\n THE $%T2;r$%\"9F mmwraxa\n\n\"  E?  SECRETARY\n\nmivazzatmgtm cm REVEHIIE\nM a mgxnama\n\n  mm Tnmtxm\n- VEEL I\nmp BY rm cmmum\n\n  A  BELTHAI%'(?aA.DI '\u00a353,133\n\n1) K DIBTRICT.\n\nSKI HAREMRA HEBEAR\n3;' E} E1533 GAHAPiiT'HY HEBEAR\n\ni\n\n\n\nWW ,,,,_,,,7.,'_, ,,,,. .,.,,....,.,...........,.\"-.,.....--.. umiwn\ufb02nrt wwwmm wan rru-mmmwmamwwwa rvnwm MWUKI M51?\" mmmw\ufb02mtwm WEWW %WW%'\u00a7' Q?   \n\nAGED 76 YEARS\n\nCJCC: AGRICULTURE\nRIA KOHRNGE HOUEE\nARAS  F03'?\nBELTHAJVGAIJI TALIIK\nB K I)IBTRICT,.\n\n[BY 3121 mmcmmm R max, \n\nmm WRIT PETI'I'\u00a7GI\u20ac.__$~ F11-LEI}. IJ\u00a3'?\u20ac3'E'I-Z\u00ab ARTICLEE 226\nas 227 GF THE coHs'rr1'u''rzQH . .1531?'  Pkavuxa T0\nQUASK THE omzamz I)A'\u00a3'\u00a31_)_1i,G9.1.98\"I'~ Pi\u00a7S8B'D BY 'I\"HE\nR2 LAND 'ra}BUN5L .11? $0 'm:r:_ Ag__C\u00a3)l~.'\u00a73r'-'REG THE\nQGCUFARCY  'cw '1'I~IE'   0.34\nscam m S _Y;R'O.i.QO1g1 .;s:;&gt;1r... I\u00a7;A'L'h'.Y.&amp;DAKA muss,\nBELTHABGABI \u00e9ramx, \u00a3'3..K.BIi$'IfRI\u00a3T  ANX-A.\n\nmas' \" i$E*i*\u00a5if3x;)N'7'\u00a7. 51? mg PRELILERARY\nmama :-:5 '5' c}R:::';:\u00a3\u00a7%r\u00a711*s_I:Aa',-THE comm mam THE\nmamwmce: -  =    \n\n  _ %o\"3  R\n\n    \" 'QM MMMM R Ram harxaed Gmmzmmz\n\n for rmpondents Ivlcul and 2\n\nV Vvsince  am umapx\ufb01ted. Tim third'\n\nAT   'Ike. mtmrm im befczzra thiw Caurt making' for\n  af writ as mrmm tn quash am nrdm* am\n\nI1.Q9.1\u00a781 in 4:;-aw N$.LRY 341' 7'4-=75{2)! 7\u20ac'r-'3'? pamad\n\n\u00ab\u00e9\n\nup\na\n\n  .\n<\/pre>\n<p>mans nmnamm\ufb01mmm Maw?! HWUKE Ki?&#8217; mnatmmamnm M\ufb01m\ufb01 uwwm W?&#8217; W55%N\u00a7\u00b0&#8217;vE;M5\ufb01l.i&#8217;\u00a7.M i&#8221;&#8216;\u00a7i\u00a7.$fH RUM?<\/p>\n<p>by \ufb01rm smond mspondesnt-Land Tribunal   <\/p>\n<p>grant ef umupancy  ts in      V<\/p>\n<p>maeasursng&#8217; 84 cenm Em Survey HGJVCQ\/&#8217;    a &#8216;  .<\/p>\n<p>wnaga,Bentm;gga1&#8217;ra1uk, K R <\/p>\n<p>3. The ihcbs which   that the<br \/>\npad\ufb01gmr and mg   and in<br \/>\nwet cf   the<br \/>\n\ufb01rm&#8221; 5 ~  1 V  V Subsequmx\ufb02y on<br \/>\nnaming &#8216;   t Act,<\/p>\n<p>that ;:ve&#8217;::itisn:\u00abx1.te~aV:;;L&#8217;\ufb01Js;-245?.  A 1%.? \u00a311 raw: 0!&#8221; the mom<\/p>\n<p>  to his share, while the third<\/p>\n<p>ma&#8221; wwem\ufb02an mwwrnw<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01led 3 aeparahe Form No.7 in<\/p>\n<p> W,A.\/m&amp;pwg% % \u00a2f  which had beam gamed ts his slmm.<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;   an rival zzlaim w\u00a7.th ward tr: any of<\/p>\n<p>  nuwzsm axrwngst the pai\ufb01anar and the<\/p>\n<p>h   rmpaozltieexztf, separate  arm held&#8217; in<\/p>\n<p>   cf rawpeetiw Farm 210.?&#8217; which had bm\ufb01kxi by<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">42<\/span><\/p>\n<p>no<\/p>\n<p>mom-w. mwxmvuu umwvmrhuu warm<\/p>\n<p>xummnwmmnnww unwrri &#8216;%m\u00ab&#8217;w!&#8221;%\u00bba9W!\ufb01 WV mmnmm\u00e9nrmn Niw\ufb01 \ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01mi WW KMWWWEAKFK H553 <\/p>\n<p>claim at&#8217; the petitiaonttr hm-ein, the Land Tribgui\u00e9i\u00e9t<br \/>\ngranted amtmpancy right in :respe__Vc!;.\u00bb_:_:4f    &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>irxdioated in the erdex dam 21.10. aLf;~4L&#8217;5_;11r&gt;:e:\u00ab:1.:x~r..:  <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;G&#8217; ?x: the petitizm.  <\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01izionar is alac trm  cf  1<br \/>\nmmurixg 1 acre 32   had<br \/>\nmt made any %    Survey<br \/>\nHum\/1.  caqpysf Razz \ufb01led by<br \/>\nthe tltairci   &#8216;N&#8217; would indicate<br \/>\nthat the  %rm had made cum in<\/p>\n<p>rmpect af     &#8216; 34 cantas in Survey<\/p>\n<p>fv?a,A11C# [i\u00b01.5&gt;_  wlu\ufb02e considmxng the Form<\/p>\n<p> of the same E5; arm :iam&amp;<\/p>\n<p>  aim are &#8216;A&#8217; while mticm the claim<\/p>\n<p>  far 84 cam: in Survey Ncnll\ufb01f 1. Hewavezr<\/p>\n<p>V    yamizg the Iand at: am: af $4\u00bb cents in Survey<br \/>\nk%F%&amp;%\u00ab%k%%%::&#8217;e.1oo;: has new gm-mm imsead of 119:1. The<\/p>\n<p>\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>*W&#8221;*-&#8220;&#8221;&#8221;n'&lt;&#039;~n WNW&quot; N-N-&quot;Mn! KM I\\Hm*veM:Hu\\M Hymn Luu\ufb01s Ur nnnwmwmm Mimi&#039;: MUUKE U?&quot; l&amp;MKN&#039;A!\ufb02\u00a7\u00a3M MEMM LOU!<\/p>\n<p>petitmer mwm mt being party to <\/p>\n<p>Pmme&amp;i% was not aware ofthe  H  &#039; &#039; : &quot; .  &quot;<\/p>\n<p>4. One other aspect of<br \/>\nbe netioed &#8216;m that am  r\u00a2a;\u00a7\u00a7:1am;;   fact<br \/>\nwas bafom thk Caurt  &#8216;qrcier dated<br \/>\n11,09,193: ha      Gtthmr<br \/>\ncmjmmt in \ufb01fL\u00e9i_  _ &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Caurt in v.*.P.N\u00a7.S2\u00a5i;.; ;i&#8221;ha..:*rrm~9a&#8217;\u00a7&#8217; nm in the am<br \/>\n &#8216;  $    of martaxxd survey<\/p>\n<p>nummrs far    been made. Therefore this<\/p>\n<p>  tn the Trzibuzml cmly he<\/p>\n<p> arm the said survey numbem<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00bb&#8230;v,f::r&#8217;   bmn made by the third xmpondant.<br \/>\n &amp;  \ufb01n such &amp;i\u00a3&#8217;et:1&#8217;3&#8242;.oz1a by th&#8217;m Court,<br \/>\n  has disposed at&#8217; the mm qr its ordm&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>V    22.123392 as at Anrmzre &#8216;Q&#8217; 13:: the petition. A<br \/>\n gr the said arder Wculd ir1dk:ats that whilcz<br \/>\n  passing the suhswumt ardmg Elm Tribunal in fact has<\/p>\n<p>\u00abi<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;-1<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> 2   <\/span><\/p>\n<p>w::t&#8221;&#8216;v\u00a2w\u00bbr&#8217;1tm%uv&#8217;\ufb01. vuaaumcnmw wwwnn wm mmmwwmnmawm Hymn MMUK! W? \ufb01\ufb02\ufb01w\ufb02i\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02 NEW&#8221; Hww\ufb01ui 5}?&#8221;   <\/p>\n<p>gantacl &#8216;ths: attmzt of 84 mans in Survey I&#8217;i&#8217;o._J.~Z\u00a7i\u00a7I&#8217;<br \/>\nt}mth1rd&#8217; rmpondent has:-min&#8217;  gfth\u00e9  &#8216;4  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>111$ P\ufb01titioner hmwmx&#8217; has 110  &#8216;  A     <\/p>\n<p>5. In the mm: of   the:\n<\/p>\n<p>qumsan whiz}: new sex\u00bb  is xzmly<br \/>\nwith ma;-d -no %  %[L%:;:f s&lt;~  Survay<br \/>\nHGJOOI 3.     ciespihe<br \/>\nthan  the same meraesno<br \/>\nthan erda:   Tliw sequent}: netioed<\/p>\n<p>   fact that the third respox\ufb01ent<\/p>\n<p> iwriier and an mend has lame;<\/p>\n<p>91&#039; 34 mm 233. sumy Hmll\ufb01fi and\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;   saxn\u00e9e  itxzuciicam that the thir\ufb01 rapnndmxi 5:11<br \/>\nX   had mt cxaim the pmmty in Survey<br \/>\nA   zmmsurirsg 34 camts. &#8216;rum-gas:-5 having<br \/>\n the we Farm 1%.? namely me filcad by the<br \/>\n  w\ufb01\ufb01axmm\ufb01one\ufb01kdlythe\ufb02\ufb01r\u00e9rmwndmnm\ufb01ak\ufb02<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>4&#8243;,<br \/>\nrs<\/p>\n<p>W Mum\u00bb mwuna wr nnmvnanma mmzm LUUKE KM&#8221; wmmmmm HEGH CQUR? OF K&amp;RNAY\ufb01aK.\ufb02%&#8217;% HIGH COW<\/p>\n<p>the gm: af Survey Nc&gt;.110,I1 msmu\ufb01m 84<br \/>\nthud&#8221; respondemt, it apyears that_  &#8220;.  u  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>mmm-mg&#8221; 84 cam in survey Nov.iOQ'{1~:V<\/p>\n<p>dated 11.99.1981 by the<br \/>\nrmpondmt E an obir\ufb01aqg   the<br \/>\nsaid meat of land rm:   in the<br \/>\ntam} extent of I vs;r,:\u00a7c__32  gamma&#8217;!<br \/>\ntn the    21.10.1973<br \/>\nwhich   h\u00e9\u00e9  been queettioneai<br \/>\nby the    A<\/p>\n<p>    ixmafar as the grain: of the<\/p>\n<p>  84 :.&#8217;.e11m in survey<br \/>\n  dated zmgggm m fawur cf<br \/>\n  mx\ufb02mt he augtaixmg In the ma<br \/>\n&#8216;A   the or\u00e9er \u00e9ated 11.39.1981 stan\ufb01s quaah\ufb01.<br \/>\nV    cztlrzm  \u00a7 the said murder 311311 stand<\/p>\n<p>i.\n<\/p>\n<p>#3<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nIn mm ufthe abaw, the peti\ufb01on stgzzfqtia   .4<br \/>\nof.N&lt;:rdm:*astz&gt;caam. V F &#8216;  &#8216;V<br \/>\n sax\u00bb<br \/>\nca\/..\n<\/p>\n<p>g\ufb01\ufb01u 33:; \u00a7\u00a7.w\u00a3\u00a7K\u00a7\u00a3 \u00a33 mE\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 Emit ggmgg\ufb02g .33. 35333. \u00a7\u00a7uw_u fa\u00a7a..\u00a7.rar\u00a2\u20ac.9L.\u00a7 53 :.?..a\u00a7r3 __:._\u00a7&#8230;.\u00a7 F3..s&#8230;\u00a7_..:.s{.s&#8230;\u00a7. .\u00a7&#8230;..,u_.,.\u00a7ii .7&#8230; ,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna ,&#8230;&#8230;m wwwnr m..n- nnwmmamn\ufb02 mam?! wwum Ur KARMAT?-\\%A ME\u00a33\u00a7~E COURT 0? \u00a7\u20ac\ufb01:\ufb01N\ufb013\ufb01%{a\ufb01 H\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 CQW 3: THE mmicoum 01-&#8216; I\u00ab:.AmA&#8217;rAKA, BAHGALbR:\u00ab:kkk%*Ffj if mama T;-m&#8217;rHE 17% my G1?&#8217; DE(.TE_MBER &#8221; &#8216;V BEF@E THE smmx MR. JUs&#8217;r;\u00a7:g_.,g;.s;B{\u00a7E.a1\u00a7r:g\u00e9 WRIT mmg 11 Q [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":762,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009"},"wordCount":762,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009","name":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-10T09:09:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-sudhama-hebbar-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Sudhama Hebbar vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}