{"id":98580,"date":"2007-06-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007"},"modified":"2017-02-01T08:23:10","modified_gmt":"2017-02-01T02:53:10","slug":"k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","title":{"rendered":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 534 of 2004(L)\n\n\n1. K.T.HASSAN,S\/O.KUNJALIKUTTY, RESIDING AT\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KASIM KUNJU ISMAIL PILLA, AGED ABOUT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. ABDUL SATHAR, AGED 43 YEARS,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\n\n Dated :19\/06\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                         PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J.\n\n                            -------------------------\n\n                        WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004\n\n                            --------------------------\n\n               Dated this the 19th  day of June, 2007\n\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
      Exhibit – P8 order by which the learned Subordinate Judge<\/p>\n
dismissed   two   applications   preferred   by   the   plaintiff,   one   for<\/p>\n
amendment   of   the   judgment   and   decree   so   as   to   correct   the<\/p>\n
name of the defendant as  Ismail Pilla S\/o. Kassim Kunju instead<\/p>\n
of Kassim Kunju, S\/o. Ismail Pilla and another for making similar<\/p>\n
corrections in the plaint   is under challenge in this Writ Petition<\/p>\n
under Article 227 of the   Constitution  of India instituted by the<\/p>\n
plaintiff.   Exhibit – P2 is the copy of the plaint instituted by the<\/p>\n
petitioner, which is one for recovery of money on the basis of a<\/p>\n
transaction between the   petitioner and the 1st  respondent.   The<\/p>\n
name   of   the   1st  respondent   is   written   in   Exhibit-P2   as  Kasim<\/p>\n
Kunju   aged   about   36,   S\/o.   Ismail   Pillai.     The   relief   is   claimed<\/p>\n
only   against   the   1st  defendant     Kassim   Kunju,   S\/o.   Ismail   Pilla.<\/p>\n
Several   attempts   were     resorted   to   serve   summons   on   the   1st<\/p>\n
defendant in Ext.P2 failed.  Resort was taken to substituted mode<\/p>\n
of   service   and   even   publication   in   newspaper   was   effected.<\/p>\n
Ultimately, the 1st  defendant was   set ex parte and the suit was<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n
decreed   against   him.     But   in   execution   proceedings   it   was<\/p>\n
reported   by   Ismail   Pilla,   the   recipient   of   the   notice,     the   1st<\/p>\n
respondent herein that the decree is not executable against him<\/p>\n
and that the decree is against Kassim Kunju only.<\/p>\n
       2.     The petitioner\/plaintiff   filed two applications, one for<\/p>\n
correction of judgment and decree under Sections 151, 152 and<\/p>\n
153 of the Code of Civil Procedure and another for  impleadment<\/p>\n
of   Ismail   Pilla   on   the   ground   that   it   was   Ismail   Pilla   who   was<\/p>\n
intended   to   be   sued   and   not     Kassim   Kunju   who   was   father   of<\/p>\n
Ismail   Pilla.   These   applications   were   dismissed   by   the   learned<\/p>\n
Subordinate   Judge   giving   liberty   to   the   petitioner   to   pursue<\/p>\n
appropriate   other   remedies.   Accordingly,   the   present<\/p>\n
applications   I.A.   No.369\/02   and   I.A.   No.370\/02   were   filed<\/p>\n
subsequently.  The learned Subordinate Judge has dismissed the<\/p>\n
applications   mainly   on   the   reason   that   allowing   the   application<\/p>\n
will   necessitate   cancellation   of   the   ex   parte   decree   passed<\/p>\n
against   Kassim Kunju and that the same cannot be done on an<\/p>\n
application  filed by the plaintiff  since the  provisions of Order 9<\/p>\n
Rule 13 applies only to applications submitted by the defendants.<\/p>\n
The learned Subordinate Judge  also observed that it will not be<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                          3<\/span><\/p>\n
fair   to   allow   the   amendment   so   as   to   make   the   judgment   and<\/p>\n
decree   binding   on   the   1st  respondent   since   the   summons   was<\/p>\n
admittedly   not   served   on   him   directly.     In   other   words,   the<\/p>\n
learned   Subordinate   Judge   was   worried   that     granting   of   the<\/p>\n
amendment application will result in denying opportunity to the<\/p>\n
respondent to contest the suit.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       3.     It has been repeatedly held by the Supreme Court that<\/p>\n
when   interests   of   technicalities   and   those   of   substantial   justice<\/p>\n
are putted against each other, the  court shall strive  to advance<\/p>\n
the   interests   of   substantial   justice.     It   is   crystal   clear   and   the<\/p>\n
learned Subordinate Judge also practically agrees that the party<\/p>\n
whom the petitioner wanted to sue was  Ismail Pillai and that the<\/p>\n
name   of     Kassim   Kunju,   S\/o.   Ismail   Pillai,     the   father   of   the<\/p>\n
present respondent was shown in the plaint by mistake.  I find on<\/p>\n
a reading of Ext.P2 plaint that though the names of the son and<\/p>\n
father were written wrongly, the age of the respondent,  which is<\/p>\n
given against the name of the 1st  defendant in the suit, and the<\/p>\n
averments   in   Ext.P2   will     show   that     the   cause   of   action<\/p>\n
upon which the the suit is instituted is a transaction which took<\/p>\n
place   in     Abu   Dhabi   where   the   petitioner   and   the   respondent<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                            4<\/span><\/p>\n
were   working   together.     The   documents   which   were   produced<\/p>\n
along with the  plaint particularly the sworn affidavit relied on as<\/p>\n
Item   No.1   in   the   plaint   is   an   affidavit   sworn   to   by   the<\/p>\n
respondent, who was at that time   working in Abu Dhabi.   I am<\/p>\n
convinced   that   the   impleadment   of     Kassim   Kunju   instead   of<\/p>\n
Ismail   Pilla     as   the   1st  defendant   in   the   suit   is   the   result   of   a<\/p>\n
mistake   for   which   the   draftsman   of   the   plaint   is   to   be   blamed<\/p>\n
more than the plaintiff himself.  Learned Subordinate Judge also<\/p>\n
discernibly thought that interest of justice demands  grant of the<\/p>\n
applications.     The   learned   Subordinate   Judge   has   certainly<\/p>\n
viewed   that   it   is   not   right   to   deny   an   opportunity   to   the<\/p>\n
respondent to resist the suit. That view is certainly a correct one.<\/p>\n
       4.     Having   considered   the   totality   of   the   circumstances<\/p>\n
attending   on   this   case,     I   feel   that   the   extra-ordinary   visitorial<\/p>\n
jurisdiction under  Article 227 must be invoked in this case so as<\/p>\n
to   advance   the   cause   of   rendering   substantial   justice   between<\/p>\n
the parties.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        5.    Accordingly, I set aside the decree passed  against the<\/p>\n
1st  defendant   in   Ext.P2   plaint.   Even   otherwise     the   decree<\/p>\n
passed against Kassim Kunju, a deceased person is a nullity and<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                                         5<\/span><\/p>\n
could   be   ignored.     I.A   No.369\/2002   and   I.A   No.370\/2002   will<\/p>\n
stand allowed.       The suit O.S. No.24\/1998 will  be re-posted by<\/p>\n
the   learned   Subordinate   Judge,   who   after   ensuring   that<\/p>\n
necessary corrections are made, will issue fresh summons to the<\/p>\n
1st  defendant therein.    It is not necessary  to issue notice to the<\/p>\n
2nd  defendant.       The 1st  defendant upon receiving summons will<\/p>\n
be   entitled   to   file   written   statement   raising   all   available<\/p>\n
contentions.  This court will not be justified in awarding costs to<\/p>\n
the   respondent.     But   the   inconvenience   caused   to   the   court   on<\/p>\n
account of the  carelessness  in the drafting of the plaint is to be<\/p>\n
taken note of.  Noticing the said inconvenience, I make the above<\/p>\n
orders   conditional   upon   the   petitioner   paying   an   amount   of<\/p>\n
Rs.3,000\/- to the credit of High Court Legal Services Committee,<\/p>\n
within   a   period   of   three   weeks   from   today,   failing   which<\/p>\n
payment, the writ petition will stand dismissed.<\/p>\n
      This writ petition is conditionally allowed as above.<\/p>\n
                                                        Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                        (PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE)<\/p>\n
ma<\/p>\n
                                  \/True copy\/<\/p>\n
                                                     P.A. to Judge<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                            6<\/span><\/p>\n
                                  K.THANKAPPAN,J<\/p>\n
                                 CRL.A. NO.92 OF 1999<\/p>\n
WP ( C ) NO. 534 of 2004<\/p>\n
                            7<\/span><\/p>\n
                                    ORDER<\/p>\n
                                  25th May, 2007<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 534 of 2004(L) 1. K.T.HASSAN,S\/O.KUNJALIKUTTY, RESIDING AT … Petitioner Vs 1. KASIM KUNJU ISMAIL PILLA, AGED ABOUT … Respondent 2. ABDUL SATHAR, AGED 43 YEARS, For Petitioner :SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN For Respondent […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-98580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nK.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1016,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\",\"name\":\"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007","datePublished":"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007"},"wordCount":1016,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007","name":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-06-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-01T02:53:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-t-hassan-vs-kasim-kunju-ismail-pilla-on-19-june-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.T.Hassan vs Kasim Kunju Ismail Pilla on 19 June, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=98580"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/98580\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=98580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=98580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=98580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}